Abstract
Pain is one of the most prominent symptoms of osteoarthritis. However, there is often discordance between the pain experienced by individuals with osteoarthritis and the degree of articular pathology. This suggests that individual differences, including genetic variability in the central processing of nociceptive stimuli, may impact the presentation of osteoarthritis. Here, we show that the single nucleotide polymorphism rs16868943 in the collagen gene COL11A2 is significantly associated with lowered heat pain tolerance on the arm in participants with knee osteoarthritis (P = 1.21 × 10−6, P = 0.0053 after Bonferroni correction, beta = −3.42). A total of 161 knee osteoarthritis participants were included and evaluated for heat, punctate and pressure pain sensitivity of the affected knee and the ipsilateral arm. Each participant was genotyped for 4392 single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes implicated in pain perception, inflammation and mood and tested for association with pain sensitivity. The minor A allele of single nucleotide polymorphism rs16868943 was significantly associated with lower arm heat pain tolerance after correction for age, gender, race, and study site. This single nucleotide polymorphism was also nominally associated with other measures of heat pain sensitivity, including lowered knee heat pain tolerance (P = 1.14 × 10−5, P = 0.05 after Bonferroni correction), lowered arm heat pain threshold (P = 0.0039, uncorrected) and lowered knee heat pain threshold (P = 0.003, uncorrected). Addition of genotypes from 91 participants without knee pain produced a significant interaction between knee osteoarthritis status and the rs16868943 single nucleotide polymorphism in heat pain tolerance (P = 1.71 × 10−5), such that rs16868943 was not associated with heat pain tolerance in participants without knee pain (P = 0.12, beta = 1.3). This is the first study to show genetic association with heat pain tolerance in individuals with osteoarthritis. The association is specific to participants who have already developed knee osteoarthritis, suggesting that the COL11A2 gene, which has previously been associated with familial osteoarthritis, may play a role in pain sensitization after the development of osteoarthritis.
Keywords
Introduction
Pain is the most common symptom of osteoarthritis (OA), yet the determinants of OA-related pain remain poorly understood. Objective measures of OA severity are at best only modestly associated with pain severity, suggesting that individual differences in pain processing may contribute to OA-related pain. Indeed, heightened experimental pain sensitivity has been observed in participants with knee OA, and experimental pain sensitivity predicts severity of clinical pain in these participants.1–6 Understanding the factors driving heightened pain sensitivity in knee OA could provide clinically relevant information.
The experience of pain is a complex process determined by multiple biological and environmental factors, including genetic influences. The genetic contribution to pain sensitivity has been estimated to be 22–55% in twin studies. 7 Heritability for nociceptive and analgesic sensitivity in mice similarly ranges from 28% to 76%. 8 Several genes have been implicated in increased pain sensitivity in humans. The most-studied gene in pain research is the catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT) gene. COMT polymorphisms and haplotypes have been associated with both experimental pain sensitivity and clinical pain phenotypes. Several other genes have likewise shown associations with experimental pain sensitivity in multiple studies, including OPRM1, 9 GCH1,10,11 MC1R, 12 and SCN9A13,14 and dopamine transporter genes (SLC6A3 and SLC6A4). 15
In OA-related pain, several genes have been associated with clinical pain severity in candidate gene studies. For example, the Val158Met polymorphism in the COMT gene (rs4680) was associated with increased hip OA pain, 16 though a subsequent study failed to observe any association of this single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with knee OA. 17 Also, SNP rs900414 in the PCSK6 gene was associated with protection against pain when radiographic OA was present. 18
Despite these recent advances in our knowledge of genetic contributions to OA, our understanding of genetic factors associated with pain sensitivity in OA remains limited. Previous studies have focused on a few very specific variants in candidate genes, making it difficult to discover potential disease-associated variants outside of the hypotheses. The primary aim of this study is to significantly expand the tested genes and polymorphisms, with the hope to discover new risk genes and alleles for pain sensitivity in OA. To address this aim, we performed an association study including 4392 SNPs in 555 genes implicated in pain, inflammation, and psychiatric disorders. We performed extensive pain phenotyping, including assessment of clinical pain and quantitative sensory testing to assess sensitivity to heat, cold, pressure, and punctate pain. To characterize pain sensitivity at sites remote from the primary painful joint in OA participant, pain sensitivities were assessed not only on the most painful knee (i.e., index knee) but also at body sites outside the index knee.
Material and methods
Study subjects
Recruitment of knee OA participants in the study has been described elsewhere. 19 Briefly, 45- to 85-year-old individuals, who self-identified their race/ethnicity as African American or Non-Hispanic Whites, were enrolled in the study at the University of Florida and University of Alabama at Birmingham. Participants were recruited who screened positive for unilateral or bilateral symptomatic knee OA 20 and physical examination subsequently confirmed knee pain symptoms consistent with a clinical diagnosis of knee OA, regardless of radiographic evidence. At the time of study entry, posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the knees were obtained from all participants, with the knees in a bilateral weight-bearing, fixed-flexion position, as described elsewhere. 21
Participants were excluded if any of the following features were present: (1) prosthetic knee replacement or other clinically significant surgery to the affected knee; (2) uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure >150/95 mm Hg), heart failure, or history of acute myocardial infarction; (3) peripheral neuropathy; (4) systemic rheumatic disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia; (5) daily opioid use; (6) cognitive impairment; or (7) hospitalization for psychiatric illness within the preceding year. Individuals with no knee pain (i.e., controls) met the same inclusion/exclusion criteria, with the exception that they reported no knee pain.
A total of 177 participants with knee OA and 99 participants without knee pain were genotyped. Participants with missing gender, age, race, or study sites were excluded from the analysis. Participants with greater than 10% missing genotype were also excluded. After exclusion criteria were applied, 161 knee OA and 91 participants without knee pain were included in the analysis.
Pain measurement
Pain measurements have been described elsewhere. 19 The index knee here is defined as the most painful knee.
Heat
Heat–pain threshold and tolerance levels were assessed on both the index knee and the ipsilateral ventral forearm, starting at the baseline temperature (32℃) and increasing 0.5℃/s. Participants were instructed to press a button when the sensation “first became painful” (i.e., threshold) and also when they “no longer felt able to tolerate the pain” (i.e., tolerance). The mean temperature from three trials was used for analysis.
Pressure
Pressure–pain thresholds were evaluated at the medial joint line of the index knee as well as the ipsilateral trapezius. For each site, a handheld Medoc digital pressure Algometer (Algomed) was applied at a constant rate of 30 kPa/s. The participant was instructed to press a button when the sensation “first became painful.” An average pressure–pain threshold was determined for each site from three trials. The maximum pressure for the knee site was 600 and 1000 kPa at the ipsilateral trapeziius. If participants did not report pain at the maximum pressure level, the procedure was terminated and a pressure of 600 or 1000 kPa was assigned for that trial.
Punctate
Sensitivity to punctate mechanical stimuli was assessed at the index patella and back of the ipsilateral hand using a nylon monofilament delivering a target force of 300 g. Participants provided verbal pain ratings following a single contact and after 10 contacts, at a rate of 1 contact/s. Ratings were made on a scale of 0 to 100. The procedure was repeated, and the ratings for multiple contacts were averaged for analysis.
Cold sensitivity
Participants placed their right hand into a 12℃ cold water bath for up to 1 min. Participants provided verbal ratings of pain intensity at the end of the immersion on a scale of 0 to 100. If a participant withdrew the hand from the water bath before the 1-min period ended, the pain rating was collected and the withdrawal time was recorded.
Graded Chronic Pain Scale
The Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) evaluates global pain severity and pain-related interference over the past six months and consists of seven items related to pain intensity and pain interference. 22 With a 0–10 numeric rating scale, participants rated the intensity of their current knee pain and the worst and average pain during the past six months. These three items were averaged and multiplied by 10 to generate a GCPS characteristic pain intensity score.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) 23 assesses symptoms of knee OA in the past 48 h. For this study, the 4-point Likert-type scale version was used. The WOMAC yields three subscales, including pain during activities (5 items), stiffness during the day (2 items), and impairments in physical function (17 items), with higher scores indicating worse pain, stiffness, and impairments in physical function.
Genotyping
Knee OA participants and healthy participants were genotyped in the same fashion. At enrollment, whole blood was collected by venipuncture from study participants who provided consent for genotyping. Blood was collected into 5-mL ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid–containing Vacutainer tubes (Beckton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and leukocytes were purified and stored at −80℃. Genomic DNA was purified utilizing protocols based on PureGene Extraction Kits from Qiagen (Germantown, MD). All individuals were genotyped using the Algynomics (Chapel Hill, NC) Pain Research Panel, a dedicated chip-based platform manufactured by Illumina. The panel assesses 4900 SNPs representing 555 genes known to be involved in systems relevant to pain perception (complete list provided in the Supplementary Material 1). DNA sample concentrations were measured with PicoGreen (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and diluted to 50 ng/µl in 96-well plates. These were genotyped using the Algynomics chips, run on an Illumina VeraCode instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA). SNPs were excluded when minor allele frequency was 1% or less, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P < 10−5, and SNP call rate 95% or less. After quality control, a total of 4392 SNPs were included in the analysis.
Statistical analysis
Associations between each phenotype and each individual SNP were tested with PLINK using the additive genetic model in linear regression, 24 with age, sex, study sites, and race as covariates. A similar analysis including weight as an additional covariate was applied to the significantly associated SNP. Bonferroni correction for testing 4392 SNPs was applied to the adjusted P value. The study-wide Bonferroni-corrected statistical significance level was set at P = 1.14 × 10−5. A subanalysis was carried out in Africans Americans and Europeans Americans for heat pain tolerance and threshold. The rs16868943 polymorphism, being the only significant SNP associated with the arm heat tolerance phenotype after Bonferroni correction, was selected for further analysis in participants without knee pain. In this population, a similar association study was carried out between rs16868943 and arm heat tolerance. A subanalysis was carried out in Africans and European Americans. The interaction between the heat pain tolerance in the arm and knee OA phenotype was also tested. Interaction P value was calculated using the linear regression model in PLINK, controlling for age, sex, study sites, and race. The locus plot was generated by LocusZoom. 25 Comparisons of pain measures between knee OA and participants without knee pain were calculated with two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Results
Demographics and pain sensitivity of knee OA and healthy participants.
Participants with knee OA in general have greater pain sensitivity compared to participants without knee pain. P value is calculated from two-tailed student’s t-test.
OA: osteoarthritis.

Heat pain sensitivity by phenotype and genotype. (a) The s16868943 polymorphism is associated with decreased arm heat pain tolerance in participants with knee OA (P = 1.21 × 10−6, P = 0.0053 after Bonferroni correction, beta = −3.42), but not in participants without knee pain; (b) the heat pain tolerance and threshold are broken down by race and genotype in (c–f). The GA genotype is nominally associated with lower heat pain tolerance and threshold in the index knee in African Americans but not in European Americans. *Statistically significant association of s16868943 with the specific phenotype (uncorrected P < 0.05). For a complete listing of uncorrected and corrected P values, please refer to the Results section.
Top SNPs associated with each pain measure.
The study-wide significant P value is set at 1.14 × 10−5 after Bonferroni correction for 4392 SNPs included in the study.
SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.
rs16868943 is associated with decreased heat pain tolerance after Bonferroni correction. Associations of this SNP with each pain measure are included in this table.
Because the minor allele frequency (A allele) of this SNP is higher in African Americans than European Americans, associations with heat pain tolerance/threshold were examined separately by race. Knee OA participants with the GA genotype, compared to the GG genotype, had lower heat pain tolerance/threshold in the ipsilateral arm and ipsilateral leg within both African Americans and European Americans (Figure 1 (c)—(f). Within African Americans, the presence of the A allele was associated with lower heat pain tolerance in the index knee (P = 4.91 × 10−5, corrected P = 0.21, beta = −4.68) and the ipsilateral arm (P = 3.21 × 10−5, corrected P = 0.14, beta = −3.74), and lower heat pain threshold in the index knee (P = 0.0037, corrected P = 1, beta = −3.59) and ipsilateral arm (P = 0.0018, corrected P = 1, beta = −2.90), compared to the G allele. Within European Americans, the A allele was not statistically associated with heat pain tolerance in the index knee (P = 0.91, beta = −0.14), the ipsilateral arm (P = 0.072, beta = −2.38), or heat pain threshold in the index knee (P = 0.77, beta = −2.57) and ipsilateral arm (P = 0.25, beta = −2.09). The P value approached significance for the ipsilateral arm in European Americans, but there was reduced power due to the lower A allele frequency in this population. The direction of the association was the same between European and African Americans, with presence of the A allele related to reduced pain tolerance.
We carried out a follow-up association study between rs16868943 and participants without knee pain, to test whether this polymorphism also is associated with decreased heat pain tolerance in participants without knee pain. The result is shown in Figure 1(b). There was no association found between arm heat pain tolerance and rs16868943 in participants without knee pain (P = 0.12). The data trend was also opposite of that seen in participants with knee OA (beta = 1.3). A subanalysis was carried out in African Americans and European Americans without knee pain (Supplementary Material 2, Figure 1). In African Americans, there was no association between arm heat pain tolerance and the minor allele of rs16868943 (P = 0.31, beta = −0.85). In European Americans, there was a significant association (P = 0.03), but the trend was opposite of that seen in participants with knee OA (beta = 2.68). Because of the discrepancy seen between participants with knee OA and participants without knee pain, we asked whether the genotypes of rs16868943 interact with the presence of knee OA. After controlling for race, gender, age, and study site, a significant interaction was found between the minor allele of rs16868943 and the presence of knee OA (P = 1.71 × 10−5, see Supplementary Material 2, Figure 2 for illustration.). This result suggests that the effect of this polymorphism is dependent upon the development of knee OA. Its effect on pain perception is not present in participants without knee pain.
The genomic structure and P values of SNPs surrounding rs16868943 are shown in Figure 2. The rs16868943 polymorphism is in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) with many local SNPs, but only rs2229784 is included in the study. The rs2229784 polymorphism is a missense mutation (Pro → Thr) variant within the COL11A2 gene. It is associated with lower arm heat pain tolerance at P = 0.00035 (corrected P = 1). This finding implies that the rs16868943 polymorphism, an intron variant in the COL11A2 gene, and the rs2229784 polymorphism, a missense variant in the COL11A2 gene may both play a role in the development of increased pain sensitivity, or that other genetic variants within the haplotype are conferring or contributing to the effect.
Genetic structure around the s16868943 polymorphism. The rs16868943 polymorphism lies in the COL11A2 gene. The rs2229784 polymorphism is a missense mutation (Pro →Thr) in the COL11A2 gene in strong linkage disequilibrium with rs16868943.
Discussion
Pain sensitivity is influenced by multiple individual difference factors, including genetic variability. We hypothesize that natural genetic variations within pain-related genes affect the development of such hypersensitivity in participants with knee OA. Here, we showed that the minor (A) allele of rs16868943 in COL11A2 is significantly associated with lowered arm heat tolerance in participants with knee OA. This SNP is also nominally associated with other measures of heat pain hypersensitivity, including lowered knee heat pain tolerance, lowered arm heat pain threshold, and lowered knee heat pain threshold. Since minor allele frequency is higher in the African American population (7%) compared to the non-Hispanic Whites (1.4%), a race-specific analysis was carried out. The same finding remains significant in African Americans and the trend is similar within non-Hispanic Whites. Furthermore, an association study carried out between rs16868943 and arm heat pain tolerance was found to be non-significant in participants without knee pain.
The rs16868943 SNP is located within an intron of the COL11A2 gene, coding for the protein Collagen Type XI Alpha 2 Chain. This SNP is scored a 5 (TF binding or DNase peak) on RegulomeDB, 30 with unclear functional implication. However, this SNP is in high LD with several SNPs with high regulatory potentials. Over 20 SNPs are in high LD (R2 > 0.7), with these SNPs in the European American and African American population (for details, please see LDProxy using the ASW and CEU population on the LDlink website 31 ). These SNPs may represent potential causative SNPs. Most of these SNPs are within the COL11A2 gene, including the missense variant rs2229784, but some of these SNPs are within other nearby genes, including HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DPB2, and RING1. Therefore, rs16868943 may simply be a proxy for other causative, genetically linked polymorphisms. The A allele of rs16868943 has also been associated with Celiac disease in a GWAS study 32 at a genome-wide significant level (P = 2.06 × 10−11). The clinical significance of such an association is unclear.
The COL11A2 gene has been linked to the development of OA in several studies. A splicing mutation in the gene has been associated with early onset OA. 33 Mutations in COL11A2 have also been associated with Stickler’s syndrome,34,35 a syndrome commonly accompanied with joint pain, stiffness, and inflammation. It is also the disease gene for the autosomal-dominant and recessive forms of osteochondrodysplasia. 36 In animal model, the COL11A2 knock-out mouse shows an increased rate of developing knee OA. 37 COL11A2 has not been associated with OA in several recent GWAS studies,38–40 but its sister gene, COL11A1, has been associated with OA in a meta-analysis of nine genome-wide association studies. 41 Despite these findings, no study to date has suggested the role of COL11A2 in pain perception among individuals with OA. This is the first study to suggest that the A allele of rs16868943, within COL11A2, is associated with increased heat pain sensitivity in participants with knee OA. This finding expands the potential influence of the COL11A2 gene to not just the development of OA but potentially to the development of the widespread painful sensation in participants with OA.
The minor allele frequency of rs16868943 differs among racial populations, being higher in the African American population (7%) than the European Americans (1.4%). African Americans in general have enhanced sensitivity to noxious stimuli, including lower heat pain tolerance compared to their European American counterparts.19,42–44 The higher allele frequency of this polymorphism in African Americans may partially contribute to their lower pain tolerance compared to European Americans. Despite the higher allele frequency, our analysis showed that African Americans still displayed higher pain sensitivity and clinical pain levels after controlling for the rs16868943 genotype. This finding suggests that there are factors other than the rs16868943 genotype causing the lower pain tolerance within African Americans, whether it be other genetic or environmental factors.
The mechanism by which COL11A2 gene produces heightened heat pain sensitivity in people with knee OA is unclear. One possibility is that COL11A2 is related to the pathology of OA and heightened pain sensitivity is the indirect consequence of the chronic OA disease. However, multiple GWAS studies have failed to show an association of COL11A2 with OA, which argues against COL11A2 as a causative OA gene. Perhaps the effect of COL11A2 is somehow activated by the genetic predispositions of those who developed knee OA. This is consistent with the significant interaction in heat pain sensitivity between the presence of knee OA and the genotype of rs16868943, suggesting that this polymorphism does not play a role in heat pain until knee OA has developed. Given that COL11A1, a sister gene of COL11A2, has been found to be associated with OA in a recent meta-analysis, one possible genetic explanation is that COL11A1 and COL11A2 may be working in concert in increasing heat pain sensitivity. Unfortunately, COL11A1 was not included in our study so this hypothesis could not be addressed. Another interesting observation is that COL11A2 solely affects heat pain sensitivity and thresholds but not other clinical or experimental pain measures. The reason behind such a difference is again unclear. COL11A2 may be only involved in the transduction pathway of heat pain 45 but not pathways involving cold, punctuate, or pressure pain.
Central pain sensitization has been hypothesized as one of the mechanisms producing pain in individuals with OA. Quantitative sensory studies indicated that OA individuals are more sensitive to experimental pain stimuli than healthy individuals, particularly among individuals with high levels of clinical pain.26–29 Notably, the increased pain sensitivity is not only present at sites close to the affected knee 29 but also at sites remote from the primary painful joint, including the forehead 46 and the arms.29,47 Within our study, the rs16868943 polymorphism of COL11A2 conferred decreased heat pain tolerance and threshold in both the ipsilateral arm and knee. This indicates that the effect of COL11A2 on heat pain responses is widespread and not just limited to the ipsilateral knee. Such an observation suggests the possible role of COL11A2 in producing wide-spread pain sensitization in knee OA.
There are several limitations to this study. First, the findings are limited to the genes and SNPs included in this study. Second, all the experimental tasks were acute, controlled painful experiences. Given the artificial nature of the experimental procedures, the outcomes may have limited practical utility. However, several studies have shown the relevance of using experimental pain induction procedures to predict clinical pain1–6 In addition, our sample size was relatively small for a candidate gene study, especially given the low minor allele frequency of rs16868943 in non-Hispanic whites. Thus, replication of these findings in a larger sample is needed. Another limitation is that because it is a retrospective study, it is difficult to know whether the participants developed higher pain sensitivities after developing knee OA. A prospective study is needed to more confidently conclude that the rs16868943 A allele, or related haplotype, is associated with increased pain sensitivity before and after onset of knee OA. Because this study was initially designed to examine ethnic differences, roughly half of the participants were African American and half were European Americans. Although self-reported ethnicity was controlled in the linear regression analysis, underlying population stratification may have confounded the outcome.
These limitations notwithstanding, our findings indicate that the rs16868943 polymorphism in the COL11A2 gene may be a marker for increased heat pain sensitivity in participants with knee OA. Additional research is warranted to replicate and expand this finding.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by NIH/NIA Grant Numbers R37AG033906 (awarded to both the University of Florida and the University of Alabama at Birmingham) and K07AG046371 (RBF), and K99AG052642 (EJB). The research was also supported by NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards UL1TR001417 (University of Alabama at Birmingham) and UL1TR001427 (University of Florida). Dr. Emily Bartley received support from the National Institutes of Health (K99AG052642). KTS is funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, K23AR062099.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
