Documenting the January 6 attack on the US Capitol: A comparative case study on German and US perspectives for teaching the historical and the contemporary

Abstract

The storming of the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021 shocked the world and challenged democratic norms. Considerations on how to teach the events of January 6th remains an open question, not just for the United States but for other democratic nations, including Germany. This comparative case study explored the similarities and differences in how US and German social studies/history teachers made meaning of the January 6th attack and their rationale for teaching (or in some cases not teaching) the event. The international comparison sheds light on how threats to democracy are perceived by educators and their pedagogical rationales for teaching them. Findings suggest that teachers’ analysis of media credibility and instructional decision-making were complicated by their social and cultural connections to the event. German participants expressed a greater willingness to teach the events of the insurrection compared to their US counterparts. This study offers recommendations beyond teaching January 6th for teacher educators and education stakeholders supportive of teaching difficult and controversial histories. Exploring these international comparisons also calls into question how events are remembered and taught, potentially impacting democratic education.

Keywords

social studies education media education democratic education difficult history current events January 6th

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baden-Württemberg State Constitution (1953) Retrieved from https://www.lpb-bw.de/bwverf/Landesverfassung-BW.pdf

Baildon

Afandi

(2018) History education research and practice: an international perspective. In: Metzger

McArthur

(eds) The Wiley International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 37–60.

Barber

Clark

Torney-Purta

, et al. (2021) Learning environments and school/classroom climate as supports for civic reasoning, discourse, and engagement. In: Lee

White

Dong

(eds) Education for Civic Reasoning & Discourse. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp. 273–319.

Barton

Avery

(2016) Research on social studies education: diverse students, settings, and methods. In: Gitomer

Bell

(eds) Handbook of Research on Teaching. 5th edition. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, pp. 985–1038.

Barton

Levstik

(2004) Teaching History for the Common Good. 1st edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bergmann

(2016) Multiperspectivity. 3rd edition. Schwalbach/Ts: Thinking history for yourself.

Bishop

Cushing

(2009) The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Boone

Taylor

Gallant

(2023) International reactions to the Capitol attack of January 6th: a media frames analysis. American Behavioral Scientist 67(6): 784–806. DOI: 10.1177/00027642221091214.

Boxell

Gentzkow

Shapiro

(2021) Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. (Working Paper: 26669). DOI: 10.3386/w26669.

10.

Busey

Duncan

Dowie-Chin

(2023) Critical what what? a theoretical systematic review of 15 years of critical race theory research in social studies education, 2004–2019. Review of Educational Research 93(3): 412–453. DOI: 10.3102/00346543221105551.

11.

Christensen

Grammes

(2020) The beutelsbach consensus: the German approach to controversial issues in an international context. Acta Didactica Norden 14(4): 1–19. DOI: 10.5617/adno.8340.

12.

Clark

Schmeichel

Garrett

(2020) Social studies teacher perceptions of news source credibility. Educational Researcher 49(4): 262–272. DOI: 10.3102/0013189x20909823.

13.

Demoiny

(2017) Are you ready? elementary pre-service teachers’ perceptions about discussing race in social studies. Multicultural Education 24(2): 25–33.

14.

Dewey

(1916) Democracy and Education. New York: The MacMillan Company.

15.

DiGiacomo

Hodgin

Kahne

, et al. (2021) Civic education in a politically polarized era. Peabody Journal of Education 96(3): 261–274. DOI: 10.1080/0161956X.2021.1942705.

16.

do Amaral

(2022) Comparative case studies: methodological discussion. In: Benasso

Boultiet

Neves

, et al. (eds) Landscapes of Lifelong Learning Policies across Europe: Comparative Case Studies. New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 41–60.

17.

Evans

(2006) The social studies wars: now and then. Social Education 70(5): 317–321.

18.

Goodrick

(2014) Comparative case studies. In: Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 7. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.

19.

Grant

(2022) A failure to educate: January 6, 2021 and the banality of evil. The Educational Forum 86(2): 109–124. DOI: 10.1080/00131725.2021.2021056.

20.

Gross

(2022) From slavery to socialism, new legislation restricts what teachers can discuss. Washington, DC: NPR (National Public Radio). Retrieved from. https://www.npr.org/2022/02/03/1077878538/legislation-restricts-what-teachers-can-discuss

21.

Guess

Lyons

(2020) Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda. In: Persily

Tucker

(eds) Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field and Propspects for Reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press, pp. 10–33.

22.

Guimarães

Finardi

(2021) Global citizenship education (GCE) in internationalisation: COIL as alternative Thirdspace. Globalisation, Societies and Education 19(5): 641–657. DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2021.1875808.

23.

Gutmann

(1999) Democratic Education. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

24.

Handro

(2014) Konstruktivismus. In: Mayer

Pandel

H-J

Schneider

, et al. (eds) Wörterbuch Geschichtsdidaktik. Frankfurt, GER: Wochenschau Verlag.

25.

Hasberg

(2014) Historisches Lernen für alle. In: Barsch

Hasberg

(eds) Inklusiv-exklusiv: Historisches Lernen für alle. Frankfurk, GER. Frankfurt, Germany: Wochenschau Verlag, pp. 11–39.

26.

Hess

McAvoy

(2015) The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. New York: Routledge.

27.

McAvoy

Hess

, et al. (2017) Teaching and learning about controversial issues and topics in the social studies: a review of the research. In: Manfra

Bolick

(eds) The Wiley Handbook of Social Studies Research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 319–335.

28.

Hobbs

Seyferth-Zapf

Grafe

(2018) Using virtual exchange to advance media literacy competencies through analysis of contemporary propaganda. Journal of Media Literacy Education 10(2): 152–168. DOI: 10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-2-9.

29.

Journell

(ed) (2019) Unpacking Fake News: An Educator’s Guide to Navigating the Media with Students. New Hork: Teachers College Press.

30.

Journell

(2022) Classroom controversy in the midst of political polarization: the essential role of school administrators. NASSP Bulletin 106(2): 133–153. DOI: 10.1177/01926365221100589.

31.

Kahne

Bowyer

(2017) Educating for democracy in a partisan age: confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal 54(1): 3–34. DOI: 10.3102/0002831216679817.

32.

Kavanagh

Rich

(2018) Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation (Retrieved July 1, 2023).

33.

Keegan

(2021) Critical affective civic literacy: a framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. Journal of Social Studies Research 45(1): 15–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssr.2020.06.003.

34.

Kello

(2016) Sensitive and controversial issues in the classroom: teaching history in a divided society. Teachers and Teaching 22(1): 35–53. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027.

35.

King

Chandler

(2016) From non-racism to anti-racism in social studies teacher education: social studies and racial pedagogical content knowledge. In: Crowe

Cuenca

(eds) Rethinking Social Studies Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 3–21.

36.

Kohlmeier

Saye

(2019) Examining the relationship between teachers’ discussion facilitation and their students’ reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education 47(2): 176–204. DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2018.1486765.

37.

Körber

(2015) Historical consciousness, historical competencies – and beyond? Some conceptual development within German history didactics. Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung. Retrieved from www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2015/10811/pdf/Koerber_2015_Development_German_History_Didactics.pdf

38.

Krutka

Manca

Galvin

, et al. (2019) Teaching “against” social media: confronting problems of profit in the curriculum. Teachers College Record 121(14): 1–42.

39.

Ladson-Billings

(2003) Lies my teacher still tells: developing a critical race perspective toward the social studies. In: Ladson-Billings

(ed) Critical Race Theory Perspectives on the Social Studies. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press, pp. 1–14.

40.

Levy

Babb-Guerra

Owczarek

, et al. (2019) Can education reduce political polarization? fostering open-minded political engagement during the legislative semester. Teachers College Record 121(5): 1–40.

41.

Kisa

(2021) Requiring civics then and now: potentials and pitfalls of mandated civics curriculum. Teachers College Record 123(2): 1–42.

42.

Hodgin

Garcia

(2022) Blended spaces: reimagining civic education in a digital era. Democracy and Education 30(2): 1–10.

43.

Mason

Krutka

Stoddard

(2018) Media literacy, democracy, adn the challenge of fake news. Journal of Media Literacy Education 10(2): 1–10.

44.

McGrew

Breakstone

Ortega

, et al. (2018) Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education 46(2): 165–193. DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320.

45.

McGrew

Merroth

Zuspan

, et al. (2022) Teaching students to evaluate online information through current events. Social Education 86(6): 386–391.

46.

Medina

Hestler

(2021) How a Challenge is also a Chance: Shaping Teacher Education through Collaborative Online International Learning. Ludwigsburger Beiträge zur Medienpädagogik 21: 1–16.

47.

Misco

Patterson

(2007) A study of pre-service teachers’ conceptualizations of academic freedom and controversial issues. Theory & Research in Social Education 35(4): 520–550. DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2007.10473349.

48.

Natanson

(2023, February 20). As Red States Target Black History Lessons, Blue States Embrace Them. Washington, D.C: Washington Post, NA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A737979677/AONE?u=anon∼2a90c993&sid=googleScholar&xid=0c6e8b04 (Accessed July 1, 2023).

49.

National Association for Media Literacy Education (2007) Core Principles of Media Literacy. New York, NY: National Association for Media Literacy Education.

50.

National Council for the Social Studies (2010) About the national Council for the social studies. Silver Spring, MA: National Council for the Social Studies. [Online]. Available. https://www.socialstudies.org/about (Accessed July 1, 2023).

51.

Noddings

Brooks

(2017) Teaching Controversial Issues: The Case for Critical Thinking and Moral Commitment in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

52.

Parker

(2003) Teaching Democracy: Unity and Diversity in Public Life. New York: Teachers College Press.

53.

Polkinghorne

(2005) Narrative psychology and historical consciousness: relationships and Perspectives. In: Straub

(ed) Narrative, Identity, and Historical Consciousness. Oxford, UK: Berghan, pp. 3–22.

54.

Reisman

(2012) Reading like a historian: a document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction 30(1): 86–112. DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2011.634081.

55.

Rogers

Franke

Yun

J-EE

, et al. (2017) Teaching and Learning in the Age of Trump: Increasing Stress and Hostility in America’s High Schools. Los Angles. Los Angeles: UCLA IDEA.

56.

Salewski

(2022) Multiperspektivität. In: Mayer

Pandel

H-J

Schneider

, et al. (eds) Wörterbuch Geschichtsdidaktik. Frankfurt, GER: Wochenschau Verlag, pp. 166–167.

57.

Seixas

(2016) Translation and its discontents: key concepts in English and German history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies 48(4): 427–439. DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1101618.

58.

Sheppard

Levy

(2019) Emotions and teacher decision-making: an analysis of social studies teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 77(1): 193–203.

59.

Stake

(1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

60.

Stoddard

(2022) Integrating media education into the social studies. Social Education 86(6): 383–385.

61.

Stoddard

Fitchett

Hess

(2022) Teaching the US 2018 midterm elections: a survey of secondary social studies teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies 54(4): 536–558.

62.

Verfassung des Landes Baden-Württemberg (1953). https://www.lpb-bw.de/bwverf/Landesverfassung-BW.pdf (Accessed November 1, 2022).

63.

Walker

(2022) From critical race theory to the January 6th insurrection speech: the high school classroom and the politics of division. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 22(5): 505–512. DOI: 10.1177/15327086221096849.

64.

Wertsch

(2008) The narrative organization of collective memory. Ethos 36(1): 120–135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20486564

65.

Wineburg

(2001) Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. Philadelphia, US: Temple University Press.

66.

Zembylas

(2017) Teacher resistance to engage with ‘alternative’perspectives of difficult histories: the limits and prospects of affective disruption. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38(5): 659–675.