The purpose of this study was to investigate key factors related to lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by eliciting survivors’ subjective needs for, attitudes towards and experiences with behaviour changes in their everyday life to improve future interventions promoting lifestyle changes.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 individuals who had recently experienced an AMI. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
The data analysis revealed that lifestyle changes following AMI are influenced by a combination of individual (physical and psychological) and social factors that can be grouped into facilitators and barriers. The interviews indicated the need for more personalised information regarding the causes and risk factors of illness, the benefits of lifestyle changes and the importance of including significant others in lifestyle advice and education and of individualising support.
Discussion
Lifestyle change is a continuous process that is not completed within a few months after a cardiac event. Considering the identified themes when developing interventions to promote lifestyle changes following AMI may enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of such interventions.
RogerVLGoASLloyd-JonesDMet al.Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation2011; 123: e18–e209.
2.
BrinkEKarlsonBWHallbergLR-M. Readjustment 5 months after a first-time myocardial infarction: reorienting the active self. J Adv Nurs2006; 53: 403–411.
3.
MayouRAGillDThompsonDRet al.Depression and anxiety as predictors of outcome after myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med2000; 62: 212–219.
4.
RosengrenAHawkenSÔunpuuSet al.Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet2004; 364: 953–962.
5.
YusufSHawkenSOunpuuSet al.Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet2004; 364: 937–952.
6.
SdringolaSNakagawaKNakagawaYet al.Combined intense lifestyle and pharmacologic lipid treatment further reduce coronary events and myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with usual-care cholesterol-lowering drugs in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol2003; 41: 263–272.
7.
WoodDA. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. Lancet2001; 357: 995–1001.
8.
MurrayJCraigsCLHillKMet al.A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change. BMC Cardiovasc Disord2012; 12: 120–120.
9.
WilesRKinmonthA-L. Patients’ understandings of heart attack: implications for prevention of recurrence. Patient Educ Couns2001; 44: 161–169.
10.
PetrieKJCameronLDEllisCJet al.Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med2002; 64: 580–586.
11.
PettyRECacioppoJT. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol1984; 46: 69–81.
12.
JensenBOPeterssonK. The illness experiences of patients after a first time myocardial infarction. Patient Educ Couns2003; 51: 123–131.
13.
KayaniyilSArdernCWinstanleyJet al.Degree and correlates of cardiac knowledge and awareness among cardiac inpatients. Patient Educ Couns2009; 75: 99–107.
14.
RushfordNMurphyBMWorcesterMUCet al.Recall of information received in hospital by female cardiac patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2007; 14: 463–469.
15.
HanssenTANordrehaugJEHanestadBR. A qualitative study of the information needs of acute myocardial infarction patients, and their preferences for follow-up contact after discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2005; 4: 37–44.
16.
MurrayJHoneySHillKet al.Individual influences on lifestyle change to reduce vascular risk: a qualitative literature review. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract2012; 62: e403–e410.
GregorySBostockYBackett-MilburnK. Recovering from a heart attack: a qualitative study into lay experiences and the struggle to make lifestyle changes. Fam Pract2006; 23: 220–225.
19.
FålunNFridlundBSchaufelMAet al.Patients’ goals, resources, and barriers to future change: a qualitative study of patient reflections at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2016; 15: 495–503.
20.
McSweeneyJCCoonS. Women’s inhibitors and facilitators associated with making behavioral changes after myocardial infarction. Medsurg Nurs2004; 13: 49–49.
21.
BennettKKMarteRM. Patient attributions for cardiac events: predictors of physical and psychological recovery. J Appl Soc Psychol2013; 43: 660–672.
22.
CreswellJW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2003.
23.
HsiehH-FShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res2005; 15: 1277–1288.
24.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care2007; 19: 349–357.
25.
BühringerGet al.Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in Germany, Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, 2002.
26.
RubakSSandbækALauritzenTet al.Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract2005; 55: 305–312.
27.
RollnickSMillerWRButlerCC. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior applications of motivational interviewing, New York: Guilford Publications, 2007.
28.
GaglioBGlasgowREBullSS. Do patient preferences for health information vary by health literacy or numeracy? A qualitative assessment. J Health Commun2012; 17: 109–121.
29.
KreuterMWHoltCL. How do people process health information? Applications in an age of individualized communication. Curr Dir Psychol Sci2001; 10: 206–209.
30.
TimminsFKaliszerM. Information needs of myocardial infarction patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs J Work Group Cardiovasc Nurs Eur Soc Cardiol2003; 2: 57–65.
31.
FixGMBokhourBG. Understanding the context of patient experiences in order to explore adherence to secondary prevention guidelines after heart surgery. Chronic Illn2012; 8: 265–277.
32.
ThompsonDRChairSYChanSWet al.Motivational interviewing: a useful approach to improving cardiovascular health?J Clin Nurs2011; 20: 1236–1244.
33.
ColeJASmithSMHartNet al.Do practitioners and friends support patients with coronary heart disease in lifestyle change? A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract2013; 14: 126–126.
34.
JoÃo FigueirasMWeinmanJ. Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery?Psychol Health2003; 18: 201–216.
