Narratives of death: Systemic determinants of the coverage of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern

Abstract

This study used the 2014 Ebola outbreak as a case study to compare news coverage of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) between the Polarized Pluralist media system and the Liberal media system. This investigation revealed that partisan frames, emphasis on local and international efforts and use of health expert sources all differed across the two media systems. These differences suggest that social, political and economic attributes of media systems affect how news is shaped. When an event of international significance occurs, such as a disease outbreak, the characteristics that make up a media system will influence how issues are covered and presented to the public. Giving the current globalized nature of news, the findings in this study has implications for international news flow.

Keywords

Ebola epidemics media systems news coverage of health outbreaks public health emergency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

Carpenter

Hojnacki

(2006) Whose deaths matter? Mortality, advocacy, and attention to disease in the mass media. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31(4): 729–772.

Belknap

(2001) The CNN Effect: Strategic Enabler or Operational Risk? ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA.

Bennett

(1988) News: The Politics of Illusion. London: Longman.

Bennett

(1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40(2): 103–125.

CDC (2015) Ebola (Ebola Virus Disease), 25 September. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/index.html (accessed 27 September 2015).

Cook

(1998) Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. University of Chicago Press.

D’Angelo

Pollock

Kiernicki

, et al. (2013) Framing of AIDS in Africa: Press-state relations, HIV/AIDS news, and journalistic advocacy in four sub-Saharan Anglophone newspapers. Politics and Life Sciences 32(2): 100–125.

Dolan

Iredale

Williams

, et al. (2004) Consumer use of the internet for health information: A survey of primary care patients. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28(2): 147–153.

Dudo

Dahlstrom

Brossard

(2007) Reporting a potential pandemic: A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in U.S. newspapers. Science Communication 28: 429–454.

10.

Duhé

Cho

(2009) Network news coverage of avian flu: Identifying the characteristics of risk. Electronic News 3: 124–142.

11.

Entman

(1991) Symposium framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication 41(4): 6–27.

12.

Entman

(2004) Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.

13.

Entman

Paletz

(1981) Media and the conservative myth. Journal of Communication 30(4): 154–165.

14.

Esser

Umbricht

(2014) The evolution of objective and interpretative journalism in the western press comparing six news systems since the 1960s. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91(2): 229–249.

15.

Gans

(1979) Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time.

16.

Gilboa

(2005) The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political Communication 22(1): 27–44.

17.

Hallin

Gitlin

(1993) Agon and ritual: The Gulf War as popular culture and as television drama. Political Communication 10(4): 411–424.

18.

Hallin

Mancini

(2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Hampton

(2008) The ‘objectivity’ ideal and its limitations in 20th-century British journalism. Journalism Studies 9(4): 477–493.

20.

Hanitzsch

(2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory 17(4): 367–385.

21.

Hawkins

(2012) Terrorism and news of Africa post-9/11 coverage in The New York Times. Journal of African Media Studies 4(1): 13–25.

22.

Hayes

(2009) Statistical Methods for Communication Science. Abingdon: Routledge.

23.

Iyengar

(1991) Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Iyengar

Simon

(1993) News coverage of the gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research 20: 365–383.

25.

Janowitz

(1975) Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly 52(4): 618–626.

26.

Kennedy

(2014) WHO declares Ebola outbreak an international public health emergency. The Guardian, 8.

27.

Keyton

(2011) Communication Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

28.

Liebler

Bendix

(1996) Old-growth forests on network news: News sources and the framing of an environmental controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73(1): 53–65.

29.

Livingston

(2011) The CNN effect reconsidered (again): Problematizing ICT and global governance in the CNN effect research agenda. Media, War & Conflict 4(1): 20–36.

30.

Longest

Jr ( 2005) Health Policymaking.

31.

Neiger

Zandberg

(2004) Days of awe: The praxis of news coverage during national crisis. Communications 29(4): 429–446.

32.

Netter

(1992) The media and AIDS: A global perspective. In: Sepulveda

Fineberg

Mann

(eds.) AIDS: Prevention through Education: A World View. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.241–253.

33.

Neuendorf

(2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

34.

Nisbet

(2006) Avian Flu and the Surveillance Function of the News Media. Available at: http://www.csicop.org/scienceandmedia/birdflu/ (accessed 27 October 2015).

35.

Nossek

(2004) Our news and their news the role of national identity in the coverage of foreign news. Journalism 5(3): 343–368.

36.

Olsen

Carstensen

Høyen

(2003) Humanitarian crises: Testing the ‘CNN effect’. Forced Migration Review 1(16): 39–41.

37.

Otten

(1992) The influence of the mass media on health policy. Health Affairs (Millwood) 11(4): 111–118.

38.

Picard

(2004) Commercialism and newspaper quality. Newspaper Research Journal 25(1): 54–65.

39.

Paul

(2015) Ending Ebola: A Moving Target, pp. 15–17.

40.

Ridout

Fowler

Searles

(2012) Exploring the validity of electronic newspaper databases. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(6): 451–466.

41.

Robinson

(2005) The CNN effect revisited. Critical Studies in Media Communication 22(4): 344–349.

42.

Schudson

(2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149–170.

43.

Shaw

Carr-Hill

(1992) Public opinion and media coverage in Britain. Triumph of the image: the medias war in the Persian Gulf a global perspective. Westview Press: Oxford.

44.

Siebert

Peterson

Schramm

(1956) Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

45.

Waisbord

(2009) Advocacy journalism in a global context. In: Wahl-Jorgensen

Hanitzsch

(eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.371–385.

46.

Yan

Bissell

(2015) The sky is falling: Predictors of news coverage of natural disasters worldwide. Communication Research 45: 862–886.

47.

Yang

(2003) Framing the NATO air strikes on Kosovo across countries: Comparison of Chinese and US newspaper coverage. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands) 65(3): 231–249.