This paper explores the extent to which our past and present knowledge can help us to be future-ready, and suggests a theoretical basis for future-readiness. Drawing on the thought of the Daoist philosopher Zhuangzi, it is argued that future-readiness is primarily about having an open and flexible mindset where one responds appropriately to emerging realities and challenges. Two salient key Daoist principles that underpin the notion of future-readiness are ‘walking two roads’ (liang xing) and ‘rightness of the present this’ (yin shi). The former is about going beyond shi/fei distinctions – ‘this/right’ versus ‘not-this/wrong’ – to consider and harmonise alternatives to achieve the best possible outcome. The principle of ‘rightness of the present this’ refers to making the most appropriate response based on situational constraints. The major educational implications are a rejection of limiting teaching and learning to skills-centred education; an emphasis on unlearning; and the promotion of self-transformative education.
BarrotJS (2021) K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: towards making students future ready. Asia Pacific Journal of Education1–15. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2021.1973959
2.
BjerstedtA (1986) Lära för framtid. (Learning for a Future). Stockholm: Liber Utbildningsförlaget.
3.
CallahanW (1998) Cook Ding’s life on the whetstone. In: AmesRT (ed) Wandering at Ease in the Zhuangzi. Albany, NY: SUNY, 175–196.
4.
ChangCH (2021) What does future-ready social studies education look like? Insights from teaching and learning geography. The Journal of Social Studies Education in Asia10: 3–11.
5.
ChiuWW (2018) Zhuangzi's knowing-how and skepticism. Philosophy East and West68(4): 1062–1084.
6.
ChongK-C (2006) Zhuangzi and the nature of metaphor. Philosophy East and West56(3): 370–391.
7.
CookS (ed) (2003) Hiding the World in the World—Uneven Discourses on the Zhuangzi. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
De ReuW (2010) How to throw a pot: The centrality of the potter's wheel in the Zhuangzi. Asian Philosophy20(1): 43–66.
9.
DufresneM (2017) The illusion of teaching and learning: Zhuangzi, Wittgenstein, and the groundlessness of language. Educational Philosophy and Theory49(12): 1207–1215.
10.
D’AmbrosioP (2007) Students feed monkeys for education: Using the Zhuangzi to communicate in a contemporary system of education. Kritike1(2): 36–48.
11.
FraserC (2006) Zhuangzi, Xunzi, and the paradoxical nature of education. Journal of Chinese Philosophy33(4): 529 542.
12.
FraserC (2014) Heart-fasting, forgetting, and using the heart like a mirror: applied emptiness in the Zhuangzi. In: LiuJBergerD (eds) Nothingness in Asian Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 197–212.
13.
FraserC (2015) Zhuangzi and the heterogeneity of value. In: KohnL (ed) New Visions of the Zhuangzi. St. Petersburg, FL: Three Pines Press, 40–58.
14.
GeertshuisSLewisN (2020) Future Ready Graduates Embedding Employability in the Curriculum: Strategies for the Development of Future-Ready Employability Attributes within Advanced and Research Informed Programmes. Wellington: Ako Aotearoa.
15.
GrahamAC (1986) How much of Chuang Tzu did Chuang Tzu write? In: Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies.
16.
GrahamAC (2001) Chuang-tzŭ. 4th edition. London: Allen & Unwin.
17.
HelsingJ (2019) The wandering heart-mind: Zhuangzi and moral psychology in the inner chapters. Dao18: 555–575.
18.
IvanhoePJ (1993) Zhuangzi on scepticism, skill, and the ineffable dao. Journal of the American Academy of Religion61(4): 639–654.
19.
JiangT (2011) Two notions of freedom in classical Chinese thought: The concept of hua 化 in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi. Dao10: 463–486.
20.
KjellbergP (1994) Scepticism, truth, and the good life: A comparison of Zhuangzi and Sextus Empiricus. Philosophy East and West44(1): 111–133.
21.
LaiK (2022) Freedom and agency in the Zhuangzi: navigating life’s constraints. British Journal for the History of Philosophy30(1): 3–23.
22.
LaiKLChiu W-w (eds) (2019) Skill and Mastery: Philosophical Stories from the Zhuangzi. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
23.
MachekD (2016) Beyond sincerity and pretence: Roleplaying and unstructured self in the Zhuangzi. Asian Philosophy26(1): 52–65.
24.
MeyerAS (2010) Appendix A: Key Chinese terms and their translations. In: MajorJSQueenSAMeyerAS, et al. (eds) The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China. New York: Columbia University Press, 869–913.
25.
NgDFS (2021) System leadership for future-ready learners in Singapore. In: BrownSDuignanP (eds) Leading Education Systems. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 111–131.
26.
NgDFSChuaJ (2023) Future-Readiness in education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education43(3): 633–647.
27.
NgDKuD (2023) School reform: New future-ready quality outcomes and proposed measures. Education Sciences13(1246): 1–12.
28.
NgDWongCPLiuS (2020) Future-ready learners: Learning, lifework, living, and habits of practices. In: NIE Working Paper Series No. 20. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
PrettiTJEtmanskiBDreweryDW (2021) Development and validation of a future ready talent framework. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning22(3): 369–383.
31.
RaphalsL (1994) Sceptical strategies in the “Zhuangzi” and “Theaetetus”. Philosophy East and West44(3): 501–526.
32.
RemesP (1993) Soft systems approach in creating future readiness for vocational adult education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research37(3): 205–216.
33.
RothHD (1999) Original Tao: Inward training (Nei-yeh) and the Foundations of Taoist Mysticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
SinghD (2014) Zhuangzi, wuwei, and the necessity of living naturally: A reply to Xunzi’s objection. Asian Philosophy24(3): 212–226.
36.
SlingerlandE (2000) Effortless action: the Chinese spiritual ideal of Wu-wei. Journal of the American Academy of Religion68(2): 293–327.
37.
SlingerlandE (2004) Conceptions of the self in the Zhuangzi: Conceptual metaphor analysis and comparative thought. Philosophy East and West54(3): 322–342.
38.
SturgeonD (2015) Zhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledge. Philosophy East and West65: 892–917.
39.
TanC (2020a) Revisiting Donald Schön’s notion of reflective practice: A Daoist interpretation. Reflective Practice21(5): 686–698.
40.
TanC (2020b) The learning school through a Daoist lens. Oxford Review of Education46(3): 393–407.
41.
TanC (2021) Rethinking the notion of high-performing education system: A Daoist response. Research in Comparative and International Education16(1): 100–113.
42.
TanC (2023a) Clarifying the concept of future-ready learning: A Confucian perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education1–12. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2023.2231651
43.
TanC (2023b) A Daoist interpretation of perspective-taking. Journal of Beliefs & Values44(3): 349–362.
44.
TanC (2023c) Daoism, novelty and usefulness: A philosophical exploration of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behaviour57(2): 237–247.
45.
TanC (2023d) A Daoist understanding of mindful leadership. Leadership19(3): 275–289.
46.
TanJP-LChooSSKangT, et al. (2017) Educating for twenty-first century competencies and future-ready learners: Research perspectives from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education37(4): 425–436.
47.
The University of Hong Kong (2023) Preparing for Success in Your Future at HKU and in the World. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong: https://fri.hku.hk/
48.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology (2014) Future Ready Schools: Building Technology Infrastructure for Learning. Washington, D.C.: OET.
49.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology (2016) Future Ready Learning Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. Washington D.C.: OET.
50.
WangH (2013) Confucian self-cultivation and Daoist personhood: implications for peace education. Frontiers of Education in China8(1): 62–79.
51.
WongDB (2005) Zhuangzi and the obsession with being right. History of Philosophy Quarterly22(2): 91–107.
52.
World Economic Forum (2020) Schools of the Future: Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Cologny, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
53.
XuK (2011) A different type of individualism in Zhuangzi. Dao10: 445–462.
54.
ZeehanFAliasRATasirZ (2020) Discovering digital technology training challenges for future-ready educator: A preliminary study from trainer perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research8(3A): 12–23.
55.
ZiporynB (2009) Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
