Bringing self-management into clinical view: a qualitative study of long-term condition management in primary care consultations

Abstract

Objectives: To understand social processes underpinning support for self-management of long-term conditions in primary care.

Methods: Comparative analysis of observational and interview data concerning the management of long-term conditions in UK primary-care consultations. Analysis of recordings of primary care consultations (n = 86) was conducted in conjunction with analysis of semi-structured interviews with health professionals (n = 17) and patients (n = 12) living with a long-term condition.

Results: A key finding was the infrequency with which self-management topics became legitimate objects for discussion in consultations. Analysis suggested that the maintenance of self—other relations was a prime objective for both patients and professionals, and the introduction of self-management topics threatened this process. Technology and the division of labour among primary-care professionals reinforced this tension.

Discussion: In order for self-management support to become embedded and integrated into primary care, interventions concerning long-term condition management need to take into account this tension underpinning care.

Keywords

Communication Consultations Long-term conditions Primary care Self-management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wagner EH , Austin BT , Davis C. , Hindmarsh M. , Schaefer J. , Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Aff 2001; 20: 64-78.

Department of Health. Supporting people with long term conditions: An NHS and Social Care Model to support local innovation and integration, London: Department of Health, 2005.

Riegel B. , Moser DK , Anker SD , et al. State of the science. Promoting self-care in persons with heart failure: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009; 120: 1141-63.

Elwyn G. , Hutchings H. , Edwards A. , et al. The OPTION scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 2005; 8: 34-42.

Glasgow RE , Whitesides H. , Nelson CC , King DK Use of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: Relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management . Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2655-61.

Department of Health. Investing in general practice: The new general medical services contract, London : Department of Health, 2003.

Silverman D. Communication and medical practice: Social relations in the clinic , London: Sage, 1987.

Roland M. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: Too early for a final verdict . Brit J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 525-7.

Mangin D. , Toop L.

The Quality and Outcomes Framework: What have you done to yourselves?

Brit J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 435-7.

10.

Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in social research , London: Sage, 1998.

11.

Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis , London: Sage, 2006.

12.

Chew-Graham CA , May CR , Perry MS Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: Lessons from interviewing fellow professionals . Fam Pract 2002; 19: 285-9.

13.

Collins S , Britten N , Ruusuvuori J , Thompson A , eds. Patient participation in health care consultations: Qualitative perspectives, Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007.

14.

Royal College of General Practitioners. Extracts from the RCGP ethical guidelines regarding the recording of consultations for assessment of clinical competence. London: RCGP, 2005. Available at http://www.rcgp.org.uk (accessed July 25, 2005).

15.

General Medical Council. Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. London: General Medical Council, 2002. Available at http://www.gmc-uk.org (accessed July 25, 2005).

16.

Greenhalgh T. , Robert G. , Macfarlane F. , Bate P. , Kyriakidou O. , Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61: 417-30.

17.

Bower P. , Gask L. , May C. , Mead N. Domains of consultation research in primary care. Patient Educ Counsel 2001; 45: 3-11.

18.

Byrne PS , Long BE Doctors talking to patients: A study of the verbal behaviour of general practitioners consulting in their surgeries, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1976 .

19.

Balint M. The Doctor, his patient, and the illness; (Millennium reprint of 2nd edn) . Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone , 2000.

20.

Conner M , Norman P , eds. Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models, 2nd edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2005.

21.

Gerhardt U. Ideas about illness: An intellectual and political history of medical sociology , Basingstoke: Macmillan Education Ltd, 1989.

22.

Coleman T. , Murphy E. Combining qualitative interviews with video-recorded consultations: Gaining insight into GPs’ decision-making. Fam Pract 1999; 16: 173-8.

23.

Rapley T. Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis, London : Sage, 2007.

24.

Miller G. , Fox KJ Building bridges: The possibility of analytic dialogue between ethnography, conversation analysis and Foucault. In: Silverman D , ed. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice , 2nd edn. London: Sage, 2004: 35-55.

25.

Heritage J. , Maynard DW Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annu Rev of Socio 2006; 32: 351-74.

26.

Crossley N. The social body: Habit, identity and desire, London : Sage, 2001.

27.

Poland BD Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research . Qual Inq 1995; 1: 290-310.

28.

Lewis RB NVivo 2.0 and ATLAS.ti 5.0: A comparative review of two popular qualitative data-analysis programs. Field Methods 2004 ; 16: 439-64.

29.

Maynard DW , Zimmerman DH Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships . Soc Psychol Quart 1984; 47: 301-16.

30.

Lincoln YS , Guba EG Naturalistic inquiry, London: Sage , 1985.

31.

Creese A. Linguistic ethnography. In: King KA , Hornberger NH , eds. Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd edn, Volume 10: Research methods in language and education . New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC, 2008: 229-241. Available at http://www.ling-ethnog.org.uk/papers.htm (accessed January 24, 2009).

32.

NPT: Normalization Process Theory [Online]. Available from: URL:http://normalizationprocess.co.uk (accessed July 24, 2009).

33.

May C. , Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: An outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology 2009 ; 43: 535-54.

34.

Townsend A. , Wyke S. , Hunt K. Self-managing and managing self: Practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness . Chronic Illness 2006; 2: 185-94.

35.

Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illness 1982; 4: 167-82.

36.

Bury MR The sociology of chronic illness: A review of research and prospects . Sociol Health Illness 1991; 13: 451-68.

37.

Williams SJ Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept . Sociol Health Illness 2000; 22: 40-67.

38.

May C. The hard work of being ill. Chronic Illness 2006; 2: 161-2.

39.

Fairhurst K. , May C. What general practitioners find satisfying in their work: Implications for health care system reform. Ann Fam Med 2006 ; 4: 500-5.

40.

Robinson CA Managing life with a chronic condition: The story of normalization. Qual Health Res 1993; 3: 6-28.

41.

Kennedy A. , Rogers A. , Bower P. Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. Brit Med J 2007; 335: 968-70.

42.

Kinnersley P. , Edwards A. , Hood K. , et al. Interventions before consultations to help patients address their information needs by encouraging question asking: Systematic review. Brit Med J 2008; 337: 485.

43.

Maynard DW Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. Am J Sociol 1991; 97: 448-95.

44.

Fried TR , McGraw S. , Agostini JV , Tinetti ME Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 1839-44.

45.

Young GJ , White B. , Burgess JF , et al. Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs. Am J Med Qual 2005; 20: 144-50.

46.

Campbell SM , McDonald R. , Lester H. The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: A qualitative study. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6: 228-34.

47.

Menzies IEP. A case-study in the functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety: A report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital. Hum Relat 1960; 13: 95-121.