Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-8
Social media,political discourse and the 2019 elections in India: Journalists’ perspectives on the changing role of the mainstream media in setting the political agenda
With the rise in social media usage, India now grapples with the problem of polarized political discourse via digital platforms. In light of the general elections in 2019, veteran Indian journalists, during in-depth interviews, discussed how social media influenced political discourse and enabled a polarized political narrative that gave rise to aggressive nationalism and majoritarian viewpoints. Journalists asserted that social media were instrumental in setting the agenda for the mainstream media and that social media had redefined their professional roles as the platforms enabled the politicians to bypass the mainstream news media and reach the voters directly.
BanajiSBhatRAgarwalA, et al. (2019) WhatsApp vigilantes: An exploration of citizen reception and circulation of WhatsApp misinformation linked to mob violence in India. London: Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science.
5.
Belair-GagnonVMishraSAgurC (2013) Emerging spaces for storytelling: Journalistic lessons of social media from the Delhi Gang Rape case. Nieman Journalism Lab 8: 478–492.
6.
BennettWLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58(4): 707–731.
7.
BharaliBGoswamiAL (2017) Fake news: Credibility, cultivation syndrome and the new age media. Media Watch9(1): 118–130.
8.
BhushanB (2015) The changing structure of media and ethics in India. In: Rao S and Wasserman H (eds.)Media Ethics and Justice in the Age of Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.194–209.
9.
BimberB (1998) The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity31(1): 133–160.
10.
BrandtzaegPBLüdersMSpangenbergJ, et al. (2016) Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice10(3): 323–342.
11.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
12.
CeronA (2014) Twitter and the traditional media: Who is the real agenda setter? APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper. SSRN.
13.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
ConwayBAKenskiKWangD (2015) The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20(4): 363–380.
EngesserSErnstNEsserF, et al. (2017) Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society20(8): 1109–1126.
19.
FeezellJT (2018) Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly71(2): 482–494.
20.
GangulyNKumaraguruP (2019) The positive and negative effects of social media in India. Communications of the ACM62(11): 98–99.
GraeffEStempeckMZuckermanE (2014) The battle for ‘Trayvon Martin’: Mappinga media controversy online and off-line. First Monday19(2). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v19i2.4947.
23.
HarderRASevenansJVan AelstP (2017) Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics22(3): 275–293.
KhuranaPKumarD (2018, April) Sir model for fake news spreading through whatsapp. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on internet of things and connected technologies (ICIoTCT), Jaipur, India, 31 October 2019, pp.26–27.
27.
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2016) Network media logic: Some conceptual considerations. In: BrunsAEnliGSkogerbøE, et al. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 23–38.
McCombsM (2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies6(4): 543–557.
30.
McCombsMEShawDL (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36: 176–185.
31.
McGregorSCVargoCJ (2017) Election-related talk and agenda-setting effects on Twitter: A big data analysis of salience transfer at different levels of user participation. The Agenda Setting Journal1(1): 44–62.
32.
MerazS (2009) Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting in- fluence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(3): 682–707.
33.
MerazS (2011) Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly88(1): 176–194.
34.
MessnerMDistasoMW (2008) The source cycle: How traditional media and weblogs use each other as sources. Journalism Studies9(3): 447–463.
35.
MushtaqSBaigF (2020) Indian media system: An application of comparative media approach. South Asian Studies31(2): 439–457.
36.
NeumanRWGuggenheimLMo JangS, et al. (2014) The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication64(2): 193–214.
37.
NeyaziTA (2018) Political Communication and Mobilisation: The Hindi Media in India. England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
NeyaziTA (2020) Digital propaganda, political bots and polarized politics in India. Asian Journal of Communication30(1): 39–57.
39.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDE, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods16(1). DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847
40.
Office of the Registrar of Newspapers for India (2020) Available at:https://mruc.net/downloads-1 (accessed 22 March 2020).
PalJPandaA (2019) Twitter in the 2019 Indian general elections: Trends of use across states and parties. Economic & Political Weekly54(51).
43.
ParmeleeJH (2013) The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media & Society16(3): 434–450.
44.
PrasadR (2019) “Digital disruption? Journalism startups in India. Journalism22(8): 2122–2138.
45.
RanjiB (2020) Shaping news waves and constructing events: Iranian journalists’ use of online platforms as sources of journalistic capital. New Media & Society23(7): 1936–1952.
RodriguesUM (2010) Print media in the era of globalization. In: RanganathanMRodriguesUM (eds) Indian Media in a Globalised World. Sage, pp. 56–57.
48.
RodriguesUM (2014) Social media’s impact on journalism: A study of media’s coverage of anti-corruption protests in India. Global Media Journal: Australian Edition8(1): 1–10.
49.
RodriguesUMNiemannM (2017) Social media as a platform for incessant political communication: A case study of Modi’s “clean India” campaign. International Journal of Communication11: 23.
50.
Russell NeumanWGuggenheimLMo JangS, et al. (2014) The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication64(2): 193–214.
51.
ScharkowMVogelgesangJ (2011) Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research23(1): 104–113.
SharmaN (2023) Populism and social media use: Comparing the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s strategic use of Twitter during the 2014 and the 2019 election campaigns. Media Asia50(2): 181–203.
54.
SonwalkarP (2019) From by-line to bottom-line: Trust deficit in world’s largest democracy. Journalism20(1): 60–63.
55.
TrombleRKooleK (2020) She belongs in the kitchen, not in Congress? Political engagement and sexism on Twitter. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies9(2): 191–214.
56.
VargoCJBasilaiaEShawDL (2015) Event versus issue: Twitter reflections of major news, a case study. Communication and Information Technologies Annual – Studies in Media and Communications9: 215–239.
57.
VuHTSaldañaM (2021) Chillin’ effects of fake news: Changes in practices related to accountability and transparency in American newsrooms under the influence of misinformation and accusations against the news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 98(3): 769–789.
58.
WoodlyD (2008) New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice134(1–2): 109–123.
