Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of interventions and treatments for self-harm is well researched. Previous reviews of the literature have highlighted the lack of definitively effective interventions for self-harm and have highlighted the need for future research. These recommendations are also reflected in clinical guidelines published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE, 2004) which also call for service user involvement in studies of treatment efficacy.

Aims

A systematic review was undertaken to determine: a) what contributions service users have made to the evaluation of psycho-social interventions; b) by what methods have service users been involved; c) in what ways could service user involvement supplement empirical evidence for interventions.

Methodology

Electronic searches were completed on the 28th January 2011 of the Medline (1950–present), Web of Science (1898–Present), Web of Science (including Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index), the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and Psychinfo (1979–present) databases using a combination of 13 search terms. References were independently sifted according to set criteria by two of the authors to ensure inter-rater reliability.

Results

Sixty-five references were included in the review. Of these, 59% of studies were empirically based, and 26% used qualitative data collection methods to gather service user narratives. Only 8% of studies used a mixed-methodology to combined qualitative and quantitative data collection. No studies featured service user involvement.

Conclusion

Service user involvement is a rarity in the evaluation of psycho-social interventions, despite its use being mandated by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and evidenced as effective in other areas of mental health (Leader, 1998). The authors make a number of recommendations for future involvement in future self-harm research.

Keywords

psycho-social interventions self-harm systematic literature review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleby

Cooper

Amos

(1999) Psychological autopsy study of suicides by people aged under 35. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175: 168–174.

Bailey

(2011) Interdisciplinary Working in Mental Health, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Balsam

Beauchaine

Mickey

(2005) Mental health of lesbian, gay, bisexual and heterosexual siblings: The effects of gender, sexual orientation, and family. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114: 471–476.

Barber R, Boote JD, Parry GD, et al. (2011) Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expectations 15(3), 229–241.

Beresford

(2000) Service users 'knowledge' and social work theory: Conflict or collaboration. British Journal of Social Work, 30: 489–503.

Borg

Karlsson

Kim

(2009) User involvement in community mental health services – Principles and practices. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 16: 285–292.

Briere

Gil

(1998) Self-mutilation in clinical and general population samples: Prevalence, correlates, and functions. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68: 609–620.

Bristol Crisis Service for Women (1994) Women and Self-injury: A Survey of 76 Women. Bristol, UK: Bristol Crisis Service for Women.

Brown

Comtois

Linehan

(2002) Reasons for suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111: 198–202.

10.

Chapman

Gratz

Brown

(2006) Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44: 371–394.

11.

Cresswell M (2006) Self-harm: Perspectives from personal experience – An appreciation. Available at: http://www.studymore.org.uk/cress3.pdf (accessed 16 August 2011).

12.

Crowe

Bunclark

(2000) Repeated self-injury and its management. International Review of Psychiatry, 12: 48–53.

13.

Denzin

(1970) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, Chicago, IL: Aldine.

14.

Faulkner

(2004) The Ethics of Survivor Research: Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Research Carried Out by Mental Health Service Users and Survivors, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

15.

Faulkner

Thomas

(2002) User-led research and evidence-based medicine. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180: 1–3.

16.

Foster J, Tyrell K, Cropper V, et al. (2005) Welcome to the team: Service users in staff recruitment. Drink and Drugs News 21: 3–6.

17.

Hanson

(2008) Whither qualitative/quantitative? Grounds for methodological convergence. Quality and Quantity, 42(1): 97–111.

18.

Harrison

(1997) Cutting the ties. Feminism and Psychology, 7(3): 438–440.

19.

Hawton

Kirk

(1989) Problem-solving. In: Hawton

Salkovskis

Kirk

(eds) Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychiatric Problems: A Practical Guide, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 406–426.

20.

Hickey

Kipping

(1998) Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7: 83–88.

21.

Hjelmeland

Hawton

Nordvik

(2002) Why people engage in parasuicide: A crosscultural study of intentions. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 32(4): 380–393.

22.

Hjelmeland

Nordvik

Bille-Brahe

(2000) A cross-cultural study of suicide intent in parasuicide patients. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 30(4): 295–303.

23.

Jayne

(2006) Service user engagement in prison mental health inreach service development. Mental Health Review, 11(2): 21–24.

24.

Kapur

(2005) Management of self-harm in adults: Which way now? British Journal of Psychiatry, 187: 497–499.

25.

Kenning

Cooper

Short

(2010) Prison staff and women prisoner’s views on self-harm; their implications for service delivery and development: A qualitative study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 20(4): 274–284.

26.

Klonsky

(2007) The functions of deliberate self-injury: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 27: 226–239.

27.

Leader

(1998) Power Tools: A Resource Pack For Those Committed To The Development Of Mental Health Advocacy Into The Millennium, Brighton, UK: Pavilion.

28.

LeFevre

(1996) Killing Me Softly: Self-Harm, Survival not Suicide, Gwynedd, UK: Handsell Publications.

29.

McAllister

Creed

Moyle

(2002) Nurses’ attitudes towards clients who self-harm. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(5): 578–586.

30.

McDermott P (1997) Will drug users respond to the challenge? Drug Edition. Available at: http://www.drugtext.org/pdf/Self-help-peer-support-and-outreach/will-drug-users-respond-to-the-challenge.pdf (accessed 11 October 2012).

31.

McLaughlin

(2010) Keeping service user involvement in research honest. British Journal of Social Work, 40: 1591–1608.

32.

McMurran

(2007) What works in substance misuse treatment for offenders? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17(4): 225–233.

33.

Maddock

Lineham

Shears

(2004) Empowering mental health research: User-led research into the care programme approach. Policy and Planning, 22(2): 15–22.

34.

Martin

(2008) Ordinary people only’: Knowledge, representativeness and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(1): 35–54.

35.

Meltzer

Lader

Corbin

(2002) Non-Fatal Suicidal Behaviour Among Adults Aged 16-74 in Great Britain, London, UK: Office of National Statistics.

36.

Ministry of Justice (2008) National Service Framework. Improving Services to Women Offenders, London, UK: HMSO.

37.

Morgan

(1979) Death Wishes: Assessment and Management of Deliberate Self-Harm, Chichester, UK: Wiley.

38.

National Self-Harm Network (1998) The Hurt Yourself Less Workbook. Available at: http://www.kreativeinterventions.com/TheHurtYourselfLessWorkbook.pdf (accessed 9 May 2012).

39.

Nelson

Grunebaum

(1971) A follow-up study of wrist slashers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 127: 1345–1349.

40.

NICE (2004) The short-term physical and psychological management and secondary prevention of self-harm in primary and secondary care. Practice Guideline 16. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10946/29424/29424.pdf (accessed 26 October 2010).

41.

NICE (2011) Putting patients and the public at the heart of NICE’s work. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/media/F38/C9/PPIP2Updated270911.pdf (accessed 24 August 2012).

42.

Nock

Prinstein

(2004) A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72: 885–890.

43.

Pembroke

(1994) Self-Harm: Perspectives from Personal Experience, London, UK: Survivors Speak Out.

44.

Pembroke

(2007) Harm minimisation: Limiting the damage of self-injury. In: Spandler

(ed.) Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People who Self-Harm, Ross-on-Wye, UK: PCCS Books, pp. 163–172.

45.

Prinstein

(2008) A review of unique challenges and important directions for self-injury science. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1): 1–8.

46.

Read

(2007) To ask or not to ask about abuse. New Zealand research. American Psychologist, May–June: 327–328.

47.

Ringel

Brandell

(2011) Trauma: Contemporary Directions in Theory, Practice and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

48.

Roberts

(2002) Biographical Research, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

49.

Rose

(2003) Collaborative research between users and professionals: Peaks and pitfalls. Psychiatric Bulletin, 27: 404–406.

50.

Royal College of Psychiatrists (2010) Better Services for People who Self-Harm. Wave 3 Baseline Data – Key Finding and Recommendations. London: Author. Available at: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Aggregated%20W3%20Report%20Summary.pdf (accessed 22 June 2011).

51.

Spirito

Esposito-Smythers

(2006) Attempted and completed suicide in adolescence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2: 237–266.

52.

Tantam

Hubband

(2009) Understanding Repeated Self-injury: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

53.

Tate

(2010) Getting it right: Caring for people who self-harm. Emergency Nurse, 18(6): 32–33.

54.

Treloar

AJC

Lewis

(2008) Professional attitudes towards deliberate self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(7): 578–584.

55.

Wallcraft

Nettle

(2009) History, context and language. In: Wallcraft

Schrank

Amering

(eds) Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

56.

Wallcraft

Schrank

Amering

(2009) Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

57.

Ward J and Bailey D (2011) At arms length: The development of a self-injury training package for prison staff through service user involvement. Journal of Mental Health Education, Training and Practice 6(4): 175–185.

58.

Ward J and Bailey D (2012) Consent, confidentiality and the ethics of PAR in the context of prison research. In: Love K (ed) Ethics in Social Research (Studies in Qualitative Methodology, vol. 12). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 149–169.

59.

Weiner

(2009) Lay involvement and legitimacy: The construction of expertise and participation within HEART UK. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(2): 254–273.

60.

Whitlock JL, Eells G, Cummings N, et al. (2009) Nonsuicidal self-injury in college populations: Mental health provider assessment of prevalence and need. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy 23(3): 172–183.

61.

Zahl

Hawton

(2004) Repetition of deliberate self-harm and subsequent suicide risk: Long-term follow-up study of 11,583 patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185(1): 70–75.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.21 MB

Service user involvement in the evaluation of psycho-social intervention for self-harm: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Background

Aims

Methodology

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material