This paper presents data obtained from a questionnaire sent to trust nurse executives in England and Scotland. White the data indicate a great deal of enthusiasm for clinical supervision, some concern must be shown for the lack of preparation and support for those involved in its implementation, a fact which will undoubtedly reflect badly in any evaluation exercise.
Bishop, V. (1994) Clinical supervision for an accountable profession . Nursing Times90: 39, 34-39.
2.
Bishop, V. (1998) Results of a questionnaire. In: Bishop, V. (ed) Clinical Supervision. Some questions, answers and guidelines. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
3.
Butterworth, T., Bishop, V., Carson, J. (1996) First steps towards evaluating clinical supervision. Part 1:theory, policy and practice development. A review. Journal of CfinicalNursing5: 127-132.
4.
Butterworth, T., Carson, J., White, E. et al. (1997) Cliniral supervision and mentorship. It is good to talk:An evaluation studyin England andScotland . Manchester: School of Nursing , Midwifery and Health Visiting, University of Manchester .
5.
Hawkins P., Shoet, R. (1992) Supervision in the Helping Professions. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
6.
Proctor, B. (1991) On being a trainer and supervision for counselling in action. In: Dryden, W., Thorne, B. (eds) Training and Supervision for Counselling in Action. London: Sage.
7.
United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Vsiting (1990) The Report of the Post-Registration Education and Practice Project (PREPP). London: UKCC.
8.
United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1992) The Scope of Professional Practice . London: UKCC.
