Five-year evaluation of a low-cost quality assurance protocol for clinical ultrasound transducers

Abstract

Objective:

To implement, execute and evaluate a quality assurance test protocol for clinical ultrasound transducers that is software-based, user-independent, inexpensive, easily repeatable, and does not require tissue phantoms.

Methods:

The test protocol is based on in-air reverberation images. The software test tool generates uniformity- and reverberation profiles to monitor system sensitivities and signal uniformities that provide a sensitive analysis of transducer status. Whenever a transducer was suspected to be damaged validating tests were conducted using the Sonora FirstCall test system. A total of 21 transducers from five ultrasound scanner systems were included in the study. Tests were performed every other month for a total of 5 years.

Results:

Each transducer was tested on average 11.7 times. Testing a transducer required a total of 2.75 hours annually. The ultrasound quality assurance test protocol detected an average annual fail rate of 10.7%. The test protocol provides a reliable approach for monitoring transducer lens status of clinically used ultrasound transducers.

Conclusion:

The ultrasound quality assurance test protocol may potentially find deviations in diagnostic quality before being noticed by the clinicians. Thus, the ultrasound quality assurance test protocol holds the ability to reduce the risk of undiscovered image quality degradation hereby minimizing the danger of diagnostic errors.

Keywords

Ultrasound quality assurance transducer lens status ultrasound transducer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mårtensson

Olsson

Segall

, et al. High incidence of defective ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 389–394.

Thijssen

Weijers

de Korte

. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 460–471.

Kollmann

deKorte

Dudley

, et al. Guideline for technical quality assurance (TQA) of ultrasound devices (B-Mode) version 1.0 (July 2012): EFSUMB Technical Quality Assurance Group US-TQA/B. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 544–549.

Kofler

. Quality assurance of ultrasound images: procedures, expectations, and philosophies. In: Proceedings of the AAPM 43rd annual meeting of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2001, https://www.aapm.org/meetings/2001AM/pdf/7194-74902.pdf

American College of Radiology (ACR). Ultrasound accreditation program requirements. Reston, VA: ACT, 2017.

College of Radiographers Royal College of Radiologists. The imaging services accreditation scheme standard: Statements, rationales and criteria. London: College of Radiographers Royal College of Radiologists, 2017.

Sipilä

Mannila

Vartiainen

. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 519–525.

Hangiandreou

Stekel

Tradup

, et al. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 1350–1357.

Mårtensson

Olsson

Brodin

. Ultrasound transducer function: annual testing is not sufficient. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 801–805.

10.

Moore

Gessert

Schafer

. The need for evidence-based quality assurance in the modern ultrasound clinical laboratory. Ultrasound 2005; 13: 158–162.

11.

Weigang

Moore

Gessert

, et al. The methods and effects of transducer degradation on image quality and the clinical efficacy of diagnostic sonography. J Diagn Med Sonogr 2003; 19: 3–13.

12.

Weijers

Thijssen

Korte

. Quality assurance 4 medical UltraSound equipment Medical Ultrasound Imaging Centre, Radboud UMC, http://music.radboudimaging.nl/index.php/MUSIC_qa4us (accessed 22 April 2020).

13.

Quinn

Verma

. The analysis of in-air reverberation patterns from medical ultrasound transducers. Ultrasound 2014; 22: 26–36.

14.

Sonora Medical Systems Inc. FirstCall 2000 ultrasound probe testing system users guide. Longmont, CO: Sonora Medical Systems Inc.

15.

Dudley

Wooley

. Blinded comparison between an in-air reverberation method and an electronic probe tester in the detection of ultrasound probe faults. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43: 2954–2958.