The National Health Service is committed to measuring the quality of nursing care through adopting a number of indicators which are not nationally standardised. Compassionate communication is one indicator, but it is unclear how this is assessed or demonstrated in practice. This is primarily a methodological paper which aims to establish the face and content validity of a questionnaire to measure nurses’ non-verbal methods of compassionate communication with patients in acute healthcare. An existing questionnaire was amended to meet the study’s requirements. A ‘lay expert sample’ was used to rate the face validity and a ‘research expert sample’ to rate the content validity of the instrument. Modification of one response and adding instructions on how to complete the questionnaire meant that Version 2 potentially has high face validity. The questionnaire demonstrated excellent content validity (Scale-Content Validity Index = 0.85). Recommendations include pilot testing to further investigate the construct of non-verbal compassionate communication in an acute healthcare context. This research can be used to inform the measurement of compassionate communication and promote standardisation nationally.
AndresL (2012) Designing and Doing Survey Research, London: SAGE Publications.
2.
BecksteadJW (2009) Content validity is naught. International Journal of Nursing Studies46(9): 1274–1283.
3.
Bornstein RF (2004) Face validity. In: Lewis-Beck MS, et al. The SAGE Encyclopaedia of Social Science Research Methods. Available at: http://srmo.sagepub.com (accessed 24 June 2015).
4.
BridgesJ (2012) Capacity for care: Meta-ethnography of acute care nurses’ experiences of the nurse-patient relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing69(4): 760–772.
5.
CalvinAO (2007) The neuroscience ICU nurses perceptions about end-of-life care. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing39(3): 143–150.
6.
Care Quality Commission (CQC) (2013) Raising Standards, Putting People First. Strategy for 2013–16, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: CQC.
7.
Carretero-DiosHPerezC (2007) Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Consideration about test selection in psychological research. International Journal of Clinical and Health Research7(3): 863–882.
8.
CicchettiDVSparrowS (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Application to assessment of adaptive behaviour. American Journal of Mental Deficiency86: 127–137.
9.
CingelMV (2011) Compassion in care: A qualitative study of older people with a chronic disease and nurses. Nursing Ethics18(5): 672–685.
10.
CrawfordP (2014) The design of compassionate care. Journal of Clinical Nursing23(23–24): 3589–3599.
11.
CreswellJW (2003) Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
CuradoMAS (2014) Analysis of variables that are not directly observable: Influence on decision-making during the research process. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP48(1): 146–152.
14.
DavisL (1992) Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research5(4): 194–197.
15.
Delgado-RicoE (2012) Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology12(3): 449–460.
16.
Department of Health (2008) High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report, London: Department of Health.
17.
Department of Health (2012) Developing a Culture of Compassionate Care: Creating a New Vision and Strategy for Nurses, Midwives and Care Givers, London: Department of Health.
18.
DewarB (2010) Use of emotional touchpoints as a method of tapping into the experience of receiving compassionate care in a hospital setting. Journal of Research in Nursing15(1): 29–41.
19.
DewarB (2011) Valuing compassion through definition and measurement. Nursing Management17(9): 32–37.
20.
DewarB (2014) Clarifying misconceptions about compassionate care. Journal of Advanced Nursing70(8): 1738–1747.
21.
DruryV (2014) Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, anxiety, depression and stress in registered nurses in Australia: Phase 2 results. Journal of Nursing Management22: 519–531.
22.
Firth-CozensJCornwellJ (2008) The Point of Care: Enabling Compassionate Care in Acute Hospital Settings, London: The Kings Fund.
23.
FleissJ (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley.
Francis R (2013) Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.
26.
GarthwaitePH (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association100(470): 680–701.
27.
Goodrich J (2012) Supporting hospital staff to provide compassionate care: Do Schwartz Centre Rounds work in English Hospitals? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 105(3): 117–122.
28.
GriffithsP (2008) Metrics for Nursing. Nursing Management15(4): 10–11.
29.
GriffithsP (2008) State of the Art Metrics for Nursing: A Rapid Appraisal, National Research Unit, Kings College: London.
30.
GrossD (1990) Communication and the elderly. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics9(1): 49–64.
31.
HalldorsdottirS (2008) The dynamics of the nurse-patient relationship: Introduction of a synthesised theory from the patient’s perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences22: 643–652.
32.
HaynesSN (1995) Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment7(3): 238–247.
33.
HinkinTR (1997) Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research21(1): 100–120.
34.
HofmeijerJ (2014) Evidence-based medical knowledge: The neglected role of expert opinion. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice20: 803–808.
35.
IBM Corporation (2013) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0, Armonk, New York: IBM Corp.
KelleyTL (1927) Interpretation of Educational Measurements, New York: Macmillan.
39.
KimberlinCLWintersteinAG (2008) Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacology65: 2276–2284.
40.
KozlowskaLDoboszynskaA (2012) Nurses’ nonverbal methods of communicating with patients in the terminal phase. International Journal of Palliative Nursing18(1): 40–46.
41.
KuisEE (2015) Self-report questionnaire for measuring presence: Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences29(1): 173–182.
42.
LandsheerJABoeijeHR (2010) In search of content validity: Facet analysis as a qualitative method to improve questionnaire design. Quality and Quantity44(1): 59–69.
Lown BA, et al. (2015) Can compassionate healthcare be measured? The Schwartz Centre Compassionate Care Scale. Patient Education and Counselling 98(8): 1005–1010.
45.
LynnMR (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research35(6): 382–386.
46.
MabenJ (2012) High Quality Care Metrics for Nursing, London: National Nursing Research Unit, Kings College London.
47.
MackintoshC (2007) Protecting the self: A descriptive qualitative exploration of how registered nurses cope with working in surgical areas. International Journal of Nursing Studies44(6): 982–990.
MurrayP (1999) Fundamental issues in questionnaire design. Accident & Emergency Nursing7(3): 148–153.
50.
National Nursing Research Unit (NNRU) (2008) Policy+. Policy plus evidence, issues and opinions in healthcare. Available at: www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/nursing/nnru/policy (accessed 1 June 2015).
51.
NevoB (1985) Face validity revisited. Journal of Educational Measurement22(4): 287–293.
52.
NewellRBurnardP (2011) Research for Evidence-based Practice in Healthcare, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
53.
NolanL (2006) Caring connections with older persons with dementia in an acute hospital setting – a hermeneutic interpretation of the staff nurse’s experience. International Journal of Older People Nursing1(4): 208–215.
54.
NolanL (2007) Caring for people with dementia in the acute setting: A study of nurses’ views. British Journal of Nursing16(7): 419–422.
55.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) (2015) The Code: Professional Standards of Practice and Behaviour For Nurses and Midwives, London: Crystal Mark.
PearsonA (2006) Powerful caring. Second article. Nursing Standard20(48): 20–22.
59.
PernegerTV (2015) Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Quality of Life Research24(1): 147–151.
60.
PolgarSThomasSA (2008) Introduction to Research in the Health Sciences, 5th edn. Edinburgh: Elsevier.
61.
PolitDFBeckCT (2006) The Content Validity Index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health29: 489–497.
62.
PolitDF (2007) Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health30: 459–467.
63.
PostSG (2014) Routine, empathic and compassionate patient care: Definitions, development, obstacles, education and beneficiaries. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice20(6): 872–880.
64.
QuinnB (2003) Exploring nurses’ experiences of supporting a cancer patient in their search of meaning. European Journal of Oncology Nursing7(3): 164–171.
65.
RattrayJJonesMC (2007) Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing16(2): 234–243.
66.
RoterDL (2006) The expression of emotion through nonverbal behaviour in medical visits. Journal of General Internal Medicine21(1): S28–S34.
67.
RothmanM (2009) Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification. PRO Task Force Report. Value Health12(8): 1075–1083.
68.
Royal College of Nursing (RCN) (2012) Quality with Compassion: The Future of Nursing Education. Report of the Willis Commission on Nursing Education, London: RCN.
69.
RubioDM (2003) Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research27(2): 94–104.
70.
StickleyTFreshwaterD (2002) The art of loving and the therapeutic relationship. Nursing Enquiry9(4): 250–256.
StreinerDLNormanGR (2008) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
SwahnbergKWijmaB (2012) Staffs' perception of abuse in healthcare: A Swedish qualitative study. BMJ Open2(e001111): 1–8.
74.
ThomasSD (1990) Development of the general health motivation scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research12(3): 318–335.
75.
ThomasSD (1992) Technical notes: Face validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research14(1): 109–112.
76.
TorjuulK (2007) Compassion and responsibility in surgical care. Nursing Ethics14(4): 522–534.
77.
ViljoenM (2012) Constructing Homogeneous Likert-Type Summative Rating Scales According to Classical Measurement Theory, Kidmore End, UK: Academic Conferences International Ltd.
78.
WangEW (2009) A practical guide for understanding confidence intervals and P values. Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery140(6): 794–799.
79.
WatsonJCFlemezB (2015) Counseling Assessment and Evaluation: Fundamentals of Applied Practice, Singapore: SAGE.
80.
WatsonR (2006) Successful Statistics for Nursing and Healthcare, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
WayDTracySJ (2012) Conceptualizing compassion as recognizing, relating and (re)acting: A qualitative study of compassionate communication at hospice. Communication Monographs79(3): 292–315.
82.
WilkinKSlevinE (2004) The meaning of caring to nurses: An investigation into the nature of caring work in an intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing13(1): 50–59.
83.
YaghmaieF (2003) Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education3(1): 25–27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
