A cultural lens to school leadership effects on teacher instructional practices: The mediation of teacher collective efficacy and the moderation of uncertainty avoidance

Abstract

This study explores how and under what boundary conditions school leadership influences teachers’ instructional practices in Turkey. Using survey data from a sample of 928 teachers in 87 middle and high schools, the present study tested a moderated mediation model of school leadership's effects on teacher instructional practices, with teacher collective efficacy as the mediator and uncertainty avoidance perceptions of teachers as the moderator. We performed a multilevel structural equation modeling with Bayesian estimation to examine the relationships between our constructs. The results showed significant indirect effects of school leadership on teacher instructional practices with the significant mediator role of teacher collective efficacy. However, the distinct contribution of this study lies in exploring the moderator role of uncertainty avoidance on the effect of school leadership on teacher instructional practices through teacher collective efficacy. Our results enhance the field's understanding of how and to what extent cultural aspects of any given society shape the effects of school leadership practices on teaching.

Keywords

Uncertainty avoidance school leadership teacher collective efficacy teacher instructional practices secondary schools

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afsar

Masood

(2017) Transformational leadership, creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisor, uncertainty avoidance, and innovative work behavior of nurses. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 54(1): 36–61.

Altuncu

Aktepe

ŞÖ

İslamoğlu

(2012) Preliminary study for the development of uncertainty avoidance instrument in Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance 1(4): 34–48.

Aslanargun

Tarku

(2014) Expectations of teachers from inspectors about professional supervision and guidance. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice 20(3): 281–306.

Bandura

(1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: H. W. Freeman.

Bellibaş

Polatcan

Kılınç

AÇ

(2022) Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 50(5): 812–831.

Blömeke

Klein

(2013) When is a school environment perceived as supportive by beginning mathematics teachers? Effects of leadership, trust, autonomy and appraisal on teaching quality. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11(4): 1029–1048.

Bryk

Sebring

Allensworth

, et al. (2010) Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons From CHICAGO. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

Bush

(2021) School leadership and culture: societal and organisational perspectives. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 49(2): 211–213.

Connelly

(2016) Cross-sectional survey research. Medsurg Nursing 25(5): 369–370.

10.

Day

Sammons

(2016) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: how successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly 52(2): 1–38.

11.

Edmonds

(1979) Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership 37(1): 15–24.

12.

Eells

Ciesielski

Rivkin

(2020) The relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 90(2): 269–305.

13.

Erdoğan

Dönmez

(2015) Adaptation of collective teacher efficacy scale into Turkish: validity and reliability study. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice 21(3): 345–366.

14.

Fancera

Bliss

(2011) Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools 10(3): 349–370.

15.

Geijsel

Sleegers

PJC

Stoel

, et al. (2009) The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal 109(4): 406–427.

16.

George

James

(1993) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(5): 798–804.

17.

Goddard

(2002) Collective efficacy and school organization: a multilevel analysis of teacher influence in schools. Theory and Research in Educational Administration 1: 169–184.

18.

Goddard

Hoy

Woolfolk Hoy

(2000) Collective teacher efficacy: its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 37(2): 479–507.

19.

Goddard

Bailes

, et al. (2019) From school leadership to differentiated instruction: a pathway to student learning in schools. The Elementary School Journal 120(2): 197–219.

20.

Gumus

Bellibas

Esen

, et al. (2018) A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(1): 25–48.

21.

Guskey

(1988) Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education 4(1): 63–69.

22.

Hair

Black

Babin

, et al. (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

23.

Hallinger

(2003) Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education 33(3): 329–352.

24.

Hallinger

(2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(1): 5–24.

25.

Hallinger

Gümüş

Bellibaş

MŞ

(2020) Are principals instructional leaders yet?’ A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics 122: 1629–1650.

26.

Hallinger

Heck

(1996) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly 32(1): 5–44.

27.

Hallinger

Kantamara

(2001) Exploring the cultural context of school improvement in Thailand. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12(4): 385–408.

28.

Hallinger

Leithwood

(1998) Unseen forces: the impact of social culture on school leadership. Peabody Journal of Education 73(2): 126–151.

29.

Hallinger

Murphy

(1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal 86(2): 217–247.

30.

Harman

(1976) Modern Factor Analysis. USA: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Harris

(2005) Teacher leadership: more than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools 4: 201–219.

32.

Hattie

(2009) Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London and New York: Routledge.

33.

Heck

Hallinger

(2014) Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration 52(5): 653–681.

34.

Hofstede

(1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

35.

Hofstede

(2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Available at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8

36.

İlhan

ÜD

Yemişci

(2020) The relationship between national culture, organizational culture, and occupational safety culture: a review of Turkey from the perspective of Hofstede’s power distance and uncertainty avoidance dimensions. Journal of Management and Economics 27(3): 703–724.

37.

Karacabey

Bellibaş

MŞ

Adams

(2022) Principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Turkish schools: examining the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy and teacher trust. Educational Studies 48(2): 253–272.

38.

Kılınç

AÇ

Polatcan

Savaş

, et al (2022) How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 0(0): 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082803.

39.

Klassen

Usher

Bong

(2010) Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education 78: 464–486.

40.

Leithwood

(2012) The Ontario Leadership Framework 2012 with a Discussion of the Research Foundations. Toronto, ON, Canada: Institute for Educational Leadership and the Ontario Ministry of Education.

41.

Leithwood

Louis

Anderson

Wahlstrom

(2004) How leadership influences student learning: review of research. The Wallace Foundation. Available at: https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf

42.

Leithwood

Sun

Schumacker

(2020) How school leadership influences student learning: a test of “The Four Paths Model”. Educational Administration Quarterly 56(4): 570–599.

43.

Liu

Hallinger

Feng

(2016b) Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration 54(6): 661–682.

44.

Liu

Hallinger

Feng

(2016a) Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education 59: 79–91.

45.

MacKinnon

Lockwood

Williams

(2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 39: 99–128.

46.

Marks

Printy

(2003) Principal leadership and school performance: an integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly 39(3): 370–397.

47.

Marzano

Pickering

Pollock

(2001) Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

48.

Meyer

Richter

Hartung-Beck

(2022) The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration: investigating the mediating effect of teachers’ collective efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 50(4): 593–612.

49.

Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2017) Teacher strategy paper . Available at: https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_05/25170118_Teacher_Strategy_Paper_2017-2023.pdf.

50.

Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018) Turkey’s 2023 education vision . Available at: http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf.

51.

Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2021/2022) National education statics formal education . Available at: https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2022_09/15142558_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2021_2022.pdf.

52.

Muthén

(1998–2017) Mplus user’s Guide, 8th ed Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

53.

Ninković

Knežević Florić

OČ

(2018) Transformational school leadership and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of perceived collective teacher efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(1): 49–64.

54.

OECD (2019a) PISA 2018: insights and interpretations . Available at: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf.

55.

OECD (2019b) TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science . Available at: https://timss2019.org/reports/wp-content/themes/timssandpirls/download-center/TIMSS-2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf.

56.

OECD (2019c) TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing.

57.

Pietsch

Tulowitzki

(2017) Disentangling school leadership and its ties to instructional practices–an empirical comparison of various leadership styles. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 28(4): 629–649.

58.

Podsakoff

MacKenzie

Lee

, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879–903.

59.

Polatcan

(2020) The adaptation of professional learning activities scale to Turkish: The validity and reliability study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 7(2): 281–290.

60.

Rigby

Larbi-Cherif

Rosenquist

, et al. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction? Educational Administration Quarterly 53(3): 475–516.

61.

Ross

Gray

(2006) Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: the mediating effects of collective teacher self-efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17(2): 179–199.

62.

Saylık

(2019) Hofstede’nin kültür boyutları ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması; geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi 8(3): 1860–1881.

63.

Shengnan

Hallinger

(2021) Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 49(2): 214–233.

64.

Shrout

Fleiss

(1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86(2): 420–428.

65.

Somech

Drach-Zahavy

(2000) Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education 16: 649–659.

66.

Sørlie

Torsheim

(2011) Multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher collective efficacy and problem behaviour in school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 22(2): 175–191.

67.

Stronge

Ward

Tucker

, et al. (2007) What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 20(3-4): 165–184.

68.

Supovitz

(2014) Building a lattice for school leadership: the top to bottom re-thinking of leadership development in England (Research Report No. 83). Retrieved from Consortium for Policy Research in Education website. Available at: http://cpre.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/2027_leadershipengland.pdf.

69.

Thoonen

Sleegers

Oort

, et al. (2011) How to improve teaching practices: the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly 47(3): 496–536.

70.

Tschannen-Moran

Barr

(2004) Fostering student learning: the relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools 3(3): 189–209.

71.

Tschannen-Moran

Hoy

(2001) Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17(7): 783–805.

72.

Walker

Dimmock

(1999) A cross-cultural approach to the study of educational leadership: an emerging framework. Journal of School Leadership 9(4): 321–348.

73.

Walker

Dimmock

(2002) Moving school leadership beyond its narrow boundaries: developing a cross-cultural approach. In: Leithwood

(eds) Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Springer, 167–202.

74.

Walker

Dimmock

(2012) Cross-cultural and comparative insights into educational administration and leadership: an initial framework. In: Walker A and Dimmock C (eds) School leadership and administration. New York: Routledge, 13–32.

75.

Walker

Qian

(2018) Deciphering Chinese School Leadership: Conceptualisation, Context and Complexities. New York: Routledge.

76.

Watts

Steele

Hartog

DND

(2020) Uncertainty avoidance moderates the relationship between transformational leadership and innovation: a meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies 51(1): 138–145.

77.

Yalçın

Atasoy

(2021) School leadership scale: a validity and reliability study. International Journal of Karamanoglu Mehmetbey Educational Research 3(2): 103–112.

78.

Yoo

Donthu

Lenartowicz

(2011) Measuring Hofstede's five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 23(3-4): 193–210.

79.

Zheng

Yin

(2019) Exploring the relationships among instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher self-efficacy in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47(6): 843–859.