This study examines the visual content of Twitter posts, including photos and videos, published during the 2018 protests in Iran. Our main objective is to understand how these protests were visually represented on Twitter. The theoretical framework of this study is drawn from the ‘dynamic dual path way model of approach coping’ that categorizes responses of collective action in emotion-focused and problem-focused coping. Our findings reveal that visual content with efficacy-eliciting characteristics was posted more often than emotion-arousing content. Furthermore, visual content with more protest activity is more likely to be retweeted.
AndersonTKanukaH (2003) E-Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.
2.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
BoydDGolderSLotanG (2010) Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: Paper presented at the System sciences (hicss), 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference on, Honolulu, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2010. IEEE.
5.
BrownCM (2017) Tweets and mobilisation: Collective action theory and social media. Medijske studije8(15): 3–21.
6.
BurnsAElthamB (2009) Twitter free Iran: An evaluation of Twitter's role in public diplomacy and information operations in Iran's 2009 election crisis. In: Communications policy & research forum 2009, 19–20 November 2009. Sydney: University of Technology.
7.
CarafanoJJ (2009) All a Twitter: How Social Networking Shaped Iran’s Election Protests. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, p.2300.
8.
CastellsM (2015) Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
ChristensenC (2011) Twitter revolutions? Addressing social media and dissent. The Communication Review14(3): 155–157.
10.
ChuD (2009) Collective behavior in YouTube: A case study of ‘Bus Uncle’online videos. Asian Journal of Communication19(3): 337–353.
11.
ClarkE (2012) Social movement & social media: A qualitative study of occupy Wall Street. Södertörn University School of Culture and Communication Research report, Spring term.
12.
DehghanSKGraham-HarrisonE (2017) Iranians chant ‘death to dictator’ in biggest unrest since crushing of protests in 2009. The Guardian, 30December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/
13.
EarlJKimportK (2011) Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
14.
Encyclopædia Britannica (2009) Encyclopædia Britannica. Chicago, IL: Common Law.
15.
FittonLGruenMPostonL (2010) Twitter for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
GastPAndoneDFoxK (2018) Here’s why the Iran protests are significant. CNN, 3January. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/
17.
GazzanigaMS (1998) The Mind’s Past. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
18.
GerbnerGGrossLMorganM, et al. (2002) Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research2: 43–67.
19.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication17(3): 319–336.
GoodwinJPfaffS (2001) Emotion work in high-risk social movements: Managing fear in the US and east German civil rights movements. In: GoodwinJJasperMPollettaF (eds) Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.282–302.
22.
GuadagnoRERempalaDMMurphyS, et al. (2013) What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2312–2319.
23.
Hänska-AhyMTShapourR (2013) Who’s reporting the protests? Converging practices of citizen journalists and two BBC World Service newsrooms, from Iran's election protests to the Arab uprisings. Journalism Studies14(1): 29–45.
HermidaAHernández-SantaolallaV (2018) Twitter and video activism as tools for counter-surveillance: The case of social protests in Spain. Information, Communication & Society21(3): 416–433.
26.
HowardPNDuffyAFreelonD, et al. (2011) Opening Closed Regimes: What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2595096; 1–30). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2595096
27.
HowardPNHussainMM (2011) The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy22(3): 35–48.
28.
Iranian Students Polling Agency (2018) The Report on the Popular Views about the January 2018 Protests. Tehran: Iranian Students’ Polling Center.
29.
JalaeipourHHajizadeganA (2020) Exploring and evaluating the patterns of how Iranian Twitter users are affected by the political attitudes of influencers. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science9(2): 125–140.
30.
KavanaughAYangSLiLT, et al. (2011) Microblogging in crisis situations: Mass protests in Iran, Tunisia, Egypt. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCHI(6), 1–7.
31.
KeathL (2018) Iran’s working class, facing dim prospects, fuels unrest. AP, 7January. Available at: https://www.apnews.com
32.
KhamisSVaughnK (2012) ‘We Are All Khaled Said’: The potentials and limitations of cyberactivism in triggering public mobilization and promoting political change. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research4(2–3): 145–163.
33.
KhanikiHBasirian JahromiH (2013) Activism and power in virtual social networks: A study of functions of facebook in the real world. [مطالعه کارکردهای فیس بوک در فضای واقعی کنشگری و قدرت در شبکه های اجتماعی مجازی]. Social Science Quarterly61: 45–80.
34.
KharroubTBasO (2016) Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society18(9): 1973–1992.
35.
LiuSBPalenLSuttonJ, et al. (2008) In search of the bigger picture: The emergent role of on-line photo sharing in times of disaster. In: Proceedings from the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, 5–7 May, pp.140–149.
36.
LotanGGraeffEAnannyM, et al. (2011) The Arab Spring| the revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication5: 31.
37.
MacdonaldSGrinnellDKinzelA, et al. (2019) Daesh, Twitter and the social media ecosystem: A study of outlinks contained in tweets mentioning Rumiyah. The RUSI Journal164(4): 60–72.
38.
McCarthyJDZaldMN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82(6): 1212–1241.
39.
MilaniA (2010) The Green Movement, vol. 42. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
40.
MoghanizadehS (2013) The role of social media in Iran’s Green Movement. Master’s thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
41.
MorozovE (2009) Iran: Downside to the “twitter revolution”. Dissent56(4): 10–14.
42.
MortensenM (2011) When citizen photojournalism sets the news agenda: Neda Agha Soltan as a Web 2.0 icon of post-election unrest in Iran. Global Media and Communication7(1): 4–16.
43.
NabiRL (1999) A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory9(3): 292–320.
44.
NewellBC (2014) Crossing lenses: Policing’s new visibility and the role of ‘smartphone journalism’ as a form of freedom-preserving reciprocal surveillance. Journal of Law, Technology and Policy1: 59–104.
PanttiMBakkerP (2009) Misfortunes, memories and sunsets: Non-professional images in Dutch news media. International Journal of Cultural Studies12(5): 471–489.
47.
PoellTBorraE (2012) Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism13: 695–713.
48.
RahimiB (2011) The agonistic social media: Cyberspace in the formation of dissent and consolidation of state power in postelection Iran. The Communication Review14(3): 158–178.
49.
SeoH (2014) Visual propaganda in the age of social media: An empirical analysis of Twitter images during the 2012 Israeli–Hamas conflict. Visual Communication Quarterly21(3): 150–161.
50.
ShaghasemiEBonyadT (2011) Internet and political change in Iran: Nature or content. Amity Journal of Media and Communication Studies1(1): 41–46.
51.
ShinK-AHanM (2016) The role of negative emotions on motivation and communicative action: Testing the validity of situational theory of problem solving in the context of South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication26(1): 76–93.
52.
SmallTA (2011) What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society14(6): 872–895.
53.
SmithHJPettigrewTFPippinGM, et al. (2012) Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review16(3): 203–232.
54.
SoonCSohYD (2014) Engagement@ web 2.0 between the government and citizens in Singapore: Dialogic communication on Facebook?Asian Journal of Communication24(1): 42–59.
55.
StarbirdKPalenL (2012, February) (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In: Proceedings of the acm 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp.7–16.
56.
TajfelHTurnerJCAustinWG, et al. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader56(65): 9780203505984-16.
57.
TauschNBeckerJCSpearsR, et al. (2011) Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101(1): 129.
58.
TufekciZWilsonC (2012) Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication62(2): 363–379.
59.
Van ZomerenMLeachCWSpearsR (2012) Protesters as “passionate economists” a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review16(2): 180–199.
60.
Van ZomerenMSpearsRFischerAH, et al. (2004) Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(5): 649.
61.
WalkerISmithH (eds) (2002) Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development and Integration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WilsonCDunnA (2011) The Arab Spring| Digital media in the Egyptian revolution: Descriptive analysis from the Tahrir data set. International Journal of Communication5: 25.
