International aid agencies often claim to give the poor and disenfranchised a voice by helping them tell their stories to others located far away. But how do aid workers conceptualize and operationalize a politics of voice within media production processes? How do ideas about giving voice to others shape aid agencies’ engagement with mainstream news organizations? This article explores two contrasting news production case studies which took place in South Sudan and Mali, involving Save the Children, Christian Aid and their local partners. It finds that different approaches to giving voice exist in aid work, creating tensions within and between agencies. In addition commercialized notions of value for money, the influence of mediated donor reporting, and aid workers’ weak understandings of linguistic and intercultural interpretation combined to make aid agencies’ values-in-action far less empowering than they assumed.
AndersonI (2007) Global action international NGOs and advocacy. In: RugendykeB (ed.) NGOs as Advocates for Development in a Globalising World. London: Routledge, pp.71–95.
2.
BakerM (2006) Translation and Conflict. London; New York: Routledge.
3.
BassnettSTrivediH (eds) (1999) Post-Colonial Translation: Theory and Practice. London; New York: Routledge.
4.
BeckettC (2008) Supermedia: Saving Journalism So It Can Save the World. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BergeneAC (2007) Towards a critical realist comparative methodology. Journal of Critical Realism6(1): 5–27.
6.
BielsaEBassnettS (2009) Translation in Global News. London: Routledge.
7.
British Overseas Network for Development (BOND) event (2014) In the Public Interest: NGOs, Transparency and the Media. London: BOND.
8.
CollingwoodV (2006) Non-governmental organisations, power and legitimacy in international society. Review of International Studies32(3): 439–454.
9.
CooperG (2011) From Their Own Correspondent? New Media and the Changes in Disaster Coverage: Lessons to Be Learned. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
10.
CottleSNolanD (2007) Global humanitarianism and the changing aid-media field: Everyone was dying for footage. Journalism Studies8(6): 862–878.
11.
CouldryN (2010) Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. London: Sage.
DaviesN (2008) Flat Earth News. London: Chatto and Windus
15.
DograN (2012) Representations of Global Poverty: Aid, Development and International NGOs. London: I.B. Tauris.
16.
FentonN (2010) NGOs, new media and the mainstream news. In: FentonN (ed.) New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age. London: Sage, pp.153–168.
17.
FranksS (2013) Reporting Disasters: Famine, Aid, Politics and the Media. London: Hurst Publishers.
18.
FreireP (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Sheed and Ward.
19.
GentD (2014) Finding fluency in the field ethical challenges of conducting research in another language. In: LunnJ (ed.) Fieldwork in the Global South: Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.49–58.
20.
GudykunstBModyB (2002) Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication. New York: Sage.
21.
HoffmanPJWeissTG (2006) Sword and Salve: Confronting New Wars and Humanitarian Crises. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
HonnethA (1996) The Struggle for Recognition. London: Polity Press.
23.
IgoeJKelsallT (2005) Between a Rock and a Hard Place: African NGOs, Donors and the State. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Publishing.
24.
JonesB (2016) Looking good: Mediatisation and international NGOs. European Journal of Development Research29: 176–191.
25.
KilbyP (2004) Nongovernmental organizations and accountability in an era of global anxiety. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomatic and International Relations5: 67–78.
26.
KrauseM (2014) The Good Project: Humanitarian Relief NGOs and the Fragmentation of Reason. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.
27.
LeckH (2014) Whose voice? Ethics and dynamics of working with interpreters and research assistants. In: LunnJ (ed.) Fieldwork in the Global South: Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas. Abingdon, OX: Routledge, pp.59–68.
28.
LewisDMosseD (2006). Development Brokers and Translators: the Ethnography of Aid and Agencies. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
29.
ListerS (2003) NGO legitimacy technical issue or social construct?Critique of Anthropology23(2): 175–192.
30.
Lugo-OcandoJMalaoluPO (2014) Africa – That scar on our face. In: Lugo-OcandoJ (ed.) Blaming the Victim: How Global Journalism Fails Those in Poverty. London: Pluto Press, pp.85–103.
31.
MadianouMLongboanLOngJ (2015) Finding a voice through ‘humanitarian technologies’? Communications technology and participation in disaster recovery. International Journal of Communication9: 3020–3038.
32.
MoscoVLavinDO (2009) The labouring of international communication. In: ThussuD (ed.) Internationalizing Media Studies. London: Routledge, pp.147–162.
33.
MudimbeVY (1994) The Idea of Africa. Bloomington, IN; London: Indiana University Press.
NolanDMikamiA (2013) The things that we have to do’: Ethics and instrumentality in humanitarian communication. Global Media and Communication9(1): 53–70.
36.
OrgadS (2013) Visualizers of solidarity: Organizational politics in humanitarian and international development NGOs. Visual Communication12(3): 295–314.
37.
OrgadSSeuBFlanaganFet al. (2012) Knowing about and Acting in Relation to Distant Suffering (Report for Polis). London: London School of Economics.
38.
PowersM (2014) The structural organization of NGO publicity work: Explaining divergent publicity strategies at humanitarian and human rights organizations. International Journal of Communication8: 90–107.
39.
PowersM (2016a) NGO publicity and reinforcing path dependencies: Explaining the persistence of media-centered publicity strategies. International Journal of Press/Politics21: 490–507.
40.
PowersM (2016b) Beyond boon or bane: Using normative theories to evaluate the newsmaking efforts of NGOs. Journalism Studies18: 1070–1086.
41.
ReeseSD (2015) The globalization of media spaces; the case of transnational environmentalism in China. International Journal of Communication9: 2263–2281.
42.
RicoeurP (2005) The Course of Recognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
SambrookR (2010) Are Foreign Correspondents Redundant?Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
44.
SenA (2010) The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.
45.
SlimH (2002) By what authority? The legitimacy and accountability of non-governmental organisations. Paper presented at the international meeting on global trends and human rights – Before and after September 11, the International Council on Human Rights Policy, Geneva, 10–12 January.
46.
SpivakGC (1998) Can the subaltern speak? In: NelsonCGrossbergL (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. London: Macmillan, pp.271–315.
47.
TacchiJA (2008) Voice and poverty. Media Development1(1): 12–15.
48.
VenutiL (1998) The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London; New York: Routledge.
49.
WaisbordS (2011) Can NGOs change the news?International Journal of Communication5: 142–165.
50.
WrightK (in print). Who’s Reporting Africa Now? Non-governmental organizations, journalists and multimedia. New York: Peter Lang.
51.
YanacopulosH (2015) International NGO Engagement, Advocacy, Activism: The Faces and Spaces of Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
ZadekS (1996) Interlude looking back from 2010. In: SoggeD (ed.) Compassion and Calculation: The Business of Private Foreign Aid. London: Pluto Press, pp.24–35.
