‘If you had taken the lead…’ – a qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions and their perspective in clinical encounters with medical students
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2023
‘If you had taken the lead…’ – a qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions and their perspective in clinical encounters with medical students
To explore what patients with chronic conditions emphasize as important in the patient-medical student conversation, and how the patients’ experiences relate to trust.
Methods
Twenty-one video-recorded sessions of patients’ feedback in simulation-based communication courses for medical students were observed, transcribed, analyzed inductively and organized into three themes.
Results
In the patients’ feedback, three aspects were emphasized as important relating to trust: a) when the medical student relates medical information to the patient's lifeworld, b) when the student leads the patient throughout the conversation, and c) when the patient gets emotional support from the student. The patients felt that being met this way by the students grows trust and allows them to lean into the uncertainties they experience while still feeling safe.
Discussion
The patients emphasize three aspects of importance in conversations with the medical students that grow trust. We argue that these aspects cannot be found in the traditional authority-led practice but can be found in leadership, which imply empathy and willingness to learn from patients. We suggest that students should learn that to effectively communicate with patients infers such leadership. By doing so, medical students can walk alongside their patients to build a relationship and nurture trust.
HendrenEMKumagaiAK. A matter of trustAcad Med2019; 94: 1270–1272.
2.
ImberJB. How navigating uncertainty motivates trust in medicine. AMA J Ethics2017; 19: 391–398.
3.
SklarDP. A new conversation on trust in health care and health professions education. Acad Med2018; 93: 1748–1749.
4.
LynchTJWolfsonDBBaronRJ. A trust initiative in health care: why and why now?Acad Med2019; 4: 463–465.
5.
CoulterA. Patients’ views of the good doctor. Doctors have to earn patients’ trustBr Med J2002; 25: 668–669.
6.
Broholm-JørgensenMGuassoraADReventlowS, et al.Balancing trust and power: a qualitative study of GPs perceptions and strategies for retaining patients in preventive health checks. Scand J Prim Health Care2017; 35: 89–97.
7.
GreeneJRamosC. A mixed methods examination of health care provider behaviors that build Patients’ trustPatient Educ Couns2021; 104: 1222–1228.
8.
DangBNWestbrookRANjueSM, et al.Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Med Educ2017; 17(23): 1–10.
9.
AgledahlKMGulbrandsenPFørdeR, et al.Courteous but not curious: how doctors’ politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations. J Med Ethics2011; 37: 650–654.
10.
MechanicDMeyerS. Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Soc Sci Med2000; 51: 657–668.
11.
HoveyRBDvorakMLBurtonT, et al.Patient safety: a consumer’s perspective. Qual Health Res2011; 21: 662–672.
12.
SnowR. Real patient participation in simulations. In: NestelDBearmanM (eds) Simulated patient methodology: theory, evidence and practice. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2015, pp.105–109.
13.
GraboyesRFTopolE. Anatomy and atrophy of medical paternalism. MERCATUS CENTER, Virginia, USA: George Mason University, 2017. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191489
14.
AgledahlKMFørdeRWifstadÅ. Clinical essentialising: a qualitative study of doctors’ medical and moral practice. Med Health Care Philos2010; 13: 107–113.
15.
OlsenCFDebesayJBerglandA, et al.What matters when asking, “what matters to you?” — perceptions and experiences of health care providers on involving older people in transitional care. BMC Health Serv Res2020; 20(17): 1–13.
16.
JoenssonABRGuassoraADFreilM, et al.What the doctor doesn’t know: discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity. Chronic Illn2020; 16: 212–225.
17.
BleakleyA. ‘Good’ and ‘poor’ communication in an OSCE: education or training?Med Educ2003; 37: 186–187.
18.
PilnickADingwallR. On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Soc Sci Med2011; 72: 1374–1382. Elsevier.
19.
RieffestahlAMRisørTMogensenHO, et al.Ignitions of empathy. Medical students feel touched and shaken by interacting with patients with chronic conditions in communication skills training. Patient Educ and Couns2021; 104: 1668–1673.
20.
ScheiE. Doctoring as leadership - the power to heal. Perspect Biol Med2006; 49: 393–406. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
NeumannMEdelhäuserFTauschelD, et al.Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med2011; 86: 996–1009.
22.
UndermanKHirshfieldKE. Detached concern?: emotional socialization in twenty-first century medical education. Soc Sci Med2016; 160: 94–101.. Elsevier.
23.
CoulterA. Engaging patients in healthcare. Open University Press, 2011.
24.
GidmanJ. Listening to stories: valuing knowledge from patient experience. Nurse Educ Pract2012; 13: 192–196. Elsevier.
25.
ChengPTMTowleA. How patient educators help students to learn: an exploratory study. Med Teach2017; 39: 308–314.. Taylor & Francis Group.
26.
TowleAGodolphinW. Patients as educators: interprofessional learning for patient-centred care. Med Teach2013; 35: 219–225. https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.737966. Taylor & Francis Group.
27.
KlineCCParkSEGodolphinWJ, et al.Professional identity formation: a role for patients as mentors. Acad Med2020; 95: 1578–1586.
28.
SpencerJBlackmoreDHeardS, et al.Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in education of medical students. Med Educ2000; 34: 851–858.
29.
JhaVQuintonNDBekkerHL, et al.What educators and students really think about using patients as teachers in medical education: a qualitative study.Med Educ2009; 43: 449–456.. Blackwell Publishing Ltd
30.
WykurzGKellyD. Developing the role of patients as teachers: literature review. Br Med J2002; 325: 818–821. (Clinical Research ed.).
31.
SzumacherE. Patients’ engagement in medical education. JCE2019; 34: 203–204.
32.
VoyerSPrattDD. Feedback: much more than a tool. Med Educ2011; 45: 862–865. Blackwell Publishing Ltd
33.
ChuaISBogetzAL. Patient feedback requirements for medical students: do perceived risks outweigh the benefits?Clin Pediatr2018; 57: 193–199.
34.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP. Ethnography. Principles in practice. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 2007.
35.
KnoblauchH. Focused ethnography. Forum qualitative sozialforschung / forum. Qual Soc Res2005; 6: 1–11.
36.
WolcottHF. Ethnography. A way of seeing. Lanham, USA: AltaMira Press, 2008.
37.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101. Taylor & Francis Group.
38.
ThorgaardK. Is Evidens-based medicine about democrazing medical practice?Outlines. Critical Practice Studies2014; 15: 49–62.
39.
MckinstryB. Paternalism and the doctor-patient relationship in general practice. Br J Gen Pract1992; 42: 340–342.
40.
SontagS. Illness as metaphor. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987, ISBN 0140067027.
41.
GunterH. Critical approaches to leadership in education. Educ Inq2001; 2: 94–108.
42.
LaurantTGBradneyDA. Leadership behaviors of athletic training leaders compared with leaders in other fields. J Athl Train2007; 42: 120–125.
43.
GeyerALJSteyrerJM. Transformational leadership and objective performance in banks. Appl Psychol-Int Rev1998; 47: 397–420.
44.
KotterJP. What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review December 2001: 103–111.
45.
RubinRSMunzDCBommerWH. Leading from within: the effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Acad Manag J2005; 48: 845–858.
46.
SkinnerCSpurgeonP. Valuing empathy and emotional intelligence in health leadership: a study of empathy, leadership behaviour and outcome effectiveness. Health Serv Manag Res2005; 18: 1–12.
47.
MaxwellJC. The 5 levels of leadership: proven steps to maximize your potential. Center Street: USA, 2011.ISBN13:9781546059790
48.
CsordasTJ. Embodiment and experience: the existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
