The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to identify and synthesise qualitative research relating to experiences of using mobile health (mHealth) applications to aid self-management of Type 2 Diabetes.
Methods
Using a systematic search strategy, 11 databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ProQuest A&1, ProQuest UK & Ireland, Mednar). “Best fit” framework synthesis was used guided by the Health Information Technology Acceptance Model (HITAM). Assessment of methodological limitations was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and confidence in the review findings were guided by GRADE-CERQual.
Results
Fourteen eligible studies were included in the synthesis (7 qualitative and 5 mixed methods). Key themes identified under the health, information and technology zones of the HITAM revealed the benefits of mHealth apps, barriers to their use, their perceived usefulness and ease of use.
Discussion
Most people used the apps for feedback on their self-management and found them helpful in their communication with health care providers. Some embraced the technology and found it easy to use while others found mHealth apps to be counterintuitive.
KhuntiSKhuntiKSeiduS.Therapeutic inertia in Type 2 diabetes: prevalence, causes, consequences and methods to overcome inertia. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism2019;
10.
3.
DebongFMayerHKoberJ.Real-World Assessments of mySugr Mobile Health App. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics2019;
21(S2): S2-35–S2-40.
HurleyLO'DonnellMO'HaraMCCareyMEWillaingIDalyH, et al.
Is diabetes self-management education still the Cinderella of diabetes care?Patient Education and Counseling2017;
100(10): 1957–60.
6.
PetersA. Use apps for Diabetes but with care. Medscape, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Oct 11, 2019. Available at: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/919511#vp_2. (Accessed 17th October, 2019).
7.
FlemingAGPetrieJRBergenstalRMHollRWPetersALHeinemannL.Diabetes digital app technology: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.Diabetes Care2020;
43(1): 250–60.
8.
CuiMWuXMaoJWangXNieM.T2DM self-management via smartphone applications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE2016;
11(11).
9.
HouCCarterBHewittJFrancisaTMayorS.Do mobile phone applications improve glycemic control (HbA1c) in the self-management of diabetes? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 randomized trials.Diabetes Care2016;
39(11): 2089–95.
10.
HouCXuQDiaoSHewittJLiJCarterB.Mobile phone applications and self-management of diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis, meta-regression of 21 randomized trials and GRADE.Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism2018;
20(8): 2009–13.
11.
PalKEastwoodSVMichieSFarmerAJBarnardMLPeacockR, et al.
Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2013; 2017(12).
12.
WuYYaoXVespasianiGNicolucciADongYKwongJ, et al.
Mobile app-based interventions to support diabetes self-management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to identify functions associated with glycemic efficacy(JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, (2017)
5, 3, 10.2196/mhealth.6522). JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018; 6(1).
FlemmingKBoothAGarsideRTunçalpÖNoyesJ.Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods.BMJ Global Health2019;
4(Suppl 1): e000882.
15.
RossmannCRiesmeyerCBrew-SamNKarnowskiVJoeckelSChibA, et al.
Appropriation of mobile health for diabetes self-management: Lessons from two qualitative studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research2019;
21(3).
16.
YinglingLAllenNALitchmanMLColicchioVGibsonBS.An Evaluation of Digital Health Tools for Diabetes Self-Management in Hispanic Adults: Exploratory Study.JMIR Diabetes2019;
4(3): e12936.
17.
TorbjørnsenARibuLRønnevigMGrøttlandAHelsethS.Users' acceptability of a mobile application for persons with Type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research2019;
19(1).
18.
JeffreyBBagalaMCreightonALeaveyTNichollsSWoodC, et al.
Mobile phone applications and their use in the self-management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A qualitative study among app users and non-app users. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome2019;
11(1).
19.
BoothACarrollC.How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare.BMJ quality & safety2015;
24(11): 700–8.
20.
KimJParkHA.Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers' health behavior intention. Journal of Medical Internet Research2012;
14(5).
21.
SinDYEGuoXYongDWWQiuTYMoeyPKSFalkM-R, et al.
Assessment of willingness to Tele-monitoring interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension in the public primary healthcare setting. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making2020;
20(1): 11.
22.
VosJMiddlemassJWindleKSiriwardenaAN. Feasibility of using the Health Information Technology Acceptance Model (HITAM) for assessing readiness to adopt telecare in older adults with multiple chronic diseases. Conference Presentation: Trent Regional SAPC Meeting. March 2015. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4742.3520
23.
BoothA.Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews2016;
5(1).
24.
OlofssonHBrolundAHellbergCSilversteinRStenströmKÖsterbergM, et al.
Can abstract screening workload be reduced using text mining? User experiences of the tool Rayyan.Research Synthesis Methods2017;
8(3): 275–80.
25.
ThomasJHardenA.Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology2008;
8.
26.
CarrollCBoothACooperK.A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents.BMC Medical Research Methodology2011;
11(1): 29.
27.
HoughtonCMurphyKBrookerDCaseyD. Healthcare staffs' experiences and perceptions of caring for people with dementia in the acute setting: Qualitative evidence synthesis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2-16; 61, 104-116.
28.
AduMDMalabuUHMalau-AduliAEO,
Malau-Aduli BS. Users’ preferences and design recommendations to promote engagements with mobile apps for diabetes self-management: Multi-national perspectives. PLoS ONE2018;
13(12).
29.
KayyaliRPeletidiAIsmailMHashimZBandeiraPBonnahJ.Awareness and Use of mHealth Apps: A Study from England. Pharmacy2017;
5(2): 33.
CarrollCBoothALeavissJRickJ.“Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method.BMC Medical Research Methodology2013;
13:37.
32.
LewinSBohrenMRashidianAMunthe-KaasHGlentonCColvinCJ, et al.
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: How to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Implementation Science2018;
13.
33.
BurfordSJParkSDawdaP.Small data and its visualization for diabetes self-management: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research2019;
21(8).
34.
DesveauxLShawJSaragosaMSoobiahCMaraniHHenselJ, et al.
A mobile app to improve self-management of individuals with Type 2 diabetes: Qualitative realist evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research2018;
20(3).
35.
KellyLJenkinsonCMorleyD.Experiences of using web-based and mobile technologies to support self-management of Type 2 diabetes: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research2018;
20(5).
36.
MamykinaLHeitkemperEMSmaldoneAMKukafkaRCole-LewisHDavidsonPG, et al.
Structured scaffolding for reflection and problem solving in diabetes self-management: Qualitative study of mobile diabetes detective.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2016;
23(1): 129–36.
37.
PengWYuanSHoltzBE.Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Health Mobile Apps for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Living in Rural Communities.Telemedicine and e-Health2016;
22(9): 733–8.
38.
MaglalangDDYooGJUrsuaRAVillanuevaCCheslaCABenderMS."I don't have to explain, people understand": Acceptability and cultural relevance of a mobile health lifestyle intervention for Filipinos with Type 2 diabetes.Ethnicity and Disease2017;
27(2): 143–54.
39.
TataraNÅrsandESkrovsethSOHartvigsenG.Long-term engagement with a mobile self-management system for people with Type 2 diabetes. Journal of Medical Internet Research2013;
15(3).
40.
JungH. (2018). Creating a Smartphone Application for Image-Assisted Dietary Assessment among Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes (Thesis, University of Washington).
41.
WuXGuoXZhangZ.The efficacy of mobile phone apps for lifestyle modification in diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth2019;
7(1).
42.
MahmoodAKediaSWyantDKAhnSBhuyanSS.Use of mobile health applications for health-promoting behavior among individuals with chronic medical conditions. Digital Health2019;
5.
43.
ThomsonKBrouwersCDammanOCde BruijneMCTimmermansDRMMellesM.How Health Care Professionals Evaluate a Digital Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence: Qualitative Exploratory Study.JMIR Hum Factors2018;
5(1): e7.
44.
BirkhoffSDSmeltzerSC.Perceptions of Smartphone User-Centered Mobile Health Tracking Apps Across Various Chronic Illness Populations: An Integrative Review.Journal of Nursing Scholarship2017;
49(4): 371–8.
45.
OrCKKarshB-TSevertsonDBurkeLBrownRBrennanP.Factors affecting home care patients' acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA2011;
18:51–9.
46.
HolmenHWahlAKSmåstuenMCRibuL.Tailored communication within mobile apps for diabetes self-management: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research2017;
19(6).
47.
YoungHMMiyamotoSDharmarMTang-FeldmanY.Nurse coaching and mobile health compared with usual care to improve diabetes self-efficacy for persons with Type 2 diabetes: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth2020;
8
48.
TongAFlemmingKMcInnesEOliverSCraigJ.Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology2012;
12.
49.
PolonskyWHFisherLSchikmanCHHinnenDAParkinCGJelsovskyZ, et al.
Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: Results from the structured testing program study. Diabetes Care2011;
34(2): 262–7.
50.
EatonSRobertsSTurnerB.Delivering person centred care in long term conditions. BMJ (Online)2015; 350.
