This qualitative (phenomenological) study focused on gaining a deep understanding of the experiences of women leaders in Mexico, a predominantly male-dominated culture. Seven women leaders were interviewed to share their personal experiences, reflections, feelings, ideas, and actions related to their leadership positions in different arenas, such as corporate, political, academic, and non-profit organizations.
The Solution
We conducted a thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews to discover commonalities among the experiences of the participants. The analysis revealed six themes: academic preparation is necessary, there are innate characteristics, decisions are made under principles and ethical values, the job itself is very important, the goal is to find a balance between personal and professional time, and the leadership position gives benefits.
The Stakeholders
This research has implications for human resource development (HRD) practitioners, academics, and executives. HRD practitioners can design more effective interventions, deliver more effective training and leadership programs, and provide opportunities focused on women interested in reaching top executive positions. This research suggests the importance of future research, both qualitative and quantitative in Mexico, focusing on research of women, Mexican women, and Mexican women leaders.
BermanS.MaerkerD. (2000). Mujeres y poder [Women and power]. México City, México: Raya En El Agua.
2.
BieremaL. L. (2002). A feminist approach to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 244-268. doi:10.1177/1534484302012006
3.
BieremaL. L.TisdellE.Johnson-BaileyJ.GedroJ. (2002). Integrating feminist research and practice in the field of HRD. In EganT. M.LynhamS. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development (pp. I-4). Baton Rouge, LA: Academy of Human Resource Development.
4.
BrymanA. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology. The British Journal of Sociology, 35, 75-92.
5.
BurkeR. J. (2002). Do workaholics prefer demanding, aggressive, and results-oriented organizational cultures?Career Development International, 7, 211-217.
6.
BuzzanellP. M.MeisenbachR.RemkeR. (2005). The good working mother: Managerial women’s sensemaking and feelings about work-family issues. Communication Studies, 56, 261-285.
7.
Chávez-ArellanoM. N.Váquez-GarcíaV. (2011). Administrators of rural municipal female presidents in Tlaxcala, México, 1992-2010, from the protagonists’ perception. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo, 8, 45-78.
8.
ChrislerJ. C.ClappC. (2008). When the boss is a woman. In PaludiM. A. (Ed.), The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce (pp. 33-66). Westport, CT: Praeger.
9.
ChristmanD.McClellanR. (2008). “Living on barbed wire”: Resilient women administrators in educational leadership programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 3-29. doi:10.1177/0012161X07309744
10.
ClancyS. (2007). ¿Por qué no hay más mujeres en la cima de la escala corporativa: Debido a estereotipos, a diferencias biológicas o a escogencias personales? [Why aren’t more women at the top of the corporate ladder: Stereotypes, biological differences, or choices made?]. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 38, 1-8.
11.
ClarkC. M.CaffarellaR. S.IngramP. B. (1999). Women in leadership: Living the constraints of the glass ceiling. Initiatives, 59, 65-76.
12.
CollinsG. (2009). When everything changed: The amazing journey of American women from 1960 to present. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
13.
Contreras-GarduñoJ. Q.Camacho-FernándezM.Cortés-LópezC. (2001). Hombres y mujeres, sus diferencias como líder [Men and women, their differences as leader]. Memoria electrónica del Coloquio de Investigación de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM). Available from http://www.claem.org
14.
CreswellJ. C. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
DominiciF.FriedL. P.ZegerS. L. (2009). So few women leaders. Academe, 95(4), 25-27.
17.
EaglyA. H. (2007). Female leadership advantages and disadvantages: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1-12.
18.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62-71.
19.
ErlandsonD. A.HarrisE. L.SkipperB. L.AllenS. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
20.
FineM. G. (2009). Women leader’s discursive construction of leadership. Women’s Studies in Communication, 32, 180-202. doi:10.1080/07491409.2009.10162386
FriezeI. H.PauknerovaD. (2008). Continuing problems for women becoming leaders. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8, 247-249. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00150.x
23.
FröhlichR.PetersS. B. (2007). PR Bunnies caught in the agency ghetto? Gender stereotypes, organizational factors, and women’s careers in PR agencies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19, 229-254.
24.
FurstS. A.ReevesM. (2008). Queens of the hill: Creative destruction and the emergence of executive leadership of women. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 372-384.
25.
GloverS. K. (2009). An empirical study investigating the key success factors amongst women in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Lawrence Technological University). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/33/89/3389924.html
26.
HeideggerM. (1967). What is a thing?South Bend, IN: Regnery Gateway.
27.
Helms MillsJ. C. (2005). Organizational change and representations of women in a North American utility company. Gender, Work & Organization, 12, 242-269.
28.
Hernández-PalominoJ.Rodríguez-MoraM.EspinozaJ. J. (2010). Mujeres directivas en las MIPYMES de México [Women leaders in the small businesses in México]. Revista Internacional de Administración y Finanzas, 3, 15-24.
29.
HerzbergF. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees?Harvard Business Review, 46, 53-62.
30.
HofstedeG. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
HollandJ. (Ed.). (2002). 1000 years of famous people. New York, NY: Kingfisher.
32.
IturbeE.TalanR. (2006). Women’s leadership in México. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Available from www.topkinisis.com
33.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
34.
MadsenS. R. (2007). Learning to lead in higher education: Insights into the family backgrounds of women university presidents. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 5, 183-200.
35.
MadsenS. R. (2008). On becoming a woman leader: Learning from the experiences of universities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Méndez-MorseS. (2004). Constructing mentors: Latina educational leaders’ role models and mentors. The Journal of Leadership for Effective & Equitable Organization, 40, 561-590. doi:10.1177/0013161X04267112
37.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
MillerS. K.WashingtonY. C.FieneJ. R. (2006). Female superintendents: Historic barriers and prospects for the future. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 4, 219-242.
39.
MiramontesG. (2008). A qualitative study examining leadership characteristics of Mexican leaders (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/33/11/3311373.html
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2008). The price of prejudice: Labour market discrimination on the grounds of gender and ethnicity. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/43244511.pdf
44.
Ortiz-OrtegaA. (2009). Poder, mujeres y liderazgo: Guía incluyente en un contexto global [Power, women, and leadership: Inclusive guide in a global context]. Monterrey, México: Instituto Estatal de las Mujeres de Nuevo León.
PillowW. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
47.
PompperD. (2001). Fifty years later: Mid-career women of color against the glass ceiling in communications organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 464-486. doi:10.1108/09534811111144629
48.
RaphaelR. (2014). Mirreynato: La otra desigualdad [Myrreynato: The other inequality]. México City, México: Tiempos de Hoy.
StephensonM. (2010). Fathers, families, and work: Putting “working fathers” in the picture. The Political Quarterly, 81, 237-242. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02084.x
Van AukenH.WerbelJ. (2006). Family dynamic and family business financial performance: Spousal commitment. Family Business Review, 19, 49-63. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00059.x
54.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: Althouse Press.
55.
VargasG. (2007). Soy mujer, soy invencible ¡y estoy exhausta! [I am a woman, I am invincible, and I am exhausted!]. México City, México: Aguilar.
WarnerK. K.WinterJ. K.BreshearsR. G. (2005). Family issues in the workplace: Are students on track?Journal of Education for Business, 1, 145-148.
59.
WestrupN. (2007). A qualitative study on the influence of mothers in the development of Mexican female transformational leaders (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/32/87/3287750.html
60.
WildgrubeM. (2008). On work-life balance: In my own voice. In PaludiM. A. (Ed.), The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce (pp. 31-38). Westport, CT: Praeger.
61.
WrushenB. R.ShermanW. H. (2008). Women secondary school principals: Multicultural voices from the field. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 457-469.
62.
ZabludovskyG. (2007). México: Women in the private sector’s managerial positions. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 38, 9-26.
63.
ZigarmiD.NimonK. (2011). A cognitive approach to work intention: The stuff that employee work passion is made of?Advances in Human Resources, 13, 447-461. doi:10.1177/1523422311431152
