Intellectual disability is commonly conceptualised as stigmatised identity; however, within the literature, the notion of a damaged identity is contested. The aim of this research was to explore the social construction of intellectual disability from the perspective of staff who work closely with people with intellectual disabilities. Informed by a contextualist perspective, this research was based on interviews with five staff members of an advocacy agency in a regional area of Australia. Causal layered analysis was used to deconstruct the interview data. Analysis of the interactions that emerged across the causal layers revealed a complex dynamic of world views, which served to dehumanise people with intellectual disabilities and blame them for their own fate (victim blaming). For transformative change to occur, understandings of the ‘problems’ of intellectual disability must be reformulated and those social structures and processes that support the relationship between the powerful and the powerless must be challenged.
BeartSHardyGBuchanL (2004) Changing selves: a grounded theory account of belonging to a self-advocacy group for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities17: 91–100.
2.
BeartSHardyGBuchanL (2005) How people with intellectual disabilities view their social identity: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities18: 47–56.
3.
BishopBJDzidicPL (2014) Dealing with wicked problems: conducting a causal layered analysis of complex social psychological issues. American Journal of Community Psychology53: 13–24.
4.
BoxallKJonesMSmithS (2002) Advocacy and parents with earning difficulties: even when you’ve got an advocate social services still always do what’s easiest for them. In: RaceDG (ed) Learning Disability: A Social Approach. London: Routledge. pp.171–188.
5.
ChapmanR (2014) An exploration of the self-advocacy support role through collaborative research: there should never be a them and us. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities27: 44–53.
6.
ChappellAL (1992) Toward a sociological critique of the normalisation principle. Disability, Handicap & Society7: 35–51.
7.
CreswellJW (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
8.
CrockerJMajorB (1989) Social stigma and self-esteem: the self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review96: 608–630.
9.
CrowL (1996) Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In: MorrisJ (ed) Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London: The Women’s Press, pp. 206–226.
10.
CulhamANindM (2003) Deconstructing normalisation: clearing the way for inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability28: 65–78.
11.
DaviesCAJenkinsR (1997) She has different fits to me: how people with learning difficulties see themselves. Disability & Society12: 95–109.
12.
DorozenkoKPBishopBJRobertsLD (in press) Fumblings and faux pas: Reflections on engaging in participatory research with people with intellectual disabilities.
13.
Dudley-MarlingC (2004) The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities37: 482–489.
14.
EmersonE (2007) Poverty and people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews13: 107–113.
15.
EmersonEHattonC (2008) Socioeconomic disadvantage, social participation and networks and the self-rated health of English men and women with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities: cross sectional survey. The European Journal of Public Health18: 31–37.
16.
FarmerTWFarmerEMZ (1996) Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: social networks and homophily. Exceptional Children62: 431–450.
17.
FineM (1986) Contextualizing the study of social injustice. In: SaksMJSaxeL (eds) Advances in Applied social Psychology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 103–126.
18.
FineMAschA (1988) Disability beyond stigma: social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues44: 3–21.
19.
FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppresssed. New York: Seabury.
20.
FurnhamA (1995) The just world, charitable giving and attitudes to disability. Personality and Individual Differences19: 577–583.
21.
GabelSPetersS (2004) Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability & Society19: 585–600.
22.
GergenKJ (1985) The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist40: 266–275.
23.
GergenKJ (1990) Social understanding and the inscription of self. In: SiglerJWShwederRAHerdtG (eds) Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 569–606.
24.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoilt Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
25.
GoodleyD (2000) Self-Advocacy in the Lives of People with Learning Difficulties: The Politics of Resilience. Buckingham: Open University Press.
26.
GoodleyD (2001) Learning difficulties, the social model of disability and impairment: challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society16: 207–231.
27.
HastingsRP (2010) Support staff working in intellectual disability services: the importance of relationships and positive experiences. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability35: 207–210.
28.
HattonCEmersonE (2010) Staff in services for people with learning disabilities: an overview of current issues. Mental Handicap Research8: 215–219.
29.
InayatullahS (1998) Causal layered analysis: poststructuralism as method. Futures30: 815–829.
30.
InayatullahS (2004) Causal layered analysis: theory, historical context, and case studies. In: InayatullahS (ed) The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) Reader. Taiwan: Tamkang University.
31.
InayatullahS (2005) Causal Layered Analysis: Deepening the Future. Taiwan: Tamkang University Press.
32.
JaegerMERosnowRL (1988) Contextualism and its implications for psychological inquiry. British Journal of Psychology79: 63–75.
33.
JahodaAMarkovaI (2004) Coping with social stigma: people with intellectual disabilities moving from institutions and family home. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research48: 719–729.
34.
JostJTBanajiMR (1994) The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology33: 1–27.
35.
JostJTHunyadyO (2005) Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science14: 260–265.
36.
KielhofnerG (2005) Rethinking disability and what to do about it: disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy59: 487–496.
37.
LernerMJ (1980) The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
McconkeyRCollinsS (2010) The role of support staff in promoting the social inclusion of persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research54: 691–700.
40.
McmanusJL (2010) The effects of appearance and intellectual disability identification on perceptions of and affective and behavioral intentions toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. Master’s dissertation, Kansas State University, USA.
41.
McvillyKRStancliffeRJParmenterTR. (2006) I get by with a little help from my friends: adults with intellectual disability discuss loneliness. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities19: 191–203.
42.
McvittieCGoodallKEMckinlayA (2008) Resisting having learning disabilities by managing relative abilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities36: 256–262.
43.
MillerECooperSCookA. (2008) Outcomes important to people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities5: 150–158.
44.
OliverMJ (1999) Capitalism, disability, and ideology: a materialist critique of the normalization principle. In: FlynnRJLemayRA (eds) A Quarter Century of Normalization and Social Role Valorization: Evolution and Impact. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. pp. 163–174.
45.
PatelN (2003) Clinical psychology: reinforcing inequalities or facilitating empowerment?The International Journal of Human Rights7: 16–39.
46.
PeterD (2002) Better and worse: overview of formal advocacy for people with intellectual disabilities in Australia. In: GrayBJacksonR (eds) Advocacy and Learning Disability. pp. 206–223. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
47.
PoveeKBishopBJRobertsLD (2014) The use of photovoice with people with intellectual disabilities: Reflections, challenges and opportunities. Disability & Society, 29: 893–907.
48.
PrilleltenskyI (1989) Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist44: 795–802.
49.
RaceDBoxallKCarsonI (2005) Towards a dialogue for practice: reconciling social role valorization and the social model of disability. Disability & Society20: 507–521.
50.
RapleyM (2004) The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RappaportJ (1977) Community Psychology: Values, Research, And Action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52.
RyanW (1971) Blaming the Victim. New York: Pantheon Books.
53.
SciorK (2011) Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities32: 2164–2182.
54.
SimonsKCarterJ (1992) ‘Sticking Up for Yourself’: Self-advocacy and People With Learning Difficulties. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
55.
SzivosSGriffithsE (1992) Coming to terms with learning difficulties: the effects of groupwork and group processes on stigmatised identity. In: WaitmanAConboy-HillS (eds) Psychotherapy and Mental Handicap. London: Sage Publications. pp. 59–80.
56.
ThomasA (2000) Stability of Tringo’s hierarchy of preference toward disability groups: 30 years later. Psychological Reports86: 1155–1156.
57.
ThomasC (2004) How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society19: 569–583.
58.
ToddSShearnJ (1997) Family dilemmas and secrets: parents’ disclosure of information to their adult offspring with learning disabilities. Disability & Society12: 341–366.
59.
VailDJ (1966) Dehumanization and the Institutional Career. Springfield: Charles C Thomas.
60.
Van Asselt-GovertsAEmbregtsPHendriksA (2013) Structural and functional characteristics of the social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities34: 1280–1288.
61.
WagnerRK (2000) Practical intelligence. In: SternbergRJ (ed) Handboook of Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 245–264.
62.
WolfensbergerW (1975) The Origin and Nature of Our Institutional Models. Syracuse: Human Policy Press.
63.
WolfensbergerW (1998) A Brief Introduction to Social Role Valorization: A High-order Concept for Addressing the Plight of Societally Devalued People and for Structuring Human Services, 3rd revised edition. Syracuse: Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership & Change Agentry, Syracuse University.
64.
WolfensbergerW (2000) A brief overview of social role valorization. Mental Retardation38: 105–123.
