The financial burdens of Filipino migrant workers are exacerbated by the lure of miscellaneous consumer goods peddled to them by businesses looking for a lucrative share of their remittances. This study examines a profit-oriented model of diasporic media that directly serves the business interests of its publisher and its advertisers. It analyses the Taiwan-based EEC Now magazine and criticizes the duplicity of its proclaimed mission of ‘Caring for Migrant Workers Now and in the Future’. Through a thematic analysis of advertisements published in selected issues of EEC Now, the study reveals the consumerist ideology espoused by the magazine: the commodification of the migrant worker’s body, the obligatory sending of balikbayan (repatriate) cargo boxes and cash remittances and the search for the next overseas destination. Applying concepts from Baudrillard’s theory of consumer society and San Juan’s critique of Filipino diaspora formation, the themes from the analysis reveal how profit-oriented diasporic media reflect social inequities and service the global capitalist system that ultimately spawned labour migration.
AlcidM (2006) NGO-Labor Union Cooperation in the promotion of the rights and interests of landbased overseas Filipino workers. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal15(3): 335–357.
2.
AsisM (2008) The social dimensions of international migration in the Philippines: Findings from research. In: AsisMBaggioF (eds) Moving Out, Back and Up: International Migration and Development Prospects in the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Scalabrini Migration Center, pp.77–108.
3.
BaileyOCammaertsBCarpentierN (2007) Understanding Alternative Media. Berkshire: Open University Press.
BasaC and De LaRosaR (2007) Me, us and them: Realities and illusions of Filipina domestic workers in Italy. In: HoegsholmF (ed.) In De Olde Worlde: Views of Filipino Migrants in Europe. Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Migration Research Network and Philippine Social Science Council, pp.136–159.
6.
BaudrillardJ (1998 [1970]) The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage.
7.
BhugraDAyonrindeO (2004) Depression in migrants and ethnic minorities. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment10: 13–17.
8.
BoniniT (2011) The media as ‘home-making’ tools: Life story of a Filipino migrant in Milan media. Media Culture & Society33(6): 869–883.
9.
BozdagCHeppASunaL (2012) Diasporic media as the ‘focus’ of communicative networking among migrants. In: RigoniISaittaE (eds) Mediating Cultural Diversity in a Globalised Public Space. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 96–115.
10.
CamposanoC (2012) Balikbayan boxes and the performance of intimacy by Filipino migrant women in Hong Kong. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal21(1): 83–103.
11.
CaspiDEliasN (2011) Don’t patronize me: Media-by and media-for minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies34(1): 62–82.
12.
CroteauD (2002) Media and ideology. In CroteauDHoynesW (eds) Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.159–194.
13.
Del RosarioJ (2007) Information needs of Filipinos in Belgium: A survey research. In: HoegsholmF (ed.) In De Olde Worlde: Views of Filipino Migrants in Europe. Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Migration Research Network and Philippine Social Science Council, pp.225–240.
14.
GeorgiouM (2013) Diaspora in the digital era: Minorities and media representation. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe12(4): 80–99.
15.
HiguchiNInabaN (2012) Migrant workers enchanted with consumer society: Transnationalism and global consumer culture in Bangladesh. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies13(1): 22–35.
16.
KamaA (2008) Labor migrants’ self-empowerment via participation in a diasporic magazine: Filipinos at Manila-Tel Aviv. Asian Journal of Communication18(3): 223–238.
17.
KarimK (2011) Global media policy and cultural pluralism. In: MansellRRaboyM (eds) The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.192–276.
18.
KellnerD (2003) Cultural studies, multiculturalism, and media culture. In: DinesGHumezJM (eds) Gender, Race, and Class in Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.9–20.
19.
LanP (2003) Political and social geography of marginal insiders: Migrant domestic workers. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal12(1): 99–125.
20.
Lindio-McGovernL (2004) Alienation and labor export in the context of globalization. Critical Asian Studies36(2): 217–238.
21.
ParrenasR (2001) Transgressing the nation-state: The partial citizenship and ‘Imagined (Global) Community’ of migrant Filipina domestic workers. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society26(4): 1129–1153.
San JuanE (2009) Overseas Filipino workers: The making of an Asian-Pacific Diaspora. The Global South3(2): 99–129.
24.
San JuanE (2011) Contemporary global capitalism and the challenge of the Filipino Diaspora. Global Society25(1): 7–27.
25.
StavrakakisY (2006) Objects of consumption, causes of desire: Consumerism and advertising in societies of commanded enjoyment. Gramma14: 83–106.
26.
TsagarousianouR (2004) Rethinking the concept of Diaspora: Mobility, connectivity and communication in a globalised world. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture1(1): 52–65.
27.
UrbanoR (2011) Global justice and the plight of Filipino domestic migrant workers. Journal of Asian and African Studies47(6), 605–619.
28.
YangDMartinezC (2005) Remittances and poverty in migrants home areas: Evidence from the Philippines’. In: OzdenCSchiffM (eds) International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp.81–121.
29.
ZhangYWildemuthB (2009) Qualitative analysis of content. In: WildemuthB (ed.) Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, pp.308–319.
