This review aimed to examine the perceptions of parents, professionals and informal network members regarding support needs of parents with intellectual disabilities (ID). In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, five databases were systematically searched and 19 qualitative studies were reviewed using thematic analyses. No data were available on the perceptions of the informal social network. Data on parents and professionals were categorized in four themes (type of support, sources of support, conditions of successful support and characteristics of support members). Data from professionals did not refer to emotional support needs or to the potential support of volunteers, friends and neighbours. Data from parents indicated a preference to be treated as ‘full’ parents, whereas professionals tended to focus on disabilities of parents. Results and implications contribute to insights into support needs of parents with ID from different perspectives and may help identify new entry points to improve future interventions and working alliances.
AunosMPachecoL (2013) Changing perspective: workers’ perceptions of inter-agency collaboration with parents with an intellectual disability. Parents with Disabilities in Child Welfare7: 658–674.
2.
BoothTBoothW (1999) Parents together: action research and advocacy support for parents with learning difficulties. Health & Social Care in the Community7: 464–474.
3.
BoothTBoothW (2005) Parents with learning difficulties in the child protection system: experiences and perspectives. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities9: 109–129.
4.
BoothTBoothW (2006) The uncelebrated parent: stories of mothers with learning difficulties caught in the child protection net. British Journal of Learning Disabilities34: 94–102.
5.
CalderonRGreenbergMT (2010) Challenges to parents and professionals in promoting socioemotional development in deaf children. In: SpencerPEErtingCMarscharkM. (eds) The Deaf Child in the Family and at School. Didcot: Taylor & Francis e-Library, pp. 167–186.
6.
CollingsSLlewellynG (2012) Children of parents with intellectual disability: facing poor outcomes or faring okay?Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability37: 65–82.
7.
ConderJMirfin-VeitchBSandersJ (2008) ‘I’ve got to think of him…’: relationships between parents with an intellectual disability and foster parents. Developing Practice21: 17–25.
8.
DarbyshireLVStenfert KroeseB (2012) Psychological well-being and social support for parents with intellectual disabilities: risk factors and interventions. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities9: 40–52.
9.
EmbregtsPJCM (2011) Zien, bewogen worden, in beweging komen [See, be moved, start moving]. Tilburg, The Netherland: Tilburg University.
10.
FeldmanMA (1994) Parenting education for parents with intellectual disabilities: a review of outcome studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities15: 299–332.
11.
Forrester-JonesRCarpenterJCoolen-SchrijnerP, et al. (2006) The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities19, 285–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00263.x.
12.
GoodingeS (2000) A Jigsaw of Services. Inspection of services to support disabled adults in their parenting roles. UK: Department of Health.
13.
GouldSDoddK (2014) ‘Normal people can have a child but disability can’t’: the experiences of mothers with mild learning disabilities who have had their children removed. British Journal of Learning Disabilities42: 27–37.
14.
HastingsRPRemingtonB (1994) Rules of engagement: Toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 279–298.
15.
JonesN (2013) Good enough parents? Exploring attitudes of family centre workers supporting and assessing parents with learning difficulties. Practice25: 169–190.
16.
KazakAE (1989) Families of chronically ill children: a systems and social-ecological model of adaptation and challenge. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology57: 25–30.
17.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. The BMJ339: b2700.
18.
LlewellynG (1995) Relationships and social support: views of parents with mental retardation/intellectual disability. Mental Retardation33: 349–363.
19.
LlewellynG (1997) Parents with intellectual disability learning to parent: the role of experience and informal learning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education44: 243–261.
20.
LlewellynGHindmarshG (2015) Parents with intellectual disability in a population context. Current Developmental Disorders Reports2: 119–126.
21.
McConnellDLlewellynGByeR (1997) Providing services for parents with intellectual disability: parent needs and service constraints. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability22: 5–17.
22.
McGheeJHunterS (2011) The Scottish children’s hearings tribunals system: a better forum for parents with learning disabilities?The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law33: 255–266.
23.
MacIntyreGStewartA (2012) For the record: the lived experience of parents with a learning disability – a pilot study examining the Scottish perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities40: 5–14.
24.
MayesRLlewellynG (2012) Mothering differently: narratives of mothers with intellectual disability whose children have been compulsorily removed. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability37: 121–130.
25.
MayesRLlewellynGMcConnellD (2008) Active negotiation: mothers with intellectual disabilities creating their social support networks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability21: 341–350.
26.
MeppelderMHodesMKefS, et al. (2014) Expecting change: mindset of staff supporting parents with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities35: 3260–3268.
27.
PaceRPluyePBarlettG, et al. (2012) Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies49: 47–53.
28.
Pixa-KettnerU (1999) Follow-up study on parenting with intellectual disability in Germany. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability24: 75–93.
29.
PluyePGagnonMPGriffithsF, et al. (2009) A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies46: 529–546.
30.
PluyePRobertECargoM, et al. (2011) Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Montreal: McGill University. Available at: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com(accessed 23 September 2018).
31.
RawlsJ (1999) A Theory of Justice (revised ed). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
SchalockRL (2004) The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203–216. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x.
33.
SchuengelCKefSHodesMW, et al. (2017) Parents with intellectual disability. Current Opinion in Psychology15: 50–54.
34.
StarkeM (2010) Encounters with professionals: views and experiences of mothers with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities14: 9–19.
35.
StarkeM (2011) Supporting families with parents with intellectual disability: views and experiences of professionals in the field. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities8: 163–171.
36.
Stenfert KroeseBSHusseinHCliffordC, et al. (2002) Social support networks and psychological well-being of mothers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities15: 324–340.
37.
StrikeRMcConnellD (2002) Look at me, listen to me, I have something important to say. Sexuality and Disability20: 53–63.
38.
TarletonBWardL (2007) ‘Parenting with support’: the views and experiences of parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities4: 194–202.
ThomasJHardenA (2008) Methods for thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology8: 45.
41.
ThompsonJRBradleyVBuntinxWHE, et al. (2009) Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities47: 135–146.
42.
TraustadóttirRSigurjónsdóttirHB (2008) The ‘mother’ behind the mother: three generations of mothers with intellectual disabilities and their family support networks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities21: 331–340.
43.
United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations, 2006.
44.
UngarM (2009) Overprotective parenting: helping parents provide children the right amount of risk and responsibility. The American Journal of Family Therapy37: 258–271.
45.
Van Asselt-GovertsAEEmbregtsPJCMHendriksAHC (2013) Structural and functional characteristics of the social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1280–1288. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.012.
46.
Van Asselt-GovertsAEEmbregtsPJCMHendriksAHC (2015) Social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities: characteristics, satisfaction, wishes and quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research59: 450–461.
47.
WadeCLlewellynGMatthewsJ (2011). Modeling contextual influences on parents with intellectual disability and their children. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities6: 419–437.
48.
WadeCMMildonRLMatthewsJM (2007) Service delivery to parents with an intellectual disability: family-centred or professionally centred?Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities20: 87–98.
49.
WalshDDowneS (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing50: 204–211.
50.
WilsonSMcKenzieKQuayleE, et al. (2013) The postnatal support needs of mothers with an intellectual disability. Midwifery29: 592–598.
