Considering the orphan: Personal identification and its relations with transformational leadership,trust,and performance in a three-path mediation model
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2015
Considering the orphan: Personal identification and its relations with transformational leadership,trust,and performance in a three-path mediation model
Transformational leadership research investigating the identification processes of followers has mostly focused on social identification. In contrast, empirical evidence on the role of followers’ personal identification with their leader is still scarce. Furthermore, there has been no attempt to test the links between personal identification and other proposed mediators of transformational leadership. This study examined how a group’s identification with and trust in its leader sequentially combine to mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and supervisor-rated group performance. Using a sample of 343 employees and their supervisors (N = 80), we tested a model in which trust functions as a proximal mediator and personal identification as a distal mediator in the leadership–performance relationship. Results support the hypothesized three-path mediation model. Our findings indicate the importance of trust for the development of personal identification in the leadership process and provide evidence that the group’s identification with the leader results in positive outcomes for organizations.
AronA (2003) Self and close relationships. In: LearyMRTangneyJP (eds) Handbook of Self and Identity, New York, NY: The Guilford Press, pp. 442461.
5.
AshforthBEHarrisonSHCorleyKG (2008) Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management34(3): 325374.
6.
AshforthBEMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 2039.
7.
AvolioBJZhuWKohW (2004) Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior25(8): 951968.
8.
BarberB (1983) The Logic and Limits of Trust, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 11731182.
10.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, New York, NY: Free Press.
11.
BassBM (1999) Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology8(1): 932.
12.
BassBAvolioB (1995) MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
13.
BassBMRiggioRE (2006) Transformational Leadership, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 349852.
15.
BollenKA (1998) Path analysis. In: ArmitagePColtonT (eds) Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Sussex, UK: John Wiley, pp. 32803284.
16.
BrewerMBGardnerW (1996) Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(1): 8393.
17.
BrownMETreviñoLKHarrisonDA (2005) Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes97(2): 117134.
18.
ButlerJK (1991) Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management17(3): 643663.
19.
CarmeliABen-HadorBWaldmanDA (2009) How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: Implications for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology94(6): 15531561.
20.
CasimirGWaldmanDABartramT (2006) Trust and the relationship between leadership and follower performance: Opening the black box in Australia and China. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies12(3): 6884.
21.
ChanD (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology83(2): 234246.
22.
ChanD (2009) So why ask me? Are self report data really that bad? In: LanceCEVandenbergRJ (eds) Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 309335.
23.
ChenGKirkmanBLKanferR (2007) A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology92(2): 331346.
24.
ChenGMathieuJEBliesePD (2004) A framework for conducting multilevel construct validation. In: YammarinoFJDansereauF (eds) Research in Multilevel Issues: Multilevel Issues in Organizational Behavior and Processes, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 273303.
25.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1998) Charismatic Leadership in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
ConnaughtonSLDalyJA (2004) Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co-located teams. Corporate Communications: An International Journal9(2): 89103.
27.
De CremerDvan DijkeMBosAE (2007) When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology37(8): 17971816.
28.
DirksKT (2000) Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology85(6): 10041012.
29.
DirksKTFerrinDL (2002) Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 611628.
30.
EndersCK (2001) A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling8(1): 128141.
31.
Felfe J (2006) Validierung einer deutschen Version des “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ Form 5 x Short) von Bass und Avolio (1995) [Validation of a German version of the “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ 5X–Short) by Bass and Avolio (1995)]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 50(2): 61–78.
32.
FelfeJGoihlK (2002) Deutsche überarbeitete und ergänzte Version des “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ) [German revised and supplemented version of the “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ)]. In: Glöckner-RistA (eds) ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Version 5.00, Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
33.
GabarroJJ (1987) The Dynamics of Taking Charge, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
GillespieNAMannL (2004) Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology19(6): 588607.
35.
GlickWH (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review10(3): 601616.
36.
GraenGBUhl-BienM (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219247.
37.
GuzzoRAYostPRCampbellRJ (1993) Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology32(1): 87106.
38.
HeinitzKLiepmannDFelfeJ (2005) Examining the factor structure of the MLQ: Recommendation for a reduced set of factors. European Journal of Psychological Assessment21(3): 182190.
39.
HolmbeckGN (1997) Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology65(4): 599610.
40.
HowellJMShamirB (2005) The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review30(1): 96112.
41.
HuLBentlerP (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods3(4): 424453.
42.
JamesLRBrettJM (1984) Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology69(2): 307321.
43.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1993) rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78(2): 306309.
44.
JonesGGeorgeJ (1998) The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review23(3): 531546.
45.
JudgeTAColquittJA (2004) Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 395404.
46.
JudgeTAPiccoloRF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology89(5): 755768.
47.
JungDIAvolioBJ (1999) Effects of leadership style and followers' cultural orientation on performance in group and individual task conditions. Academy of Management Journal42(2): 208218.
48.
JungDIAvolioBJ (2000) Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior21(8): 949964.
49.
JungDISosikJ (2002) Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research33(3): 313336.
50.
KaplanRSNortonD (1992) The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review70(1): 7179.
51.
KarkRShamirBChenG (2003) The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology88(2): 246255.
52.
KatzDKahnRL (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations, New York, NY: Wiley.
53.
KellerRT (2006) Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology91(1): 202210.
54.
KelmanHC (1961) Processes of opinion change. The Public Opinion Quarterly25(1): 5778.
55.
KlineRB (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
56.
KozlowskiSWJKleinKJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 390.
57.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11(4): 815852.
58.
LewickiRJBunkerBB (1995) Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In: BunkerBBRubinJZ (eds) Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 133173.
59.
LiuWZhuRYangY (2010) I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly21(1): 189202.
60.
LordRGBrownDJFreibergSJ (1999) Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes78(3): 167203.
61.
McAllisterDJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal38(1): 2459.
62.
McCraeRRCostaPT (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(1): 8190.
63.
MacKinnonDPLockwoodCMHoffmanJM (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods7(1): 83104.
64.
MaelFAshforthBE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior13(2): 103123.
65.
MathieuJEChenG (2011) The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management37(2): 610641.
66.
NüboldAMuckPMMaierGW (2013) A new substitute for leadership? Followers' state core self-evaluations. Leadership Quarterly24(1): 2944.
67.
PiccoloRFColquittJA (2006) Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal49(2): 327340.
68.
PillaiRSchriesheimCAWilliamsES (1999) Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management25(6): 897933.
69.
PodsakoffNPMacKenzieSBMoormanRH (1990) Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly1(2): 107142.
70.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879903.
71.
PurvanovaRKBonoJEDzieweczynskiJ (2006) Transformational leadership, job characteristics, and organizational citizenship performance. Human Performance19(1): 122.
72.
RauchAFreseMSonnentagS (2000) Cultural differences in planning-success relationships: A comparison of small enterprises in Ireland, West Germany, and East Germany. Journal of Small Business Management38(4): 2841.
73.
ShamirBHouseRJArthurMB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science4(4): 577594.
74.
Shamir B, Zakay E, Breinin E and Popper M (1998) Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors' appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 387–409.
75.
SidersMAGeorgeGDharwadkarR (2001) The relationship of internal and external commitment foci to objective job performance measures. Academy of Management Journal44(3): 570579.
76.
SitkinSBRothNL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science4(3): 367392.
77.
SlussDMAshforthBE (2007) Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review32(1): 932.
78.
TaylorABMacKinnonDPTeinJ (2008) Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods11(2): 241269.
79.
van KnippenbergDvan KnippenbergBDeCremerD (2004) Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly15(6): 825856.
80.
WalumbwaFOAvolioBJZhuW (2008) How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology61(4): 793825.
81.
WalumbwaFOHartnellCA (2011) Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology84(1): 153172.
82.
WoffordJCWhittingtonJLGoodwinVL (2001) Follower motive patterns as situational moderators for transformational leadership effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues13(2): 196211.
83.
YuklGA (1989) Leadership in Organizations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
84.
ZhuWWangGZhengX (2013) Examining the role of personal identification with the leader in leadership effectiveness: A partial nomological network. Group and Organization Management38(1): 3667.
