We analyzed incidence and implementation patterns of physical restraint (PR) among 448 adults with intellectual disability within community-based day habilitation programs and group homes. PR was implemented exclusively as a consequence for self-harming, aggressive, and environmentally disruptive behaviors. Less than 10% of adults received PR and more than 90% of documented restraints occurred as a planned intervention procedure. Several adults accounted for the majority of PR. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Cunningham J., McDonnell A., Easton S. and Sturmey P. ( 2003) Social validation data on three methods of physical restraint: views of consumers, staff, and students. Research in Developmental Disabilities24: 307-316.
2.
Emerson E., Robertson J., Gregory N., Hatton C., Kessissoglou S., Hallam A. and Hillery J. ( 2000) Treatment and management of challenging behaviors in residential settings. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities13: 197-215.
3.
Favell JE, McGimsey JF and Jones ML ( 1978) The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis11: 225-241.
4.
Federal Statutes, Regulations, and Policies Governing the ICF/MR program ( 2003) Retrieved from http://cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/icfmr/icfregs.asp .
5.
Hagermoser-Sanetti LM and Kratochwill TR ( 2008) Treatment integrity in behavioral consultation: measurement, promotion, and outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy4: 95-114.
6.
Harris J. ( 1996) Physical restraint procedures for managing challenging behaviors presented by mentally retarded adults and children. Research in Developmental Disabilities17: 99-134.
7.
Hill J. and Spreat S. ( 1987) Staff injury rates associated with the implementation of contingent restraint. Mental Retardation25: 141-145.
8.
Kleinmann AE, Luiselli JK, DiGennaro FD, Pace GM, Langone SR and Cochran C (2009) Systems-level assessment of interobserver agreement (IOA) for implementation of protective holding (therapeutic restraint) in a behavioral healthcare setting. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities21: 473-483.
9.
Luiselli JK(2009) Physical restraint of people with intellectual disability: a review of implementation and reduction procedures. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities22: 126-134.
10.
Luiselli JK ( 2011) Therapeutic implementation of physical restraint. In: Luiselli JK (ed.) Handbook of High-Risk Challenging Behaviors: Assessment and Intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.
11.
Matson JL and Boisjoli JA(2009) Restraint procedures and challenging behaviors in intellectual disability: an analysis of causative factors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities22: 111-117.
12.
Reed DD, Fienup DM, Luiselli JK and Pace GM (2010) Performance improvement in behavioral healthcare: collateral effects of planned treatment observations as an applied example of scheduled induced responding. Behavior Modification34: 367-385.
13.
Sturmey P. ( 1999) Correlates of restraint use in an institutional population . Research in Developmental Disabilities20: 339-346.
14.
Sturmey P.(2009) It is time to reduce and safely eliminate restrictive behavioral practices . Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities22: 105-110.
15.
Sturmey P. and McGlynn AP ( 2003) Restraint reduction. In: Allen D (ed.) Ethical Approaches to Physical Interventions: Responding to Challenging Behaviour in People with Intellectual Disabilities. Plymouth: BILD, 203-218.
16.
Williams DE(2009) Restraint safety: an analysis of injuries related to restraint of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities22: 135-139.
