The objective was to gain a deeper insight into the lived experiences of parents during antenatal testing for Down syndrome and the subsequent birth of their baby. A phenomenological research inquiry used unstructured interviews and thematic framework analysis. Conversations between parents and midwives about Down syndrome, when they occurred, were brief, functional and had a biomedical problem orientation. Antenatal screening failed to meet parents’ expectations of better preparation for birth. After birth, children’s ‘differentness’ rather than health needs was the main focus of care interventions. The inquiry revealed the ‘invisibility’ of the potential child with Down syndrome. Professionals in maternity care services must be equipped with appropriate knowledge about Down syndrome in order to better support parents. Such preparation must include a balanced view of the future of the child, consistent with the principle of reproductive autonomy. Appropriate support after birth is also essential in helping parents to adapt to their new situation.
Alderson, P. ( 2001) ‘Prenatal Screening, Ethics and Down’s Syndrome: A Literature Review’, Nursing Ethics, 8 (4).
2.
Barr, O. & McConkey, R. ( 2007) ‘A Different Type of Appointment: The Experience of Parents Who Have Children with Intellectual Disabilities Referred for Genetic Investigation’, Journal of Research in Nursing, 12 (6): 637-52.
3.
Benner, P. ( 1994) Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring, and Ethics in Health and Illness. London: Sage.
4.
Bewley, S. ( 1994) Prenatal Diagnosis. London: Chapman and Hall.
5.
Bramwell, R. & Carter, D. ( 2001) ‘An Exploration of Midwives’ and Obstetricians’ Knowledge of Genetic Screening in Pregnancy and Their Perception of Appropriate Counselling’, Midwifery, 17: 133-41.
6.
Bryant, L.D., Green, J.M. & Hewison, J. ( 2006) ‘Understandings of Down’s Syndrome: A Q Methodological Investigation’, Social Science & Medicine, 1188-1200.
7.
Clarke, A. ( 1997) ‘The Process of Genetic Counselling: Beyond Non-Directive Counselling’, in P. S. Harper & A. J. Clarke (eds), Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice. Oxford: Oxford Scientific.
8.
Colaizzi, P.F. ( 1978) ‘Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology’ , in R. S. Valle & M. King (eds), Existential- Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Creswell, J.W. ( 1997) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Department of Health (1993) Changing Childbirth. Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO.
11.
Department of Health (1998) ‘Free Fast Food for Babies’. www.dh.gov.uk/publications , accessed 14 November 2006.
12.
Down’s Syndrome Association (2006) Pregnancy and Birth: Experiences of Parents Who Have a Child with Down’s Syndrome. London: DSA.
13.
Edwards, A. & Bastian, H. ( 2002) ‘Risk Communication: Making Evidence Part of Patient Choices’, in A. Edwards & G. Elwyn (eds), Evidence-Based Patient Choice: Inevitable or Impossible?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Edwins, J. ( 2000) ‘From a Different Planet: Women Who Choose to Continue Their Pregnancy after a Diagnosis of Down’s Syndrome’ , Practising Midwife, 3 (4): 21-24.
15.
Farsides, B., Williams, C. & Alderson, P. ( 2004) ‘Aiming towards "Moral Equilibrium": Health Care Professionals’ Views on Working within the Morally Contested Field of Antenatal Screening’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30: 505-9.
16.
Fisher, P. & Goodley, D. ( 2007) ‘The Linear Medical Model of Disability; Mothers of Disabled Babies with Counter-Narratives’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 29 (1): 66-81.
17.
Garcia, J., Redshaw, M., Fitzsimons, B. & Keene, J. ( 1998) First Class Delivery: A National Survey of Women’s Views of Maternity Care. London: Audit Commission.
18.
Geertz, C. ( 1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic.
19.
Gilligan, C. ( 1980) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Part 1: Woman’s Place in Man’s Life Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Glover, J. ( 2006) Choosing Children: Genes, Disability and Design . Oxford: Clarendon.
21.
Goodey, C.F. ( 1991) Living in the Real World: Families Speak about Down’s Syndrome. London: Twenty One.
22.
Green, J.M. & Richards, M.P.M. ( 1993) ‘Psychological Aspects of Fetal Screening and the New Genetics’, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology , 11 (1-2).
23.
Green, J.M., Hewison, J., Bekker, H.L., Bryant, L.D. & Cuckle, H.S.( 2004) ‘Psychological Aspects of Genetic Screening of Pregnant Women and Newborns: A Systematic Review’, Health Technology Assessment, 8 (33).
24.
Harcombe, J. & Fairgrieve, S. ( 2004) National Training Needs Analysis for Antenatal Screening Services across England. UK National Screening Committee. London: NICE, NHS.
25.
Kirkham, M. & Stapleton, H. ( 2001) Informed Choice in Maternity Care:An Evaluation of Evidence Based Leaflets. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. CRD Report 20. York: University of York.
26.
Kvale, S. ( 1996) InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing . London: Sage.
27.
Marteau, T.M. ( 1998) ‘Psychological Responses to Genetic Testing’ , British Medical Journal, 693-696.
28.
Marteau, T.M. & Dormandy, E. ( 2001) ‘Facilitating Informed Choice in Prenatal Testing: How Well Are We Doing?’, American Journal of Medicine and Genetics, 106 (3): 185-90.
29.
Marteau, T.M., Dormandy, E. & Michie, S. ( 2001) ‘A Measure of Informed Choice’, Health Expectations, 4 (2): 99-108.
30.
Merleau-Ponty, M. ( 1962) The Phenomenology of Perception. London : Routledge Kegan Paul.
31.
Michael, J. ( 2008) Healthcare for All: Report of the Independent Inquiry into Access to Healthcare for People with Learning Disabilities. http://www.iahpld.org.uk/Healthcare_final.pdf, accessed 17 April 2009.
32.
Michie, S., Marteau, T.M. & Bobrow, M. ( 1997) ‘Genetic Counselling: the Psychological Impact of Meeting Patients’ Expectations’, Journal of Medical Genetics, 34: 237-41.
33.
Michie, S., Smith, D. & Marteau, T.M. ( 1999) ‘Prenatal Tests: How Are Women Deciding?’ , Prenatal Diagnosis, 19: 743-8.
National Screening Committee. (1998) First Report. London: NHS and Department of Health.
36.
National Screening Committee (2004) The National Down’s Syndrome Screening Programme for England. Annual Programme Report 2002/2003. London: NHS and Department of Health.
37.
O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. & Walters, S.J. ( 2002) ‘Women’s Perceptions of Informed Choice in Maternity Care’, Midwifery18: 136-44.
38.
Oiler, C. ( 1982) ‘The Phenomenological Approach in Nursing Research’ , Nursing Research Journal, 31 (3): 178-81.
39.
Parkington, K.J. ( 2002) ‘Maternal Responses to the Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities in Children: A Qualitative Study Using a Focus Group Approach’ , Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6 (2): 163-73.
40.
Rapp, R. ( 1999) Testing Women,Testing the Foetus: Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge .
41.
Reynolds, S. ( 2003) ‘Down’s Syndrome: Breaking Bad News. Psychological Issues’, British Journal of Midwifery , 11 (12).
42.
Rutter, S. ( 2002) ‘Down’s Syndrome’. Learning about Intellectual Disabilities and Health. http://www.intellectualdisability.info/diagnosis/downs_syndrome.htm, accessed 30 May 2008.
43.
Sandelowski, M. ( 1993) ‘The Use of Quotes in Qualitative Research’ , Research in Nursing and Health, 17 (6): 479-83.
44.
Skirton, H. & Barr, O. ( 2007) ‘Influences on Uptake of Antenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: A Review of the Literature’, Evidence Based Midwifery, 5: 4-9.
45.
Skirton, H. & Barr, O. ( 2009) ‘Antenatal Screening and Informed Choice: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Parents and Professionals’, Midwifery. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.002.
46.
Spinelli, E. ( 2005) The Interpreted World: An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
47.
Stapleton, H., Kirkham, M. & Thomas, G. ( 2002) ‘Quality Study of Evidence Based Leaflets in Maternity Care’, British Medical Journal, 324 (7338): 639.
48.
Statham, H. & Green, J. ( 1993) ‘Serum Screening for Down’s Syndrome: Some Women’s Experiences’, British Medical Journal , 307: 174-6.
49.
Thomas, S.P.( 2005) ‘Through the Lens of Merleau-Ponty: Advancing the Phenomenological Approach to Nursing Research’, Nursing Philosophy, 6: 63-76.
50.
Wald, N.J., Kennard, A., Hacksaw, A. & McGuire, A. ( 1998) ‘Antenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome’ , Health Technology Assessment 2 (1).
51.
Williams, C., Alderson, P. & Farsides, B. ( 2002a) ‘Is Non-Directiveness Possible within the Context of Antenatal Screening and Testing?’, Social Science & Medicine, 54 (3): 339-47.
52.
Williams, C., Alderson, P. & Farsides, B. ( 2002b) ‘Too Many Choices? Hospital and Community Staff Reflect on the Future of Prenatal Screening’, Social Science & Medicine, 55: 743-53.
53.
Yearley, C. ( 1997) ‘Motherhood as a Rite of Passage: An Anthropological Perspective’, in J. Alexander, V. Levy & C. Roth (eds), Midwifery Practice Core Topics. London: Macmillan.
