Today, additive manufacturing technology has brought revolutionary changes to the materials and manufacturing industries. While polymer printing and metal 3D printing have been extensively researched, ceramic printing has emerged as a new trend in research. Ceramic additive manufacturing not only shares the characteristics of additive manufacturing but also faces greater challenges due to the higher melting temperatures and inherent brittleness of ceramics compared to polymers and metals. Ceramic materials possess some excellent performance characteristics. Additive manufacturing technology makes it possible to produce complex ceramic parts with shorter production cycles, lower costs, and retaining the characteristics of traditionally manufactured products. This article introduces the specific working modes of ceramic additive manufacturing technology, including SL, DLP, TPP, DIW, FDM, UP, SLS/SLM, LOM, and BJ3DP printing technologies. The current research status of ceramic additive manufacturing is discussed, as well as the preparation of slurries and the basic requirements for successful ceramic printing.
WohlersTTCampbellIDiegelO, et al. 3D Printing and additive manufacturing global state of the industry annual worldwide progress. Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins, CO, 2021.
Revilla-LeónMSadeghpourMÖzcanM. An update on applications of 3D printing technologies used for processing polymers used in implant dentistry. Odontology2020; 108: 331–338.
4.
DadkhahMMosallanejadMHIulianoL, et al.A comprehensive overview on the latest progress in the additive manufacturing of metal matrix composites: potential, challenges, and feasible solutions. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett)2021; 34: 1173–1200.
5.
ChuaCKLeongKFAnJ. Introduction to rapid prototyping of biomaterials. In: Rapid prototyping of biomaterials (second edition). NC, US: Woodhead Publishing, 2020,PP.1–15.
6.
AlammarAKoisJCRevilla-LeónM, et al.Additive manufacturing technologies: current status and future perspectives. J Prosthodont2022; 31: 4–12.
7.
MosallanejadMHNiroumandBGhibaudoC, et al.In-situ alloying of a fine grained fully equiaxed ti-based alloy via electron beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf2022; 56: 102878.
8.
DadkhahMTullianiJMSabooriA, et al.Additive manufacturing of ceramics: advances, challenges, and outlook. J Eur Ceram Soc2023; 43: 6635–6664.
9.
Saleh AlghamdiSJohnSRoy ChoudhuryN, et al.Additive manufacturing of polymer materials: progress, promise and challenges. Polymers (Basel)2021; 13: 753.
10.
VentolaCL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T2014; 39: 704.
11.
VialeVStavridisJSalmiA, et al.Optimisation of downskin parameters to produce metallic parts via laser powder bed fusion process: an overview. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 123: 2159–2182.
12.
KeleşÖBlevinsCWBowmanKJ. Effect of build orientation on the mechanical reliability of 3D printed ABS. Rapid Prototyp J2017; 23: 320–328.
13.
Del GuercioGGalatiMSabooriA. Innovative approach to evaluate the mechanical performance of Ti–6Al–4V lattice structures produced by electron beam melting process. Met Mater Int2021; 27: 55–67.
14.
ScheithauerUSchwarzerEMoritzT, et al.Additive manufacturing of ceramic heat exchanger: opportunities and limits of the lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM). J Mater Eng Perform2018; 27: 14–20.
15.
StansburyJWIdacavageMJ. 3D Printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater2016; 32: 54–64.
16.
AllenAJLevinIWittSE. Materials research & measurement needs for ceramics additive manufacturing. J Am Ceram Soc2020; 103: 6055–6069.
17.
KumarRKumarMChohanJS. Material-specific properties and applications of additive manufacturing techniques: a comprehensive review. Bull Mater Sci2021; 44: 181.
18.
Medellin-CastilloHIZaragoza-SiqueirosJ. Design and manufacturing strategies for fused deposition modelling in additive manufacturing: a review. Chin J Mech Eng2019; 32: 1–16.
19.
KotlinskiJ. Mechanical properties of commercial rapid prototyping materials. Rapid Prototyp J2014; 20: 499–510.
20.
MosallanejadMHNiroumandBAversaA. Laser powder bed fusion in-situ alloying of Ti-5% Cu alloy: process-structure relationships. J Alloys Compd2021; 857: 157558.
21.
PeigneyA. Tougher ceramics with nanotubes. Nat Mater2003; 2: 15–16.
22.
SahaMMallikM. Additive manufacturing of ceramics and cermets: present status and future perspectives. Sādhanā2021; 46: 162.
23.
MaGXaoHYeJ, et al.Research status and development of magnesium matrix composites. Mater Sci Technol2020; 36: 645–653.
24.
HayatMDSinghHHeZ, et al.Titanium metal matrix composites: an overview. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 121: 418–438.
25.
KumarVMVenkateshCV. A comprehensive review on material selection, processing, characterization and applications of aluminium metal matrix composites. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 072001.
26.
MortensenALlorcaJ. Metal matrix composites. Annu Rev Mater Res2010; 40: 243–270.
27.
XuY. Ferroelectric materials and their applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2013.
28.
KaurMSinghK. Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 102: 844–862.
29.
KurinjinathanPArulKTRamyaJR. Cobalt ions doped bioactive ceramics for biosensor biomedical applications. Int J Curr Res Rev2018; 10: 49–52.
30.
RavaglioliAKrajewskiA. Bioceramics: materials·properties·applications. London: Springer Science & Business Media, 1991.
31.
JazayeriHERodriguez-RomeroMRazaviM, et al.The cross-disciplinary emergence of 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds in orthopedic bioengineering. Ceram Int2018; 44: 1–9.
32.
DeckersJVleugelsJKruthJP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: a review. J Ceram Sci Technol2014; 5: 245–260.
33.
XuXQChenYSLiuXH. Innovative design method research of ceramic tea set based on shape grammer. Packag Eng2021; 42: 298–304.
34.
ZoccaAColomboPGomesCM, et al.Additive manufacturing of ceramics: issues, potentialities, and opportunities. J Am Ceram Soc2015; 98: 1983–2001.
35.
WangNWangWJiangR, et al.Ceramic core shifting monitoring through clamping rods optimization for wax pattern of turbine blade. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 91: 2193–2204.
36.
KimYHYeoJGChoiSC. The effect of fused silica crystallization on flexural strength and shrinkage of ceramic cores for investment casting. J Korean Ceram Soc2016; 53: 246–252.
37.
LiuYChenZW. Research progress in photopolymerization-based 3D printing technology of ceramics. J Mater Eng2020; 9: 1–12.
38.
LiYAnnanCSuJ, et al.An overview on ceramic multi-material additive manufacturing: progress and challenges. Int J Extr Manuf2025; 7: 042005.
39.
PengCYLiHXuGQ, et al.Synergistic effect of solid content and sintering temperature on the mechanical properties of alumina ceramics. Mater Chem Phys2026; 348: 131531.
40.
PengCYLiHColomboP. Effect of sol types on the mechanical properties of 3D printed silica ceramics. J Mater Sci2025; 60: 8689–8706.
41.
JangSParkSBaeC. Development of ceramic additive manufacturing: process and materials technology. Biomed Eng Lett2020; 10: 493–503.
42.
ChenZLiZLiJ, et al.3D Printing of ceramics: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc2019; 39: 661–687.
43.
BoseSAkdoganEKBallaVK, et al.3D Printing of ceramics: advantages, challenges, applications, and perspectives. J Am Ceram Soc2024; 107: 7879–7920.
44.
KanyoJESchaffönerSUwanyuzeRS, et al.An overview of ceramic molds for investment casting of nickel superalloys. J Eur Ceram Soc2020; 40: 4955–4973.
45.
AltunAAProchaskaTKoneggerT, et al.Dense, strong, and precise silicon nitride-based ceramic parts by lithography-based ceramic manufacturing. Appl Sci2020; 10: 996.
46.
HalbigMCGradyJESinghM, et al. A fully nonmetallic gas turbine engine enabled by additive manufacturing of ceramic composites: Additive manufacturing and characterization of ceramic composites-part III. 2015.
47.
AbdelkaderMPetrikSNestlerD, et al.Ceramics 3D printing: a comprehensive overview and applications, with brief insights into industry and market. Ceramics2024; 7: 68–85.
48.
ChenANWuJMLiuK, et al.High-performance ceramic parts with complex shape prepared by selective laser sintering: a review. Adv Appl Ceram2018; 117: 100–117.
49.
CaoJWWangPLiuZY, et al.Research progress on powder-based laser additive manufacturing technology of ceramics. J Inorg Mater2022; 37: 241–254.
50.
GobbinFElsayedHItalianoA, et al.Large scale additive manufacturing of artificial stone components using binder jetting and their X-ray microtomography investigations. Open Ceram2021; 7: 100162.
51.
ChenZLiDZhouW. Process parameters appraisal of fabricating ceramic parts based on stereolithography using the Taguchi method. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf2012; 226: 1249–1258.
52.
LiuYChenZLiJ, et al.3D Printing of ceramic cellular structures for potential nuclear fusion application. Addit Manuf2020; 35: 101348.
53.
SuFLiuYZhangC, et al.Photopolymerization and reaction sintering enabled generative shaping and material-forming of complex ceramic structures with high performance. Addit Manuf2022; 51: 102651.
54.
WindsheimerHTravitzkyNHofenauerA, et al.Laminated object manufacturing of preceramic-paper-derived Si-SiC composites. Adv Mater2007; 19: 4515–4519.
55.
ImTKimSKimJ. Additive manufacturing of Fe-6.5 Si cores with metal-insulator-metal structure via dual-nozzle material extrusion (MEX) technology. Virtual Phys Prototyp2025; 20: e2457027.
56.
LeukersBGülkanHIrsenSH, et al.Biocompatibility of ceramic scaffolds for bone replacement made by 3D printing. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik: Entwicklung, Fertigung, Prüfung, Eigenschaften und Anwendungen Technischer Werkstoffe2005; 36: 781–787.
57.
EckelZCZhouCMartinJH, et al.Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics. Science2016; 351: 58–62.
58.
WätjenAMGingterPKramerM, et al.Novel prospects and possibilities in additive manufacturing of ceramics by means of direct inkjet printing. Adv Mech Eng2014; 6: 141346.
59.
FranchinGColomboP. Porous geopolymer components through inverse replica of 3D printed sacrificial templates. J Ceram Sci Technol2015; 6: 105–111.
60.
OrtonaAD'AngeloCGianellaS, et al.Cellular ceramics produced by rapid prototyping and replication. Mater Lett2012; 80: 95–98.
61.
LuRChandrasekaranSDu FraneWL, et al.Complex shaped boron carbides from negative additive manufacturing. Mater Des2018; 148: 8–16.
62.
PengCLiHColomboP. Effect of sol types on the mechanical properties of 3D printed silica ceramics. J Mater Sci2025; 25: 1–18.
63.
ChaudharyRPParameswaranCIdreesM, et al.Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics: materials, technologies, properties and potential applications. Prog Mater Sci2022; 128: 100969.
64.
RasakiSAXiongDXiongS, et al.Photopolymerization-based additive manufacturing of ceramics: a systematic review. J Adv Ceram2021; 10: 442–471.
65.
CaoJIdreesMTianG, et al.Complex SiC-based structures with high specific strength fabricated by vat photopolymerization and one-step pyrolysis. Addit Manuf2021; 48: 102430.
66.
TravitzkyNBonetADermeikB, et al.Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater2014; 16: 729–754.
67.
MelcherRMartinsSTravitzkyN, et al.Fabrication of Al2O3-based composites by indirect 3D-printing. Mater Lett2006; 60: 572–575.
68.
YaoDGomesCMZengYP, et al.Near zero shrinkage porous Al2O3 prepared via 3D-printing and reaction bonding. Mater Lett2015; 147: 116–118.
69.
EcheberriaJRodríguezNVleugelsJ, et al.Hard and tough carbon nanotube-reinforced zirconia-toughened alumina composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Carbon N Y2012; 50: 706–717.
ChuanzhenHJingSLinH, et al.A study on the wear resistance of ZrO2/Al2O3 ceramic scissors for spinning and weaving. J Mater Eng Perform2002; 11: 610–613.
72.
LicciulliACorcioneCEGrecoA, et al.Laser stereolithography of ZrO2 toughened Al2O3. J Eur Ceram Soc2005; 25: 1581–1589.
73.
ColomboPMeraGRiedelR, et al.Polymer-derived ceramics: 40 years of research and innovation in advanced ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2010; 93: 1805–1837.
74.
RiedelRMeraGHauserR, et al.Silicon-based polymer-derived ceramics: synthesis properties and applications-a review dedicated to Prof. Dr. Fritz Aldinger on the occasion of his 65th birthday. J Ceram Soc Jpn2006; 114: 425–444.
75.
WynneKJRiceRW. Ceramics via polymer pyrolysisdagger. Annu Rev Mater Sci1984; 14: 297–334.
76.
ZhangSHanCZhangX, et al.Synthesis and spinnability of vinyl-grafted carbon nanotubes/polycarbosilane precursor with high ceramic yield. Ceram Int2025; 51: 2830–2839.
77.
GaoYMeraGNguyenH, et al.Processing route dramatically influencing the nanostructure of carbon-rich SiCN and SiBCN polymer-derived ceramics. Part I: low temperature thermal transformation. J Eur Ceram Soc2012; 32: 1857–1866.
78.
ZhangZZengFHanJ, et al.Synthesis and characterization of a new liquid polymer precursor for Si–B–C–N ceramics. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 5940–5947.
79.
WidgeonSMeraGGaoY, et al.Effect of precursor on speciation and nanostructure of SiBCN polymer-derived ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2013; 96: 1651–1659.
80.
FazenPJRemsenEEBeckJS, et al.Synthesis, properties, and ceramic conversion reactions of polyborazylene. A high-yield polymeric precursor to boron nitride. Chem Mater1995; 7: 1942–1956.
81.
ColomboP. Polymer derived ceramics: from nano-structure to applications. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, US: DEStech Publications, Inc, 2010.
82.
GuilhonFBonnetotBCornuD, et al.Conversion of tris (isopropylamino) borane to polyborazines. Thermal degradation to boron nitride. Polyhedron1996; 15: 851–859.
83.
KimDPMoonKTKhoJG, et al.Synthesis and characterization of poly (aminoborane) as a new boron nitride precursor. Polym Adv Technol1999; 10: 702–712.
84.
PenderMJCarrollPJSneddonLG. Transition-metal-promoted reactions of boron hydrides. 17. 1 Titanium-catalyzed decaborane−olefin hydroborations. J Am Chem Soc2001; 123: 12222–12231.
85.
SangeethaNMonishPBrathikanVM. Review on various materials used in additive manufacturing[C]. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng2022; 1228: 012015.
86.
GuoARosoMModestiM, et al.Hierarchically structured polymer-derived ceramic fibers by electrospinning and catalyst-assisted pyrolysis. J Eur Ceram Soc2014; 34: 549–554.
87.
AdamMVakifahmetogluCColomboP, et al.Polysiloxane-derived ceramics containing nanowires with catalytically active tips. J Am Ceram Soc2014; 97: 959–966.
88.
ColomboPPeriniKBernardoE, et al.Ceramic microtubes from preceramic polymers. J Am Ceram Soc2003; 86: 1025–1027.
89.
ColomboPPaulsonTEPantanoCG. Synthesis of silicon carbide thin films with polycarbosilane (PCS). J Am Ceram Soc1997; 80: 2333–2340.
90.
FukushimaMColomboP. Silicon carbide-based foams from direct blowing of polycarbosilane. J Eur Ceram Soc2012; 32: 503–510.
91.
BiasettoLElsayedHBonolloF, et al.Polymer-derived sphene biocoating on cp-Ti substrates for orthopedic and dental implants. Surf Coat Technol2016; 301: 140–147.
92.
MoleroEFerrariBSanchez-HerenciaAJ, et al.Ti/Ti3SiC2 (/TiC) bulk and foam composites by pyrolysis of polycarbosilane and TiH2 mixtures. Adv Eng Mater2017; 19: 1600700.
93.
HullCW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography: US6027324 A[P]. U.S: 1996-03-11.
94.
WangWSunJGuoB, et al.Fabrication of piezoelectric nano-ceramics via stereolithography of low viscous and non-aqueous suspensions. J Eur Ceram Soc2020; 40: 682–688.
95.
XingHZouBLiS, et al.Study on surface quality, precision and mechanical properties of 3D printed ZrO2 ceramic components by laser scanning stereolithography. Ceram Int2017; 43: 16340–16347.
96.
DattaPBallaVK. Ceramics processing by additive manufacturing. Trans Indian Natl Acad Eng2021: 1–15.
97.
AlharbiNOsmanRWismeijerD. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent2016; 115: 760–767.
98.
KimGBLeeSKimH, et al.Three-dimensional printing: basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology. Korean J Radiol2016; 17: 182–197.
99.
MpofuTPMawereCMukoseraM. The impact and application of 3D printing technology. Int J Sci Res2014; 3: 02014675.
100.
ZakeriSVippolaMLevänenE. A comprehensive review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in stereolithography. Addit Manuf2020; 35: 101177.
101.
GriffithMLHalloranJW. Freeform fabrication of ceramics via stereolithography. J Am Ceram Soc1996; 79: 2601–2608.
102.
HalloranJWGriffithML. Ultraviolet curing of highly loaded ceramic suspensions for stereolithography of ceramics. In: 1994 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1994.
103.
Allen BradyGHalloranJW. Stereolithography of ceramic suspensions. Rapid Prototyp J1997; 3: 61–65.
104.
HalloranJWTomeckovaVGentryS, et al.Photopolymerization of powder suspensions for shaping ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc2011; 31: 2613–2619.
105.
BaeCJRamachandranAHalloranJW. Quantifying particle segregation in sequential layers fabricated by additive manufacturing. J Eur Ceram Soc2018; 38: 4082–4088.
106.
WuJLiZMengX, et al.ZrO2-CPS/ZrO2 graded composite ceramics with high osteoinductivity for dental implants fabricated by stereolithography. Ceram Int2025; 51: 21900–21912.
107.
WuHLiuWHeR, et al.Fabrication of dense zirconia-toughened alumina ceramics through a stereolithography-based additive manufacturing. Ceram Int2017; 43: 968–972.
108.
WangLJiaoYYaoL, et al.Effect of sintering temperature and low-temperature aging on microstructure and flexural strength of Fe2O3-doped 3Y-TZP ceramics fabricated by stereolithography-based additive manufacturing. Ceram Int2023; 49: 37307–37315.
109.
YıldızBKYıldızASKulM, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D-printed Al2O3 honeycomb sandwich structures prepared using the SLA method with different core geometries. Ceram Int2024; 50: 2901–2908.
110.
LiHHuKLiuY, et al.Improved mechanical properties of silica ceramic cores prepared by 3D printing and sintering processes. Scr Mater2021; 194: 113665.
111.
MaHZhangQMengT, et al.Design and mechanical/thermal properties of in-situ synthesized mullite in SLA 3D printing Al2O3-SiO2 ceramic. Ceram Int2025; 51: 10726–10737.
112.
KadryHWadnapSXuC, et al.Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printing technology and photoreactive polymers in fabrication of modified-release tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci2019; 135: 60–67.
113.
ZhangFLianQWuXQ, et al.Ceramics fabrication using rapid prototyping of mask projection stereolithography. J Mech Eng2017; 53: 138–144.
114.
JiangCPHentihuMFRChengYC, et al.Development of 3d slurry printing technology with submersion-light apparatus in dental application. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 7873.
115.
SantoliquidoOColomboPOrtonaA. Additive manufacturing of ceramic components by digital light processing: a comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. J Eur Ceram Soc2019; 39: 2140–2148.
116.
HeRLiuWWuZ, et al.Fabrication of complexshaped zirconia ceramic parts via a DLP stereolithography-based 3D printing method. Ceram Int2018; 44: 3412–3416.
117.
ZengQYangCTangD, et al.Additive manufacturing alumina components with lattice structures by digital light processing technique. J Mater Sci Technol2019; 35: 2751–2755.
118.
ChoiJWWickerRLeeSH, et al.Fabrication of 3D biocompatible/biodegradable micro-scaffolds using dynamic mask projection microstereolithography. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 5494–5503.
119.
ZhangAPQuXSomanP, et al.Rapid fabrication of complex 3D extracellular microenvironments by dynamic optical projection stereolithography. Adv Mater2012; 24: 4266–4270.
120.
ChenDDBaoMDLiX, et al.Research on anisotropy of 3D printed silicon oxide-based ceramic cores. China Ceram2020; 56: 33–39.
121.
JiangWLiKXiaoJ, et al.Effect of silica fiber on the mechanical and chemical behavior of alumina-based ceramic core material. J Asian Ceram Soc2017; 5: 410–417.
122.
ChuTMGHalloranJW. High-temperature flow behavior of ceramic suspensions. J Am Ceram Soc2000; 83: 2189–2195.
123.
XuXNiuSWangX, et al.Fabrication and casting simulation of composite ceramic cores with silica nanopowders. Ceram Int2019; 45: 19283–19288.
124.
LiKJiangWWangS, et al.Effect of specimen thickness on the creep deformation of a silica-based ceramic core material. J Alloys Compd2018; 763: 781–790.
125.
LequeuxNRichardNBochP. Shrinkage reduction in silica-based refractory cores infiltrated with boehmite. J Am Ceram Soc1995; 78: 2961–2966.
126.
BeyerMSchellerLBurdeAV, et al.Comparative evaluation of SLA and DLP 3D printing in dental implant guides: impact on fabrication accuracy, speed, and resin usage. Dentist J2025; 13: 471.
127.
KathengAPrawatvatcharaWChaiamornsupP, et al.Comparison of mechanical properties of different 3D printing technologies. Sci Rep2025; 15: 18998.
128.
WoodwardDIPurssellCPBillsonDR, et al.Additively-manufactured piezoelectric devices. Phys Status Sol A2015; 212: 2107–2113.
129.
SongXChenZLeiL, et al.Piezoelectric component fabrication using projection-based stereolithography of barium titanate ceramic suspensions. Rapid Prototyp J2017; 23: 44–53.
130.
ChenYBaoXWongCM, et al.PZT Ceramics fabricated based on stereolithography for an ultrasound transducer array application. Ceram Int2018; 44: 22725–22730.
131.
SmirnovAChugunovSKholodkovaA, et al.Progress and challenges of 3D-printing technologies in the manufacturing of piezoceramics. Ceram Int2021; 47: 10478–10511.
132.
ZhaoYYLuoHCLiangZX, et al. Micro-nano 3D printing based on photopolymerization and its development status and trends. Chin J Lasers2022; 49: 330–359.
133.
LeeKSKimRHYangDY, et al.Advances in 3D nano/microfabrication using two-photon initiated polymerization. Prog Polym Sci2008; 33: 631–681.
134.
SunHBFatkullinNIkeharaT, et al. Two-photon photopolymerization and 3D lithographic microfabrication. In: NMR · 3D Analysis · Photopolymerization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp.169–273.
135.
VaradanVKJiangXVaradanVV. Microstereolithography and other fabrication techniques for 3D MEMS. (No Title), 2001.
136.
WuESStricklerJHHarrellWR, et al. Two-photon lithography for microelectronic application[C]. In: Optical/Laser Microlithography V. SPIE, vol. 1674, 1992, pp. 776–782.
137.
MaruoSNakamuraOKawataS. Three-dimensional microfabrication with two-photon-absorbed photopolymerization. Opt Lett1997; 22: 132–134.
138.
CumpstonBHAnanthavelSPBarlowS, et al.Two-photon polymerization initiators for three-dimensional optical data storage and microfabrication. Nature1999; 398: 51–54.
139.
SchizasCMelissinakiVGaidukeviciuteA, et al.On the design and fabrication by two-photon polymerization of a readily assembled micro-valve. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2010; 48: 435–441.
140.
GengQWangDChenP, et al.Ultrafast multi-focus 3-D nano-fabrication based on two-photon polymerization. Nat Commun2019; 10: 2179.
141.
LeHP. Progress and trends in ink-jet printing technology. J Imaging Sci Technol1998; 42: 49–62.
142.
DongHCarrWWMorrisJF. An experimental study of drop-on-demand drop formation. Phys Fluids2006; 18.
143.
ChenZBrandonN. Inkjet printing and nanoindentation of porous alumina multilayers. Ceram Int2016; 42: 8316–8324.
144.
XiangQFEvansJRGEdirisingheMJ, et al.Solid freeforming of ceramics using a drop-on-demand jet printer. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf1997; 211: 211–214.
145.
YuCChen CWu D, et al. Research progress of inkjet printed perovskite optoelectronic devices requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Chin J Liq Cryst Displays2021; 36: 158–175.
146.
KawaseTShimodaTNewsomeC, et al.Inkjet printing of polymer thin film transistors. Thin Solid Films2003; 438: 279–287.
147.
KawaharaYHodgesSCookBS, et al. Instant inkjet circuits: lab-based inkjet printing to support rapid prototyping of UbiComp devices. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 2013, pp. 363–372.
148.
NakamuraMKobayashiATakagiF, et al.Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng2005; 11: 1658–1666.
149.
BlazdellPFEvansJRGEdirisingheMJ, et al.The computer aided manufacture of ceramics using multilayer jet printing. J Mater Sci Lett1995; 14: 1562–1565.
150.
XiangQFEvansJRGEdirisingheMJ, et al.Solid freeforming of ceramics using a drop-on-demand jet printer. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf1997; 211: 211–214.
151.
ZhaoXEvansJRGEdirisingheMJ, et al.Formulation of a ceramic ink for a wide-array drop-on-demand ink-jet printer. Ceram Int2003; 29: 887–892.
152.
SeerdenKAMReisNEvansJRG, et al.Ink-jet printing of wax-based alumina suspensions. J Am Ceram Soc2001; 84: 2514–2520.
153.
KosmalaAZhangQWrightR, et al.Development of high concentrated aqueous silver nanofluid and inkjet printing on ceramic substrates. Mater Chem Phys2012; 132: 788–795.
154.
JiHCZhangXJPeiWC, et al.Research progress in ceramic 3D printing technology and material development. J Mater Eng2018; 46: 19–28.
155.
PeymanniaMSoleimani-GorganiAGhahariM, et al.The effect of different dispersants on the physical properties of nano CoAl2O4 ceramic ink-jet ink. Ceram Int2015; 41: 9115–9121.
156.
SeerdenKAMReisNDerbyB, et al.Direct ink-jet deposition of ceramic green bodies: i-formulation of build materials. MRS Online Proc Library (OPL)1998; 542: 141.
157.
ReisNSeerdenKAMDerbyB, et al.Direct inkjet deposition of ceramic green bodies: ink-jet behaviour and deposit formation. MRS Online Proc Library (OPL)1998; 542: 147.
158.
ChenZOuyangJLiangW, et al.Development and characterizations of novel aqueous-based LSCF suspensions for inkjet printing. Ceram Int2018; 44: 13381–13388.
159.
VerweyEJWOverbeekJTG. Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. J Colloid Sci1955; 10: 224–225.
160.
FrommJE. Numerical calculation of the fluid dynamics of drop-on-demand jets. IBM J Res Dev1984; 28: 322–333.
161.
BergeronVBonnDMartinJY, et al.Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives. Nature2000; 405: 772–775.
162.
ReisNDerbyB. Ink jet deposition of ceramic suspensions: modeling and experiments of droplet formation. MRS Online Proc Library (OPL)2000; 625: 117.
163.
NogueraRLejeuneMChartierT. 3D Fine scale ceramic components formed by ink-jet prototyping process. J Eur Ceram Soc2005; 25: 2055–2059.
164.
NogueraRDossou-YovoCLejeuneM, et al.Fabrication of 3D fine scale PZT components by ink-jet prototyping process. J Phys IV (Proc) EDP Sci2005; 128: 87–93.
165.
DerbyB. Inkjet printing ceramics: from drops to solid. J Eur Ceram Soc2011; 31: 2543–2550.
166.
KuscerDStavberGTrefaltG, et al.Formulation of an aqueous titania suspension and its patterning with ink-jet printing technology. J Am Ceram Soc2012; 95: 487–493.
DeeganRDBakajinODupontTF, et al.Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature1997; 389: 827–829.
169.
MajumderMRendallCSEukelJA, et al.Overcoming the “coffee-stain” effect by compositional Marangoni-flow-assisted drop-drying. J Phys Chem B2012; 116: 6536–6542.
170.
CesaranoJIIIDellingerJGSaavedraMP, et al. Customization of load-bearing hydroxyapatite lattice scaffolds. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2005; 2: 212–220.
171.
DouRWangTGuoY, et al.Ink-jet printing of zirconia: coffee staining and line stability. J Am Ceram Soc2011; 94: 3787–3792.
172.
FriederichABinderJRBauerW. Rheological control of the coffee stain effect for inkjet printing of ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2013; 96: 2093–2099.
173.
ÖzkolEWätjenAMBermejoR, et al.Mechanical characterisation of miniaturised direct inkjet printed 3Y-TZP specimens for microelectronic applications. J Eur Ceram Soc2010; 30: 3145–3152.
174.
BhattiARMottMEvansJRG, et al.PZT Pillars for 1–3 composites prepared by ink-jet printing. J Mater Sci Lett2001; 20: 1245–1248.
175.
LejeuneMChartierTDossou-YovoC, et al.Ink-jet printing of ceramic micro-pillar arrays. J Eur Ceram Soc2009; 29: 905–911.
176.
CappiBÖzkolEEbertJ, et al.Direct inkjet printing of Si3N4: characterization of ink, green bodies and microstructure. J Eur Ceram Soc2008; 28: 2625–2628.
177.
MottMEvansJRG. Solid freeforming of silicon carbide by inkjet printing using a polymeric precursor. J Am Ceram Soc2001; 84: 307–313.
178.
SukeshiniMACumminsRReitzTL, et al.Ink-jet printing: a versatile method for multilayer solid oxide fuel cells fabrication. J Am Ceram Soc2009; 92: 2913–2919.
179.
YashiroNUsuiTKikutaK. Application of a thin intermediate cathode layer prepared by inkjet printing for SOFCs. J Eur Ceram Soc2010; 30: 2093–2098.
180.
AyabeSYashiroNKikutaK. Application of dispenser printing for the preparation of a SOFC cathode with controlled microstructure. J Eur Ceram Soc2012; 32: 4279–4286.
181.
HanGDNeohKCBaeK, et al.Fabrication of lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite (LSCF) cathodes for high performance solid oxide fuel cells using a low price commercial inkjet printer. J Power Sources2016; 306: 503–509.
182.
LiCChenHShiH, et al.Green fabrication of composite cathode with attractive performance for solid oxide fuel cells through facile inkjet printing. J Power Sources2015; 273: 465–471.
183.
JiangXLiWHaiT, et al.Inkjet-printed MXene micro-scale devices for integrated broadband ultrafast photonics. npj 2D Mater Appl2019; 3: 34.
184.
ZhuZGongZQuP, et al.Additive manufacturing of thin electrolyte layers via inkjet printing of highly-stable ceramic inks. J Adv Ceram2021; 10: 279–290.
185.
ReveloCFColoradoHA. 3D Printing of kaolinite clay ceramics using the direct ink writing (DIW) technique. Ceram Int2018; 44: 5673–5682.
186.
RavichandranDAhmedRJBanerjeeR, et al.Multi-material 3D printing-enabled multilayers for smart actuation via magnetic and thermal stimuli. J Mater Chem C2022; 10: 13762–13770.
187.
LiJPHabibovicPDoelM, et al.Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition. Biomaterials2007; 28: 2810–2820.
188.
del-Mazo-BarbaraLGinebraMP. Rheological characterisation of ceramic inks for 3D direct ink writing: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc2021; 41: 18–33.
189.
Cesarano TIlJBaerTACalvertP. Recent developments in freeform fabrication of dense ceramics from slurry deposition. Solid Free Fabr Proceedings1997; 1997: 25–32.
190.
MirandaPSaizEGrynK, et al.Sintering and robocasting of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for orthopaedic applications. Acta Biomater2006; 2: 457–466.
191.
LiJPHabibovicPvan den DoelM, et al.Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition. Biomaterials2007; 28: 2810–2820.
192.
FarahaniRDDubéMTherriaultD. Three-dimensional printing of multifunctional nanocomposites: manufacturing techniques and applications. Adv Mater2016; 28: 5794–5821.
193.
LiuCTongJMaJ, et al.Low-temperature deposition manufacturing: a versatile material extrusion-based 3D printing technology for fabricating hierarchically porous materials. J Nanomater2019; 2019: 1291067.
194.
FeildenEBlancaEGTGiulianiF, et al.Robocasting of structural ceramic parts with hydrogel inks. J Eur Ceram Soc2016; 36: 2525–2533.
195.
SunKWeiTSAhnBY, et al.3D Printing of interdigitated Li-Ion microbattery architectures. Adv Mater2013; 25: 4539–4543.
196.
LewisJASmayJEStueckerJ, et al.Direct ink writing of three-dimensional ceramic structures. J Am Ceram Soc2006; 89: 3599–3609.
197.
ElsayedHColomboPBernardoE. Direct ink writing of wollastonite-diopside glass-ceramic scaffolds from a silicone resin and engineered fillers. J Eur Ceram Soc2017; 37: 4187–4195.
198.
TuttleBASmayJECesaranoJ, et al.Robocast Pb (Zr0. 95Ti0. 05) O3 ceramic monoliths and composites. J Am Ceram Soc2001; 84: 872–874.
199.
YoungMLRaoRAlmerJD, et al.Load partitioning in Al2O3–Al composites with three-dimensional periodic architecture. Acta Mater2009; 57: 2362–2375.
200.
GratsonGMGarcía-SantamaríaFLousseV, et al.Direct-write assembly of three-dimensional photonic crystals: conversion of polymer scaffolds to silicon hollow-woodpile structures. Adv Mater2006; 18: 461–465.
201.
LeeYLuXHaoY, et al.Rapid prototyping of ceramic millimeter wave metamaterials: simulations and experiments. Microw Opt Technol Lett2007; 49: 2090–2093.
202.
LarsonCMChoiJJGallardoPA, et al.Direct ink writing of silicon carbide for microwave optics. Adv Eng Mater2016; 18: 39–45.
203.
LiuCChengXLiB, et al.Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed highly-porous 3D LiFePO4 electrodes by low temperature direct writing process. Materials (Basel)2017; 10: 934.
204.
StueckerJNMillerJEFerrizzRE, et al.Advanced support structures for enhanced catalytic activity. Ind Eng Chem Res2004; 43: 51–55.
205.
KuhnMNappornTMeunierM, et al.Direct-write microfabrication of single-chamber micro solid oxide fuel cells. J Micromech Microeng2007; 18: 015005.
206.
MichnaSWuWLewisJA. Concentrated hydroxyapatite inks for direct-write assembly of 3-D periodic scaffolds. Biomaterials2005; 26: 5632–5639.
207.
LewisJA. Direct-write assembly of ceramics from colloidal inks. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci2002; 6: 245–250.
208.
WeiXPanYChenZ. 3D Printing of NiZn ferrite architectures with high magnetic performance for efficient magnetic separation. J Eur Ceram Soc2022; 42: 1522–1529.
209.
LiuCXuFChengX, et al.Comparative study on the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cathodes fabricated by low temperature 3D printing, direct ink writing and conventional roller coating process. Ceram Int2019; 45: 14188–14197.
210.
ElsayedHChmielarzAPotoczekM, et al.Direct ink writing of three dimensional Ti2AlC porous structures. Addit Manuf2019; 28: 365–372.
211.
Martínez-Vázquez FJPerera FHMirandaP, et al.Improving the compressive strength of bioceramic robocast scaffolds by polymer infiltration. Acta Biomater2010; 6: 4361–4368.
212.
SEqtesadiSMoteallehAMirandaP, et al.A simple recipe for direct writing complex 45S5 Bioglass® 3D scaffolds. Mater Lett2013; 93: 68–71.
213.
DellingerJG. Development of model hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multiscale porosity for potential load bearing applications. Michigan, US: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2005.
214.
DellingerJGEurellJACJamisonRD. Bone response to 3D periodic hydroxyapatite scaffolds with and without tailored microporosity to deliver bone morphogenetic protein 2. J Biomed Mater Res A2006; 76: 366–376.
215.
MirandaPPajaresASaizE, et al.Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. J Biomed Mater Res A2008; 85: 218–227.
216.
SimonJLMichnaSLewisJA, et al.In vivo bone response to 3D periodic hydroxyapatite scaffolds assembled by direct ink writing. J Biomed Mater Res A2007; 83: 747–758.
217.
San MarchiCKouzeliMRaoR, et al.Alumina–aluminum interpenetrating-phase composites with three-dimensional periodic architecture. Scr Mater2003; 49: 861–866.
EqtesadiSMoteallehAPereraFH, et al.Fabricating geometrically-complex B4C ceramic components by robocasting and pressureless spark plasma sintering. Scr Mater2018; 145: 14–18.
220.
HuangTMasonMSHilmasGE, et al.Freeze-form extrusion fabrication of ceramic parts. Virtual Phys Prototyp2006; 1: 93–100.
221.
LeuMCDeuserBKTangL, et al.Freeze-form extrusion fabrication of functionally graded materials. CIRP Ann2012; 61: 223–226.
222.
ColomboPSchmidtJFranchinG, et al.Additive manufacturing techniques for fabricating complex ceramic components from preceramic polymers. Am Ceram Soc Bull2017; 96: 16–23.
223.
ZoccaAFranchinGElsayedH, et al.Direct ink writing of a preceramic polymer and fillers to produce hardystonite (Ca2ZnSi2O7) bioceramic scaffolds. J Am Ceram Soc2016; 99: 1960–1967.
224.
FranchinGWahlLColomboP. Direct ink writing of ceramic matrix composite structures. J Am Ceram Soc2017; 100: 4397–4401.
225.
FuKWangYYanC, et al.Graphene oxide-based electrode inks for 3D-printed lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater2016; 28: 935–9648.
226.
ShahzadALazogluI. Direct ink writing (DIW) of structural and functional ceramics: recent achievements and future challenges. Compos B Eng2021; 225: 109249.
227.
MaRPengCCaiZ, et al.Effect of bimodal microstructure on the tensile properties of selective laser melt Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy. J Alloys Compd2020; 815: 152422.
228.
ButscherABohnerMDöbelinN, et al.Moisture based three-dimensional printing of calcium phosphate structures for scaffold engineering. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 5369–5378.
229.
GrauJMoonJUhlandS, et al. High green density ceramic components fabricated by the slurry-based 3DP process. In: 1997 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1997.
230.
SachsECimaMWilliamsP, et al.Three dimensional printing: rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model. J Eng Ind1992; 114: 481–488.
231.
SachsEWylonisEAllenS, et al.Production of injection molding tooling with conformal cooling channels using the three dimensional printing process. Polym Eng Sci2000; 40: 1232–1247.
232.
WuBMBorlandSWGiordanoRA, et al.Solid free-form fabrication of drug delivery devices. J Controlled Release1996; 40: 77–87.
233.
SinghR. Three dimensional printing for casting applications: a state of art review and future perspectives. Adv Mat Res2010; 83: 342–349.
234.
WillJMelcherRTreulC, et al.Porous ceramic bone scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med2008; 19: 2781–2790.
235.
ButscherABohnerMDoebelinN, et al.New depowdering-friendly designs for three-dimensional printing of calcium phosphate bone substitutes. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 9149–9158.
236.
KeDBoseS. Effects of pore distribution and chemistry on physical, mechanical, and biological properties of tricalcium phosphate scaffolds by binder-jet 3D printing. Addit Manuf2018; 22: 111–117.
237.
ZoccaAElsayedHBernardoE, et al.3D-printed Silicate porous bioceramics using a non-sacrificial preceramic polymer binder. Biofabrication2015; 7: 025008.
238.
MoonJGrauJEKnezevicV, et al.Ink-jet printing of binders for ceramic components. J Am Ceram Soc2002; 85: 755–762.
239.
LauderACimaMJSachsE, et al.Three dimensional printing: surface finish and microstructure of rapid prototyped components. MRS Online Proc Library1991; 249: 331–336.
240.
LanzettaMSachsE. Improved surface finish in 3D printing using bimodal powder distribution. Rapid Prototyp J2003; 9: 157–166.
241.
ZhangWMelcherRTravitzkyN, et al.Three-dimensional printing of complex-shaped alumina/glass composites. Adv Eng Mater2009; 11: 1039–1043.
242.
UtelaBStortiDAndersonR, et al.A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP). J Manuf Process2008; 10: 96–104.
243.
KarapatisNPVan GriethuysenJPSGlardonR. Direct rapid tooling: a review of current research. Rapid Prototyp J1998; 4: 77–89.
244.
FieldingGABandyopadhyayABoseS. Effects of silica and zinc oxide doping on mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed tricalcium phosphate tissue engineering scaffolds. Dent Mater2012; 28: 113–122.
245.
NanBYinXZhangL, et al.Three-dimensional printing of Ti3SiC2-based ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2011; 94: 969–972.
246.
DcostaDJSunWLinF, et al.Freeform fabrication of Ti3SiC2 powder-based structures: part II: characterization and microstructure evaluation. J Mater Process Technol2002; 127: 352–360.
247.
SachsECimaMCornieJ. Three-dimensional printing: rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model. CIRP Ann1990; 39: 201–204.
248.
GibsonIShiD. Material properties and fabrication parameters in selective laser sintering process. Rapid Prototyp J1997; 3: 129–136.
249.
HoHCHGibsonICheungWL. Effects of energy density on morphology and properties of selective laser sintered polycarbonate. J Mater Process Technol1999; 89: 204–210.
250.
KruthJPWangXLaouiT, et al.Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering. Assem Autom2003; 23: 357–371.
251.
SchmidtMPohleDRechtenwaldT. Selective laser sintering of PEEK. CIRP Ann2007; 56: 205–208.
252.
BadrinarayanBBarlowJW. Metal parts from selective laser sintering of metal-polymer powders. In: 1992 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1992.
253.
SimchiAPohlH. Effects of laser sintering processing parameters on the microstructure and densification of iron powder. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 359: 119–128.
254.
YanCShiYYangJ, et al.Preparation and selective laser sintering of nylon-12 coated metal powders and post processing. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 5785–5792.
255.
LakshminarayanUOgrydiziakSMarcusHL. Selective laser sintering of ceramic materials. In: 1990 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1990.
256.
LakshminarayanUMarcusHL. Microstructural and mechanical properties of Al2O3/P2O5 and Al2O3/B2O3 composites fabricated by selective laser sintering. In: 1991 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1991.
257.
SimchiA. Direct laser sintering of metal powders: mechanism, kinetics and microstructural features. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 428: 148–158.
258.
ExnerHHornMStreekA, et al.Laser micro sintering: a new method to generate metal and ceramic parts of high resolution with sub-micrometer powder. Virtual Phys Prototyp2008; 3: 3–11.
259.
ExnerHRegenfussPHartwigL, et al. Selective laser micro sintering with a novel process. In: Fourth International Symposium on Laser Precision Microfabrication. SPIE, vol. 5063, 2003, pp. 145–151.
260.
LorrisonJCDalgarnoKWWoodDJ. Processing of an apatite-mullite glass-ceramic and an hydroxyapatite/phosphate glass composite by selective laser sintering. J Mater Sci Mater Med2005; 16: 775–781.
261.
GoodridgeRDDalgarnoKWWoodDJ. Indirect selective laser sintering of an apatite-mullite glass-ceramic for potential use in bone replacement applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med2006; 220: 57–68.
262.
ShuaiCFengPCaoC, et al.Processing and characterization of laser sintered hydroxyapatite scaffold for tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng2013; 18: 520–527.
263.
XiaoHuiSWeiLPingHuiS, et al.Selective laser sintering of aliphatic-polycarbonate/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for medical applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2015; 81: 15–25.
264.
GaoCYangBHuH, et al.Enhanced sintering ability of biphasic calcium phosphate by polymers used for bone scaffold fabrication. Mater Sci Eng C2013; 33: 3802–3810.
265.
ChungHDasS. Functionally graded nylon-11/silica nanocomposites produced by selective laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 487: 251–257.
266.
GriffinCDaufenbachJMcMillinS. Desktop manufacturing: LOM vs pressing. Am Ceram Soc Bull1994; 73: 109–113.
267.
DermeikBTravitzkyN. Laminated object manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater2020; 22: 2000256.
268.
KlostermanDAChartoffRPOsborneNR, et al.Development of a curved layer LOM process for monolithic ceramics and ceramic matrix composites. Rapid Prototyp J1999; 5: 61–71.
269.
WeisenselLTravitzkyNSieberH, et al.Laminated object manufacturing (LOM) of SiSiC composites. Adv Eng Mater2004; 6: 899–903.
270.
GriffinEAMummDRMarshallDB. Rapid prototyping of functional ceramic composites. Am Ceram Soc Bull1996; 75: 271598.
271.
ZhangYHanJZhangX, et al.Rapid prototyping and combustion synthesis of TiC/Ni functionally gradient materials. Mater Sci Eng A2001; 299: 218–224.
272.
GomesCTravitzkyNGreilP, et al.Laminated object manufacturing of LZSA glass-ceramics. Rapid Prototyp J2011; 17: 424–428.
273.
PanMJLeungAWuCCM, et al.Optimizing the performance of telescoping actuators through rapid prototyping and finite element modeling. Ceram Trans2004; 150: 53–62.
274.
SteidleCKlostermanDChartoffR, et al. Automated fabrication of custom bone implants using rapid prototyping. In: 44th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, 1999, pp. 1866–1877.
275.
TravitzkyNWindsheimerHFeyT, et al.Preceramic paper-derived ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2008; 91: 3477–3492.
276.
GomesCMGutbrodBTravitzkyN, et al.Preceramic paper derived fibrillar ceramics. Ceram Mater Compon Energy Environ Appl2010; 210: 421–426.
277.
RodriguesSJChartoffRPKlostermanDA, et al. Solid freeform fabrication of functional silicon nitride ceramics by laminated object manufacturing 1. In: 2000 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2000.
278.
PenasOZenatiRDuboisJ, et al.Processing, microstructure, mechanical properties of Si3N4 obtained by slip casting and pressureless sintering. Ceram Int2001; 27: 591–596.
279.
YuJWangHZhangJ. Neural network modeling and analysis of gel casting preparation of porous Si3N4 ceramics. Ceram Int2009; 35: 2943–2950.
280.
KlostermanDChartoffRGravesG, et al.Interfacial characteristics of composites fabricated by laminated object manufacturing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1998; 29: 1165–1174.
281.
WangXJiangMZhouZ, et al.3D Printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng2017; 110: 442–458.
282.
MazzantiVMalaguttiLMollicaF. FDM 3D Printing of polymers containing natural fillers: a review of their mechanical properties. Polymers (Basel)2019; 11: 1094.
283.
RundleG. A revolution in the making. VIC, Australia: Simon and Schuster, 2014.
284.
WittbrodtBPearceJM. The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components. Addit Manuf2015; 8: 110–116.
285.
SmirnovANikitinNPeretyaginP, et al.Experimental and statistical modeling for effect of nozzle diameter, filling pattern, and layer height of FDM-printed ceramic–polymer green body on biaxial flexural strength of sintered alumina ceramic. J Compos Sci2023; 7: 381.
286.
SarrafFAbbatinaliEGorjanL, et al.Effect of MgO sintering additive on mullite structures manufactured by fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology. J Eur Ceram Soc2021; 41: 6677–6686.
287.
ZengXSipautCIsmail N, et al.Mechanical properties and biological activity of 3D printed silicon nitride materials. Ceram Int2024; 50: 16704–16713.
288.
HutmacherDWSchantzTZeinI, et al.Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res2001; 55: 203–216.
289.
CaoTHoKHTeohSH. Scaffold design and in vitro study of osteochondral coculture in a three-dimensional porous polycaprolactone scaffold fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Tissue Eng2003; 9: 103–112.
290.
TsangVLBhatiaSN. Three-dimensional tissue fabrication. Adv Drug Delivery Rev2004; 56: 1635–1647.
291.
XuNYeXWeiD, et al.3D Artificial bones for bone repair prepared by computed tomography-guided fused deposition modeling for bone repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6: 14952–14963.
292.
SaMWNguyenBNBMoriartyRA, et al.Fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed BCP scaffolds reinforced with ZrO2 for bone tissue applications. Biotechnol Bioeng2018; 115: 989–999.
293.
PilleuxMESafariAAllahverdiM, et al.3-D Photonic bandgap structures in the microwave regime by fused deposition of multimaterials. Rapid Prototyp J2002; 8: 46–52.
294.
ChenYBartzosDLuY, et al.Simulation, fabrication, and characterization of 3-D alumina photonic bandgap structures. Microw Opt Technol Lett2001; 30: 305–307.
295.
SarhanAADDuanCFYipMW, et al.Geometrical structure and layer orientation effects on strength, material consumption and building time of FDM rapid prototyped samples. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mech Manuf Eng2015; 9: 1063–1068.
296.
RangarajanSQiGVenkataramanN, et al.Powder processing, rheology, and mechanical properties of feedstock for fused deposition of Si3N4 ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2000; 83: 1663–1669.
297.
KalitaSJBoseSHosickHL, et al.Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Mater Sci Eng C2003; 23: 611–620.
298.
ScheithauerUJohneRGottliebL, et al.Recent developments in the field of additive manufacturing of ceramic-based multi-material components open the door to highly functionalized components. Prog Addit Manuf2025; 10: 4051–4059.
299.
ZhangMZhangLZhongK, et al.Fabrication process of large-dimensional alumina ceramic parts via stereolithography, joining, and infiltration techniques. Ceram Int2025; 15: 52615–52627.
300.
KajiFNguyen-HuuHBudhwaniA, et al.A deep-learning-based in-situ surface anomaly detection methodology for laser directed energy deposition via powder feeding. J Manuf Process2022; 81: 624–637.
301.
LiuZFLi ZQWangQ, et al.Multimaterial additive manufacturing manipulator for fabricating magnetoelectric pressure sensors. Sci China Technol Sci2022; 65: 2542–2550.
302.
GuQWangHGaoW, et al.Preparation of large-size alumina ceramic parts by DLP 3D printing using high-solid-loading paste and optimizing the debinding process. Ceram Int2023; 49: 28801–28812.
303.
YuXWangZYuZ, et al.Additive manufacturing and joining double processes of ceramic-resin green bodies using a single-or double-phase photocuring slurry. Ceram Int2024; 50: 14088–14100.
304.
JiaXLiSWangT, et al.High-performance defect detection methods for real-time monitoring of ceramic additive manufacturing process based on small-scale datasets. Processes2024; 12: 633.
