Research papers on prisons have occasionally been illustrated with photographs. Yet rarely have visual methods been used critically in prison ethnography; image-making and images themselves have been used illustratively rather than as constitutive sites of knowledge production and, therefore, as objects to be interrogated in their own right by the researcher through, for example, participant collaboration. This paper focuses on the use of ‘photo-elicitation’ interviewing as a method for unpacking prison officers’ use of force. The discussion is based on an ethnography conducted inside an Italian custodial complex that hosts both a forensic psychiatric hospital and a prison. Prison officers, psychiatric staff and prisoners were invited to discuss a number of images produced by the researcher–in the wing where they were working and/or living–representing the use of force and violence, thereby helping the researcher to address what Joe Sim (2008: 187) calls an ‘inconvenient criminological truth’ and at the same time giving the participants a voice.
BarthesR (1977) Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.
2.
CarrabineE (2008) Crime, Culture and the Media. Cambridge: Polity.
3.
CohenS (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.
4.
CohenSTaylorL (1972) Psychological Survival: Experience of Long Term Imprisonment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
5.
CollierJCollierM (1967) Visual Anthropology. Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
6.
CreweB (2009) The Prisoner Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
FitzgeraldMSimJ (1979) British Prisons. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8.
FoucaultM (1975) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
9.
FoucaultM (1980) The eye of power. In: GordonC (ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 146–165.
10.
GariglioL (2010) I visual studies e gli usi sociali della fotografia. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia1: 117–140.
11.
GariglioL (2015a) Etnografia, studi visuali e metodi visuali in criminologia: Un dialogo con Eamonn Carrabine e Ronnie Lippens sulla criminologia visual. Studi Culturali1: 101–119.
GariglioL (2016) Threatening coercion symbolically or credibly: An ethnography of ‘soft-coercion’ in one asylum. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 1.
14.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
15.
GoboG (2008) Ethnographic interviewing. In: Gobo G (ed.) Doing Ethnography. London: Sage, pp. 190–201.
16.
HallS (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
17.
HarperDA (2002) Talking about pictures: A case for Photoelicitation. Visual Studies17(1): 13–26.
18.
JewkesYJohnstonH (2013/2007) The evolution of prison architecture. In: JewkesY (ed.) Handbook on Prisons. London: Routledge, pp. 174–196.
19.
KauffmanK (1988) Prison violence. In: KauffmanK (ed.) Prison Officers and their World. London: Harvard University Press, pp. 118–164.
20.
LapentaF (2011) Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In: MargolisEPauwelsL (eds) The Sage Handbook for Visual Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 201–214.
21.
MarquartJW (1986) Prison guards and the use of physical coercion as a mechanism of prisoner control. Criminology24(2): 347–366.
22.
MirzoeffN (2011) The right to look. Critical Inquiry37(3): 473–496.
23.
RhodesLA (2004) Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
RoseG (2011) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.
25.
RoseG (2014) On the relation between “visual research methods” and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review62(1): 24–46.
26.
SaboDKupersTALondonW (eds) (2001) Prison Masculinities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
27.
SchegloffESacksH (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica4(8): 289–327.
28.
ScheptJ (2014) (Un)seeing like a prison: Counter-visual ethnography of the carceral state. Theoretical Criminology18(2): 198–223.
29.
SekulaA (1982) On the invention of photographic meaning. In: BurginV (ed.) Thinking Photography. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 84–109.
30.
SimJ (2008) An inconvenient criminological truth: Pain, punishment and prison officers. In: BennetJCreweBWahidinA (eds) Understanding Prison Staff. London: Routledge, pp. 187–209.
31.
SimJ (2009) Punishment and Prisons: Power and the Carceral State. London: Routledge.
32.
SontagS (1973) On Photography. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
33.
SturkenMCartwrightL (2009) Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
TaggJ (1988) Evidence, truth and order: Photographic records and the growth of the state. In: The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photography and Histories. London: Macmillan, pp. 60–65.
35.
TaggJ (2009) The Disciplinary Frame: Photographic Truths and the Capture of Meaning. London: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
TerrillW (2014) Police coercion. In: ReisigMDKaneRJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Police and Policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 260–279.
37.
VisserHVroegeB (eds) (2007) Luigi Gariglio: Portraits in Prisons. Amsterdam: De Verbeelding.
38.
WagnerJ (ed.) (1979) Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social SciencesLondon: Sage.
39.
YoungA (2010) The Scene of Violence: Cinema, Crime and Affect. London: Routledge.
