This article analyzes the sociomaterial construction of plural and hierarchical leadership in liminal and dominant spaces. Combining insights from, first, the emerging body of studies exploring the role of spaces in sociomaterial construction of leadership; second, spatial management and organization research focusing on liminal spaces; and third, Victor Turner’s social structure–anti-structure framework, it is argued that dominant spaces actively participate in a sociomaterial construction of leadership that reflects the social structure of an organization. Liminal spaces as places fostering the experience of communitas, then, actively participate in the sociomaterial construction of plural leadership if collectively used.
AlvessonMSveningssonS (2003)
Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations56(12): 1435–1459.
2.
BathurstRCainT (2013a) Essay: from authenticity to communitas: An ecology of leadership. In: LadkinDSpillerC (eds) Authentic Leadership: Clashes, Convergences and Coalescences.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, pp.195–207.
3.
BathurstRCainT (2013b)
Embodied leadership: The aesthetics of gesture. Leadership9(3): 358–377.
CollinsonD (2011) Critical leadership studies. In: BrymanACollinsonDGrintKet al. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Leadership.
London:
SAGE Publications Ltd, pp.181–194.
6.
CollinsonD (2014)
Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies?Leadership10(1): 36–55.
7.
CrevaniL (2018)
Is there leadership in a fluid world? Exploring the ongoing production of direction in organizing. Leadership14(1): 83–109.
8.
CrevaniLLindgrenMPackendorffJ (2010)
Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management26(1): 77–86.
9.
DaleK (2005)
Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization12(5): 649–678.
10.
DaleKBurrellG (2008) Spaces of Organization and the Organization of Space.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
DaleKBurrellG (2015) Leadership and space in 3D: Distance, dissent and disembodiment in the case of a new academic building. In: RopoASalovaaraPSauerEet al. (eds) Leadership in Spaces and Places.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, pp.217–241.
12.
DenisJLLangleyASergiV (2012)
Leadership in the plural. Academy of Management Annals6(1): 211–283.
13.
Dixon NM (1997) The hallways of learning. Organizational Dynamics 25(4): 23–34.
14.
EdwardsG (2015) Community as Leadership.
Cheltenham, UK:
Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
15.
FairhurstGTGrantD (2010)
The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly24(2): 171–210.
16.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
New York:
Anchor Books.
17.
HansenHRopoASauerE (2007)
Aesthetic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly18(6): 544–560.
18.
HawkinsB (2015)
Ship-shape: Materializing leadership in the British Royal Navy. Human Relations68(6): 951–971.
19.
HawkinsBEdwardsG (2017) Facing the monsters: Embracing liminality in leadership development. In: KempsterSTurnerAFEdwardsG (eds) Field Guide to Leadership Development.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp.203–217.
20.
IedemaRLongDCarrollK (2010) Corridor communication, spatial design and patient safety: Enacting and managing complexities. In: Van MarrewijkAYanowD (eds) Organizational Spaces: Rematerializing the Workaday World.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.41–57.
21.
JonesA (2006)
Developing what? An anthropological look at the leadership development process across cultures. Leadership2(4): 481–498.
22.
LadkinD (2008)
Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. The Leadership Quarterly19(1): 31–41.
23.
LadkinD (2010) Rethinking Leadership: A New Look at Old Leadership Questions.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing.
24.
LadkinD (2013)
From perception to flesh: A phenomenological account of the felt experience of leadership. Leadership9(3): 320–334.
25.
Leadership (2013) Special issue: The materiality of leadership: Corporeality and subjectivity. 9(3).
26.
MelinaLRBurgessGJFalkmanLLet al. (eds) (2013) The Embodiment of Leadership.
San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
27.
ObornEBarrettMDawsonS (2013)
Distributed leadership in policy formulation: A sociomaterial perspective. Organization Studies34(2): 253–276.
28.
OlavesonT (2001)
Collective effervescence and communitas: Processual models of ritual and society in Emile Durkheim and Victor Turner. Dialectical Anthropology26(2): 89–124.
29.
ParrisDLPeacheyJW (2013)
Encouraging servant leadership: A qualitative study of how a cause-related sporting event inspires participants to serve. Leadership9(4): 486–512.
30.
RopoADe PaoliDSalovaaraPet al. (2015) Why does space need to be taken seriously in leadership and organization studies and practice? In: RopoASalovaaraPSauerEet al. (eds) Leadership in Spaces and Places.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.1–23.
31.
RopoAParviainenJ (2001)
Leadership and bodily knowledge in expert organizations: Epistemological rethinking. Scandinavian Journal of Management17(1): 1–18.
32.
RopoASalovaaraP (2018) Spacing leadership as an embodied and performative process. Leadership. Epub ahead of print 16 April 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1742715018768707.
33.
RopoASauerESalovaaraP (2013)
Embodiment of leadership through material place. Leadership9(3): 378–395.
SalovaaraPRopoA (2018) Lefebvre and spacing leadership: From power-over to power-with. In: KingmaSDaleKWassermanV (eds) Organizational Space and Beyond: The Significance of Henri Lefebvre for Organizational Studies.
London:
Routledge. pp. 72–75.
36.
SauerE (2015) The hospital as a space of power: Ownership of space and symbols of power in the hospital setting. In: RopoASalovaaraPSauerEet al. (eds) Leadership in Spaces and Places.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.242–263.
37.
ShorttH (2015)
Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations68(4): 633–658.
38.
SinclairA (2005)
Body possibilities in leadership. Leadership1(4): 387–406.
39.
SinhaPN (2010)
The dramatistic genre in leadership studies: Implications for research and practice. Leadership6(2): 185–205.
40.
SturdyASchwarzMSpicerA (2006)
Guess who’s coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy. Human Relations59(7): 929–960.
41.
SöderlundJBorgE (2017) Liminality in management and organization studies: Process, position and place. International Journal of Management Reviews. Epub ahead of print 15 November 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12168.
42.
TaylorSSpicerA (2007)
Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews9(4): 325–346.
43.
TurnerE (2012) Communitas: The Anthropology of Collective Joy.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
TurnerV (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and anti-Structure.
New Brunswick:
Aldine Transaction.
45.
TurnerV (1974) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
46.
TurnerV (1979)
Frame, flow and reflection: Ritual and drama as public liminality. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies6(4): 465–499.
47.
Van GennepA (1960 [1909]) The Rites of Passage.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
48.
Van MarrewijkAYanowD (eds) (2010) Organizational Spaces: Rematerializing the Workday World.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing.
49.
VesalaHTuomivaaraS (2018) Experimenting with work practices in a liminal space: A working period in a rural archipelago. Human Relations. 71(10): 1371–1394.
50.
WoodM (2005)
The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1101–1121.
51.
YipJRaelinJA (2012)
Threshold concepts and modalities for teaching leadership practice. Management Learning43(3): 333–354.
52.
ZhangZSpicerA (2014)
‘Leader, you first’: The everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy. Human Relations67(6): 739–762.
