Leadership is fundamentally a social phenomenon, and a leader’s legitimacy in personal and social terms is determined partly by how effectively they incorporate the prototypical leader identity. Using the historical British officers’ mess as a case study, this article presents a conceptual examination of the function place can perform in the construction of collective leader identities and the interconnected influence shared history, materiality and social interaction can have in encouraging inclusivity in leadership. Leadership identity is an integral feature of military life which has historically drawn on complex cultural and legal traditions to underwrite the individual’s right to command. This article will argue that social places such as the officers’ mess have been utilised as a means of cultivating cohesion in the past and that they may have an application in furthering inclusive collective leader identities in the future.
AnnettR (2020) RAF College, Cranwell: A Centenary Celebration: We Seek the HighestYorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen and Sword Aviation and Air World. Kindle Edition).
BashamV (2013) War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.
4.
BathurstRCainT (2013) Embodied leadership: the aesthetics of gesture. Leadership93(3): 258–377.
5.
Blake-BeardSRobertsLMEdgehillB, et al. (2019) Feeling connected: the importance of engagement, authenticity and relationships in the careers of diverse professionals. In: RobertsLMMayoAJThomasDA (eds), Race, Work and Leadership: New Perspectives on the Black Experience. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, pp. 151–172.
6.
BrownAD (1997) Narcissism, identity, and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review22(3): 643–686.
7.
BrownAD (2006) A narrative approach to collective identities*. Journal of Management Studies43(4): 731–753.
8.
BrownADHumphreysM (2002) Nostalgia and the narrativization of identity: a turkish case study. British Journal of Management13: 141–159.
9.
BullockCL (2019) Driving new narratives: women-leader identities in the automotive industry. Gender in Management: An International Journal34(3): 200–216.
10.
CarlilePRNicoliniDLangleyA, et al. (2013) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Centre for Army Leadership (2015) The Army Leadership Code. Camberley: Army Media & Comms.
ChemersMM (2001) Leadership effectiveness: an integrative review. In: HoggMATindaleRS (eds), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp. 376–399.
14.
ClarkeCABrownADHaileyVH (2009) Working identities? antagonistic discursive resources and managerial identity. Human Relations62(3): 323–352.
15.
CollinsonDL (2019) Critical leadership studies: exploring the dialectics of leadership. In: RiggioRE (ed), What’s Wrong with Leadership? Improving Leadership Research and Practice. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 260–278.
16.
CollinsonD (2011) Critical leadership studies. In: BrymanACollinsonDGrintK, et al. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE.
17.
CunliffeALEriksenM (2011) Relationship Leadership. Human Relations64(11): 1425–1499.
18.
DansereauFGraenGHagaWJ (1975) A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance13(1): 46–78.
19.
DayDVHarrisonMM (2007) A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review17: 360–373.
20.
Defence Leadership Centre (2004) Leadership in Defence. Llanelli: DSDC. (L).
21.
DempseyN (2021) UK Defence Personnel StatisticsReport. UK,: Commons Library Briefing.
22.
DeRueDSAshfordSJ (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. The Academy of Management Review35(4): 627–647.
23.
Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry Regimental Museum Misc 565c (1879) Snuff Box.
24.
DownSReveleyJ (2009) Between narration and interaction: situating first-line supervisor identity work. Human Relations62(3): 379–401.
25.
Elonga MboyoJP (2019) School leadership and Black and minority ethnic career prospects in England: The choice between being a group prototype or deviant head teacher. Educational Management Administration & Leadership47(1): 110–128.
26.
FaisonPLinHBroomesA (2019) Authenticity in the workplace: an African American Perspective. In: RobertsLMMayoAJThomasDA (eds), Race, Work and Leadership: New Perspectives on the Black Experience. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, pp. 135–150.
27.
FrenchD (2005) Military Identities: The Regimental System, The British Army and The British People C.1870-2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
GoslingE (2016) Tommy Atkins, War Office Reform and the Social and Cultural Presence of the Late-Victorian Army in Britain 1868-1899. PhD Thesis: University of Plymouth.
29.
GraenGCashmanJF (1975) A Role Making Model in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach. In: Hung JG and Larson LL (eds), Leadership Frontiers. Kent: Kent State University Press, pp. 143–165.
30.
GrintK (2005) Problems, problems, problems: the social construction of 'leadership'. Human Relations58(11): 1467–1494.
31.
HaleHC (2008) The development of british military masculinities through symbolic resources. Culture & Psychology14(3): 305–332.
32.
HardingR (2004) The Royal Navy 1930-1990: Innovation and Defence. London: Routledge.
33.
HarrisonC (2018) Leadership Theory and Research: A Critical Approach to New and Existing Paradigms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
HarroldJPorterR (2005) Britannia Royal Naval College 1905-2005: A Century of Officer Training at Dartmouth. Dartmouth: Richard Webb.
35.
HawkinsB (2015) Ship-shape: materializing leadership in the British Royal Navy. Human Relations68(6): 951–971.
HoldsworthAPugsleyC (2005) Sandhurst: A Tradition of Leadership. London: Third Millennium Publishing.
38.
HussainAMIshaqM (2016) Equality and diversity in the british armed forces: progress, challenges and prospects. Defense & Security Analysis32(1): 36–50.
39.
JansenMMDelahaijR (2020) Leadership acceptance through the lens of social identity theory: a case study of military leadership in Afghanistan. Armed Forces & Society46(4): 657–676.
40.
KapasiISangKJCSitkoR (2016) Gender, authentic leadership and identity: analysis of women leaders' autobiographies. Gender in Management: An International Journal31(5/6): 339–358.
41.
KingA (2007) The existence of group cohesion in the armed forces. Armed Forces & Society33(4): 638–645.
42.
KirkeC (2009) Group cohesion, culture, and practice. Armed Forces & Society35(4): 745–753.
43.
KomivesSROwenJELongerbeamSD, et al. (2005) Developing a leadership identity: a grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development46(6): 593–611.
44.
KüpersWM (2013) Embodied inter-practices of leadership – phenomenological perspectives on relational and responsive leading and following. Leadership9(3): 335–357.
45.
LadkinD (2013) From perception to flesh: a phenomenological account of the felt experience of leadership. Leadership9(3): 320–334.
46.
LearmonthMMorrellK (2019) Critical Perspectives on Leadership: The Language of Corporate Power. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
47.
LevrayF (1919) Etiquette in the mess-rooms of the British Army. The Lotus Magazine10(3): 106–109.
48.
LordRGHallRJ (2005) Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skill. The Leadership Quarterly16: 591–615.
49.
LoweF (2013) Keeping leadership white: invisible blocks to black leadership and its denial in white organizations. Journal of Social Work Practice27(2): 149–162.
50.
LumbyJ (2009) Performativity and identity: mechanisms of exclusion. Journal of Education Policy24(3): 353–369.
51.
McClellanP (2012) Race, gender, and leadership identity: an autoethnography of reconciliation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education25(1): 89–100.
52.
Misc 565 c (1879) Snuffbox [Object]. Bodmin: DCLI Regimental Museum.
53.
OffermannLRCoatsMR (2018) Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change over two decades. The Leadership Quarterly29(4): 513–522.
54.
OspinaSSorensonG (2007) Toward a contextual theory of leadership. In: GoethalsGRSorensonG (eds), The Quest for a General Theory of Leadership. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 188–204.
55.
RidgewayCL (2003) Status characteristics and leadership. In: van KippenbergDHoggMA (eds), Leadership and Power: Identity Processes in Groups and Organisations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
56.
RopoASauerESalovaaraP (2013) Embodiment of leadership through material place. Leadership9(3): 378–395.
57.
ScottCPRJiangHWildmanJL, et al. (2018) The impact of implicit collective leadership theories on the emergence and effectiveness of leadership networks in teams. Human Resource Management Review28: 464–481.
58.
ShaughnessySPCoatsMR (2019) Leaders are complex: expanding our understanding of leader identity. In: RiggioRE (ed), What’s Wrong with Leadership? Improving Leadership Research and Practice. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 173–188.
59.
ShepperdA (1980) Sandhurst: The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and its Predecessors. London and New York: Country Life Books.
60.
SieboldGL (2007) The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society33(2): 286–295.
61.
SimsCMGongTHughesC (2017) Linking leader and gender identities to authentic leadership in small businesses. Gender in Management: An International Journal32(5): 318–329.
62.
SpiersEM (1980) The Army and Society 1815-1914. London and New York: Longman.
63.
SpiersEM (1992) The Late Victorian Army 1868-1902. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
64.
SveningssonSLarssonM (2006) Fantasies of leadership: identity work. Leadership2(2): 203–224.
65.
Royal Air Force (2020) Inspiring Leadership. Cranwell: Tedder Academy of Leadership.
66.
ThornborrowT (2005) The Construction of Collective Identity in the British Parachute Regiment: A Storytelling Approach. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.
67.
ThornborrowTBrownAD (2009) `Being regimented': aspiration, discipline and identity work in the british parachute regiment. Organization Studies30(4): 355–376.
68.
SmithRTTrueG (2014) Warring Identities. Society and Mental Health4(2): 147–161.
69.
Uhl-BienM (2006) Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing.
UK Ministry of Defence (2019) The Queen’s Regulations for the Army 1975 (Amendment No 37). London: Ministry of Defence.
72.
UK Ministry of Defence (2016) The Queen’s Regulations for the Royal Air Force. Amendment No 41). London: The Stationary Office.
73.
UK Ministry of Defence (2014) The Queen’s Regulations for the Royal Navy (BRd 2). Fareham: Navy Publications and Graphics Organisation.
74.
VogelBReichardRJBatističS, et al. (2020) A bibliometric review of the leadership development field: how we got here, where we are and where we are headed. The Leadership Quarterly. Epub ahead of print. 28 February 2020. ISSN: 1048-984.
75.
WareV (2014) Military Migrants: Fighting for Your Country. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
WashingtonEAMaeseEMcFeelyS (2019) Workplace engagement and the glass ceiling: the experience of black professionals. In: RobertsLMMayoAJThomasDA (eds), Race, Work and Leadership: New Perspectives on the Black Experience. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, pp. 115–134.
77.
Wigston Air Chief MarshallM (2019) Wigston Review into Inappropriate Behaviours Report. UK: Ministry of DefenceJuly.
78.
WilsonE (2017) A Social History of British Naval Officers, 1775-1815. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
79.
WoodwardR (2017) The Palgrave International Handbook of Gender and the Military. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
80.
WoodwardRNeil JenkingsK (2011) Military Identities in the Situated Accounts of British Military Personnel. Sociology45(2): 252–268.
