Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Migraine is the second most prevalent disorder in the world; yet, its underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. Cumulative studies have revealed pivotal roles of cerebral cortex in the initiation, propagation, and termination of migraine attacks as well as the interictal phase. Investigation of basic mechanisms of the cortex in migraine not only brings insight into the underlying pathophysiology but also provides the basis for designing novel treatments. We aim to summarize the current research literatures and give a brief overview of the cortex and its role in migraine, including the basic structure and function; structural, functional, and biochemical neuroimaging; migraine-related genes; and theories related to cortex in migraine pathophysiology. We propose that long-term plasticity of synaptic transmission in the cortex encodes migraine.

Keywords

migraine cerebral cortex cortical spreading depression long-term potentiation pathophysiology

Introduction

Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of moderate to severe headache and a host of neurological, gastrointestinal, autonomic, cognitive, and emotional symptoms.^1,2 Ranking as the second most prevalent disorder in the world, migraine has affected 12% of the world’s population and 9.3% of the mainland Chinese population.^3–5 Although the initiation of migraine attack is identified to be related to a range of internal and external triggers, such as stress, hormone fluctuations, skipping meals, sleeping disturbances, odor, light, alcohol, and so on,⁶ the pathophysiology of migraine remains to be completely understood.¹

The etiopathogenesis of migraine includes various pathological processes and mechanisms involving activation of the trigeminal nerve system, abnormality of brain structure, cortical dysfunction, and vasoconstriction and vasodilation.^7–9 However, there is no single hypothesis that can explain all clinical features of migraine. Previous studies have indicated that migraine is a pain disorder associated with abnormal brain structure and function, among which the brain cortex serves a vital role.⁸ Cortical hyperexcitability and aberrant resting-state brain activity may underlie the cascade of migraine attacks.⁸ Meanwhile, the neural-vascular theory has combined initiation, amplification, and propagation of migraine with vascular reactions as well as responses of cortical neurons.¹⁰ Interfering with cortical activity can affect pain perception, while pain-related cortical regions undergoing changes in synaptic plasticity can generate pain perception even with no detectable sensory input from the periphery.¹¹

In this review, we aim to summarize the involvement of different cortices (Figure 1) in migraine from several perspectives, including cortex structure and function, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging (including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetoencephalography (MEG)), biochemical neuroimaging (including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)), migraine-related genes, neurotransmitters, and peptides. Meanwhile several theories related to cortex in migraine pathophysiology and lately progressed are discussed, including cortical spreading depression, central sensitization, and long-term plasticity of synaptic transmission, which may encode migraine.

Figure 1.

Pain pathways of migraine in the brain. Peripheral sensory information is first collected by the trigeminal nerve to the trigeminal ganglia (first order neurons in the trigeminal system). Then the trigeminocervical complex, including the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (TNC) and dorsal horn of the first cervical segments, are the second order central nervous system relay in the trigeminal system, receive input from trigeminal ganglia. Thalamus (Thal.), as the third-order relay in the trigeminal system, receives direct projection from TNC (blue arrows) and modulate the activity of pain-related cortex, such as anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula cortex (IC), and primary/secondary somatosensory cortex (S1/S2). Moreover, sensory inputs from periphery are relayed by TNC neurons and further projected to affective/motivational circuits through parabrachial nucleus (PBN, red arrows) and cerebellar cortex (green arrows). A1, primary auditory cortex; Amyg, amygdala; PFC, prefrontal cortex; V1, primary visual cortex.

Anterior cingulate cortex

Structure and function

The cingulate is the forebrain structure in mammal, composed of a thick belt of cortex surrounding the corpus callosum.¹² Pyramidal cells in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) receive sensory inputs from the thalamus and subcortical areas and project sensory outputs to the motor cortex, amygdala, midbrain areas, periaqueductal gray (PAG), rostral ventromedial medulla, and spinal dorsal horn.^11,13–16 The ACC is known to belong to the endogenous opioid pain control circuit and functions in the affective interpretation of pain, cognition, emotion, and motivation.^11,17 Projections from ACC to the spinal dorsal horn have been proved to facilitate nociceptive excitatory transmission.¹⁸ The activation of ACC has been indicated to be associated with chronic migraine, acute noxious stimuli, and pain-like aversive behaviors, while inhibition of excitatory transmission in ACC has been suggested to form a blockade of pain-aversive learning, which indicates its pro-nociceptive role.^19,20 It is worth mentioning that there are different definitions of the subregions of ACC. For example, according to Vogt,¹⁴ regions in what is typically called the dorsal ACC fall within the anterior MCC.

Structural neuroimaging

Using high-resolution MRI, Maleki et al.²¹ demonstrated that migraineurs with more frequent headache attacks showed significant reduced volume of ACC than less frequent ones. Similar findings that decreased gray matter volume in the dorsal ACC was also shown in migraine patients without aura comparing with healthy controls; and these changes were significantly negatively related to the migraine duration.²²

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

A resting-state fMRI study showed that chronic migraine patients present enhanced connectivity between the right ACC and right amygdala, which as well plays a vital role in the processes of emotion, motivation, learning, and memory.²³ Meanwhile, ACC showed stronger function connectivity to frontal pole, temporal pole, inferior temporal gyrus, the thalamus, and parahippocampal gyrus in migraine patients with more attacks compared with those with less frequent attacks.²¹ Another resting-state MR study focused on migraineurs with and without ictal allodynia, with results showing that migraineurs with allodynia had decreased functional connectivity between the PAG to the ACC, prefrontal cortex (PFC), and anterior insula.²⁴ The decreased functional connectivity results here implied an impairment of the descending pain modulatory pathway, yielding loss of pain inhibition in the migraine process,²⁴ while the increased functional connectivity between ACC and several higher-order pain-processing cortices and nuclei mentioned before implied an enhanced synchronous neuronal activity of these brain regions, as compensation or cause of migraine process.

Positron emission tomography

In chronic migraine patients, H₂¹⁵O PET study showed that regional cerebral blood flow changes in the ACC, which was positively associated with severity of pain and negatively associated with the paresthesia scores induced by suboccipital stimulation.²⁵ A FDG-PET study demonstrated hypometabolism in the rostral ACC in episodic migraine patients at rest, which could be relieved after reducing migraine attacks through external trigeminal nerve stimulation.²⁶ These studies not only implied the role of ACC dysfunction in migraine but also its involvement in the neuromodulation of headache pain.

Biochemical neuroimaging

Using MRS techniques, the metabolites of ACC of migraineurs were studied during the interictal phase, showing slightly reduced level of aspartate, N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), and glutamine, which did not reach significance.²⁷ The author, nevertheless, could build a model based on these three metabolites and their ratio to creatine to differentiate migraineurs from healthy controls.²⁷ Meanwhile, Niddam et al.²⁸ discovered that chronic, but not episodic migraine, was associated with reduced NAA metabolism in the ACC and the thalamus, as well as with altered interregional NAA correlations between the thalamus and the ACC, reaching the point that a dysfunctional thalamo-cortical pathway was correlated to migraine chronification.

Insular cortex

Structure and function

The insula is a part of the cerebral cortex located deep within the lateral fissure between the frontal and temporal lobe.²⁹ The anterior insula is part of the salience network with connections to the middle and inferior temporal cortex, ACC, and limbic region, which is related to emotional modulations.³⁰ The posterior insula has greater connectivity to the premotor, sensorimotor, supplementary motor, and middle posterior cingulate cortex, indicating its role in sensorimotor integration.³⁰ Nociceptive input is first processed in the posterior insula, where it is coded in terms of intensity and anatomical location. Afterward, it is conveyed to the anterior insula, where the emotional reaction to pain is elaborated.³¹ The insula functions in sensory, emotional, salience, and cognition, of which there is a large overlap related to the symptoms involved in migraine.³²

Structural neuroimaging

Significantly reduced volume of the left insula was detected in migraineurs with more frequent headache attacks comparing with less frequent attacks, indicating an adaptive response to the repetitious headache attacks.²¹ Similarly, thinning of bilateral insula was observed in chronic migraine patients compared to healthy controls, which was negatively correlated with the frequency of migraine attacks.³³ It has been reported that age-related thinning of the insula was lacking in female migraineurs compared to healthy controls, which may contribute to the overall cortical hyperexcitability of migraine brain.³⁴ These results also added more proof to the importance of insula in migraine pathophysiology.

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Elevated functional connectivity between insula and other pain-processing brain regions and intrinsic networks have been reported. Tso et al.³⁵ used fMRI to evaluate intrinsic connectivity patterns of migraineurs and discovered stronger connectivity between the dorsal anterior insula and sensory cortex in interictal periods, which might partially explain why visual and auditory stimuli became unpleasant to migraineurs rather than controls even not during an attack. Patients who have spontaneous migraine attacks without aura were observed to show increased functional connectivity between medial PFC and the insula, which was negatively correlated with the intensity of headache.³⁶ The strength of functional connectivity between the anterior insula and the mediodorsal thalamus as well as the PAG was significantly related to the disease duration in chronic migraine.³⁷ In addition, migraineurs with aura were indicated to have more fluctuating functional connectivity within the salience network (mainly composed of dACC and anterior insula) compared with migraineurs without aura and healthy individuals.³⁸ Apart from alterations within the salience network, the insula as well showed enhanced connectivity with the default network and the central executive network in migraineurs.³⁹ These findings demonstrated that insula may be a critical node in the increased intrinsic connectivity in migraine patients.³⁹

Positron emission tomography

In H₂¹⁵O PET scans, bilateral insula was indicated to be activated course with other pain-processing cortices either in spontaneous or nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attack.^40,41 Whereas, another study with the help of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine showed the right insula was activated in the headache phase but not in the premonitory phase.⁴² And right insula activation was also presented in vestibular migraine patients with spontaneous attacks, showing increased metabolisms in temporal-parieto-insular cortices.⁴³ The author referred this to the activation of vestibulo-thalamo-cortical pathway.⁴³

Frontal/prefrontal cortex

Structure and function

The frontal lobe contains many dopamine-sensitive neurons and acts as a higher-order pain-processing region in the descending pain modulatory system. Connecting with various neural areas including the medial temporal cortex, hypothalamus, brainstem, and amygdala, the orbital frontal cortex receives sensory input and sends output to various regions for emotional processing and expression.⁴⁴ Studies have also indicated that the medial PFC is involved in mediating the attenuation of pain perception via cognitive control mechanisms.^45,46 The motor and premotor cortex are parts of pain intensity pathway⁴⁷ and play a role in the generation of sensory information along with the supplementary motor area and ACC.⁴⁸ Meta-analysis showed that non-invasive stimulation of the excitatory primary motor cortex can significantly reduce intensity and frequency of migraines in migraineurs.⁴⁹

Structural neuroimaging

Among patients with migraines, meta-analysis studies of whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) have shown a widespread reduction in cortex volume, especially in the frontal cortex and cingulate gyrus.⁵⁰ One VBM study showed significantly decreased gray matter volume in the left medial PFC in migraineurs without aura.²²

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

A seed-based MR study showed stronger resting-state functional connectivity between PAG and nucleus cuneiformis to frontal and temporal regions in migraine patients with severe ictal allodynia compared with those without allodynia.⁵¹ Another resting-state fMRI study indicated that bilateral mid-dorsolateral PFC and right ventrolateral PFC presented decreased functional connectivity with PAG in episodic migraine patients and that the mid-dorsolateral PFC may be one of the target brain areas in the impaired PAG dysfunctional network.¹⁶ In episodic migraineurs with higher headache frequency, increased connectivity between the PAG and supplementary motor area was observed, while decreased connectivity between PAG and pain modulation regions such as PFC was shown, indicating high pain expectancy and impaired pain modulatory functions in migraine.⁵² Meanwhile, decreased functional connectivity between the left hippocampus, contralateral supplementary motor area, and bilateral inferior parietal gyri has been shown.⁵³ Experiments showed that increased PFC activation was correlated with trigeminal heat stimulation in migraineurs with cutaneous allodynia, as well as in healthy subjects.⁵⁴

Positron emission tomography

Both sides of the frontal cortex have been found to have decreased regional cerebral blood flow related to the headache severity in migraine patients.⁵⁵ In addition, one study indicated hypometabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex in episodic migraine patients, which can be relieved by lowering the frequency of migraine attacks with treatment.²⁶ This hypometabolism was also shown in premotor cortex in patients with episodic migraine.⁵⁶

Magnetoencephalography

Several MEG studies showed that acute migraine attacks had higher neuromagnetic activity in the frontal cortex, which was associated with the execution of flexible behavioral responses to various stimuli and can possibly influence the experience of the headache pain process.^8,57,58

Temporal cortex

Structure and function

The temporal lobe is located beneath the lateral sulcus and is an associative multisensory area that processes visual, taste, olfactory, and auditory information.⁵⁹ It receives projections from prefrontal cortex, insula, thalamus, and raphe nucleus.⁶⁰ The temporal pole, which occupies the most rostral part of the temporal lobe, mainly interconnects with amygdala, hippocampus, insula and, in particular, the superior temporal gyrus.⁶¹ The temporal pole is considered to play a role in assigning affective tone to short-term memories related to pain, and integrating multisensory stimuli including painful, visual, auditory, and olfactory.⁶²

Structural neuroimaging

Gray matter volume in the temporal lobe was shown to be decreased in both adult and pediatric migraine patients.⁶³ As for interictal periods of migraine, decreased gray matter density in the left temporal pole was detected in patients compared with healthy controls.⁶⁴ The interregional cortical thickness correlations of the temporal cortex have also been demonstrated to be able to differentiate the migraineurs’ brain structure from healthy controls in a cross-sectional investigation.⁶⁵

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

In migraine patients, there was enhanced functional connectivity between the temporal pole and several brain areas, such as the ACC, insula, S1, and temporoparietal junction compared to controls, indicating aberrant connectivity of temporal pole might contribute to clinical abnormalities in migraine patients.^66–68 Meanwhile, the decreased functional connectivity of the bilateral middle temporal gyrus with PAG, implying disrupted visual information processing in migraineurs.¹⁶ Moreover, it was indicated that the decreased connectivity within temporal cortex of the default mode network in migraineurs without aura in interictal phase.⁶⁹ Studies revealed that temporal pole density and functional activity dynamically fluctuated according to the migraine cycle,^65,66 yielding it to be a vital site involved in the pathophysiology of migraine, as well as a potential target for treatment.

Positron emission tomography

The temporal cortex was found to have increased activation in migraineurs in response to a noxious heat stimulation in ictal versus interictal states.⁶⁶ The activity of temporal pole was enhanced during the migraine attacks compared to the interictal phase, as well as in patients with more frequent attacks than those with fewer attacks.^21,70 When enhancing excitability of temporal pole by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, the migraine patients presented with normal habituation responses to visual stimulation compared with untreatment state.⁷¹ Another PET study showed that the temporal pole of interictal migraineurs had significant increased glucose metabolism in left temporal pole compared to healthy individuals during olfactory stimuli, which reflected the unique role of temporal pole in odor hypersensitivity and odor-triggered migraine.⁷² The fusiform gyrus, premotor, and somatosensory cortex were reported to be activated in patients with episodic migraine patients than healthy individuals when painful heat stimulation was applied in interictal period, and the enhanced cognitive pain processing indicates high pain expectancy and hypervigilance in migraine.⁷³ Both sides of the temporal cortex were found to have decreased regional cerebral blood flow at rest which was related to the severity of headache in migraine patients.⁵⁵

Comorbidity with epilepsy

It has been reported that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy showed higher comorbidity of migraine (up to 51.9%), and the removal of the anterior temporal lobe or the hippocampus in these patients could completely relieve the patients from migraine.^74–76 And migraine and epilepsy may have some shared pathophysiological mechanisms. Resting-state functional MRI has detected reduced connectivity between PAG and the pedunculopontine nucleus in temporal lobe epilepsy comorbided with migraine.⁷⁷ And patients with occipitotemporal lobe epilepsy combined migraine with aura showed monogenic gene defect on chromosome 9q.⁷⁵

Parietal cortex

Structure and function

The S1 is located in the postcentral gyrus, responsible for recognizing the localization and intensity of pain.⁷⁸ The secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) is located in the parietal operculum and on the ceiling of the lateral sulcus.⁷⁹ The S2 is particularly important for pain perception and the processing of pain intensity and quality.⁸⁰ Both S1 and S2 receive nociceptive inputs from the spinothalamic pathway via nuclei of the thalamus.⁸¹ These two cortices are also reciprocally connected with posterior parietal and insula through cortico-limbic somatosensory pathway which integrates somatosensory nociceptive inputs with other contextual inputs.⁸² It was reported that migraine patients had impaired lateral inhibition in the somatosensory cortex between attacks, which was directly associated with the intensity and duration of migraine attacks.⁸³

Structural neuroimaging

Studies showed controversial results of thickness change of the somatosensory cortex. Chong et al.⁸⁴ reported accelerated age-related thinning in the bilateral somatosensory cortex in episodic migraine. Meanwhile, thinning of bilateral parietal lobes was observed in chronic migraine patients compared to healthy controls, which was negatively correlated with the frequency of migraine attacks.³³ However, a study investigating episodic migraine was found to have a thicker somatosensory cortex in patients with more frequent attacks than whom with lower frequency or no attacks.²¹ Another research showed the thickening of somatosensory cortex reached 21% in migraine with aura patients than healthy controls, with most of the patients developed migraine since childhood.⁸⁵ Lower gray matter volume was also reported in the S2 of patients with episodic migraine compared with controls.⁸⁶ The thickness changes of somatosensory cortex was hypothesized to be the accumulative effects of migraine-specific factors as disease duration, headache frequency, or different circles.⁸⁷ The controversial results could also be due to reasons beyond the disease such as limited sample size or different scanning parameters. Further details regarding the controversial volume results are discussed in Occipital cortex section.

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

There have been various studies providing evidence of altered intrinsic brain connectivity during migraine attacks; using resting-state fMRI, Hougaard et al.⁸⁸ showed significant increases in connectivity between the dorsal pons and ipsilateral head and face areas of the S1 during attacks in patients with migraine with aura. Increased S1 activation was observed in migraine patients compared with healthy controls when painful heat stimulation was applied.⁷³ In addition, activation of S2 was positively associated to cutaneous allodynia in migraineurs without aura detected by fMRI.⁵⁴ While some MRI studies based on arterial spin labeling showed diverging results in S1 of headache-free migraineurs, with both hyperperfusion^89,90 and hypoperfusion⁵⁶ compared with controls, and it was speculated that the resting blood flow changes and alteration in responsivity within S1 may be the result of repetitive attacks rather than the etiology of disease.⁹⁰

Magnetoencephalography

Multiple studies have demonstrated that the somatosensory cortex has been continuously undergoing migraine-induced changes.^21,85,89,90 One MEG study indicated that migraine patients had increased S1 excitability in response to electrical stimulation compared to controls and that the activation strength was positively correlated to the headache frequency.⁹¹ Hsiao et al.⁹² recorded somatosensory gating by MEG and reported that migraineurs presented with excitability changes in S1, which reflected altered sensory modulation associated with migraine chronification.

Occipital cortex

Structure and function

The occipital lobes are located in the forebrain and contain most of the anatomical regions of the visual cortex.⁹³ As the visual processing center, the occipital cortex is considered to be highly relevant to cortical spreading depression (CSD), migraine aura, and a series of photophobia-like symptoms.⁹⁴

Migraine aura and CSD theory

The migraine aura presents in about one-third of migraineurs and is characterized by transient neurological symptoms that generally last no longer than 60 minutes.⁹⁵ Its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, though it is generally acknowledged that the dominant cause of aura is initially associated with CSD that occurred 30–60 minutes prior to the headache attack.⁹⁶ In animal models, CSD is characterized by a short-lasting, intense wave of neuronal and glial depolarization, which spreads slowly over the cortex at a rate of 2–4 mm/min, followed by a long-lasting inhibition of spontaneous and evoked neuronal activity.⁹⁷ In human beings, CSD is related to short duration of hyperemia and is followed by depression with long-lasting oligemia.⁹⁸ The visual, sensory, language, and motor symptoms are also parallel with the wave of altered brain activity which spreads slowly across the cortex.⁹⁹

Structural neuroimaging

Decreased gray matter volume of occipital lobe has been reported in migraine patients without aura.²² Similar findings were shown in right occipital lobe of chronic migraine patients complicated with medication overuse.¹⁰⁰ Another study based on general population has showed significantly decreased gray matter volume in occipital lobe, mainly in visual motion processing areas, regardless of migraine activity.¹⁰¹ A recent study using novel coordinate-based network mapping method discovered that heterogeneous areas of decreased gray matter volume in migraine were commonly connected to a single region in the left extrastriate visual cortex.¹⁰² Regarding to the VBM studies in migraine, many different brain regions or controversial results of the same region were both reported; and the coordinate-based network mapping method could be used and tested in the future study. It may provide a chance to answer whether volume change in migraine brains is the cause, result, epiphenomenon, or just false positive results in migraine disease.

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

After documenting a patient for more than 1000 migraine aura attacks, Hansen et al.¹⁰³ suggested it is possible for aura to initiate in multiple sites in the visual cortex and that the aura could cease spontaneously with limited propagations. Arngrim et al.¹⁰⁴ investigated five migraine patients using fMRI during provoked aura, showing that in the visual cortex negative symptoms (scotoma) were associated with decreased mean blood-oxygen-level-dependent response while positive symptoms (flickering) were associated with increased blood-oxygen-level-dependent response. These findings indicated that CSD could induce different effects on the brain activity, metabolism, and hemodynamics and presenting inverse aura symptoms.¹⁰⁴

Positron emission tomography

One study reported decreased metabolism and increased activation-to-resting glucose uptake ratio of neurons in the visual cortex of migraine patients during the interictal phase.¹⁰⁵ In another study using luminous stimulations, the visual cortex was activated as a response to pain in interictal and postictal phases, but deactivated in ictal phase of migraineurs, indicating that in cases of increased trigeminal nociceptive input, the pain-related visual cortex activity might subsequently be higher and lead to lesser responses to additional pain stimulation.¹⁰⁶ A recent PET/MRI study using「¹¹C」PBR28 as marker for glia activation has proved increased standard uptake value ratio in the S1, S2, insula cortex, and thalamus as well as visual cortex, linking CSD to glia activation and neuroinflammation.¹⁰⁷

Magnetoencephalography

Hyperexcitability of the occipital cortex was observed in spontaneous and visually induced migraine patients, with smaller widespread regions beyond the primary visual cortex in spontaneous subjects.¹⁰⁸ MEG was also used to evaluate treatment response, reporting hyperexcitability of the occipital cortex to visual stimulation in migraineurs, and reduced DC-MEG shifts after 30 days of valproate therapy.¹⁰⁹

Biochemical neuroimaging

Imbalances of metabolic and neural transmitters have been reported in the occipital lobe of migraine patients. Recently, MRS studies showed higher lactate levels in the occipital visual cortex in migraine with aura patients during interictal period¹¹⁰. It is found that when facing checkerboard stimulation during interictal phase, migraine aura patients who have both visual and non-visual aura (paraesthesia, paresis or dysphasia) showed lactate increase only during stimulation and only in visual cortex; however, patients with visual aura showed higher level of lactate before stimulation, and no more increase during stimulation, indicating mitochondria dysfunction in the patients.¹¹¹ Additional research focusing on the visual cortex showed consistently decreased NAA levels and increased lactate levels during visual stimulation in migraineurs with aura compared to patients without aura and normal controls.¹¹² These findings indicated that mitochondrial dysfunction might only present in migraine with aura. Furthermore, a ¹H-MRS study showed that glutamate levels were increased¹¹³ while gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels were decreased¹¹⁴ in the visual cortex in migraine patients with aura. Similar ¹H-MRS study also reported higher ratios of glutamate/creatine¹¹⁵ and glutamate/glutamine¹¹⁶ in the visual cortex of migraineurs. These findings suggested disturbances in the cortical excitatory-inhibitory balance, which could predispose the cortex to CSD and aura.¹¹⁷

Cerebellar cortex

Structure and function

The cerebellum has been demonstrated to have vast connections with migraine-related brain regions such as cerebrum, thalamus, midbrain, brainstem, and spinal cord.^118,119 Furthermore, the cerebellum has been implicated in motor control and coordination,¹²⁰ cognition,¹²¹ emotion,¹²² and pain processing.^123,124 The trigeminal spinal nucleus also directly projects to precerebellar regions such as the pontine nuclei and inferior olive.¹²⁵ The deep cerebellar nuclei receives inhibitory inputs from Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex, and excitatory inputs from the mossy fiber and the climbing fiber pathways, projects to the brainstem nuclei and thalamus, then finally terminates in the cerebral cortex.¹²³

Structural neuroimaging

MRI studies have indicated decrease volume of the cerebellar cortex in chronic migraine patients compared with normal controls.¹²⁶ Recent VBM study indicated significant decreased gray matter volume in the cerebellum in migraine patients with or without aura than healthy subjects.¹²⁷ A longitudinal study showed that cerebellar structural volume and connectivity changes were correlated to the 2-year headache frequency prognosis in migraineurs.¹²⁸ Furthermore, postmortem neuropathological examination of a familial hemiplegic migraine patient revealed cerebellar vermis atrophy and reduction of Purkinje cells and granular cells alongside proliferation of Bergmann glia.¹²⁹

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Studies showed decreased functional connectivity between crus I of the cerebellum and the thalamus, as well as the fusiformis gyrus in migraine patients.¹³⁰ The author proposed the aberrant reduced inhibitory involvement of the migraine cerebellum on gating and evaluation nociceptive sensory information.¹³⁰ Furthermore, the activation of the cerebellum in response to nociceptive input was higher during the migraine attack than in interictal periods.⁷⁰ These functional studies add proof to the cerebellar dysfunction and cerebellum involvement in migraine. Here, we would like to add some results other than fMRI studies. Cerebellar hypoperfusion has been reported in migraine patients,^131,132 and its relationship to the cause of cerebellar infarct-like lesions in migraine showed controversial results.^132,133 The CAMERA (Cerebral Abnormalities in Migraine, an Epidemiologic Risk Analysis) study indicated that prevalence of infarct-like lesions in the cerebellar region of migraine patients were significantly higher than that in controls (5.4% vs 0.7%, p = .02, adjusted OR, 7.1).¹³⁴ In addition, crossed cerebellar diaschisis has also been observed in migraine patients and is considered to pose a probable risk of infarctions and further studies are required.^133,135

Positron emission tomography

Studies have indicated activation of the cerebellum during the various phases and in different subtypes of migraine. H₂¹⁵O PET study with the help of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine showed that cerebellum activation exists in the premonitory phases of migraine.⁴² One 18F-FDG-PET study demonstrated increased metabolism in the bilateral cerebellum in the ictal phase compared with interictal phase in vestibular migraine patients.⁴³

Biochemical neuroimaging

MRS studies showed significantly reduced NAA and glutamate, with elevated myo-inositol in cerebellum of patients with familial hemiplegic migraine-type 1 (FHM-1), and the NAA level was negatively correlated with cerebellar dysfunction (gait ataxia scores).¹³⁶ Another single-voxel MRS research demonstrated significantly decreased choline levels in the cerebellum by comparing patients of migraine with aura and healthy controls.¹³⁷

Migraine and related cerebellar dysfunction

Several studies have suggested that migraine might be related with cerebellar dysfunction.^138–143 The cerebellar cortex exhibited rich expressions of CGRP and CGRP receptor components.¹⁴⁴ The high concentration of CGRP in Purkinje cells with receptor elements in fibers indicates a functional role of CGRP in the cerebellum.¹⁴⁵ It was concluded that nearly 20% of hemiplegic migraine patients showed permanent mild cerebellar symptoms.¹⁴⁶ FHM-1 is a type of headache disorder caused by mutations in CACNA1A (Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Subunit Alpha1 A) gene, which codes for the α₁ subunit of a neuronal P/Q-Ca²⁺ channel.¹⁴⁶ The P/Q-Ca²⁺ channels are widely expressed in the central nervous system, primarily in the Purkinje cells,¹⁴⁷ and this mutation has also been implicated in causing episodic ataxia type-2.¹⁴⁸ Apart from FHM-1, there are three other migraine types in which the cerebellum was involved, including migraine with aura, migraine without aura, and basilar-type migraine. Several cerebellar symptoms including ataxia, dysarthria, oculomotor deficits, and dizziness have been observed in migraine.^135,149 Balance abnormalities have been detected by stabilometry studies during ictal and interictal periods in untreated migraine patients.^139,150 Subclinical cerebellar dysfunctions such as hypermetria have also been shown in both migraine with and without aura, but were more prominent in migraine with aura.¹³⁸

A hypothesis: Long-term plasticity in the cortex contributes to migraine

Here, we would like to propose a hypothesis that long-term plasticity (the main mechanism of cortical sensitization, including presynaptic and postsynaptic plasticity) in the cortex encodes migraine (Figure 2). There are many hypotheses trying to explain the etiopathogenesis of migraine, such as activation of the trigeminal nerve, cortical dysfunction, vasoconstriction and vasodilation, and CSD.^151,152 Although there is no single hypothesis that can explain all features of migraine, the sensitization of central nervous system is often noted (such as the increased activation of ascending sensory pathways) in migraine.^153,154 Due to the synaptic plasticity in cortices is the critical molecular mechanism of chronic pain and its related emotional responses,²⁰ we believe that the cortical plasticity provides a synaptic model for studying the pathogenesis of migraine.

Figure 2.

Synaptic model for long-term potentiation (LTP) in cortex. The hyperexcitability of presynaptic neurons leads to increased release of glutamate, which combines with postsynaptic NMDA receptors (NMDARs), and causes increased postsynaptic Ca²⁺ in dendritic cells. Ca²⁺ serves as an important intracellular signal for triggering a series of biochemical events that contribute to the expression of AMPA receptors (AMPAR) and LTP. Under migraine conditions, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) might serve as another important signaling molecule for activating adenylyl cyclase 1 (AC1) and contributing to the expression of LTP. Furthermore, interneurons can inhibit or disinhibit the activity of postsynaptic neurons by releasing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). GABA_AR, γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; cAMP, cyclic AMP; CaM, calmodulin; PKA, protein kinase A; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; CaMKIV, Ca²⁺-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; CRE, cAMP response element.

Somatosensory diffusible allodynia and anxiety, which have been observed in both migraine patients and animal models, are two typical symptoms of migraine.^{153,155–157} This indicates that central modulation may be the key part for migraine. However, most previous studies focused on trigeminal ganglion (TG) and thalamus.^{153,154,158,159} Less is known about the possible roles of cortices (such as ACC and insula), which are essential for pain perception and emotional responses in the migraine.^13,14,20

Studies from rodents with peripheral injury have shown that the synaptic plasticity in cortices (such as ACC and insula) contribute to the allodynia and pain-associated emotions (such as anxiety and depression).^20,160 Similarly, increased neural activities in response to noxious stimulation in interictal migraineurs have also been observed in the cortices involved in cognitive aspects of pain processing and top-down modulation of pain.^153,154 CSD is now thought to be a precursor to migraine attacks.¹⁶¹ Changes in cortical sensory response after CSD suggest the possible involvement of known cortical plasticity in migraine. Specifically, low CSD threshold enhances cortical susceptibility, while cortical excitation can trigger CSD by increasing the release of presynaptic glutamate (related to injury-associated anxiety) and CGRP and enhancing postsynaptic NMDA receptor (NMDAR)–mediated responses (related to injury-induced allodynia).^162–165 One recent piece of evidence from mice with familial hemiplegic migraine has shown that the impairment in glutamate uptake promotes NMDA spike generation in ACC neurons and enhances the output firing of these neurons. These findings further support the view that the known plasticity in cortices is involved in migraine. In parallel, this study also shows that local rescue of the impairment in glutamate uptake in ACC can prevent abnormal NMDA spikes and reduces sensitivity to cranial pain triggers in migraine mice.¹⁶⁶ Recently, we found that cortical plasticity contributes to periorbital allodynia and anxiety in rats suffering chronic migraine, in which both glutamate release and NMDAR responses in ACC are increased (unpublished data). Furthermore, our recent slice experiments have shown that CGRP induces a long-term change of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor–mediated responses in the ACC and insula.^167,168 This may explain why infusion or overexpression of CGRP receptors in rodents can cause migraine and photophobia.^169,170

In conclusion, these findings from cortical plasticity and migraine provide a new direction to explain many symptoms of migraine, such as allodynia, anxiety, and photophobia. However, it is obvious that the current research on cortical plasticity in the regulation of migraine is still insufficient. Therefore, future studies are required to explore the specific mechanism of cortical plasticity in the regulation of migraine.

Conclusion

Migraine is a multiphasic disorder that involves not only intermittent paroxysmal pain but also influences different regions of the brain over time. Various brain cortices act as a whole and perform different roles during this process. More direct evidence and high-quality research should be attained during various phases of migraine in the future. Meanwhile, methods which could analyze the neuroimaging across different parameters and combine the results should be performed. The combination of different experimental approaches such as neuroimaging and electrophysiology studies should be carried out to enhance the base of knowledge and explore yet-unanswered questions.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Melissa Lepp for English editing.

Author contributions

All authors participated in the interpretation of collected literature, and in the drafting, critical revision, and approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (grants 81671077, 82071226), Beijing Natural Science Foundation Essential Research Project (Z170002), Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (818MS153).

ORCID iDs

Wei Dai

Shengyuan Yu

References

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) . The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1–211.

Liu

, et al. Health-care utilization for primary headache disorders in China: a population-based door-to-door survey. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 47.

Liu

Zhao

, et al. The prevalence and burden of primary headaches in China: a population-based door-to-door survey. Headache 2012; 52: 582–591.

Liu

, et al. Headache yesterday in China: a new approach to estimating the burden of headache, applied in a general-population survey in China. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 1211–1217.

GDB 2016 Headache Collaborators . Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 954–976.

Kelman

. The triggers or precipitants of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 394–402.

Villalon

Centurion

Valdivia

, et al. Migraine: pathophysiology, pharmacology, treatment and future trends. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2003; 1: 71–84.

Liu

Xiang

, et al. Resting state brain activity in patients with migraine: a magnetoencephalography study. J Headache Pain 2015; 16: 525.

Dong

Jiang

Wang

, et al. Nociceptive behaviors were induced by electrical stimulation of the dura mater surrounding the superior sagittal sinus in conscious adult rats and reduced by morphine and rizatriptan benzoate. Brain Res 2011; 1368: 151–158.

10.

Cieslak

Czarnecka

Roszek

, et al. The role of purinergic signaling in the etiology of migraine and novel antimigraine treatment. Purinergic Signal 2015; 11: 307–316.

11.

Zhuo

. A synaptic model for pain: long-term potentiation in the anterior cingulate cortex. Mol Cells 2007; 23: 259–271.

12.

Shackman

Salomons

Slagter

, et al. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011; 12: 154–167.

13.

Zhuo

. Cortical excitation and chronic pain. Trends Neurosci 2008; 31: 199–207.

14.

Vogt

. Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 533–544.

15.

Chen

Liu

, et al. Volume expansion of periaqueductal gray in episodic migraine: a pilot MRI structural imaging study. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 83.

16.

Chen

Liu

, et al. Disrupted functional connectivity of periaqueductal gray subregions in episodic migraine. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 36.

17.

Dahlke

Sable

Andrasik

. Behavioral therapy: emotion and pain, a common anatomical background. Neurol Sci 2017; 38: 157–161.

18.

Chen

Taniguchi

Chen

, et al. Top-down descending facilitation of spinal sensory excitatory transmission from the anterior cingulate cortex. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 1886.

19.

Tang

Ding

, et al. Pavlovian fear memory induced by activation in the anterior cingulate cortex. Mol Pain 2005; 1: 6.

20.

Bliss

Collingridge

Kaang

, et al. Synaptic plasticity in the anterior cingulate cortex in acute and chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016; 17: 485–496.

21.

Maleki

Becerra

Brawn

, et al. Concurrent functional and structural cortical alterations in migraine. Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 607–620.

22.

Jin

Yuan

Zhao

, et al. Structural and functional abnormalities in migraine patients without aura. NMR Biomed 2013; 26: 58–64.

23.

Chen

Liu

, et al. Altered functional connectivity of amygdala underlying the neuromechanism of migraine pathogenesis. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 7.

24.

Mainero

Boshyan

Hadjikhani

. Altered functional magnetic resonance imaging resting-state connectivity in periaqueductal gray networks in migraine. Ann Neurol 2011; 70: 838–845.

25.

Matharu

Bartsch

Ward

, et al. Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study. Brain 2004; 127: 220–230.

26.

Magis

D'Ostilio

Thibaut

, et al. Cerebral metabolism before and after external trigeminal nerve stimulation in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 2017; 37: 881–891.

27.

Becerra

Veggeberg

Prescot

, et al. A 'complex' of brain metabolites distinguish altered chemistry in the cingulate cortex of episodic migraine patients. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 11: 588–594.

28.

Niddam

Lai

Tsai

, et al. Neurochemical changes in the medial wall of the brain in chronic migraine. Brain 2018; 141: 377–390.

29.

Jaggi

Singh

. Role of different brain areas in peripheral nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain. Brain Res 2011; 1381: 187–201.

30.

Cauda

D'Agata

Sacco

, et al. Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 8–23.

31.

Frot

Faillenot

Mauguiere

. Processing of nociceptive input from posterior to anterior insula in humans. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 5486–5499.

32.

Borsook

Veggeberg

Erpelding

, et al. The insula: a "Hub of Activity" in Migraine. Neuroscientist 2016; 22: 632–652.

33.

Lai

Niddam

Fuh

, et al. Cortical morphological changes in chronic migraine in a Taiwanese cohort: Surface- and voxel-based analyses. Cephalalgia 2020; 40: 575–585.

34.

Maleki

Barmettler

Moulton

, et al. Female migraineurs show lack of insular thinning with age. Pain 2015; 156: 1232–1239.

35.

Tso

Trujillo

Guo

, et al. The anterior insula shows heightened interictal intrinsic connectivity in migraine without aura. Neurology 2015; 84: 1043–1050.

36.

Coppola

Di Renzo

Tinelli

, et al. Resting state connectivity between default mode network and insula encodes acute migraine headache. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 846–854.

37.

Schwedt

Schlaggar

Mar

, et al. Atypical resting-state functional connectivity of affective pain regions in chronic migraine. Headache 2013; 53: 737–751.

38.

Vereb

Szabo

Tuka

, et al. Temporal instability of salience network activity in migraine with aura. Pain 2020; 161: 856–864.

39.

Xue

Yuan

Zhao

, et al. Intrinsic brain network abnormalities in migraines without aura revealed in resting-state fMRI. PLoS One 2012; 7: e52927.

40.

Afridi

Giffin

Kaube

, et al. A positron emission tomographic study in spontaneous migraine. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1270–1275.

41.

Afridi

Matharu

Lee

, et al. A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in migraine using glyceryl trinitrate. Brain 2005; 128: 932–939.

42.

Maniyar

Sprenger

Monteith

, et al. Brain activations in the premonitory phase of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attacks. Brain 2014; 137: 232–241.

43.

Shin

Kim

, et al. Altered brain metabolism in vestibular migraine: comparison of interictal and ictal findings. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 58–67.

44.

Rempel-Clower

. Role of orbitofrontal cortex connections in emotion. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1121: 72–86.

45.

Lieberman

Jarcho

Berman

, et al. The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 447–455.

46.

Kupers

Gybels

Gjedde

. Positron emission tomography study of a chronic pain patient successfully treated with somatosensory thalamic stimulation. Pain 2000; 87: 295–302.

47.

Oshiro

Quevedo

McHaffie

, et al. Brain mechanisms supporting discrimination of sensory features of pain: a new model. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 14924–14931.

48.

Cavina-Pratesi

Valyear

Culham

, et al. Dissociating arbitrary stimulus-response mapping from movement planning during preparatory period: evidence from event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 2704–2713.

49.

Feng

Zhang

, et al. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on headache intensity and frequency of headache attacks in patients with migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache 2019; 59: 1436–1447.

50.

Jia

. Grey matter alterations in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage Clin 2017; 14: 130–140.

51.

Schwedt

Larson-Prior

Coalson

, et al. Allodynia and descending pain modulation in migraine: a resting state functional connectivity analysis. Pain Med 2014; 15: 154–165.

52.

Solstrand Dahlberg

Linnman

Lee

, et al. Responsivity of periaqueductal gray connectivity is related to headache frequency in episodic migraine. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 61.

53.

Wei

Chen

, et al. Impaired functional connectivity of limbic system in migraine without aura. Brain Imaging Behav 2020; 14(5): 1805–1814.

54.

Russo

Esposito

Conte

, et al. Functional interictal changes of pain processing in migraine with ictal cutaneous allodynia. Cephalalgia 2017; 37: 305–314.

55.

Cheng

Wen

Zhou

, et al. Evaluation of headache and regional cerebral flood flow in patients with migraine. Clin Nucl Med 2013; 38: 874–877.

56.

Kim

Suh

, et al. Interictal metabolic changes in episodic migraine: a voxel-based FDG-PET study. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 53–61.

57.

Ren

Xiang

Chen

, et al. Abnormal functional connectivity under somatosensory stimulation in migraine: a multi-frequency magnetoencephalography study. J Headache Pain 2019; 20: 3.

58.

Zhou

Xiang

, et al. Multi-frequency analysis of brain connectivity networks in migraineurs: a magnetoencephalography study. J Headache Pain 2016; 17: 38.

59.

Olson

Plotzker

Ezzyat

. The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing. Brain 2007; 130: 1718–1731.

60.

Markowitsch

Emmans

Irle

, et al. Cortical and subcortical afferent connections of the primate's temporal pole: a study of rhesus monkeys, squirrel monkeys, and marmosets. J Comp Neurol 1985; 242: 425–458.

61.

Chabardes

Kahane

Minotti

, et al. Anatomy of the temporal pole region. Epileptic Disord 2002; 4(Suppl 1): S9–S15.

62.

Godinho

Magnin

Frot

, et al.

Emotional modulation of pain: is it the sensation or what we recall?

J Neurosci 2006; 26: 11454–11461.

63.

Rocca

Messina

Colombo

, et al. Structural brain MRI abnormalities in pediatric patients with migraine. J Neurol 2014; 261: 350–357.

64.

Coppola

Di Renzo

Tinelli

, et al. Evidence for brain morphometric changes during the migraine cycle: a magnetic resonance-based morphometry study. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 783–791.

65.

Schwedt

Berisha

Chong

. Temporal lobe cortical thickness correlations differentiate the migraine brain from the healthy brain. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116687.

66.

Moulton

Becerra

Maleki

, et al. Painful heat reveals hyperexcitability of the temporal pole in interictal and ictal migraine States. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21: 435–448.

67.

Hadjikhani

Ward

Boshyan

, et al. The missing link: enhanced functional connectivity between amygdala and visceroceptive cortex in migraine. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 1264–1268.

68.

Xue

Yuan

Cheng

, et al. Alterations of regional spontaneous neuronal activity and corresponding brain circuit changes during resting state in migraine without aura. NMR Biomed 2013; 26: 1051–1058.

69.

Tessitore

Russo

Giordano

, et al. Disrupted default mode network connectivity in migraine without aura. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 89.

70.

Stankewitz

May

. Increased limbic and brainstem activity during migraine attacks following olfactory stimulation. Neurology 2011; 77: 476–482.

71.

Cortese

Pierelli

Bove

, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left temporal pole restores normal visual evoked potential habituation in interictal migraineurs. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 70.

72.

Demarquay

Royet

Mick

, et al. Olfactory hypersensitivity in migraineurs: a H(2)(15)O-PET study. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 1069–1080.

73.

Schwedt

Chong

Chiang

, et al. Enhanced pain-induced activity of pain-processing regions in a case-control study of episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 947–958.

74.

Yankovsky

Andermann

Mercho

, et al. Preictal headache in partial epilepsy. Neurology 2005; 65: 1979–1981.

75.

Deprez

Peeters

Van Paesschen

, et al.. Familial occipitotemporal lobe epilepsy and migraine with visual aura: linkage to chromosome 9q. Neurology 2007; 68: 1995–2002.

76.

Nunes

Zakon

Claudino

, et al. Hippocampal sclerosis and ipsilateral headache among mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Seizure 2011; 20: 480–484.

77.

Wang

Cai

, et al. Decreased resting-state functional connectivity of periaqueductal gray in temporal lobe epilepsy comorbid with migraine. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 636202.

78.

Almeida

Roizenblatt

Tufik

. Afferent pain pathways: a neuroanatomical review. Brain Res 2004; 1000: 40–56.

79.

Polonara

Fabri

Manzoni

, et al. Localization of the first and second somatosensory areas in the human cerebral cortex with functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 199–205.

80.

Seifert

Maihofner

. Central mechanisms of experimental and chronic neuropathic pain: findings from functional imaging studies. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66: 375–390.

81.

Noseda

Jakubowski

Kainz

, et al. Cortical projections of functionally identified thalamic trigeminovascular neurons: implications for migraine headache and its associated symptoms. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 14204–14217.

82.

Price

. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 2000; 288: 1769–1772.

83.

Coppola

Bracaglia

Di Lenola

, et al. Lateral inhibition in the somatosensory cortex during and between migraine without aura attacks: Correlations with thalamocortical activity and clinical features. Cephalalgia 2016; 36: 568–578.

84.

Chong

Dodick

Schlaggar

, et al. Atypical age-related cortical thinning in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 1115–1124.

85.

DaSilva

Granziera

Snyder

, et al. Thickening in the somatosensory cortex of patients with migraine. Neurology 2007; 69: 1990–1995.

86.

Celle

Creac'h

Boutet

, et al. Elderly patients with ongoing migraine show reduced gray matter volume in second somatosensory cortex. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2017; 32: 67–74.

87.

Rocca

Ceccarelli

Falini

, et al. Brain gray matter changes in migraine patients with T2-visible lesions: a 3-T MRI study. Stroke 2006; 37: 1765–1770.

88.

Hougaard

Amin

Larsson

, et al. Increased intrinsic brain connectivity between pons and somatosensory cortex during attacks of migraine with aura. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38: 2635–2642.

89.

Hodkinson

Veggeberg

Wilcox

, et al. Primary somatosensory cortices contain altered patterns of regional cerebral blood flow in the interictal phase of migraine. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0137971.

90.

Youssef

Ludwick

Wilcox

, et al. In child and adult migraineurs the somatosensory cortex stands out ... again: An arterial spin labeling investigation. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38: 4078–4087.

91.

Lang

Kaltenhauser

Neundorfer

, et al. Hyperexcitability of the primary somatosensory cortex in migraine--a magnetoencephalographic study. Brain 2004; 127: 2459–2469.

92.

Hsiao

Wang

Lin

, et al. Somatosensory gating is altered and associated with migraine chronification: a magnetoencephalographic study. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 744–753.

93.

Flores

. Occipital lobe morphological anatomy: anatomical and surgical aspects. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002; 60: 566–571.

94.

Maniyar

Sprenger

Schankin

, et al. Photic hypersensitivity in the premonitory phase of migraine--a positron emission tomography study. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21: 1178–1183.

95.

Viana

Sprenger

Andelova

, et al. The typical duration of migraine aura: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 483–490.

96.

Lauritzen

. Pathophysiology of the migraine aura. The spreading depression theory. Brain 1994; 117(Pt 1): 199–210.

97.

Ayata

. Cortical spreading depression triggers migraine attack: pro. Headache 2010; 50: 725–730.

98.

Olesen

. Cerebral and extracranial circulatory disturbances in migraine: pathophysiological implications. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1991; 3: 1–28.

99.

Charles

Hansen

. Migraine aura: new ideas about cause, classification, and clinical significance. Curr Opin Neurol 2015; 28: 255–260.

100.

Coppola

Petolicchio

Di Renzo

, et al. Cerebral gray matter volume in patients with chronic migraine: correlations with clinical features. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 115.

101.

Palm-Meinders

Arkink

Koppen

, et al. Volumetric brain changes in migraineurs from the general population. Neurology 2017; 89: 2066–2074.

102.

Burke

Joutsa

Cohen

, et al. Mapping migraine to a common brain network. Brain 2020; 143: 541–553.

103.

Hansen

Baca

Vanvalkenburgh

, et al. Distinctive anatomical and physiological features of migraine aura revealed by 18 years of recording. Brain 2013; 136: 3589–3595.

104.

Arngrim

Hougaard

Ahmadi

, et al. Heterogenous migraine aura symptoms correlate with visual cortex functional magnetic resonance imaging responses. Ann Neurol 2017; 82: 925–939.

105.

Lisicki

D'Ostilio

Coppola

, et al. Evidence of an increased neuronal activation-to-resting glucose uptake ratio in the visual cortex of migraine patients: a study comparing (18)FDG-PET and visual evoked potentials. J Headache Pain 2018; 19: 49.

106.

Boulloche

Denuelle

Payoux

, et al. Photophobia in migraine: an interictal PET study of cortical hyperexcitability and its modulation by pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 978–984.

107.

Albrecht

Mainero

Ichijo

, et al. Imaging of neuroinflammation in migraine with aura: A [(11)C]PBR28 PET/MRI study. Neurology 2019; 92: e2038–e2050.

108.

Bowyer

Aurora

Moran

, et al. Magnetoencephalographic fields from patients with spontaneous and induced migraine aura. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 582–587.

109.

Bowyer

Mason

Moran

, et al. Cortical hyperexcitability in migraine patients before and after sodium valproate treatment. J Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 22: 65–67.

110.

Watanabe

Kuwabara

Ohkubo

, et al. Elevation of cerebral lactate detected by localized 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in migraine during the interictal period. Neurology 1996; 47: 1093–1095.

111.

Sandor

Dydak

Schoenen

, et al. MR-spectroscopic imaging during visual stimulation in subgroups of migraine with aura. Cephalalgia 2005; 25: 507–518.

112.

Sarchielli

Tarducci

Presciutti

, et al. Functional 1H-MRS findings in migraine patients with and without aura assessed interictally. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 1025–1031.

113.

Zielman

Wijnen

Webb

, et al. Cortical glutamate in migraine. Brain 2017; 140: 1859–1871.

114.

Bridge

Stagg

Near

, et al. Altered neurochemical coupling in the occipital cortex in migraine with visual aura. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 1025–1030.

115.

Siniatchkin

Sendacki

Moeller

, et al. Abnormal changes of synaptic excitability in migraine with aura. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 2207–2216.

116.

Gonzalez de la Aleja

Ramos

Mato-Abad

, et al. Higher glutamate to glutamine ratios in occipital regions in women with migraine during the interictal state. Headache 2013; 53: 365–375.

117.

Hadjikhani

Sanchez Del Rio

, et al.. Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 4687–4692.

118.

Mehnert

Schulte

Timmann

, et al.. Activity and connectivity of the cerebellum in trigeminal nociception. Neuroimage 2017; 150: 112–118.

119.

Kros

Angueyra Aristizabal

Khodakhah

. Cerebellar involvement in migraine. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1782–1791.

120.

Apps

Garwicz

. Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebellar information processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 297–311.

121.

Schutter

van Honk

. An electrophysiological link between the cerebellum, cognition and emotion: frontal theta EEG activity to single-pulse cerebellar TMS. Neuroimage 2006; 33: 1227–1231.

122.

Schmahmann

Caplan

. Cognition, emotion and the cerebellum. Brain 2006; 129: 290–292.

123.

Moulton

Schmahmann

Becerra

, et al.

The cerebellum and pain: passive integrator or active participator?

Brain Res Rev 2010; 65: 14–27.

124.

Moulton

Elman

Pendse

, et al. Aversion-related circuitry in the cerebellum: responses to noxious heat and unpleasant images. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 3795–3804.

125.

Van Ham

Yeo

. Somatosensory trigeminal projections to the inferior olive, cerebellum and other precerebellar nuclei in rabbits. Eur J Neurosci 1992; 4: 302–317.

126.

Bilgic

Kocaman

Arslan

, et al. Volumetric differences suggest involvement of cerebellum and brainstem in chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2016; 36: 301–308.

127.

Bonanno

Lo Buono

De Salvo

, et al. Brain morphologic abnormalities in migraine patients: an observational study. J Headache Pain 2020; 21: 39.

128.

Liu

Lee

Chou

, et al. The cerebellum is associated with 2-year prognosis in patients with high-frequency migraine. J Headache Pain 2020; 21: 29.

129.

Takahashi

Arai

Shimamura

, et al. Autopsy case of acute encephalopathy linked to familial hemiplegic migraine with cerebellar atrophy and mental retardation. Neuropathology 2005; 25: 228–234.

130.

Mehnert

May

. Functional and structural alterations in the migraine cerebellum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019; 39: 730–739.

131.

Hansen

Schytz

Larsen

, et al. Hemiplegic migraine aura begins with cerebral hypoperfusion: imaging in the acute phase. Headache 2011; 51: 1289–1296.

132.

Kellner-Weldon

El-Koussy

Jung

, et al. Cerebellar hypoperfusion in migraine attack: incidence and significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39: 435–440.

133.

Dodick

Roarke

. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis during migraine with prolonged aura: a possible mechanism for cerebellar infarctions. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 83–86.

134.

Kruit

van Buchem

Hofman

, et al. Migraine as a risk factor for subclinical brain lesions. JAMA 2004; 291: 427–434.

135.

Crawford

Konkol

. Familial hemiplegic migraine with crossed cerebellar diaschisis and unilateral meningeal enhancement. Headache 1997; 37: 590–593.

136.

Dichgans

Herzog

Freilinger

, et al. 1H-MRS alterations in the cerebellum of patients with familial hemiplegic migraine type 1. Neurology 2005; 64: 608–613.

137.

Macri

Garreffa

Giove

, et al. Cerebellar metabolite alterations detected in vivo by proton MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21: 1201–1206.

138.

Sandor

Mascia

Seidel

, et al. Subclinical cerebellar impairment in the common types of migraine: a three-dimensional analysis of reaching movements. Ann Neurol 2001; 49: 668–672.

139.

Ishizaki

Mori

Takeshima

, et al. Static stabilometry in patients with migraine and tension-type headache during a headache-free period. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002; 56: 85–90.

140.

Harno

Hirvonen

Kaunisto

, et al..Subclinical vestibulocerebellar dysfunction in migraine with and without aura. Neurology 2003; 61: 1748–1752.

141.

Furman

Sparto

Soso

, et al. Vestibular function in migraine-related dizziness: a pilot study. J Vestib Res 2005; 15: 327–332.

142.

Brighina

Palermo

Panetta

, et al. Reduced cerebellar inhibition in migraine with aura: a TMS study. Cerebellum 2009; 8: 260–266.

143.

Gerwig

Rauschen

Gaul

, et al. Subclinical cerebellar dysfunction in patients with migraine: evidence from eyeblink conditioning. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 904–913.

144.

Eftekhari

Salvatore

Gaspar

, et al. Localization of CGRP receptor components, CGRP, and receptor binding sites in human and rhesus cerebellar cortex. Cerebellum 2013; 12: 937–949.

145.

Warfvinge

Edvinsson

. Distribution of CGRP and CGRP receptor components in the rat brain. Cephalalgia 2019; 39: 342–353.

146.

Ducros

Denier

Joutel

, et al. Recurrence of the T666M calcium channel CACNA1A gene mutation in familial hemiplegic migraine with progressive cerebellar ataxia. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64: 89–98.

147.

Nam

Hockberger

. Analysis of spontaneous electrical activity in cerebellar Purkinje cells acutely isolated from postnatal rats. J Neurobiol 1997; 33: 18–32.

148.

Ophoff

Terwindt

Vergouwe

, et al. Familial hemiplegic migraine and episodic ataxia type-2 are caused by mutations in the Ca2+ channel gene CACNL1A4. Cell 1996; 87: 543–552.

149.

Vincent

Hadjikhani

. The cerebellum and migraine. Headache 2007; 47: 820–833.

150.

Cho

Clark

Rupert

. Visually triggered migraine headaches affect spatial orientation and balance in a helicopter pilot. Aviat Space Environ Med 1995; 66: 353–358.

151.

Charles

Baca

. Cortical spreading depression and migraine. Nat Reviews Neurol 2013; 9: 637–644.

152.

Edvinsson

. The trigeminovascular pathway: role of CGRP and CGRP receptors in migraine. Headache 2017; 57(Suppl 2): 47–55.

153.

Brennan

Pietrobon

. A systems neuroscience approach to migraine. Neuron 2018; 97: 1004–1021.

154.

Burstein

Noseda

Borsook

. Migraine: multiple processes, complex pathophysiology. J Neurosci 2015; 35: 6619–6629.

155.

Hawkins

Moore

Miley

, et al. Secondary traumatic stress increases expression of proteins implicated in peripheral and central sensitization of trigeminal neurons. Brain Res 2018; 1687: 162–172.

156.

Castien

van der Wouden

De Hertogh

. Pressure pain thresholds over the cranio-cervical region in headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2018; 19: 9.

157.

Zhang

Liu

Zhao

, et al. Depression and anxiety behaviour in a rat model of chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 27.

158.

Vaughn

Gold

. Ionic mechanisms underlying inflammatory mediator-induced sensitization of dural afferents. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 7878–7888.

159.

Burstein

Jakubowski

Garcia-Nicas

, et al. Thalamic sensitization transforms localized pain into widespread allodynia. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 81–91.

160.

Qiu

Chen

Koga

, et al. An increase in synaptic NMDA receptors in the insular cortex contributes to neuropathic pain. Sci Signaling 2013; 6: ra34.

161.

Pietrobon

Moskowitz

. Chaos and commotion in the wake of cortical spreading depression and spreading depolarizations. Nat Rev Neurosci 2014; 15: 379–393.

162.

Tozzi

de Iure

Di Filippo

, et al. Critical role of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors in cortical spreading depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 18985–18990.

163.

Parker

Suryavanshi

Melone

, et al. Non-canonical glutamate signaling in a genetic model of migraine with aura. Neuron 2021; 109(4): 611–628.e8.

164.

Tottene

Favero

Pietrobon

. Enhanced thalamocortical synaptic transmission and dysregulation of the excitatory-inhibitory balance at the thalamocortical feedforward inhibitory microcircuit in a genetic mouse model of migraine. J Neurosci 2019; 39: 9841–9851.

165.

Tottene

Conti

Fabbro

, et al. Enhanced excitatory transmission at cortical synapses as the basis for facilitated spreading depression in Ca(v)2.1 knockin migraine mice. Neuron 2009; 61: 762–773.

166.

Romanos

Benke

Pietrobon

, et al. Astrocyte dysfunction increases cortical dendritic excitability and promotes cranial pain in familial migraine. Sci Advances 2020; 6: eaaz1584.

167.

Matsuura

Liu

, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide potentiated the excitatory transmission and network propagation in the anterior cingulate cortex of adult mice. Mol Pain 2019; 15: 1744806919832718.

168.

Liu

Chen

Lee

, et al. Cortical potentiation induced by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the insular cortex of adult mice. Mol Brain 2020; 13: 36.

169.

Mason

Kaiser

Kuburas

, et al. Induction of migraine-like photophobic behavior in mice by both peripheral and central CGRP mechanisms. J Neurosci 2017; 37: 204–216.

170.

Kaiser

Kuburas

Recober

, et al. Modulation of CGRP-induced light aversion in wild-type mice by a 5-HT(1B/D) agonist. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 15439–15449.

Cortical mechanisms in migraine

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Anterior cingulate cortex

Structure and function

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Positron emission tomography

Biochemical neuroimaging

Insular cortex

Structure and function

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Positron emission tomography

Frontal/prefrontal cortex

Structure and function

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Positron emission tomography

Magnetoencephalography

Temporal cortex

Structure and function

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Positron emission tomography

Comorbidity with epilepsy

Parietal cortex

Structure and function

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetoencephalography

Occipital cortex

Structure and function

Migraine aura and CSD theory

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Positron emission tomography

Magnetoencephalography

Biochemical neuroimaging

Cerebellar cortex

Structure and function

Structural neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Positron emission tomography

Biochemical neuroimaging

Migraine and related cerebellar dysfunction

A hypothesis: Long-term plasticity in the cortex contributes to migraine

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References