Continuity of care is a critical component of successful hypertension management. With the growing prevalence of people living with both hypertension and disabilities, it is essential to explore how disability impacts continuity of care. This study aimed to investigate whether disability is associated with continuity of care among people with hypertension.
Methods
This study was a retrospective observational cross-sectional analysis using the 2019 Korea National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database. A total of 104,280 individuals diagnosed with hypertension aged 30 years and older were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of disability on the odds of having higher continuity of care, measured using the Bice-Boxerman index, adjusting for sociodemographic factors.
Results
People with hypertension who also have physical disabilities were 6.6% less likely to achieve optimal COC compared to those without disabilities (Odds ratio = 0.934; 95% confidence interval = 0.875, 0.998).
Conclusion
Physical disability significantly reduces the likelihood of achieving optimal COC in hypertension management. Targeted interventions addressing barriers faced by people with disabilities and hypertension are critical for improving care coordination and health outcomes.
Discussion
This study highlights the need for disability-inclusive healthcare policies and practices to reduce disparities in hypertension care.
World Health Organization. Improving hypertension control in 3 million people: country experiences of programme development and implementation. 2020.
2.
Korean Society of Hypertension (KSH) - Hypertension Epidemiology Research Working Group. Korea Hypertension Fact Sheet 2024. Clinical Hypertension2024.
3.
ChobanianAVBakrisGLBlackHR, et al.Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. hypertension2003; 42: 1206–1252.
4.
KaptogeSPennellsLDe BacquerD, et al.World health organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions. Lancet Glob Health2019; 7: e1332–e1345.
5.
MillsKTStefanescuAHeJ. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nature Reviews Nephrology2020; 16: 223–237.
6.
KimHCLeeHLeeH-H, et al.Korea hypertension fact sheet 2021: analysis of nationwide population-based data with special focus on hypertension in women. Clinical Hypertension2022; 28: 1–5.
7.
United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2016.
8.
OhY. The national health plan 2030: its purpose and directions of development. J Prev Med Pub Health2021; 54: 173.
9.
World Health Organization. Continuity and coordination of care: a practice brief to support implementation of the WHO Framework on integrated people-centred health services. 2018.
10.
NamYSChoKHKangH-C, et al.Greater continuity of care reduces hospital admissions in patients with hypertension: an analysis of nationwide health insurance data in Korea, 2011–2013. Health Policy2016; 120: 604–611.
11.
HusseyPSSchneiderECRudinRS, et al.Continuity and the costs of care for chronic disease. JAMA Intern Med2014; 174: 742–748.
12.
ShinDWChoJYangHK, et al.Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. The Annals of Family Medicine2014; 12: 534–541.
13.
KimJ-HParkE-CKimTH, et al.Hospital charges and continuity of care for outpatients with hypertension in South Korea: a nationwide population-based cohort study from 2002 to 2013. Korean J Fam Med2017; 38: 242.
14.
BakerRFreemanGKHaggertyJL, et al.Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice2020; 70: e600–e611.
15.
GrayDJPSidaway-LeeKWhiteE, et al.Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ open2018; 8: e021161.
16.
FreemanGHughesJ. Continuity of care and the patient experience. London: The King’s Fund, 2010.
17.
SofaerSKrelingBCarmelM.Coordination of care for persons with disabilities enrolled in Medicaid managed care: A conceptual framework to guide the development of measures. Office of Disability, Aging, and Long-Term Care Policy, Office of the …, 2000.
18.
YoonC-HLeeS-JChooS-y, et al.Continuity of care of patient with diabetes and its affecting factors in Korea. J Prev Med Pub Health2007; 40: 51–58.
19.
JangYJChoyYSNamCM, et al.The effect of continuity of care on the incidence of end-stage renal disease in patients with newly detected type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol2018; 19: 1–12.
Division of Chronic Disease Control KDCaPA. Trends in prevalence of hypertension among people aged 30 years and over, 2007-2019. Public Health Weekly Report2021; 14: 1373–1376.
23.
O’BrienFMcCallionPCarrollR, et al.The prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in older adults with an intellectual disability in Ireland: a cross sectional study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2021; 20: 315–323.
24.
ParkJHParkJHLeeSY, et al.Disparities in antihypertensive medication adherence in persons with disabilities and without disabilities: results of a Korean population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89: 1460–1467.
JungCHSeoGHSuhS, et al.The population-based risk of need for coronary revascularization according to the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and history of coronary heart disease in the Korean population. PloS one2015; 10: e0128627.
30.
LeeJLeeJSParkS-H, et al.Cohort profile: the national health insurance service–national sample cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea. Int J Epidemiol2017; 46: e15–e15.
31.
BiceTWBoxermanSB. A quantitative measure of continuity of care. Med Care1977; 15: 347–349.
32.
AmjadHCarmichaelDAustinAM, et al.Continuity of care and health care utilization in older adults with dementia in fee-for-service medicare. JAMA Intern Med2016; 176: 1371–1378.
33.
KhanAMLinPKamdarN, et al.Continuity of care in adults aging with cerebral palsy and spina Bifida: the importance of community healthcare and socioeconomic context. Disabilities2023; 3: 295–306.
34.
TranBFalsterMJormL. Claims-based measures of continuity of care have non-linear associations with health: data linkage study. International journal of population data science2018; 3: 1–9.
35.
NapolitanoFNapolitanoPGarofaloL, et al.Assessment of continuity of care among patients with multiple chronic conditions in Italy. PloS one2016; 11: e0154940.
36.
RosenbergNAZulmanDM.Measures of care fragmentation: mathematical insights from population genetics. Health Serv Res2020; 55: 318–327. 20200122..
37.
NyweideDJAnthonyDLBynumJP, et al.Continuity of care and the risk of preventable hospitalization in older adults. JAMA Intern Med2013; 173: 1879–1885.
RyckmanA.A collaboration between first-and second-line healthcare for persons with a disability in Flanders to strengthen quality of care, continuity of care and affordability of care. 2023.
40.
LeeK-IRyuS-H. An anaysis of current facilities for the physically disabled in hospital. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society2015; 6: 35–41.
41.
ChoiDChoiSKimH, et al.Impact of continuity of care on cardiovascular disease risk among newly-diagnosed hypertension patients. Sci Rep2020; 10: 1–9.
42.
KhanamMAKitsosAStankovichJ, et al.Association of continuity of care with blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Australian Journal of General Practice2019; 48: 300–306.
43.
YeTSunXTangW, et al.Effect of continuity of care on health-related quality of life in adult patients with hypertension: a cohort study in China. BMC Health Serv Res2016; 16: 1–8.
