The relationship between scientific management and modernist architecture is traced through an examination of the work of the engineer-architect Owen Williams and his work for the Boots company. This account finds that at best the relationship is ‘not proven’ and that a focus on practice could be a valuable complement to an examination of the relationship between bodies of ideas.
Anon.1932a. ‘Boots’ Factory: The Design and Construction of the New Factory at Beeston.’ Building September: 392-401.
2.
Anon.1932b. ‘Messrs Boots’ Factory, Nottingham.’Architect & Building News1932: 50-6.
3.
Archer, M.1979. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.
4.
Banham, R.1960. Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. London: Architectural Press.
5.
Biggs, L.2007. ‘The Taylorised Beauty of the Mechanical: Scientific Management and the Rise of Modernist Architecture (Review). ’ Technology and Culture48: 643-4.
6.
Boots.1927. Annual Report. Nottingham: Boots.
7.
Boots.1933a. ‘Features of Beeston.’The Bee12(3): 107-8.
8.
Boots.1933b. Two Books of Press Cuttings on Opening 27 July 1933. Nottingham: Boots.
9.
Boots.1934. Souvenir of Boots Beeston Factory. Nottingham: Boots .
Boots.1994. Celebrating the Renovation of D10, a Building of Historical Significance. Nottingham: Boots.
12.
Brockman, H.1974. The British Architect in Industry 1841-1940. London: George Allen & Unwin.
13.
Chapman, S.1974. Jesse Boot of Boots the Chemists: A Study in Business History. London: Hodder and Stoughton .
14.
Cottam, D.1986. Owen Williams 1890-1969. London : Architectural Association.
15.
Curtis, W.1996. Modern Architecture since 1900. London : Phaidon.
16.
Dale, K., and Burrell, G.2007. The Spaces of Organisation and the Organising of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
Darley, G.2003. Factory. London: Reaktion.
18.
Emanuel, M.1994. Contemporary Architects. London : St James.
19.
EN-R.1921. ‘Revival of Scientific Effort.’Engineering News-Record87: 673.
20.
EN-R.1922. ‘Review of Wallace Clark. The Gantt Chart: A Working Tool of Management.’Engineering News-Record89: 487.
21.
EN-R.1924. ‘Review of Frank Copley.’Engineering News-Record93: 1005-6.
22.
EN-R.1928. ‘Review of T. Bennett, Architectural Design in Concrete.’Engineering News-Record100: 287-8.
23.
EN-R.1929. ‘Beauty as an Ideal.’Engineering News-Record103: 518-9.
24.
EN-R.1930. ‘Book Review "French and American Visions" City of Tomorrow, Le Corbusier and Metropolis of Tomorrow, Hugh Ferriss.’Engineering News-Record104: 334-5.
Fawcett, P.1994. ‘Factory with a Facelift.’The Architect’s Journal3 November: 32.
27.
Ganter, H., and P. Walgenbach.2002. ‘Middle Managers: Differences between Britain and Germany.’ In Challenges for European Management in a Global Context, edited by M. Geppert, D. Matten, and K. Williams, 165-88. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
Guillén, M.1994. Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Guillén, M.2006. The Taylorized Beauty of the Mechanical: Scientific Management and the Rise of Modernist Architecture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jacoby, S.1997. Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism since the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Lane, C.1995. Industry and Society in Europe: Stability and Change in Britain, Germany and France. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
33.
Matte, J.1921. Construction Details of General Motors Office Building .’ Engineering News-Record86: 624-30.
34.
Mehren, H.L.1924. ‘Wembley - Advertisement for Empire and Engineering .’ Engineering News-Record93: 866-9.
35.
Mentzer, M.2010. ‘Scientific Management and the American Hotel.’Management & Organizational History5: 428-46.
36.
Midant, J.1996. Dictionnaire de l’Architecture du XXe Siecle . Paris: Hazan.
37.
Millais, M.2009. Exploding the Myths of Modern Architecture. London: Frances Lincoln.
38.
Mitchell, R.1923. ‘Huge Concrete Girders and Trusses in New Theater .’ Engineering News-Record91(1): 4-9.
39.
Mutch, A.2006. ‘The Institutional Shaping of Management: In the Tracks of English Individualism.’Management & Organizational History1: 251-71.
40.
Panofsky, E.1957. Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism. Cleveland, OH: Meridian.
41.
Pevsner, N.1978. The Englishness of English Art. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
42.
Phillips, S.2003. ‘Character, Grit and Personality: Continued Education, Recreation and Training at Boots Pure Drug Company 1918-45. ’ History of Education32: 627-43.
43.
Powers, A.2005. Modern: The Modern Movement in Britain. London: Merrell.
44.
Redmayne, R.1934. A Review of the Experimental Working of the Five Days Week by Boots Pure Drug Company at Nottingham. Nottingham : Boots.
45.
Rosenberg, S.1986. ‘The Masterbuilder.’ In Owen Williams 1890-1969, by D. Cottam, F. Newby, S. Rosenberg , and G. Stamp, 17-32. London : Architectural Association.
46.
Saint, A.2007. Architect and Engineer: A Study in Sibling Rivalry . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
Schulte, G.1926. ‘Massive Reinforced-Concrete Church in Los Angeles .’ Engineering News-Record96: 701-2.
48.
Shenhav, Y.1999. Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Stamp, G.1986. ‘Sir Owen Williams and his Time.’ In Owen Williams 1890-1969, by D. Cottam , F. Newby, S. Rosenberg , and G. Stamp, 7-11. London : Architectural Association.
50.
Thompson, E.1995. The Poverty of Theory: And Other Essays. London: Merlin.
51.
Watkin, D.1979. English Architecture: A Concise History. London: Thames and Hudson.
52.
Weston, R.1996. Modernism. London: Phaidon.
53.
Whysall, P.1997. ‘Interwar Retail Internationalization: Boots underAmerican Ownership.’ International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research7: 157-69.
54.
Williams, O.1927. ‘Factories: A Few Observations Thereon.’RIBA Journal26 November: 54-5.
55.
Williams, O.1928. ‘Supporting Capacities of Piles. ’ Engineering News-Record101: 893.
56.
Williams, O.1931. ‘The Effective and the Efficient: A Parable by Sir Owen Williams.’ Studio101: 79-83.
