Objectives: To ascertain nurses' and patients' views and experiences of a nurse-led heart failure clinic provided in general practice.
Methods: The study was set in eight general practices in the North-West of England. Semi-structured interviews were devised and administered, with all the nurses providing the clinics and a purposive sample of patients attending the clinics. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify key issues and themes.
Results: Nurses felt that the self-care advice provided had empowered patients to manage their condition. Explaining why a medication had been prescribed, and how it controlled heart failure, was felt to increase compliance. Although communication was deemed good, some patients were reticent about asking questions. Patients were knowledgeable about their prescribed heart failure medications, but some did not recall having discussed their medications. Also, medication inserts led some patients to question their prescription. Patients remained confused about the purpose and outcome of investigations. Furthermore, many patients suggested that they had problems adhering to or remembering the advice given.
Discussion: There are practical benefits to be obtained from attending a nurse-led heart failure clinic in primary care. However, patients and healthcare providers may have quite divergent views about such a service and its benefits, emphasizing the potential value of consumer involvement and feedback when developing and delivering such services.
McMurray J., Hart W., Rhode G.An evaluation of the cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the UK. Br J Med Econ1993; 6: 99—110.
2.
Stewart S., Jenkins A., Buchan S., McGuire A., Capewell S., McMurray JJThe current cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the UK . Eur J Heart Fail2002; 4: 361—71.
3.
Vinson JM, Rich MW, Sperry JC, Shah AS, McNamara T.Early readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Geriatr Soc1990; 38: 1290—5.
4.
Happ MB, Naylor MD, Roe-Prior P.Factors contributing to rehospitalization of elderly patients with heart failure . J Cardiovasc Nurs1997; 11: 75—84.
5.
Ekman I., Andersson B., Ehnfors M., Matejka G., Persson B., Fagerberg B.Feasibility of a nurse-monitored, outpatient-care programme for elderly patients with moderate-to-severe, chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J1998; 19: 1254—60.
6.
Cline CM, Israelsson BY, Willenheimer RB, Broms K., Erhardt LRCost effective management programme for heart failure reduces hospitalisation . Heart1998; 80: 442—6.
7.
Stewart S., Marley JE, Horowitz JDEffects of a multidisciplinary, home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and survival among patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a randomised controlled study. Lancet1999; 354: 1077—83.
8.
Blue L., Lang E., McMurray JJ, et al.. Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure. BMJ2001; 323: 715—18.
9.
Lewin RJ, Furze G., Robinson J., et al. A randomised controlled trial of a self-management plan for patients with newly diagnosed angina. Br J Gen Pract2002; 52: 194—6, 199—201.
10.
Doughty RN, Wright SP, Pearl A., et al. Randomized, controlled trial of integrated heart failure management: the Auckland Heart Failure Management Study. Eur Heart J2002; 23: 139—46.
11.
Kasper EK, Gerstenblith G., Hefter G., et al. A randomized trial of the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in heart failure outpatients at high risk of hospital readmission. J Am Coll Cardiol2002; 39: 471—80.
12.
Pearl A., Wright SP, Gamble GD, et al. The effect of an integrated care approach for heart failure on general practice. Fam Pract2003; 20: 642—5.
13.
Department of Health.The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management in the 21st century. London: Department of Health2001 .
14.
Derry J.A digest of the national service framework for coronary heart disease for primary care groups and primary health care teams. Oxfordshire MAAG and QuEST, 2000. Available at: http://www.oxmaag.demon.co.uk/MAAG/CHD_NSF_Digest_2000.pdf (accessed)
15.
Lloyd-Williams F., Mair FS, Roberts C., et al. A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of nurse-led heart failure clinics in primary care. Eur Heart J2004; 25(Abstr. Suppl.): 545.
16.
Lloyd-Williams F., Mair F., Shiels C., et al. Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in everyday practice?J Clin Epidemiol2003; 56: 1157—62.
17.
Miles M., Huberman M.Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994.
18.
Buetow S., Goodyear-Smith F., Coster G.Coping strategies in the self-management of chronic heart failure. Fam Pract2001; 18: 117—22.
19.
Department of Health.National service framework for coronary heart disease: modern standards and service models. London: Stationery Office , 2000.
20.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).Clinical Guideline 5: Chronic heart failure. London: NICE, 2003.
21.
Goodwin Y.Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty. Br J Plast Surg2000; 53: 121—5.
22.
Richards T.Partnerships with patients. BMJ1998; 316: 85—6.
23.
Ni H., Nauman D., Burgess D., Wise K., Crispell K., Hershberger REFactors influencing knowledge of and adherence to self-care among patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med1999; 159: 1613—19.
24.
Jaarsma T., Abu-Saad HH, Dracup K., Halfens R.Self-care behaviour of patients with heart failure. Scand J Caring Sci2000; 14: 112—19.
25.
Riegel B., Carlson B.Facilitators and barriers to heart failure self-care. Patient Educ Couns2002; 46: 287—95.
26.
Rogers A., Addington-Hall JM, McCoy AS, et al. A qualitative study of chronic heart failure patients' understanding of their symptoms and drug therapy. Eur J Heart Fail2002; 4: 283—7.
27.
Guba EG, Lincoln YSCompeting paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1994:105-17.
28.
Mays N., Pope C.Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research . BMJ2000; 320: 50—2.
29.
Martin CM, Banwell CL, Broom DH, Nisa M.Consultation length and chronic illness care in general practice: a qualitative study. Med J Aust1999; 171: 77—81.
