This study explored the thoughts of emerging adults with Down syndrome on quality of life and subjective well-being. Eight 22-year-olds participated in interviews. Data was analysed with content analysis. Four themes were revealed: Work based on interest and capability, having an active and social leisure life, a safe place to live and the use of information and communication technology. Two context related patterns were identified showing that quality of life and subjective well-being were related to individualised support to enhance independency in work, social leisure and place of living. Knowledge of their perception of independency and their awareness of needing customised help and support is valuable. This study supports the proposed emerging Quality of Life Supports Paradigm in the field of intellectual disabilities, which integrates key concepts of quality of life and supports.
Alfredsson ÅgrenKKjellbergAHemmingssonH (2020) Access to and use of the Internet among adolescents and young adults with intellectual disabilities in everyday settings. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability45: 89–98.
2.
ArnettJJ (2007) Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for?Child Development Perspectives1: 68–73.
3.
BarlottTAplinTCatchpoleE, et al. (2020) Connectedness and ICT: opening the door to possibilities for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities24: 503–521.
4.
CamfieldLSkevingtonSM (2008) On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology13: 764–775.
5.
CatonSChapmanM (2016) The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability41: 125–139.
6.
ChadwickDDFullwoodC (2018) An online life like any other: identity, self-determination, and social networking among adults with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking21: 56–64.
7.
D’HaemJ (2008) Special at school but lonely at home: an alternative friendship group for adolescents with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice12: 107–111.
8.
DarcySMaxwellHGreenJ (2016) Disability citizenship and independence through mobile technology? A study exploring adoption and use of a mobile technology platform. Disability & Society31: 497–519.
9.
DolvaA-SKleivenJKollstadM (2014) Actual leisure of Norwegian adolescents with Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities18: 159–175.
10.
EllingsenKE (2010) Begrensninger og forskningsmetodiske kneiker. In: GjærumRG (ed.) Usedvanlig kvalitativ forskning [Unusual qualitative research]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 209–240.
11.
EsbensenASeltzerMGreenbergJ (2007) Factors predicting mortality in midlife adults with and without Down syndrome living with family. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research51: 1039–1050.
12.
FinlayWMLLyonsE (2001) Methodological issues in interviewing and using self-report questionnaires with people with mental retardation. Psychological Assessments13: 319–335.
13.
FlynnM (1986) Adults who are mentally handicapped as consumers: issues and guidelines for interviewing. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research30: 369–377.
14.
FoleyKDykePGirdlerS, et al. (2012) Young adults with intellectual disability transitioning from school to post-school: a literature review framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation34: 1747–1764.
15.
FolkestadH (2000) Getting the picture: photo-assisted conversations as interviews. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research2: 3–20.
16.
ForteMJahodaADagnanD (2011) An anxious time? Exploring the nature of worries experienced by young people with a mild to moderate intellectual disability as they make the transition to adulthood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology50: 398–411.
17.
GómezLESchalockRLVerdugoMA (2021) A new paradigm in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: characteristics and evaluation. Psicothema33: 28–35.
18.
GraneheimUHLundmanB (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today24: 105–112.
19.
JahodaAKempJRiddellS, et al. (2008) Feelings about work: a review of the socio-emotional impact of supported employment on people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities21: 1–18.
20.
KittelsaaAM (2008) Et ganske normalt liv [A fairly normal life]. Trondheim: Norges tekniske høgskole.
21.
KittelsaaAM (2010) En dobbel utfordring - å intervjue unge med en utviklingshemming. In: GjærumRG (ed.) Usedvanlig kvalitativ forskning [Unusual qualitative research]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 162–189.
22.
KocmanAWeberG (2018) Job satisfaction, quality of work life and work motivation in employees with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities31: 1–22.
23.
KollstadM (2008) Klare seg selv? Faglige utfordringer i arbeid med unge funksjonshemmede [Independent? Professional challenges in working with young disabled]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2009) Interview. Introduktion til et håndværk. København: Hans Reitzel.
26.
MidjoTAuneKE (2018) Identity constructions and transition to adulthood for young people with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities22: 33–48.
27.
NOU (2016:17) På lik linje [In the same line). Barne- og familiedepartementet.
28.
RobertsonJBeyerSEmersonE, et al. (2019) The association between employment and the health of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities32: 1335–1348.
29.
SamfunnsanalyseP (2016) Arbeidssituasjonen for personer med utviklingshemming [Working situation for persons with intellectual disabilities]. Oslo: Proba Samfunnsanalyse.
30.
SauerALParksAHeynPC (2010) Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology5: 377–391.
31.
SchuellerSMSeligmanME (2010) Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology5: 253–263.
32.
ScottMFoleyKRBourkeJ, et al. (2014) “I have a good life”: the meaning of well-being from the perspective of young adults with Down syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation36: 1290–1298.
33.
SolishAPerryAMinnesP (2010) Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities23: 226–236.
34.
TiptonLA (2011) A Study of the Friendship Quality in Adolescents With and Without Disability. California: University of California, Riverside.
VERBI (2014) MAXQDA Berlin: Consult. Sozialforschung: Consult. Sozialforschung.
37.
VerdugoMNavasPGómezL, et al. (2012) The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research56: 1036–1045.
38.
WendelborgCKittelsaaAMVikSE (2017) Overgang skole arbeidsliv for elever med utviklingshemming [Transition from school to work for pupils with intellectual disabilities]. Trondheim: NTNU Samfunnsforskning, Mangfold og inkludering.
39.
WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
40.
WitsøAEKittelsaaAM (2018) Active adult lives for persons with learning disabilities – the perspectives of professionals. British Journal of Learning Disabilities46: 10–16.
