The engagement of nursing and healthcare researchers with digital technologies: lessons learnt in an Australian university

Abstract

Background

The use of digital technologies has expanded rapidly in recent years, particularly with the onset of COVID-19. Digital technologies have been implemented in nursing and healthcare to support necessary care.

Aims

This research explored how nursing and healthcare researchers engage with digital technologies, including the types of technologies, facilitators, barriers and suggested improvements to enable engagement.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 nursing and healthcare researchers from an Australian University. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded and thematically analysed using the COREQ checklist.

Results

Four major types of digital technologies were engaged by nursing and healthcare researchers. These included monitoring, intervention, communication and data collection and analysis technologies. The research setting provided the overarching systems and policies that could delay actions or provide necessary supports. Access to experts, good communication, sharing digital technology information, and time and funding were identified as important.

Conclusion

This research highlights that nursing and healthcare researchers are engaging with digital technologies but there are areas for improvement that are underpinned by the research setting and need to be considered to ensure effective use of digital technologies in nursing and healthcare research.

Keywords

digital technology health healthcare nursing research university

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archibald

Ambagtsheer

Casey

, et al. (2019) Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–8.

Beleigoli

Maeder

Button

, et al. (2019) The care informatics and technologies project-enhancing capability, motivation and opportunities in digital health among health professionals and students. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 266: 25–29.

Bryman

Burgess

(1994) Reflections on qualitative data analysis. In: Bryman

Burgess

(eds) Analyzing qualitative data. 1st edition. London, UK: Routledge, 216–226.

Caro-Gonzalez

Ferreira-Lopes

(2020) Universities in transition: The 6i model for strategic governance and management. Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny 13(1): 217–230.

Ciborra

(2006) Imbrication of representations: risk and digital technologies. Journal of Management Studies 43(6): 1339–1356.

Curtis

Price

(2017) Factors that influence older people’s engagement with digital health technology. Nursing Older People 29(10): 27–30.

de Redon

Centi

(2019) Realities of conducting digital health research: Challenges to consider. Digital Health 5: 1–3.

Desveaux

Soobiah

Bhatia

, et al. (2019) Identifying and overcoming policy-level barriers to the implementation of digital health innovation: qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21(12): e14994.

Doades

Winkelmann

(2019) Facilitators and Barriers to Mobile Health (mHealth) Application Adoption. Athletic Training & Sports Health Care 11(6): 253–255.

10.

Foong

Kyaw

Upton

, et al. (2020) Facilitators and barriers of using digital technology for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A qualitative systematic review. International Wound Journal 17(5): 1266–1281.

11.

Gagnon

M-P

Desmartis

Labrecque

, et al. (2012) Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. Journal of Medical Systems 36(1): 241–277.

12.

Gale

Heath

Cameron

, et al. (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13(1): 1–8.

13.

Hansson

Polk

(2018) Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: the usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact. Research Evaluation 27(2): 132–144.

14.

Holden

(2011) What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians' use of electronic health records. Journal of Patient Safety 7(4): 193–203.

15.

Howe

Berv

(2000) Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. Teachers College Record 102(7): 19–40.

16.

Kaczmarczyk

Gray-Burrows

Vinall-Collier

, et al. (2021) Oral health promotion apps: an assessment of message and behaviour change potential. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 33(1): 112.

17.

Koivunen

Saranto

(2018) Nursing professionals' experiences of the facilitators and barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 32(1): 24–44.

18.

Liu

Shao

Liu

, et al. (2019) Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators. Digital Health 5: 10.1177/2055207619878627.

19.

Loncar-Turukalo

Zdravevski

da Silva

, et al. (2019) Literature on wearable technology for connected health: scoping review of research trends, advances, and barriers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21(9): e14017.

20.

Mann

Chokshi

Lebwohl

, et al. (2019) Building digital innovation capacity at a large academic medical center. NPJ Digital Medicine 2(1): 13–16.

21.

Martin

(2000) Research grants: problems and options. Australian Universities’ Review 43(2): 17–22.

22.

Martins

E-C

Terblanche

(2003) Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 6(1): 1060–1460.

23.

Nsengiyumva

Mappin-Kasirer

Oxlade

, et al. (2018) Evaluating the potential costs and impact of digital health technologies for tuberculosis treatment support. European Respiratory Journal 52(5): 1801363–1801375.

24.

Reinhart

Thomas

Toriskie

(2011) K-12 teachers: technology use and the second level digital divide. Journal of Instructional Psychology 38(3/4): 181–193.

25.

Rowlands

Nicholas

Williams

, et al. (2008) The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings 60(4): 290–310.

26.

Schlomann

(2018) Older Adults’ Preferences towards Using Digital Technologies: Usage Patterns, Facilitators and Barriers for Long-Term Use, Potential for Gerontological Research. PhD Thesis. Koln, Germany: , Universität zu Köln.

27.

Schwertner

(2017) Digital transformation of business. Trakia Journal of Sciences 15(1): 388–393.

28.

Sherry

(2002) Sustainability of innovations. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13(3): 211–238.

29.

Sitnicki

(2018) Development of a model of digital research universities. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 4(1): 311–318.

30.

Slevin

Kessie

Cullen

, et al. (2020) Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 113(3): 163–172.

31.

Suter

Arndt

Arthur

, et al. (2009) Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care 23(1): 41–51.

32.

Tsatsou

(2016) Digital technologies in the research process: Lessons from the digital research community in the UK. Computers in Human Behavior 61: 597–608.

33.

Vargo

Zhu

Benwell

, et al. (2021) Digital technology use during COVID‐19 pandemic: A rapid review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 3(1): 13–24.

34.

Venkatesh

Davis

(2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2): 186–204.

35.

Venkatesh

Morris

Davis

, et al. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 47(3): 425–478.

36.

Xiong

Hsiang

E-L

, et al. (2021) Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light: Science & Applications 10(1): 1–30.

37.

Yoo

Lyytinen

Boland

, et al. (2010) The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop 'Digital Challenges in Innovation Research. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1622170 (accessed 3 April 2021).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB