In this study, we identified and analyzed 75 articles in the family business (FB) literature between 2000 and 2014 as to the case study design they adopted. We found that the positivistic case study approach is the FB disciplinary convention. The two alternative approaches of critical realism and interpretivism are used to a significantly lesser extent. We anticipate that in the future the positivistic approach will continue to be used widely. The other two approaches can be employed to a higher extent since their use is likely to contribute to a scientific pluralism in FB case study research.
*AnderssonT.CarlsenJ.GetzD. (2002). Family business goals in the tourism and hospitality sector: Case studies and cross-case analysis from Australia, Canada, and Sweden, Family Business Review, 15, 89-106.
4.
AstrachanJ. H. (2003). Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 567-572.
5.
*BachkaniwalaD.WrightM.RamM. (2001). Succession in South Asian family businesses in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 19(4), 15-27.
6.
BerelsonB. (1971). Content analysis in communication research (2nd ed.). Glencoe, England: Free Press.
7.
BhaskarR. (1978). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton, England: Harvester.
8.
BhaskarR. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
9.
*BlumentrittT. P.KeytA. D.AstrachanJ. H. (2007). Creating an environment for successful nonfamily CEOs: an exploratory study of good principals. Family Business Review, 20, 321-335.
10.
*CadieuxL. (2007). Succession in small and medium-sized family businesses: Toward a typology of predecessor roles during and after instatement of the successor. Family Business Review, 20, 95-109.
11.
*CadieuxL.LorrainJ.HugronP. (2002). Succession in women-owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 17-30.
12.
*CaterJ. J.JustisR. T. (2009). The development of successors from followers to leaders in small family firms an exploratory study. Family Business Review, 22, 109-124.
13.
*CaterJ.SchwabA. (2008). Turnaround strategies in established small family firms. Family Business Review, 21, 31-50.
14.
ChenailR. J. (2009). Communicating your qualitative research better. Family Business Review, 22, 105-108.
15.
*ChittoorR.DasR. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance: A vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20, 65-79.
16.
*ChiricoF.NordqvistM. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28, 487-504.
17.
*ChiricoF. (2008). Knowledge accumulation in family firms evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal, 26(4), 433-462.
18.
*ColeP. M.JohnsonK. (2007). An exploration of successful copreneurial relationships postdivorce. Family Business Review, 20, 185-198.
19.
CornelissenJ. P. (2006). Metaphor and the dynamics of knowledge in organization theory: A case study of the organizational identity metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 683-709.
20.
*CruzD. A.HoworthC.HamiltonE. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 17-46.
21.
CunliffeA. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research Morgan and Smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 647-673.
22.
*CurimbabaF. (2002). The dynamics of women’s roles as family business managers. Family Business Review, 15, 239-252.
23.
DawsonA.HjorthD. (2012). Advancing family business research through narrative analysis. Family Business Review, 25, 339-355.
24.
De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15-29.
25.
*DeNobleA.EhrlichS.SinghG. (2007). Toward the development of a family business self-efficacy scale: A resource-based perspective. Family Business Review, 20, 127-140.
26.
DuboisA.GaddeL.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553-560.
27.
*DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143-162.
28.
*DyerW. G.MortensenS. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and family business in a hostile environment: The case of Lithuania. Family Business Review, 18, 247-258.
29.
DyerW. G.WilkinsA. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16, 613-619.
30.
EastonG. (1995). Methodology and industrial networks. In MollerK.WilsonD. T. (Eds.), Business networks (pp. 411-492). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
31.
EastonG. (2010). Critical realism in case study research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 118-128.
32.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
33.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
34.
FinlayL. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209-230.
35.
FletcherD. (Ed.). (2002). Understanding the small family business. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
*García-ÁlvarezE.López-SintasJ.GonzalvoP. S. (2002). Socialization patterns of successors in first-to second-generation family businesses. Family Business Review, 15, 189-203.
37.
*GildingM. (2000). Family business and family change: Individual autonomy, democratization, and the new family business institutions. Family Business Review, 13, 239-250.
38.
GioiaD. A. (2004). A renaissance self: Prompting personal and professional revitalization. In StableinR. E.FrostP. J. (Eds.), Renewing research practice (pp. 97-114). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
40.
*GiovannoniE.MaraghiniM. P.RiccaboniA. (2011). Transmitting knowledge across generations: The role of management accounting practices. Family Business Review, 24, 126-150.
41.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, England: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.
42.
*GravesC.ThomasJ. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21, 151-167.
43.
*HabermanH.DanesS. M. (2007). Father-daughter and father-son family business management transfer comparison: Family FIRO model application. Family Business Review, 20, 163-184.
44.
*HallA.MelinL.NordqvistM. (2004). Entrepreneurship as radical change in the family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14, 193-208.
45.
*HallA.NordqvistM. (2008). Professional management in family businesses: Toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review, 21, 51-69.
46.
*HamiltonE. (2006). Whose story is it anyway? Narrative accounts of the role of women in founding and establishing family businesses. International Small Business Journal, 24, 253-271.
47.
*HatumA.PettigrewA. (2004). Adaptation under environmental turmoil: Organizational flexibility in family-owned firms. Family Business Review, 17, 237-258.
48.
*HoworthC.AliZ. A. (2001). Family business succession in Portugal: An examination of case studies in the furniture industry. Family Business Review, 14, 231-244.
49.
*HoworthC.WestheadP.WrightM. (2004). Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 509-534.
50.
*IbrahimA. B.SoufaniK.LamJ. (2001). A study of succession in a family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 245-258.
51.
*Janjuha-JivrajS.WoodsA. (2002). Successional issues within Asian family firms learning from the Kenyan experience. International Small Business Journal, 20(1), 77-94.
52.
*JeanL. S.TanF. (2001). Growth of Chinese family enterprises in Singapore. Family Business Review, 14, 49-74.
53.
*JohannissonB.HuseM. (2000). Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 353-378.
54.
JohnsonP.BuehringA.CassellC.SymonG. (2006). Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 131-156.
55.
*JonesO.CravenM. (2001). Expanding capabilities in a mature manufacturing firm: Absorptive capacity and the TCS. International Small Business Journal, 19(3), 39-55.
56.
JärvensivuT.TörnroosJ.-Å. (2010). Case study research with moderate constructionism: Conceptualization and practical illustration. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 100-108.
57.
*KarraN.TraceyP.PhillipsN. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861-877.
58.
*Kenyon-RouvinezD. (2001). Patterns in serial business families: Theory building through global case study research. Family Business Review, 14, 175-191.
59.
*KhavulS.BrutonG. D.WoodE. (2009). Informal family business in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1219-1238.
60.
*KingS. W.SolomonG. T.FernaldL. W.Jr. (2001). Issues in growing a family business: A strategic human resource model. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 3-13.
61.
KitchenhamB. (2004). Procedures for undertaking systematic reviews (Joint Technical Report, Keele University [TR/SE-0401] and National ICT Australia, Ltd. [0400011T.1]). Retrieved from http://www.inf.ufsc.br/~awangenh/kitchenham.pdf
62.
*KnappJ. R.SmithB. R.KreinerG. E.SundaramurthyC.BartonS. L. (2013). Managing boundaries through identity work: The role of individual and organizational identity tactics. Family Business Review, 26, 333-355.
63.
KontinenT. (2014). Biohit: A global, family-owned company embarking on a new phase. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 185-203.
64.
*KontinenT.OjalaA. (2011). International opportunity recognition among small and medium-sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 490-514.
65.
*KontinenT.OjalaA. (2012). Internationalization pathways of family SMEs (2012). International Marketing Review, 29, 496-518.
66.
*KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1263-1288.
67.
*LambrechtJ. (2005). Multigenerational transition in family businesses: A new explanatory model. Family Business Review, 18, 267-282.
68.
*LambrechtJ.LievensJ. (2008). Pruning the family tree: An unexplored path to family business continuity and family harmony. Family Business Review, 21, 295-313.
69.
LangleyA.AbdallahC. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In KetchenD. J.BerghD. D. (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 201-235). Bingley, England: Emerald.
70.
*LitzR. A.KleysenR. F. (2001). Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review, 14, 335-352.
71.
*ManikuttyS. (2000). Strategic responses to more liberalized environment. Family Business Review, 13, 279-292.
72.
*MarchisioG.MazzolaP.SciasciaS.MilesM.AstrachanJ. (2010). Corporate venturing in family business: The effects on the family and its members. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22, 349-377.
73.
*MazzolaP.MarchisioG.AstrachanJ. (2008). Strategic planning in family business: A powerful developmental tool for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21, 239-258.
74.
*MelinL.NordqvistM. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5, 321-333.
75.
*Michael-TsabariN.LabakiR.ZacharyR. K. (2014). Toward the cluster model the family firm’s entrepreneurial behavior over generations. Family Business Review, 27, 161-185.
76.
MeyersM. D.KleinH. K. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17-36.
77.
*MickelsonR. E.WorleyC. (2003). Acquiring a family firm: A case study. Family Business Review, 16, 251-268.
78.
*MillerD.SteierL.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
79.
*MurrayB. (2003). The succession transition process: A longitudinal perspective. Family Business Review, 16, 17-33.
80.
*NgW.KeaseyK. (2010). Growing beyond smallness: How do small, closely controlled firms survive?International Small Business Journal, 28, 620-630.
81.
*NiemeläT. (2004). Interfirm cooperation capability in the context of networking family firms: The role of power. Family Business Review, 17, 319-330.
82.
*NordqvistM. (2012). Understanding strategy processes in family firms: Exploring the roles of actors and arenas. International Small Business Journal, 30(1), 24-40.
83.
NordqvistM.HallA.MelinL. (2009). Qualitative research on family businesses: The relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach. Journal of Management and Organization, 15, 294-308.
84.
OrlikowskiW. J.BaroudiJ. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
85.
*PagliarussiM. S.RapozoF. O. (2011). Agency relationships in a Brazilian multifamily firm. Family Business Review, 24, 170-183.
86.
*ParadaM. J.NordqvistM.GimenoA. (2010). Institutionalizing the family business: The role of professional associations in fostering a change of values. Family Business Review, 23, 355-372.
87.
*ParmentierM. A. (2011). When David met Victoria forging a strong family brand. Family Business Review, 24, 217-232.
88.
PiekkariR.WelchC.PaavilainenE. (2009). The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 567-589.
89.
PiekkariR.PlakoyiannakiE.WelchC. (2010). “Good” case research in industrial marketing: Insights from research practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 109-117.
90.
*PozaE. J.MesserT. (2001). Spousal leadership and continuity in the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 25-36.
91.
*PagliarussiM. S.RapozoF. O. (2011). Agency relationships in a Brazilian multifamily firm. Family Business Review, 24, 170-183.
92.
*SabahS.CarsrudA. L.KocakA. (2014). The impact of cultural openness, religion, and nationalism on entrepreneurial intensity: Six prototypical cases of Turkish family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 306-324.
93.
*SalvatoC.MelinL. (2008). Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review, 21, 259-276.
94.
*SalvatoC.SharmaP.ChiricoF. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing entrepreneurial exit in family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 321-348.
95.
*SantiagoA. L. (2000). Succession experiences in Philippine family businesses. Family Business Review, 13, 15-35.
96.
SayerA. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
97.
ShepherdC.ChallengerR. (2013). Revisiting paradigm(s) in management research: A rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 225-244.
98.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100.
*SteenA.WelchL. S. (2006). Dancing with giants: Acquisition and survival of the family firm. Family Business Review, 19, 289-300.
101.
*SteierL. (2001a). Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14, 353-368.
102.
*SteierL. (2001b). Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14, 259-276.
103.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, England: Sage.
104.
*SuE.DouJ. (2013). How does knowledge sharing among advisors from different disciplines affect the quality of the services provided to the family business client? An investigation from the family business advisor’s perspective. Family Business Review, 26, 256-270.
105.
*TanW. L.FockS. T. (2001). Coping with growth transitions: The case of Chinese family businesses in Singapore. Family Business Review, 14, 123-139.
106.
*ThomasJ. (2002). Freeing the shackles of family business ownership. Family Business Review, 15, 321-336.
107.
*TokarczykJ.HansenE.GreenM.DownJ. (2007). A resource-based view and market orientation theory examination of the role of “familiness” in family business success. Family Business Review, 20, 17-31.
108.
*TsangE. W. (2001). Internationalizing the family firm: A case study of a Chinese family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 88-93.
109.
*TsangE. W. (2002). Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 21-40.
110.
*VeraC. F.DeanM. A. (2005). An examination of the challenges daughters face in family business succession. Family Business Review, 18, 321-345.
111.
*WatsonT. J. (2009). Entrepreneurial action, identity work and the use of multiple discursive resources: The case of a rapidly changing family business. International Small Business Journal, 27, 251-274.
112.
WeickK. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516-531.
113.
WelchC.PlakoyiannakiE.PiekkariR.Paavilainen-MäntymäkiE. (2013). Legitimizing diverse uses for qualitative research: A rhetorical analysis of two management journals. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 245-264.
114.
WelchC.PiekkariR.PlakoyiannakiE.Paavilainen-MäntymäkiE. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 740-762.
115.
WynnD.Jr.WilliamsC. K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 36, 787-810.
116.
YangZ.WangX.SuC. (2006). A review of research methodologies in international business. International Business Review, 15, 601-617.
117.
*YeungH. W. C. (2000). Limits to the growth of family-owned business? The case of Chinese transnational corporations from Hong Kong. Family Business Review, 13, 55-70.
118.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
119.
*ZellwegerT.SiegerP. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 67-84.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
