Drawing on a contextualised case, we present a specific approach to leadership studies that brings together history, sociology and politics. We start with the following event. In August 2015, the election of Kezia Dugdale as leader of the Labour Party meant that, for the first time the leaders of the three main political parties in the Scottish Parliament were women. We approach the study of this significant leadership event, first, through a critique of aspects of leadership studies as a field. We next consider the potential for socio-historical approaches in understanding this event. Then, as a contextualised example of this alternative approach to studying leadership, we apply Bourdieu’s theoretical concepts – in particular the political field – in order to historicise the conditions of possibility of this event. Finally, we consider issues of power and gender in relation to how the leaders position themselves in relation to their parties and to each other within the political field. In so doing, we contribute to critical leadership studies by developing and demonstrating a socio-historical approach that can help us to identify processes of organisation and change in relation to the emergence of leaders.
AbbottA (1998) The causal devolution. Sociological Methods Research27(2): 148–181.
2.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society4(2): 139–158.
3.
Adler-Nissen R (2012) Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. Oxford: Routledge.
4.
AtwaterLEMumfordMDSchriesheimCAet al. (2014) Editorial. Retraction of leadership articles: Causes and prevention. The Leadership Quarterly25(6): 1174–1180.
5.
BeckwithK (1992) Comparative research and electoral systems: Lessons from France and Italy. Women and Politics12(1): 1–33.
6.
BogdanorV (1999) Devolution in the United Kingdom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BoltanskiL (2008) Rendre la réalité inacceptable, Paris: Demopolis.
8.
BourdieuP (1980) Le sens pratique, Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
9.
BourdieuP (1985) Social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society14: 723–744.
10.
BourdieuP (1990a) Droit et passe-droit [Le champ des pouvoirs territoriaux et la mise en oeuvre des règlements]. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales81: 86–96.
11.
Bourdieu P (1990b) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuP (1995) Sur les rapports entre la sociologie et l’histoire en Allemagne et en France. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales106–107: 108–122.
13.
BourdieuP (2000) Les structures sociales de l’économie, Paris: Éditions de Seuil.
14.
BourdieuP (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge: Polity.
15.
BourdieuP (2012) Sur l’état, Paris: Raisons d’agir/Seuil.
16.
Bourdieu P and Wacquant L (1992) Invitation to a reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
BreitenbachE (1990) ‘Sisters are doing it for themselves’ the women’s movement in Scotland. Scottish Government Yearbook1990: 209–225.
18.
BrownA (2000) Designing the Scottish Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs53: 542–556.
19.
BrownAStrachanY (1991/1998) The implications of a Scottish parliament for women’s organizations in Scotland. In: PatersonL (ed.) A Diverse Assembly: The Debate on a Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 211–215.
20.
BrowneS (2014) The Women’s Liberation Movement in Scotland, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21.
BrubakerR (1996) Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe, Cambridge: CUP.
CalhounC (2013) For the social history of the present: Bourdieu as historical sociologist. In: GorskiPS (ed.) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 36–66.
Cameron D and Shaw S (2016) Gender, power and political speech: Women and language in the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
CharleC (2013) Comparative and transnational history and the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. In: GorskiPS (ed.) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 67–88.
29.
Collie L, Hoare J and Roddick J (1991) Women in the Green Party. In: Woman’s Claim of Right Group (ed.) A Woman’s Claim of Right in Scotland. Edinburgh: Polygon, pp.66–74.
30.
Collinson D (2014) Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership10: 36.
31.
ConroyH (1992) Constitutional Convention’s Campaign. Scottish Government Yearbook1992: 74–83.
32.
Crick B and Millar D (1995) To Make the Parliament of Scotland a Model for Democracy. Vol. 7. Edinburgh: John Wheatley Centre.
33.
CrossleyN (2003) From reproduction to transformation: Social movement fields and radical habitus. Theory, Culture and Society20: 43–68.
EwanELInnisSReynoldsS (2006) The Biographical Dictionary of Scottish Women, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
38.
Eyal G (2005) The making and breaking of the Czechoslovak political field. In Wacquant L (ed.) (2005) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Polity, pp.151–177.
39.
Fraser N (2012) Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso Books.
40.
FyfeM (2014) A Problem like Maria, Edinburgh: Luath Press.
41.
Galloway K and Robertson J (1991) Introduction: A Woman’s Claim of Right for Scotland’. In: Woman's Claim of Right Group, A Woman's Claim of Right in Scotland. Edinburgh: Polygon, pp.1–6.
42.
Gay O, Winetrobe BK and Wood E (1995) The Government of Scotland: Recent Proposals. Research Paper 95/13. London: Home Affairs Section, House of Commons Library.
43.
Gorski PS (ed.) (2013a) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
GorskiPS (2013b) Bourdieu as theorist of change. In: GorskiPS (ed.) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–18.
45.
Harrison R (2016) Call for papers. In: International studying leadership conference, Edinburgh, December.
46.
HassanGShawE (2012) The Strange Death of Labour Scotland, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
47.
Hersh M (1991) Women in campaigning groups in Central Scotland. In: Woman’s Claim of Right Group (ed.) A Woman’s Claim of Right for Scotland. Edinburgh: Polygon, pp.102–134.
48.
HobsbawmE (2016) Pierre Bourdieu, critical sociology and social history. New Left Review101: 36–47.
JencksC (2005) The Scottish Parliament, London: Scala Publishers Ltd.
51.
Johns R and Mitchell J (2016) Takeover: Explaining the extraordinary rise of the SNP. London: Biteback.
52.
KauppiN (1999) Power or subjection? French women politicians in the European Parliament. The European Journal of Women’s Studies6: 329–340.
53.
KellasJG (1992) The Scottish constitutional convention. Scottish Government Yearbook1992: 50–58.
54.
Kenny M (2013) The Scottish Parliament’s record on women’s representation is in the balance. Available at: democraticaudit.com (accessed 12 October 2016).
55.
Kerr R and Robinson S (2009) The hysteresis effect as creative adaptation of the habitus: Dissent and transition to the ‘corporate’ in post-Soviet Ukraine. Organization 16(6), pp.829–853.
56.
KerrRRobinsonS (2011) Leadership as an elite field: The role of the Scottish banks in the crisis of 2007–2009. Leadership7(2): 151–173.
57.
Kerr R and Robinson S (2016) Architecture, symbolic capital and elite mobilisations: The case of the Royal Bank of Scotland corporate campus. Organization 23(5): pp.699–721.
58.
KerrRRobinsonSKElliottC (2016) Modernism, postmodernism, and corporate power: Historicizing the architectural typology of the corporate campus. Management and Organizational History11(2): 123–146.
59.
LevyC (1992) A woman’s place. The future Scottish Parliament. The Scottish Government Yearbook1992: 59–73.
60.
Lindsay I (1991) Constitutional change and the gender deficit. In: Woman’s Claim of Right Group (ed.) A Woman’s Claim of Right for Scotland. Edinburgh: Polygon, pp.7–13.
61.
Lovenduski J (1997) Gender politics: A breakthrough for women. Parliamentary Affairs 54(4): 200–212.
MacDonald LO (1991) Women in the Scottish churches. In: Woman’s Claim of Right Group (ed.) A woman’s claim of right for Scotland. Edinburgh: Polygon, pp.77–94.
64.
MackayFKennyM (2007) Women’s representation in the 2007 Scottish parliament: Temporary setback or return to the norm?Scottish Affairs60(1): 80–93.
65.
Mackay F, Myers F and Brown A (2003) Towards a new politics? Women and the constitutional change in Scotland. In: Women Making Constitutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp.84–98.
66.
MacwhirterI (1990) After Doomsday. Scottish Government Yearbook1990: 21–34.
67.
McCrae R (1991) Women in the Scottish Labour Party. In: Woman’s Claim of Right Group (ed.), A woman’s claim of right for Scotland. Edinburgh: Polygon, pp.47–59.
68.
McCroneD (2005) Cultural capital in an understated nation: The case of Scotland. British Journal of Sociology56: 65–82.
ParryKMumfordMDBowerIet al. (2014) Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: A review of the first 25 years of The Leadership Quarterly. The Leadership Quarterly25: 132–151.
76.
Paterson L (ed.) (1998) A Diverse Assembly. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
77.
Paterson L and McCrone D (eds) (1992) The final report of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. 1992. The Scottish Government Yearbook, Unit for the Study of Government in Scotland, University of Edinburgh, 91.
Scottish Parliament (2000) Official Report, 21 June 2000. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament.
86.
SewellWH (1999) The concept(s) of culture. In: BonnellVEHuntL (eds) Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 35–61.
87.
ShortC (1996) Women in the Labour party. In: LovenduskiJNorrisP (eds) Women in Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–26.
88.
SimontonDK (1984) Genius, Creativity, and Leadership. Historiometric Inquiries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
SpectorBA (2016) Carlyle, Freud, and the Great Man Theory more fully considered. Leadership12(2): 250–260.
90.
SpoelstraSButlerNDelaneyH (2016) Never let an academic crisis go to waste: Leadership studies in the wake of journal retractions. Leadership12(4): 383–397.
91.
SteinmetzG (2011) Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology. Cultural Sociology5(1): 45–66.
92.
Storey J, Hartley J, Denis J-L, et al. (eds) (2017) Routledge Companion to Leadership. Oxford: Routledge.
93.
Susen S (2015) Towards a critical sociology of dominant ideologies: An unexpected reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski. Cultural Sociology 10(2): 195–246.
94.
SwartzDL (2013) Symbolic Power, Politics and Intellectuals, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95.
TorranceD (2015) Nicola Sturgeon: A Political Life, Edinburgh: Birlinn.
96.
TourishD (2011) Leading questions: Journal rankings, academic freedom and performativity: What is, or should be, the future of Leadership?Leadership7(3): 367–381.
97.
WacquantLJD (2005) Symbolic power in the rule of the ‘state nobility’. In: WacquantL (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 133–150.
98.
Weber M (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe.
99.
WilliamsGA (1996) When was Wales? In: WoolfS (ed.) Nationalism in Europe 1815 to the Present, London: Routledge, pp. 192–203.
100.
Woman’s Claim of Right Group (1991) A Woman’s Claim of Right in Scotland, Edinburgh: Polygon.
101.
WrightK (1997) The People Say Yes. The Making of Scotland’s Parliament, Glendaruel: Argyll Publishing.
102.
YammarinoFJMumfordMDSerbanAet al. (2013) Assassination and leadership. Leadership Quarterly24(6): 822–841.
