Health professional-led group programmes are a common form of long-term condition self-management support. Much research has focused on clinical outcomes of group participation, yet there is limited research on how group participants perceive and experience the support they receive. We aim to identify the different types of support that participants receive from both facilitators and other participants, and how they value this support.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants taking part in a self-management group programme for a long-term condition (obesity, type 2 diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Data pertaining to support types were deductively identified through a social support framework prior to interpretive thematic analysis.
Results
Participants identified information and emotional support from both facilitators and other participants as complementary yet distinct. Facilitators’ support came from professional training and other participants’ support reflected the contextual, lived experience. Professional interactions were prioritised, constraining opportunities for participant–participant support to be received and exchanged.
Discussion
We identified a key gap in how self-management support is enacted in groups. Engaging participants to share experiential knowledge will make group support more relevant and mutually beneficial to participants living with a long-term condition.
EntwistleVACribbAOwensJ.Why health and social care support for people with long-term conditions should be oriented towards enabling them to live well. Health Care Anal2018;
26: 48–65.
2.
NolteEMcKeeM.Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective.
UK:
Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education, 2008, p.4.
3.
WagnerEH.Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?Eff Clin Pract1998;
1: 2–4.
4.
DunstonRLeeABoudD, et al.
Co‐production and health system reform – from re‐imagining to re‐making. Aust J Publ Admin2009;
68: 39–52.
5.
TaylorSJPinnockHEpiphaniouE, et al.
A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions: PRISMS–Practical systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions. Health Serv Deliv Res2014;
2: 1–622.
6.
van Het Bolscher-NiehuisMJTden OudenMEMde VochtHM, et al.
Effects of self-management support programmes on activities of daily living of older adults: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud2016;
61: 230–247.
7.
KendallEEhrlichCSunderlandN, et al.
Self-managing versus self-management: reinvigorating the socio-political dimensions of self-management. Chronic Illn2011;
7: 87–98.
8.
RogersABuryMKennedyA.Rationality, rhetoric, and religiosity in health care: the case of England's expert patients programme. Int J Health Serv2009;
39: 725–747.
9.
MorganHMEntwistleVACribbA, et al.
We need to talk about purpose: a critical interpretive synthesis of health and social care professionals' approaches to self-management support for people with long-term conditions. Health Expect2017;
20: 243–259.
10.
ThillePWardNRussellG.Self-management support in primary care: enactments, disruptions, and conversational consequences. Soc Sci Med2014;
108: 97–105.
11.
KendallERogersA.Extinguishing the social? State sponsored self‐care policy and the chronic disease self‐management programme. Disabil Soc2007;
22: 129–143.
12.
MordenAJinksCOngBN.Rethinking ‘risk' and self-management for chronic illness. Soc Theory Health2012;
10: 78–99.
13.
RogersAKennedyABowerP, et al.
The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust2008;
189: S21
14.
OngBNRogersAKennedyA, et al.
Behaviour change and social blinkers? The role of sociology in trials of self‐management behaviour in chronic conditions. Sociol Health Illn2014;
36: 226–238.
15.
TownsendAWykeSHuntK.Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn2006;
2: 185–194.
16.
Australian Government Department of Health. Flexible fund guidelines – chronic disease prevention and service improvement flexible fund, www.health.gov.au (2014, accessed 30 August 2018).
17.
PearceGParkeHLPinnockH, et al.
The PRISMS taxonomy of self-management support: derivation of a novel taxonomy and initial testing of its utility. J Health Serv Res Policy2016;
21: 73–82.
18.
de SilvaD.Evidence: helping people help themselves. A review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management.
London:
The Health Foundation, 2011.
19.
CosterSNormanI.Cochrane reviews of educational and self-management interventions to guide nursing practice: a review. Int J Nurs Stud2009;
46: 508–528.
20.
BarlowJWrightCSheasbyJ, et al.
Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns2002;
48: 177–187.
21.
BattersbyMVon KorffMSchaeferJ, et al.
Twelve evidence-based principles for implementing self-management support in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2010;
36: 561–570.
22.
LorigK.Chronic disease self-management program: insights from the eye of the storm. Front Public Health2015;
2: 1–3.
23.
DeakinTAMcShaneCECadeJE, et al.
Group based training for self‐management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005;
2: CD003417.
24.
WarsiAWangPSLaValleyMP, et al.
Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med2004;
164: 1641–1649.
25.
ZwerinkMBrusse-KeizerMvan der ValkPD, et al.
Self-management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014;
3: CD002990.
26.
LorigKRRitterPStewartAL, et al.
Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care2001;
39: 1217–1223.
27.
StenbergUHaaland-ØverbyMFredriksenK, et al.
A scoping review of the literature on benefits and challenges of participating in patient education programs aimed at promoting self-management for people living with chronic illness. Patient Educ Couns2016;
99: 1759–1771.
28.
HughesSLewisSWillisK, et al.
The experience of facilitators and participants of long term condition self-management group programmes: a qualitative synthesis. Patient Educ Couns2017;
100: 2244–2254.
29.
HughesSLewisSWillisK, et al. How do facilitators of group programmes for long-term conditions conceptualise self-management support? Chronic Illn. Epub ahead of print 1 August 2018. DOI:10. 1177/1742395318792068.
30.
SadlerEWolfeCDAMcKevittC.Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. SAGE Open Med2014;
2: 1–18.
31.
CohenS.Social relationships and health. Am Psychol2004;
59: 676–684.
32.
ThoitsPA.Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav2011;
52: 145–161.
33.
KennedyAReevesDBowerP, et al.
The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self-care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health2007;
61: 254–261.
34.
KoetsenruijterJvan EikelenboomNvan LieshoutJ, et al.
Social support and self-management capabilities in diabetes patients: an international observational study. Patient Educ Couns2016;
99: 638–643.
35.
RogersAVassilevIKennedyA, et al.
Why less may be more? A mixed methods study of the work and relatedness of ‘weak’ ties in supporting long term condition self-management. Implement Sci2014;
9: 1–11.
36.
O’brienCBHarrisBIBeckmanJT, et al.
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med2014;
89: 1245–1251.
37.
BorkmanT.Experiential knowledge: a new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Soc Serv Rev1976;
50: 445–456.
38.
ZieblandSWykeS.Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health?Milbank Q2012;
90: 219–249.
39.
AllenCVassilevIKennedyA, et al.
Long-term condition self-management support in online communities: a meta-synthesis of qualitative papers. J Med Internet Res2016;
18: e61.
40.
LeventhalHBrissetteILeventhalEA.The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: CameronLLeventhalH (eds) The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour.
London:
Routledge, 2003, pp.42–65.
41.
SnowRHumphreyCSandallJ.What happens when patients know more than their doctors? Experiences of health interactions after diabetes patient education: a qualitative patient-led study. BMJ Open2013;
3: e003583.
42.
GreenhalghTSnowRRyanS, et al.
Six 'biases' against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine. BMC Med2015;
13: 200.
43.
RogersAGatelyCKennedyA, et al.
Are some more equal than others? Social comparison in self-management skills training for long-term conditions. Chronic Illn2009;
5: 305–317.
44.
Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. National strategic framework for chronic conditions. Report.
Canberra:
Australian Government Department of Health and Aging, 2017.
45.
HibbardJGilburtH.Supporting people to manage their health: an introduction to patient activation.
London, UK:
The King’s Fund, 2014.
46.
EmbuldeniyaGVeinotPBellE, et al.
The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: a qualitative synthesis. Patient Educ Couns2013;
92: 3–12.
47.
SimmonsDBunnCCohnS, et al.
What is the idea behind peer-to-peer support in diabetes?Diabetes Manag2012;
3: 61–70.
48.
DemainSGoncalvesACAreiaC, et al.
Living with, managing and minimising treatment burden in long term conditions: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS One2015;
10: e0125457.
49.
MeadNBowerP.Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med2000;
51: 1087–1110.
