Vector flow techniques in the field of ultrasound encompass different pulse emission and estimation strategies. Numerous techniques have been introduced over the years, and recently commercial implementations usable in the clinic have been made. A number of clinical papers using different vector velocity approaches have been published. This review will give an overview of the most significant in vivo results achieved with ultrasound vector flow techniques, and will outline some of the possible clinical applications for vector velocity estimation in the future.
YiuBYLaiSSYuAC. Vector projectile imaging: Time-resolved dynamic visualization of complex flow patterns. Ultrasound Med Biol2014; 40: 2295–2309.
9.
DunmireKWBeachKWLabsKHet al.Cross-beam vector Doppler ultrasound for angle independent velocity measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol2000; 26: 1213–1235.
10.
JensenJAMunkP. A new method for estimation of velocity vectors. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control1998; 45: 837–851.
11.
AndersonME. Multi-dimensional velociy estimation with ultrasound using spatial quadrature. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control1998; 45: 852–861.
12.
TraheyGEAllisonJWRammOT. Angle independent ultrasonic detection of blood flow. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1987; 34: 965–967.
13.
JensenJABjerngaardR. Directional velocity estimation using focusing along the flow direction: II: Experimental investigation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2003; 50: 873–880.
14.
Bonnefous O. Measurement of the complete (3D) velocity vector of blood flows. In: Proceedings of IEEE ultrasonic symposium, Chicago, USA, 2–5 October 1988, pp. 795–799.
15.
FoxMD. Multiple crossed-beam ultrasound Doppler velocimetry. IEEE Trans Son Ultrason1978; 25: 281–286.
16.
NewhouseVLCensorDVontzTet al.Ultrasound Doppler probing of flows transverse with respect to beam axis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1987; 34: 779–788.
UdesenJGranFHansenKLet al.High frame-rate blood vector velocity imaging using plane waves: Simulations and preliminary experiments. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2008; 55: 1729–1743.
19.
HansenKLUdesenJOddershedeNet al.In vivo comparison of three ultrasound vector velocity techniques to MR phase contrast angiography. Ultrasonics2009; 49: 659–667.
20.
HansenKLUdesenJThomsenCet al.In vivo validation of a blood vector velocity estimator with MR angiography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2009; 56: 91–100.
21.
Moller-SorensenHGraeserKHansenKLet al.Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2014; 58: 80–88.
22.
JensenJOlesenJBStuartMBet al.Vector velocity volume flow estimation: Sources of error and corrections applied for arteriovenous fistulas. Ultrasonics2016; 70: 136–146.
23.
PedersenMMPihlMJHaugaardPet al.Comparison of real-time in vivo spectral and vector velocity estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol2012; 38: 145–151.
24.
TortoliPDallaiABoniEet al.An automatic angle tracking procedure for feasible vector Doppler blood velocity measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol2010; 36: 488–496.
25.
TortoliPLengeMRighiDet al.Comparison of carotid artery blood velocity measurements by vector and standard Doppler approaches. Ultrasound Med Biol2015; 41: 1354–1362.
26.
HansenKLMoller-SorensenHKjaergaardJet al.Vector flow imaging compared with conventional doppler ultrasound and thermodilution for estimation of blood flow in the ascending aorta. Ultrason Imaging2017; 39: 3–18.
27.
BrandtAHJensenJHansenKLet al.Surveillance for hemodialysis access stenosis: usefulness of ultrasound vector volume flow. J Vasc Access2016; 17: 483–488.
28.
HansenPMOlesenJBPihlMJet al.Volume flow in arteriovenous fistulas using vector velocity ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol2014; 40: 2707–2714.
29.
Brandt AH, Hansen KL, Nielsen MB, et al. Velocity measurement of the main portal vein with Transverse Oscillation. In: Proceedings of IEEE ultrasonic symposium, Taipei, Taiwan, 21–24 October 2015, pp. 1–4.
30.
Bechsgaard T, Hansen KL, Brandt AH, et al. Blood flow velocity in the popliteal vein using transverse oscillation ultrasound. In: Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging, San Diago, CA, USA, 27 February to 3 March 2016, pp. 1–8.
31.
PedersenMMPihlMJHaugaardPet al.Novel flow quantification of the carotid bulb and the common carotid artery with vector flow ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol2014; 40: 2700–2706.
32.
HansenKLMoller-SorensenHKjaergaardJet al.Intra-operative vector flow imaging using ultrasound of the ascending aorta among 40 patients with normal, stenotic and replaced aortic valves. Ultrasound Med Biol2016; 42: 2414–2422.
33.
HansenKLMoller-SorensenHPedersenMMet al.First report on intraoperative vector flow imaging of the heart among patients with healthy and diseased aortic valves. Ultrasonics2015; 56: 243–250.
34.
HansenKLMoller-SorensenHKjaergaardJet al.Analysis of systolic backflow and secondary helical blood flow in the ascending aorta using vector flow imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol2016; 42: 899–908.
35.
Hansen KL, Moller-Sorensen H, Kjaergaard J, et al. Aortic valve stenosis increases helical flow and flow complexity – a study of intraoperative cardiac vector flow imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.03.018.
TortoliPMorgantiTBambiGet al.Noninvasive simultaneous assessment of wall shear rate and wall distension in carotid arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol2006; 32: 1661–1670.
38.
KilnerPJYangGZWilkesAJet al.Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature2000; 404: 759–761.
39.
WangYMaRDingGet al.Left ventricular energy loss assessed by vector flow mapping in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ultrasound Med Biol2016; 42: 1730–1740.
40.
AkiyamaKMaedaSMatsuyamaTet al.Vector flow mapping analysis of left ventricular energetic performance in healthy adult volunteers. BMC Cardiovasc Disord2017; 17: 1–10.
41.
HansenKLUdesenJGranFet al.In-vivo examples of flow patterns with a fast vector velocity method. Ultraschall Med2009; 30: 471–477.
42.
FadnesSNyrnesSATorpHet al.Shunt flow evaluation in congenital heart disease based on two-dimensional speckle tracking. Ultrasound Med Biol2014; 40: 2379–2391.
43.
FaurieJBaudetMAssiKCet al.Intracardiac vortex dynamics by high-frame-rate doppler vortography-in vivo comparison with vector flow mapping and 4-D flow MRI. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2017; 64: 424–432.
44.
EkrollIKDahlTTorpHet al.Combined vector velocity and spectral Doppler imaging for improved imaging of complex blood flow in the carotid arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol2014; 40: 1629–1640.
45.
Villagomez HoyosCAStuartMBHansenKLet al.Accurate angle estimator for high-frame-rate 2-D vector flow imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2016; 63: 842–853.
46.
Olesen JB, Villagomez Hoyos CA, Traberg MS, et al. Non-invasive estimation of pressure changes along a streamline using vector velocity ultrasound. In: Proceedings of IEEE ultrasonic symposium, Taipei, Taiwan, 21–24 October 2015, pp.1–4.
47.
LengeMRamalliATortoliPet al.Plane-wave transverse oscillation for high-frame-rate 2-D vector flow imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2015; 62: 2126–2137.
48.
HolbekSEwertsenCBouzariHet al.Ultrasonic 3-D vector flow method for quantitative in vivo peak velocity and flow rate estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2016; 64: 544–554.
49.
CorreiaMProvostJTanterMet al.4D ultrafast ultrasound flow imaging: In vivo quantification of arterial volumetric flow rate in a single heartbeat. Phys Med Biol2016; 61: 48–61.
