Return to work after chronic disease is important for workers, employers and society. The process, however, is challenging. This article provides an analytical and theoretical framework for explaining this process informed by the person-environment fit theory.
Methods
This article uses a narrative method to (1) review the key concepts, benefits and influencing factors in the literature on return to work after chronic diseases, (2) analyse and critique the most important theoretical models used for explaining return to work after chronic diseases, and (3) review the person-environment fit theory and how it has been used so far.
Results
The existing models highlight different aspects, but they overlook the relationship between the worker and the employer. An analytical and theoretical framework is proposed to comprehensively explain the worker-employer dynamic. The framework also considers the role of broader factors (policy, labour market) and other stakeholders (health professionals, civil society actors) emphasising the idea that return to work is a phased and cyclical process.
Discussion
The framework can be used to guide future qualitative and quantitative studies, or as a map for identifying problematic areas related to the worker or the work environment. The model should be empirically tested in future studies.
European Commission. Population ageing in Europe: facts, implications and policies: outcomes of EU-funded research. Luxembourg: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2014.
2.
BrennanPPerolaMvan OmmenG-J, et al.Chronic disease research in Europe and the need for integrated population cohorts. Eur J Epidemiol2017; 32: 741–749.
3.
NazarovSManuwaldULeonardiM, et al.Chronic diseases and employment: which interventions support the maintenance of work and return to work among workers with chronic illnesses? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16: 1864.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Global burden of disease study 2019 results. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results (2020, accessed 7 June 2022).
EU-OSHA. Healthy workplaces manage stress. Managing stress and psychosocial risks at work; 32. (2013, accessed 10 August 2021).
11.
GrantMO-Beirne-EllimanJFroudR, et al.The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography. BMJ Open2019; 9: e025743.
12.
TammingaSJde BoerAGEMVerbeekJHAM, et al.Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process--a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health2012; 38: 144–154.
13.
GragnanoANegriniAMigliorettiM, et al.Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil2018; 28: 215–231.
14.
AnemaJRSchellartAJMCassidyJD, et al.Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil2009; 19: 419–426.
15.
HestbaekLLeboeuf-YdeCMannicheC. Low back pain: what is the long-term course? A review of studies of general patient populations. Eur Spine J2003; 12: 149–165.
16.
Wynne-JonesGCowenJJordanJL, et al.Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med2014; 71: 448–456.
17.
Donker-CoolsBHPMDaamsJGWindH, et al.Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj2016; 30: 113–131.
18.
SpeltenERSprangersMAGVerbeekJHAM. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology2002; 11: 124–131.
19.
MehnertA. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol2011; 77: 109–130.
20.
The Social Research Centre. National return to work survey report. Melbourne, Australia: The Social Research Centre (2022, accessed 20 May 2022)
21.
GreidanusMAde BoerAGEMde RijkAE, et al.Perceived employer-related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: a systematic review of employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. Psychooncology2018; 27: 725–733.
22.
van ZonSKRReijneveldSAGalaurchiA, et al.Multimorbidity and the transition out of full-time paid employment: a longitudinal analysis of the health and retirement study. J Gerontol Ser B-Psychol Sci Soc Sci2020; 75: 705–715.
23.
BernellSHowardSW. Use your words carefully: what is a chronic disease?Front Public Health2016; 4: 159.
Kouwenhoven-PasmooijTABurdorfARoos-HesselinkJW, et al.Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and early exit from paid employment in Europe; the impact of work-related factors. Int J Cardiol2016; 215: 332–337.
RiedlLBlankDKohlM, et al.Return-to-work-experts for inpatient treatment of patients with mental illnesses- a proof-of-concept-study (RETURN): the study protocol. BMC Psychiatry2020; 20: 177.
28.
RoelenCKoopmans PCde Graaf JH, et al.Sickness absence and return to work rates in women with breast cancer. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2009; 82: 543–546.
BruslettoBTorpSIhlebækCM, et al.A five-phase process model describing the return to sustainable work of persons who survived cancer: a qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs2018; 34: 21–27.
31.
LemieuxPDurandM-JHongQN. Supervisors’ perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil2011; 21: 293–303.
32.
LøchtingIGrotleMStorheimK, et al.Complex return to work process - caseworkers’ experiences of facilitating return to work for individuals on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Public Health2020; 20: 1822.
33.
GrantMReesSUnderwoodM, et al.Obstacles to returning to work with chronic pain: in-depth interviews with people who are off work due to chronic pain and employers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2019; 20: 486.
34.
de RijkAAmirZCohenM, et al.The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health. J Cancer Surviv2020; 14: 188–199.
35.
TiedtkeCde RijkADonceelP, et al.Survived but feeling vulnerable and insecure: a qualitative study of the mental preparation for RTW after breast cancer treatment. BMC Public Health2012; 12: 538.
36.
InanFSGunusenNOzkulB, et al.A dimension in recovery return to working life after breast cancer. Cancer Nurs2020; 43: E328–E334.
37.
SanchezKMRichardsonJLMasonHRC. The return to work experiences of colorectal cancer survivors. AAOHN J2004; 52: 500–510.
38.
MidtgaardJHansenMJGrandjeanB. Modesty and recognition—a qualitative study of the lived experience of recovery from anal cancer. Support Care Cancer2009; 17: 1213–1222.
39.
HedlundÅBomanEKristofferzonM-L, et al.Beliefs about return to work among women during/after long-term sick leave for common mental disorders: a qualitative study based on the theory of planned behaviour. J Occup Rehabil2021; 31: 604–612.
40.
PeugniezCFantoniSLeroyerA, et al.Return to work after treatment for breast cancer: single-center experience in a cohort of 273 patients. Ann Oncol2010; 21: 2124–2125.
41.
DorlandHFAbmaFIRoelenCAM, et al.Factors influencing work functioning after cancer diagnosis: a focus group study with cancer survivors and occupational health professionals. Support Care Cancer2016; 24: 261–266.
42.
McGrathPDHartiganBHolewaH, et al.Returning to work after treatment for haematological cancer: findings from Australia. Support Care Cancer2012; 20: 1957–1964.
43.
MunirFBurrowsJYarkerJ, et al.Women’s perceptions of chemotherapy-induced cognitive side affects on work ability: a focus group study. J Clin Nurs2010; 19: 1362–1370.
44.
TanFLLohSYSuT, et al.Return to work in multi-ethnic breast cancer survivors - A qualitative inquiry. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev2012; 13: 5791–5797.
45.
SturmCBökelAKorallusC, et al.Promoting factors and barriers to participation in working life for people with spinal cord injury. J Occup Med Toxicol2020; 15: 37.
46.
de VriesHFishtaAWeikertB, et al.Determinants of sickness absence and return to work among employees with common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil2018; 28: 393–417.
47.
Dekkers-SánchezPMWindHSluiterJK, et al.What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians’ perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2013; 86: 509–518.
48.
PopaAEMorândăuFPopaR-I, et al.Supporting the return to work after cancer in Romania: exploring Employers’ perspectives. J Occup Rehabil2020; 30: 59–71.
49.
TorpSGudbergssonSBDahlAA, et al.Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health2011; 39: 33–42.
50.
HaafkensJAKopninaHMeermanMG, et al.Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res2011; 11: 104.
51.
HoefsmitNHoukesINijhuisFJN. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil2012; 22: 462–477.
52.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol1983; 51: 390–395.
53.
ProchaskaJDiclementeCNorcrossJ. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol1992; 47: 1102–1114.
54.
KrauseNRaglandDROccupational disability due to low back pain: a new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)1994; 19: 1011–1020.
55.
KrauseNDasingerLKDeeganLJ, et al.Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med2001; 40: 374–392.
56.
FrancheR-LKrauseN. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil2002; 12: 233–256.
57.
SpeltenERVerbeekJHAMUitterhoeveALJ, et al.Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work-a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer2003; 39: 1562–1567.
58.
SteinerJFCavenderTAMainDS, et al.Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes. Cancer2004; 101: 1703–1711.
59.
FeuersteinMToddBLMoskowitzMC, et al.Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv2010; 4: 415–437.
60.
CohenMYagilDCarelR. A multidisciplinary working model for promoting return to work of cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer2021; 29: 5151–5160.
61.
SchultzIZStowellAWFeuersteinM, et al.Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil2007; 17: 327–352.
62.
CaplanRD. Person-environment fit: past Present, and future. In: CooperCL (ed.) Stress research. New directions for the 1980s, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1983, pp.35–78.
63.
CaplanRD. Person-Environment fit theory and organizations: commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. J Vocat Behav1987; 31: 248–267.
64.
VerquerMLBeehrTAWagnerSH. A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. J Vocat Behav2003; 63: 473–489.
65.
SaksAMUggerslevKLFassinaNE. Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: a meta-analytic review and test of a model. J Vocat Behav2007; 70: 413–446.
66.
TimsMDerksDBakkerAB. Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: a three-wave study. J Vocat Behav2016; 92: 44–53.
67.
ZacherHFeldmanDCSchulzH. Age, occupational strain, and well-being: a person-environment fit perspective. In: Perrewé PLRosen CCHalbeslebenJRB (eds) The Role of Demographics in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 2014; 12: 83–111 (Research in occupational stress and well being).
SpokaneARMeirEICatalanoM. Person–environment congruence and Holland’s theory: a review and reconsideration. J Vocat Behav2000; 57: 137–187.
70.
EdwardsJRShippAJ. The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: an integrative theoretical framework. In: Perspectives on organizational fit. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2007, pp.209–258.
71.
EdwardsJRCaplanRDHarissonRV. Person-environment fit theory: conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In: CooperCL (ed) Theories of organizational stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp.28–67.
72.
DurandM-JCoutuM-FTremblayD, et al.Insights into the sustainable return to work of aging workers with a work disability: an interpretative description study. J Occup Rehabil2021; 31: 92–106.
73.
MbengiRKTiraboschiMde BrouwerC, et al.How do social security schemes and labor market policies support the return-to-work of cancer survivors? A review article. J Cancer Policy2018; 15: 128–133.
74.
VarekampIHeutinkALandmanS, et al.Facilitating empowerment in employees with chronic disease: qualitative analysis of the process of change. J Occup Rehabil2009; 19: 398–408.
75.
GreidanusMAde BoerAGEMTiedtkeCM, et al.Supporting employers to enhance the return to work of cancer survivors: development of a web-based intervention (MiLES intervention). J Cancer Surviv2020; 14: 200–210.
76.
BouffardJDurandM-JCoutuM-F. Adaptation of a guide to equip employers to manage the gradual return to work of individuals with a musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil2019; 29: 625–635.
77.
CorbiereMMazaniello-ChezolMBastienM-F, et al.Stakeholders’ role and actions in the return-to-work process of workers on sick-leave due to common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil2020; 30: 381–419.
78.
KristofAL. Person-Organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers Psychol1996; 49: 1–49.
79.
van MuijenPDuijtsSFAKornet-van der AaDA, et al.Work disability assessment of cancer survivors: insurance physicians’ perspectives. Occup Med (Chic Ill)2015; 65: 558–563.
80.
NoordikENieuwenhuijsenKVarekampI, et al.Exploring the return-to-work process for workers partially returned to work and partially on long-term sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil2011; 33: 1625–1635.
81.
SteenstraIAMunhallCIrvinE, et al.Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil2017; 27: 369–381.
82.
Raque-BogdanTLHoffmanMAGinterAC, et al.The work life and career development of young breast cancer survivors. J Couns Psychol2015; 62: 655–669.
FrazierLMMillerVAMillerBE, et al.Cancer-related tasks involving employment: opportunities for clinical assistance. J Support Oncol2009; 7: 229.
85.
MunirFKalawskyKLawrenceC, et al.Cognitive intervention for breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy: a needs analysis. Cancer Nurs2011; 34: 385–392.
86.
MitchellT. Both sides of the couch: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of female healthcare professionals returning to work after treatment for cancer. Eur J Cancer Care2015; 24: 840–853.
87.
LhuilierDWaserA-M. Living and working with a chronic disease: differences and common condition. Arch Mal Prof Environ2019; 80: 375–385.
88.
ParsonsJAEakinJMBellRS, et al.“So, are you back to work yet?” Re-conceptualizing ‘work’ and ‘return to work’ in the context of primary bone cancer. Soc Sci Med2008; 67: 1826–1836.
89.
MackenzieCR. ‘It is hard for mums to put themselves first’: how mothers diagnosed with breast cancer manage the sociological boundaries between paid work, family and caring for the self. Soc Sci Med2014; 117: 96–106.
90.
SandbergJCStromCArcuryTA. Strategies used by breast cancer survivors to address work-related limitations during and after treatment. Women’s Health Issues2014; 24: e197–e204.
91.
GuanYDengHFanL, et al.Theorizing person-environment fit in a changing career world: interdisciplinary integration and future directions. J Vocat Behav2021; 126: 103557.
92.
PinquartMJuangLPSilbereisenRK. Self-efficacy and successful school-to-work transition: a longitudinal study. J Vocat Behav2003; 63: 329–346.
93.
NyeCDSuRRoundsJ, et al.Interest congruence and performance: revisiting recent meta-analytic findings. J Vocat Behav2017; 98: 138–151.
