The questionnaire survey is a common and important tool in nursing research. However, there are many psychologically related issues and limitations which may not always be considered. This paper brings these issues together under four headings: theory-building; validity of self-report; measurement and analysis — that is, spanning the formulation of the research, the collection and analysis of data through to the interpretation of the results. In planning questionnaire research the explanatory limitations must be recognised, the aims must be linked directly to the measures, other methods should be considered as checks, and, most importantly, professional advice should be sought during the planning.
Abelson, R.P. (1976) Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In: Carroll, J., Payne J. (eds.) Cognition and Social Behaviour . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Abelson, R.P. (1981) Psychological status ofthe script concept. American Psychologist36: 7, 715-729.
3.
Abraha m, C., Hampson, S.E. (1996) A social cognition approach to health psychology— Philosophical and methodological issues. Psychology and Health11:2, 223-241.
4.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1977) Attitude-behaviour relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin84: 888-918.
5.
Bozeman, D.P., Kacmar, K.M. (1997)A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organisations. Organiza tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes69:1, 9-30.
6.
Cattell, R.B. (1981) Personality and Learning Theory. Berlin: Springer.
7.
Cialdini, R. (1993) Influence: Science andpractice. New York: Harper Collins.
8.
Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T. (1979) Quasi-Experimenta tion: Design and analysis issues for fieldsettings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
Custers, E.J.F.M., Boshuizen, H.P.A., Schmidt, H.G. (1996) The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates . Memory and Cognition24:3,384-399.
10.
Debono, K.G., Snyder, M. (1995) Acting on one's attitudes —the role of a history of choosing situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21:6,629-636.
11.
Dickoff, J., James, P. (1968) A theory of theories: A position paper. Nursing Research17:3,197-203.
12.
Eysenck, HJ, Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975) Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire . London: Hodder and Stoughton.
13.
Faust, M., Babkoff, H. (1977) Script as a priming stimulus for lexical decisions with visual hemifield stimulation. Brain andLanguage57: 3,423-437.
14.
Glaser, B.C., Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discoveryof Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press.
15.
Grossarthmaticek, R., Eysenck, HJ, Barrett, P. (1993) Prediction of cancer and coronary heart disease as a function of method of questionnaire administration. Psychological Reports73:3(1), 943-959.
16.
Hayre, J., Parker, T. (1997) Putting research into practice: How to bridge the gap between policy and practice. Nursing Times Research2:1, 5-6.
17.
Hicks, C., Hennessy, D., Cooper, et al. (1996) Investigating attitudes to research in primary healthcare teams. Journal of Advanced Nursing24:1033-1041.
18.
Kazdin, A.E. (1989) Behavior Modification in AppliedSettings. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishers.
19.
Kirk-Smith, M. (1995) Handedness bias in preference rating scales. Journal ofMarket Research37:2, 195-202.
20.
Kraus, SJ (1995) Attitudes and the prediction of behavior—a meta-analysis ofthe empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21:1, 58-75.
21.
Lalljee M., Brown LB, Ginsburg G.P. (1984) Attitudes: Disposition, behaviour or evaluation . British Journal of Social Psychology23: 233-244.
22.
Langer, EJ (1978) Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction . In: Harvey, J.H., Ickes, WJ., Kidd, R.F (eds.) New Directions in Attribution Research (Vol. 2). New York: Halsted.
23.
Langer, E.J., Blank, A., Chanowitz, B. (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action . Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology36: 635-642.
24.
Lloyd, K.E. (1994) Do as I say, not as I doBehavior Analyst17:1,131-139.
25.
Lloyd, P., Mayes, A., Manstead, A.S.R. et al. (1990) Introduction to Psychofogy: An integrated approach. London: Fontana.
26.
McKenna, H.P. (1995) Application and dissemination of research findings . British Journal of Nursing4: 21,1257-1263.
27.
Mulhall, A., Alexander, C. Le May, A. (1997) Evidence for practice: Are we acknowledging the importance of methodology and context? Nursing Times Research2: 4, 242-244.
28.
Nisbett, R.E., Wilson, T.D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review84: 231-259.
29.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F. (1991) Context effects in attitude surveys: Applying cognitive theory to social research. European Review of Social Psychology2: 31-50.
30.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Mai, H.R. (1991) Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly55: 1, 3-23.
31.
Sheeran, P., Orbell, S. (1996) How confidently can we infer health beliefs from questionnaire responses. PsychologyandHealth11: 2, 273-290.
32.
Slugoski, B.R. (1995) Mindless processing of requests — don't ask twice. British Joumal ofSocial Psychology34:3, 335-350.
33.
Stevens, J. (1997) Improving integration between research and practice as a means of developing evidence-based healthcare. Nursing Times Research2:1, 7-15.
Torgerson, W.S. (1958) The Theoryand Method of Scaling. New York: Wiley.
36.
Wanke, M., Schwarz, N., Noelleneumann, E. (1995) Asking comparative questions—the impact of the direction of comparison. Public Opinion Quarterly59: 3, 347-372.
37.
Wicker, A.W. (1969) Attitudes verses actions: The relationship of verbal and overt responses to attitude objects. Journal of Sociallssues25:41-78.
