This paper offers an introduction to the transformative impact of collective candidacies on Brazil’s political representation. Focusing on the experience of ‘Juntas,’ a feminist collective that held office from 2018 to 2022, I argue they illustrate a resistance leadership practice moving people from the margins to the centre of formal political power. This practice works via a feminist and intersectional political mandate with the participation of diverse bodies, identities, and voices of civil society. The paper highlights the significance of Juntas as a platform that resisted traditional leadership, a unique model for future women’s collective candidacies, and a varied and intersectional example that can motivate critical leadership researchers to explore Global South leadership knowledge and practice.
BarrocoMLDS (2022) Human rights, neoconservatism and neofascism in contemporary Brazil. Serviço Social e Sociedade. Brazilian Journal Serviço Social e Sociedade, vol. 143, 12–21.
6.
Câmara dos Deputados (2023, February 26). Expressão Nacional - Representação das minorias na Câmara - 27/02/2023[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8mTILoQwB8.
CampusBL (2021) Juntas em um único número na urna? Uma análise das experiências de mandato coletivo no Brasil (2016-2020). [Doctoral Dissertation, Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais]. Repositorio UFMG.
10.
CollinsPH (2010) The new politics of community. American Sociological Review75(1): 7–30.
11.
CollinsonD (2011) Critical leadership studies. In BrymanACollinsonDGrintK, et al. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Leadership. London, UK: Sage, 181–194.
12.
CollinsonDSmolović JonesOGrintK (2018) ‘No more heroes’: critical perspectives on leadership romanticism. Organizational Studies39(11): 1625-1647.
Eslen-ZiyaHErhartI (2015) Toward postheroic leadership: a case study of Gezi’s collaborating multiple leaders. Leadership11(4): 471–488.
16.
GarciaSPirotaITombesiL (2022) Bolsonaro: ¿Amenaza o desafío para la democracia brasileña?Revista Sociedad43: 18-37.
17.
GohnMD (2000) 500 anos de lutas sociais no Brasil: movimentos sociais, ONGs e terceiro setor. Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais5(11): 11–40.
18.
GonzalezL (1984) Racismo e sexismo na cultura brasileira. Revista Ciências Sociais Hoje, Anpocs. Brazilian Journal Revista Ciências Sociais Hoje, Anpocs, 233–244.
19.
GurgelAMGuedesCAFriedrichK (2021) Flexibilization of the pesticide regulatory policy as an opportunity for Brazilian (necro)politics: advances in agribusiness and setbacks for health and the environment. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente57: 135–159.
20.
hooksb (1984) Feminist Theory from Margins to Center. Boston: South End Press.
IBGE Educa Jovens (2023c) Censo 2022 Brasil tem 1,7 milhão de indígenas e mais da metade deles vive na Amazônia Legal. Agencia IBGE Noticias. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br.
24.
JacksonSJ (2020) Black Lives Matter and the revitalization of collective visionary leadership. Leadership17(1): 8–17.
JurisJSitrinM (2016) Globalization, resistance, and social transformation. In CourpassonDVallasS (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Resistance. Sage, 31–50.
28.
JustSNMuhrSL (2019) “Together we rise”: collaboration and contestation as narrative drivers of the women's March. Leadership15(2): 245–267.
29.
LadkinDPatrickCB (2022) Whiteness in leadership theorizing: a critical analysis of race in Bass’ transformational leadership theory. Leadership18(2): 205–223.
30.
LearmonthMMorrellK (2021) Leadership as a project: neoliberalism and the proliferation of ‘leaders.’ Organization Theory2: 1–19.
31.
LiuH (2021) Redeeming Leadership. An Anti-racist Feminist Intervention. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
32.
MattosMB (2022) Governo Bolsonaro neofascismo e autocracia burguesa no Brasil. Relacoes Internacionais73: 025–039.
33.
MbembeA (2019) Necropolitics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MohantyCT (2003) Feminism without Borders. Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
37.
MunizRCMacchiavelloFGomezGM, et al. (2021) Covid-19 in Brazil in an era of necropolitics: resistance in the face of disaster. Disasters45(S1): S97−S118.
38.
Palmares Fundação Cultural (2012) Comunidades quilombolas: conceito, autodefinição e direitos. Palmares.gov.br. Available at: https://www.palmares.gov.br/?p=19099.
39.
QueirozEFC (2022) Os Movimentos sociais e o ativismo no brasil no embate com o governo de extrema direita de Jair Bolsonaro. Revista Movimentos Sociais4(6): 114–153.
40.
RibeiroD (2021) Lugar de Fala. Feminismos Plurais. Sao Paulo, SP: Sueli Carneiro e Jandaira.
41.
RuffinHG (2021) Working together to survive and thrive: the struggle for Black lives past and present. Leadership17(1): 32–46.
42.
SinhaPSmolović JonesOCarrollB (2019). Theorizing dramaturgical resistance leadership from the leadership campaigns of Jeremy Corbyn. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print 25 November.
43.
SinhaPSmolović JonesOCarrollB (2021) Theorizing dramaturgical resistance leadership from the leadership campaigns of Jeremy Corbyn. Human Relations74(3): 354–382.
44.
StraussD (2005) How to build a collaborative environment. In: StraussD (ed). The IAF Handbook of Group Facilitation: Best Practices from the Leading Organization in Facilitation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 191–204.
45.
TeixeiraACC (2020) Trajetórias do ideário participativo no Brasil, Caderno CRH33: 01– 15.
46.
TommaselliGCG (2020). Necropolítica, Racismo e Governo Bolsonaro. Caderno Prudentino de Geografia4(42): 179–199.
ZollerHMFairhurstGT (2007) Resistance leadership: the overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies. Human Relations60(9): 1331–1360.
