Never let an academic crisis go to waste: Leadership Studies in the wake of journal retractions

Abstract

In 2014, leadership studies saw the retraction of a number of journal articles written by prominent researchers who are closely associated with popular concepts such as transformational leadership, authentic leadership, ethical leadership and spiritual leadership. In response, The Leadership Quarterly published a lengthy editorial that presented these retractions as a sign of health in a mature scientific field. For the editors of The Leadership Quarterly, there is no crisis in leadership studies. In this paper, we suggest that the editorial is a missed opportunity to reflect on positivist leadership studies. In our view, leadership ought to be in crisis because this would stimulate the community to question its guiding assumptions and reconsider its methods and objectives. We therefore hope to open up a critical discussion about the means and ends of mainstream leadership studies – not least of all its scientific pretensions.

Keywords

Leadership studies journal retractions crisis positivism image of science philosophy of science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvesson

Kärreman

(2016) Intellectual failure and ideological success in organization studies: The case of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Inquiry 25(2): 139–152.

Aryee

Walumbwa

Mondejar

(2015) Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: Integrating self-determination and social exchange theories. Journal of Management Studies 52(2): 231–252. [Erratum (2015) Journal of Management Studies 52(2): 320.].

Asendorpf

Conner

De Fruyt

(2013) Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality 27(2): 108–119.

Atwater

Mumford

Schriesheim

(2014) Retraction of leadership articles: Causes and prevention. The Leadership Quarterly 25(6): 1174–1180.

Austin

(1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barker

(2001) The nature of leadership. Human Relations 54(4): 469–494.

Bass

Steidlmeier

(1999) Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 181–217.

Bhattacharjee Y (2013) The mind of a con man. The New York Times, April 26. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html?pagewanted=all (accessed 22 June 2016).

Bresnen

(1995) All things to all people? Perceptions, attributions, and constructions of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 6(4): 495–513.

10.

Brown

Treviño

(2006) Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly 17(6): 595–616.

11.

Bryman

(1992) Charisma and Leadership in Organizations, London: Sage.

12.

Ciulla

(1995) Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1): 5–28.

13.

Ciulla

(2008) Leadership studies and ‘the fusion of horizons’. The Leadership Quarterly 19(4): 393–395.

14.

Collins

(1992) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Collinson

(2011) Critical leadership studies. In: Bryman

Collinson

Grint

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Leadership Studies, Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 181–194.

16.

Daston

Galison

(2007) Objectivity, New York, NY: Zone Books.

17.

Fanelli

(2010) Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLOS One 5(4): e10271.

18.

Fanelli

(2013) Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLOS Medicine 10(12): 1–6.

19.

Fang

Steen

Casadevall

(2013) Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. PNAS 109(42): 17028–17033.

20.

Ferguson

Heene

(2012) A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 555–561.

21.

Ford

Harding

(2011) The impossibility of the ‘true self’ of authentic leadership. Leadership 7(4): 463–479.

22.

Francis

(2012) The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 585–594.

23.

Gronn

(2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 13(4): 423–451.

24.

Hannah ST, Avolio BJ and Walumbwa FO (2011a) Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly 21(4): 555–578. [Addendum (2014) Business Ethics Quarterly 24(2): 277–279].

25.

Hannah

Walumbwa

Fry

(2011b) Leadership in action teams: Team leader and members’ authenticity, authenticity strength, and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology 64(3): 771–802. [Expression of concern (2016) Personnel Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12148.].

26.

Hanson

(1958) Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27.

House

Aditya

(1997) The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management 23(3): 409–473.

28.

Hunt

(1999) Transformational/charismatic leadership’s transformation of the field: An historical essay. The Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 129–144.

29.

Kepes

McDaniel

(2013) How trustworthy is the scientific literature in industrial and organizational psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology 6: 252–268.

30.

Kuhn TS (1963) The function of dogma in scientific research. In: Crombie A (ed.) Scientific Change. London: Heinemann, pp.347–369.

31.

Kuhn TS (1970a) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

32.

Kuhn TS (1970b) Reflections on my critics. In: Lakatos I and Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.231–278.

33.

Latour

Woolgar

(1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

34.

Longino

(1990) Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

35.

Meehl

(1990) Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports 66(1): 195–244.

36.

Miner

(1975) The uncertain future of the leadership concept: An overview. In: Hunt

Larson

(eds) Leadership Frontiers, Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, pp. 197–208.

37.

Mirowski

(2005) How positivism made a pact with the postwar social sciences in the United States. In: Steinmetz

(ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

38.

Oke

Walumbwa

Myers

(2012) Innovation strategy, human resource policy, and firms’ revenue growth: The roles of environmental uncertainty and innovation performance. Decision Sciences 43(2): 273–302. [Expression of concern (2016) Decision Sciences 47(2): 395.].

39.

Parry

Bryman

(2006) Leadership in organizations. In: Clegg

Hardy

Lawrence

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage.

40.

Pashler

Harris

(2012) Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 531–536.

41.

Pashler

Wagenmakers

(2012) Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 528–530.

42.

Pearce

Conger

(2002) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

43.

Pfeffer

(1993) Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review 18(4): 599–620.

44.

Pfeffer

(1995) Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science 6(6): 681–686.

45.

Popper

(1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.

46.

Popper

(1970) Normal science and its dangers. In: Lakatos

Musgrave

(eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–58.

47.

Putnam

(2002) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

48.

Reichenbach

(1938) Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

49.

Retraction Watch (2015) Diederik Stapel now has 58 retractions. Retraction Watch, December 8. Available at: http://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/08/diederik-stapel-now-has-58-retractions (accessed 22 June 2016).

50.

Rost

(1993) Leadership for the Twenty-First Century, Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

51.

Schmidt

(2009) Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology 13(2): 90–100.

52.

Spector

(2014) Flawed from the ‘get-go’: Lee Iacocca and the origins of transformational leadership. Leadership 10(3): 361–379.

53.

Spoelstra

(2013) Is leadership a visible phenomenon? On the (im)possibility of studying leadership. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 7(3–4): 174–188.

54.

Spoelstra

ten Bos

(2011) Leadership. In: Painter-Morland

ten Bos

(eds) Continental Philosophy and Business Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–198.

55.

Starkey

Madan

(2001) Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management 12(1): S3–S26.

56.

Stogdill

(1948) Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology 25(1): 35–71.

57.

Stroebe

Postmes

Spears

(2012) Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 670–688.

58.

Tourish

(2015) Some announcements, reaffirming the critical ethos of Leadership, and what we look for in submissions. Leadership 11(2): 135–141.

59.

Van Knippenberg

Sitkin

(2013) A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 1–60.

60.

Van Maanen

(1995a) Style as theory. Organization Science 6(1): 133–143.

61.

Van Maanen

(1995b) Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organization Science 6(6): 87–692.

62.

Van Seters

Field

(1990) The evolution of leadership theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management 3(3): 29–45.

63.

Walumbwa

Cropanzano

Goldman

(2011a) How leader-member exchange influences effective work behaviors: Social exchange and internal-external efficacy perspectives. Personnel Psychology 64(3): 739–770. [Expression of concern (2016) Personnel Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12148.].

64.

Walumbwa

Mayer

Wang

(2011b) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115(2): 204–213. [Editorial note and an expression of concern (2015) Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 127: 103.].

65.

Wang

Walumbwa

Wang

(2013) Unraveling the relationship between family-supportive supervisor and employee performance. Group & Organization Management 38(2): 258–287. [Corrigendum (2015) Group & Organization Management 40(5): 711.].

66.

Yukl

(1999) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly 10(2): 285–305.

67.

Zhu

Avolio

Walumbwa

(2009) Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformation leadership and follower work engagement. Group & Organization Management 34(5): 590–619. [Corrigendum (2016) Group & Organization Management. DOI: 10.1177/1059601116638774.].