The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016

Abstract

This study examines the agenda-setting power of fake news and fact-checkers who fight them through a computational look at the online mediascape from 2014 to 2016. Although our study confirms that content from fake news websites is increasing, these sites do not exert excessive power. Instead, fake news has an intricately entwined relationship with online partisan media, both responding and setting its issue agenda. In 2016, partisan media appeared to be especially susceptible to the agendas of fake news, perhaps due to the election. Emerging news media are also responsive to the agendas of fake news, but to a lesser degree. Fake news coverage itself is diverging and becoming more autonomous topically. While fact-checkers are autonomous in their selection of issues to cover, they were not influential in determining the agenda of news media overall, and their influence appears to be declining, illustrating the difficulties fact-checkers face in disseminating their corrections.

Keywords

Big data computational social science fact-checking fake news intermedia agenda setting journalism misinformation network agenda setting partisanship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbar

Kwak

et al . (2015) Consumers and suppliers: attention asymmetries. A case study of Al Jazeera’s news coverage and comments. Computational Journalism Symposium, 2 October. New York: ACM.

About the International Fact-checking Network (n.d.) The poynter institute. Available at: http://www.poynter.org/about-the-international-fact-checking-network/

Adair

Stencel

(2016) How we identify fact-checkers. Duke Reporter’s Lab, 26 June. Available at: http://reporterslab.org/how-we-identify-fact-checkers/

Albright

(2016) The #Election2016 micro-propaganda machine. Medium, 18 November. Available at: https://medium.com/@d1gi/the-election2016-micro-propaganda-machine-383449cc1fba#.nax547fvh

Allcott

Gentzkow

(2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236.

Amazeen

(2012) Blind spots: examining political advertising misinformation and how U.S. news media hold political actors accountable. Dissertation Abstracts International 74(2). Available at: http://gradworks.umi.com/35/39/3539244.html

Amazeen

(2013, October). Making a difference: a critical assessment of fact-checking in 2012. New America Foundation Media Policy Initiative Research Paper. Available at: https://www.newamerica.org/new-america/making-a-difference/

Amazeen

(2014) Voter disdain: twenty-first century trends in political advertising. In Coombs

Batchelor

(eds) We Are What We Sell: How Advertising Shapes American Life… And Always Has. Santa Barbara, CA: Prager, pp. 282–301.

Barthel

Gottfried

(2016) Trump, Clinton supporters differ on how media should cover controversial statements. Pew Research Center, 17 October. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2016/10/17/trump-clinton-supporters-differ-on-how-media-should-cover-controversial-statements/

10.

Baym

(2005) The daily show: discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication 22(3): 259–276.

11.

Benkler

Faris

Roberts

et al . (2017) Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 3 March. Available at: http://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php

12.

Collins

(2016) This “conservative news site” trended on Facebook, showed up on Fox News—and duped the world. 18 October. Available at: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/28/the-man-who-duped-trumpkins-fox-news.html

13.

Davis

(2012) Study: politifact rates GOP as biggest liar. The Center for Media and Public Affairs, 21 September. Available at: http://cmpa.gmu.edu/study-politifact-rates-gop-as-biggest-liar/

14.

Dewey

(2016) Facebook fake-news writer: ‘I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me.’ The Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/17/facebook-fake-news-writer-i-think-donald-trump-is-in-the-white-house-because-of-me/?tid=sm_tw

15.

Easton

(2016) The fight against fake news. AP Newswire, 15 December. Available at: https://blog.ap.org/announcements/the-fight-against-fake-news?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP_CorpComm

16.

Flam

(2017) Fighting fake news with science. Bloomberg View, 27 March. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-03-27/fighting-fake-news-with-science

17.

Frenkel

(2016) Germany is fighting fake news on Facebook and wants Europe along for the ride. Buzzfeed, 23 November. Available at: https://www.buzzfeed.com/sheerafrenkel/germany-is-fighting-fake-news-on-facebook-and-wants-europe-a?utm_term=.txNZ2VM7W#.cj5E2d5PJ

18.

Friggeri

Adamic

Eckles

et al . (2014) Rumor cascades. In: International AAAI conference on web and social media, North America, May. Available at: http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8122

19.

Google Trends (2017) 13 January. Available at: https://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=fake%20news

20.

Graves

Glaisyer

(2012) The fact-checking universe in spring 2012. New America Foundation, February. Available at: https://www.newamerica.org/oti/policy-papers/the-fact-checking-universe-in-spring-2012/

21.

Graves

Konieczna

(2015) Sharing the news: journalistic collaboration as field repair. International Journal of Communication 9: 1966–1984.

22.

Guo

McCombs

(eds) (2016) The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting. New York and London: Routledge.

23.

Harford

(2017) The problem with facts. Financial Times, 9 March. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/eef2e2f8-0383-11e7-ace0-1ce02ef0def9

24.

Hermann

Svrluga

Miller

(2016) Alleged gunman tells police he wanted to rescue children at DC pizza shop after hearing fictional internet accounts. The Washington Post, 5 December. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/alleged-gunman-tells-police-he-wanted-to-rescue-children-at-dc-pizza-shop-after-hearing-fictional-internet-accounts/2016/12/05/cb5ebabc-bae8-11e6-ac85-094a21c44abc_story.html?utm_term=.888dd1f7e6be

25.

Hunt

(2016) What is fake news? How to spot it and what you can do about it. The Guardian, 17 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/18/what-is-fake-news-pizzagate

26.

International Fact-Checking Network (2016) An open letter to Mark Zuckerburg from the world’s fact-checkers. The Poynter Institute, 17 November. Available at: https://www.poynter.org/2016/an-open-letter-to-mark-zuckerberg-from-the-worlds-fact-checkers/439586/

27.

International Fact-checking Network Fact-checkers’ Code of Principles (n.d) The Poynter Institute. Available at: http://www.poynter.org/fact-checkers-code-of-principles/

28.

Isaac

(2016) Facebook mounts effort to limit tide of fake news. New York Times, 15 December. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/technology/facebook-fake-news.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share

29.

Jackson

(2017) BBC sets up team to debunk fake news. The Guardian, 12 January. Available at: https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/12/bbc-sets-up-team-to-debunk-fake-news

30.

Leetaru

Schrodt

(2013) GDELT: global data on events, location, and tone, 1979–2012. In: ISA annual convention. Available at: http://data.gdeltproject.org/documentation/ISA.2013.GDELT.pdf

31.

Leetaru

(2012a) Data Mining Methods for the Content Analyst: An Introduction to the Computational Analysis of Content. New York: Routledge.

32.

Leetaru

(2012b) Fulltext geocoding versus spatial metadata for large text archives: towards a geographically enriched Wikipedia. D-lib Magazine 18(9): 5.

33.

Leetaru

(2015) Mining libraries: lessons learned from 20 years of massive computing on the world’s information. Information Services & Use 35(1–2): 31–50.

34.

Leetaru

Perkins

Rewerts

(2014) Cultural computing at literature scale: encoding the cultural knowledge of tens of billions of words of academic literature. D-lib Magazine 20(9): 8.

35.

Levendusky

(2013a) Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication 30(4): 565–581.

36.

Levendusky

(2013b) Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 611–623.

37.

Lippmann

(2009 [1922]) Public Opinion. Sioux Falls, SD: NuVision Publications.

38.

McCombs

(2014) Setting the Agenda. 2nd ed. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

39.

Maheshwari

(2016) How fake news goes viral: a case study. The New York Times, 20 November. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/business/media/how-fake-news-spreads.html

40.

Meraz

(2011) Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88(1): 176–194.

41.

Mustafaraj

Metaxas

(2017) The fake news spreading plague: was it preventable? Cornell University Library. Available at: arXiv:1703.06988[cs.SI]

42.

Neil

Schweickart

Zhang

et al . (2016) The dash for gas: examining third-level agenda-building and fracking in the United Kingdom. Journalism Studies 19(2): 182–208.

43.

Neuman

Guggenheim

Mo Jang

et al . (2014) The dynamics of public attention: agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication 64(2): 193–214.

44.

Painter

Hodges

(2010) Mocking the news: how the daily show with Jon Stewart holds traditional broadcast news accountable. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 25(4): 257–274.

45.

Reese

Danielian

(1989) Intermedia influence and the drug issue: converging on cocaine. In: Shoemaker

(ed.) Communication Campaigns about Drugs: Government, Media, and the Public. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 29–46.

46.

Roberts

(2017) Donald Trump and the rise of tribal epistemology. Vox, 22 March. Available at: http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/22/14762030/donald-trump-tribal-epistemology

47.

Rojecki

Meraz

(2016) Rumors and factitious informational blends: the role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society 18(1): 25–43.

48.

Ruhnau

(2000) Eigenvector-centrality—a node-centrality? Social Networks 22(4): 357–365.

49.

Shao

Ciampaglia

Flammini

et al . (2016) Hoaxy: a platform for tracking online misinformation. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web, international world wide web conferences steering committee, April. New York: ACM. pp. 745–750.

50.

Siebert

Peterson

Schramm

(1956) Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

51.

Silverman

(2016) This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. Buzzfeed, 16 November. Available at: https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook?utm_term=.tgEkrDpr#.dvkvJ3DJ

52.

Silverman

(2017) What exactly is fake news? The Fake Newsletter, 26 February. Available at: http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=657b595bbd3c63e045787f019&id=e0b2b9eaf0&e=30348b6327

53.

Silverman

Alexander

(2016) How teens in the Balkans are duping Trump supporters with fake news. Buzzfeed, 3 November. Available at: https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-misinfo?utm_term=.vcnpxWdDl#.hqQJzQ8xV

54.

Silverman

Singer-Vine

(2016) Most Americans who see fake news believe it, new survey says. Buzzfeed, 6 December. Available at: https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey?utm_term=.jdG7neg4a#.mo0D7kq68

55.

Trump

Schwartz

(2009) Trump: The Art of the Deal. New York: Ballantine Books.

56.

Vargo

Guo

McCombs

et al . (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication 64(2): 296–316.

57.

Vargo

Guo

(2017) Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda-setting: an analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U.S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Preprint available online.

58.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Weeks

Holbert

(2013) Predicting dissemination of news content in social media a focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90(2): 212–232.

60.

Zollo

Bessi

Del Vicario

et al . (2015) Debunking in a world of tribes. Cornell University Library. Available at: arXiv:1510.04267