The role of teacher agency in shaping school practices is receiving increasing attention from leadership and management researchers, who are beginning to recognise its significance in school improvement. This study aims to explore the ways and circumstances under which principals’ empowering leadership behaviours facilitate teacher agency. In this regard, data were collected from 1902 public secondary school teachers in Türkiye. The study first examined the relationship between empowering leadership and teacher agency. Then it tested the mediation effect of teacher autonomy and the moderating effect of distributed leadership on this relationship. Subsequently, the study investigated the relationship between empowering leadership and teacher agency, by testing the mediating role of teacher autonomy and the moderating effects of gender, school district, and seniority. The findings support a partial mediation model stating that the principal's empowering leadership approach affects teacher agency both directly and indirectly through teacher autonomy. Furthermore, distributed leadership and the school district were found to play a moderating role between empowering leadership and teacher agency. This study provides valuable insights for practitioners and researchers who work in similar hierarchical and collectivist cultures, such as Türkiye.
AftabNAli ShahS AKhanZ (2020) The moderating effect of gender on the relationship between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in Pakistani university teachers. Cogent Psychology7(1): 1–13. 10.1080/23311908.2020.1860480.
2.
AguirreJ MSpeerN M (2000) Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior18(3): 327–356. 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00034-6.
3.
AndersonJ CGerbingD W (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin103(3): 411–423. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
4.
BarryGWalshCÓ GallchóirCMannix-McNamara P (2022) School self-evaluation and empowering leadership in DEIS schools: An exploration of success. Irish Educational Studies43(4): 719–736. 10.1080/03323315.2022.2135569.
5.
BeijaardDMeijerP CVerloopN (2004) Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education20(2): 107–128. 10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.
6.
BellibaşM ŞÇalışkanÖGümüşS (2019) Validity and reliability of Teacher Agency Scale. Trakya Journal of Education9(1): 1–11. Doi: 10.24315/trkefd.406391.
7.
BellibaşM ŞGümüşSChenJ (2024) The impact of distributed leadership on teacher commitment: The mediation role of teacher workload stress and teacher well-being. British Educational Research Journal50(2): 814–836. 10.1002/berj.3944.
8.
BellibaşM ŞGümüşSKılınçA Ç (2020) Principals supporting teacher leadership: The effects of learning-centred leadership on teacher leadership practices with the mediating role of teacher agency. European Journal of Education55(2): 200–216. 10.1111/ejed.12387.
9.
BellibaşM ŞKılınçA ÇPolatcanM (2021) The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly57(5): 776–814. 10.1177/0013161X211035079.
10.
BellibaşM ŞPolatcanMKılınçA Ç (2022) Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(5): 812–831. 10.1177/1741143220945706.
11.
BerraiesSHamzaK AChtiouiR (2021) Distributed leadership and exploratory and exploitative innovations: Mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing and organizational trust. Journal of Knowledge Management25(5): 1287–1318. 10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0311.
12.
BiestaGPriestleyMRobinsonS (2015) The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching21(6): 624–640. 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
13.
BlaseJBlaseJ (1997) The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration35(2): 138–164. 10.1108/09578239710161777.
14.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange & Power in Social Life. Newyork: Wiley.
15.
BorgM GFalzonJ M (1990) Teachers’ perception of primary schoolchildren's undesirable behaviours: The effects of teaching experience, pupil's age, sex and ability stream. British Journal of Educational Psychology60(2): 220–226. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00939.x.
16.
BushT (2011) Theories of Educational Leadership and Management, 4th ed.London: Sage Publications.
17.
CampbellP (2020) Rethinking professional collaboration and agency in a post-pandemic era. Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(3/4): 337–341. 10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0033.
18.
CaoJHuangYShaoX Zhang L (2025) Driving innovation: Exploring the effect of distributed leadership on collective teacher innovativeness in Chinese schools. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher34(3): 433–446. 10.1007/s40299-024-00866-x.
19.
ÇelikOKonanN (2021) The relationship between school principals’ empowering leadership with teachers’ self-efficiancy and organizational citizenship behaivors. Education and Science46(206): 241–261. 10.15390/EB.2020.8841.
20.
CherkowskiSBrownW (2013) Towards distributed leadership as standards-based practice in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Education36(3): 23–46.
21.
ChoiSMaoX (2021) Teacher autonomy for improving teacher self-efficacy in multicultural classrooms: A cross-national study of professional development in multicultural education. International Journal of Educational Research105: 1–13. 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101711.
22.
Cooper SteinKKintzTMinessA (2016) Reflectiveness, adaptivity, and support: How teacher agency promotes student engagement. American Journal of Education123(1): 109–136.
23.
CsizerKAlbertA (2024) Gender-related differences in the effects of motivation, self-efficacy, and emotions on autonomous use of technology in second language learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher33(4): 819–828. 10.1007/s40299-023-00808-z.
24.
CummingsJN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science50(3): 352–364. 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134.
25.
DalgicG (2014) A meta-analysis: Exploring the effects of gender on organisational commitment of teachers. Issues in Educational Research24(2): 133–151.
26.
DeciELConnellJPRyanRM (1989) Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology74(4): 580.
27.
DurrantJ (2020) Teacher Agency, Professional Development, and School Improvement. London: Routledge.
28.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998) What Is Agency?. American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023. 10.1086/231294.
29.
EngleJXiaJButlerSJ (2024) Teacher leadership, wellbeing, and intent to leave in US rural schools: Evidence from the 2020–21 National Teacher and Principal Survey. Education Sciences14(7): 1–16. 10.3390/educsci14070758.
30.
EversATMessmannGKreijnsK (2024) Distributed leadership, leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Current Psychology43(12): 11037–11049. 10.1007/s12144-023-05048-4.
31.
FriedmanIA (1999) Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement59(1): 58–76. 10.1177/0013164499591005.
32.
GkorezisP (2016) Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. International journal of educational management30: 1030–1044. 10.1108/IJEM-08-2015-0113.
33.
GökalpAInesiM ASezerA (2025) Exploring the relationship between social studies teachers’ gamification self-efficacy and innovative thinking tendencies with moderated mediation model. Interactive Learning Environments33(2): 1167–1179. 10.1080/10494820.2024.2364254.
34.
GourdTY (2015) Toward a theory for understanding teacher agency: Grounded theory with inclusion co-teachers. Doctoral dissertation University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
35.
GümüşEBellibaşMŞ (2023) The relationship between the types of professional development activities teachers participate in and their self-efficacy: A multi-country analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education46(1): 67–94. 10.1080/02619768.2021.1892639.
36.
HallingerPLiuSPiyamanP (2019) Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education49(3): 341–357. 10.1080/03057925.2017.1407237.
37.
HarrisA (2008) Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration46(2): 172–188. 10.1108/09578230810863253.
38.
HayesAF (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
39.
Hendawy Al-MahdyYFHallingerPEmamMHammadWAlabriK MAl-Harthi K (2021) Supporting teacher professional learning in Oman: The effects of principal leadership, teacher trust, and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(2): 395–416. 10.1177/1741143221106442.
40.
HilalYYHammadWPolatcanM (2022) Does distributed leadership improve teacher agency? Exploring the mediating effect of teacher reflection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(6): 1369–1387. 10.1177/17411432221134931.
41.
HoltzE (2025) Examining the moderating effect of teacher experience on academic achievement in urban schools: A critical spatial analysis of access. Urban Education Research & Policy Annuals8(1): 2–31. 10.55370/uerpa.v8i1.2020.
42.
HsiehCCLiHCLiangJKChiuYC (2024) Empowering teachers through principals’ emotional intelligence: Unlocking the potential of organizational citizenship behavior in Taiwan's elementary schools. Acta Psychologica243: 1–9. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104142.
43.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multi Disciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118.
44.
HulpiaHDevosGRosseelY (2009) Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement69(6): 1013–1034. 10.1177/0013164409344490.
IngersollRM (2007) Short on power, long on responsibility. Educational Leadership65(1): 20–25.
47.
JangST (2020) Contextualized effects of racial/ethnic matching between students and teachers in urban, suburban, and rural high schools. Teachers College Record122(11): 1–34.
48.
KarabatakNB (2024) Imece culture and the concept of “imece”. The Journal of Turk-Islam World Social Studies18(18): 490–501. 10.16989/TIDSAD.1607.
49.
Kasapoğlu TankutayHÇolakİ (2025) How school principals' empowering leadership influences teacher autonomy: The mediating role of teachers' academic optimism. British Educational Research Journal51(3): 1255–1270. 10.1002/berj.4125.
50.
KengatharanN (2020) The effects of teacher autonomy, student behavior and student engagement on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice20(4): 1–15. DOI 10.12738/jestp.2020.4.001.
51.
KlineRB (2016) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford publications.
52.
KnoblauchDChaseMA (2015) Rural, suburban, and urban schools: The impact of school setting on the efficacy beliefs and attributions of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education45: 104–114. 10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.001.
53.
KonanNÇelikOT (2018) The adaptation of the empowering leadership scale into Turkish for educational organizations: A validity and reliability study [Güçlendirici liderlik ölçeğinin eğitim örgütleri için Türkçeye uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması]. Kastamonu Education Journal26(4): 1043–1054. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.434140.
54.
KonczakLJStellyDJTrustyML (2000) Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement60(2): 301–313. 10.1177/00131640021970420.
55.
LauITY (2021) Comparison of teacher agency for collaboration within and across curriculum teams. Teacher Development25(4): 515–533. 10.1080/13664530.2021.1942971.
56.
LeeANNieY (2014) Understanding teacher empowerment: Teachers' perceptions of principal's and immediate supervisor's empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education41: 67–79. 10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.006.
57.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2000) The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration38(2): 112–129. 10.1108/09578230010320064.
58.
Limonİ (2022) Relationship between empowering leadership and teachers’ job performance: Organizational commitment as mediator. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science15(1): 16–41. 10.30831/akukeg.945201.
59.
LipponenL KumpulainenK (2011) Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education27(5): 812–819. 10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001.
60.
LiuJQiangFKangH (2023) Distributed leadership, self-efficacy and wellbeing in schools: A study of relations among teachers in Shanghai. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1): 1–9. 10.1057/s41599-023-01696-w.
61.
LiuLLiuPYangHYaoHThienLM (2024) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being: The mediating roles of organisational trust. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(4): 837–853. 10.1177/17411432221113683.
62.
LiuSHallingerPFengD (2016) Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference?. Teaching and Teacher Education59: 79–91. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023.
63.
LiuSKeeleyJ WSuiYSangL (2021) Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation71: 1–9. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101099.
64.
LuSPVongKIPTongL Zhou YLeungSO (2024) Moderating effect of the urbanicity construct on teachers’ capacities to foster children’s creativity in rural areas: Evidence from Southwest China. Educational Research for Policy and Practice23(1): 45–62. 10.1007/s10671-023-09352-5.
65.
LuTPChenJ (2024) The effects of teacher’s emotional intelligence on team-member exchange and job performance: The moderating role of teacher seniority. Current Psychology43(5): 4323–4336. 10.1007/s12144-023-04593-2.
66.
MengWChangY (2024) The effect of perceived principal’s instructional leadership on the occupational well-being among rural elementary and middle school teachers. Open Psychology Journal17: 1–13. DOI: 10.2174/0118743501317478240902051149.
67.
MinM (2019) School culture, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and teacher agency toward reform with curricular autonomy in South Korea: A social cognitive approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Education43(4): 951–967. 10.1080/02188791.2019.1626218.
68.
MollaTNolanA (2020) Teacher agency and professional practice. Teachers and Teaching26(1): 67–87. 10.1080/13540602.2020.1740196.
69.
MosesIAdmiraalWFBerryAK (2016) Gender and gender role differences in student–teachers’ commitment to teaching. Social Psychology of Education19(3): 475–492. 10.1007/s11218-016-9340-3.
70.
MuGM (2019) Teacher professionalism, teacher agency, and student resilience in Chinese inclusive education: A sociological perspective. In: FlorianLPantić" "ćN (eds) The Sage Handbook of Inclusion and Diversity in Education. London: Sage, 338–350.
71.
MurphyGBrennanT (2024) Enacting distributed leadership in the Republic of Ireland: Assessing primary school principals’ developmental needs using constructive developmental theory. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(3): 666–685. 10.1177/17411432221086850.
OcB (2018) Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly29(1): 218–235. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004.
74.
O'DonoghueDVan Der WerffL (2022) Empowering leadership: Balancing self-determination and accountability for motivation. Personnel Review51(4): 1205–1220. 10.1108/PR-11-2019-0619.
75.
OkçuVCemaloğluNAyİ (2025) The Effect of School Principals’ Empowering Leadership Behaviors on Well-Being at Work: The Mediating Role of Organizational Ostracism. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher34: 777–791. 10.1007/s40299-024-00895-6.
76.
ÖzdemirM (2012) The turkish adaptation of the distributed leadership inventory: Validity and reliability studies [Dağıtımcı liderlik envanterinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice4(4): 575–598.
77.
ÖzdemirMKaymakMNÇetinOU (2023) Unlocking teacher potential: The integrated influence of empowering leadership and authentic leadership on teacher self-efficacy and agency in Turkey. Educational Management Administration & Leadership53(5): 1083–1104. 10.1177/17411432231217136.
78.
Pantić" "ćNGaleySFlorianLJoksimović" "ćSViryGGašević" "ćDNyqvistHKKyritsi K (2022) Making sense of teacher agency for change with social and epistemic network analysis. Journal of Educational Change23: 145–177. 10.1007/s10833-021-09413-7.
79.
PearsonLCHallBW (1993) Initial construct validation of the Teaching Autonomy Scale. The Journal of Educational Research86(3): 172–178. 10.1080/00220671.1993.9941155.
80.
PearsonLCMoomawW (2005) The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly29(1): 38–54.
81.
PearsonLCMoomawW (2006) Continuing validation of the Teaching Autonomy Scale. The Journal of Educational Research100(1): 44–51. 10.3200/JOER.100.1.44-51.
82.
Pineda-BáezCBaumanCAndrewsD (2020) Empowering teacher leadership: A cross-country study. International Journal of Leadership in Education23(4): 388–414. 10.1080/13603124.2018.1543804.
83.
PodsakoffPMMackenzieSBPodsakoffN P (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology63(1): 539–569. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
84.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544. 10.1177/014920638601200408.
85.
PolatcanM (2021) An exploration of the relationship between distributed leadership, teacher agency, and professional learning in Turkey. Professional Development in Education50(4): 789–803. 10.1080/19415257.2021.1905050.
86.
PolatcanMArslanPBalciA (2023) The mediating effect of teacher self-efficacy regarding the relationship between transformational school leadership and teacher agency. Educational Studies49(5): 823–841. 10.1080/03055698.2021.1894549.
87.
PolatcanMÖzkanPBellibaşMŞ (2024) Cultivating teacher innovativeness through transformational leadership and teacher agency in schools: The moderating role of teacher trust. Journal of Professional Capital and Community9(3): 227–242. 10.1108/JPCC-01-2024-0008.
88.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods40(3): 879–891. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
89.
PriestleyMBiestaGRobinsonS (2012) Teachers as agents of change: An exploration of the concept of teacher agency. Curriculum Inquiry44(2): 191–214.
90.
PyhältöKPietarinenJSoiniT (2012) Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms?. Journal of Educational Change13: 95–116. 10.1007/s10833-011-9171-0.
91.
ReeveJJangH (2006) What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology98(1): 209–218. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209.
92.
SloanT (2013) Distributed leadership and organizational change: Implementation of a teaching performance measure. The New Educator9(1): 29–53. 10.1080/1547688X.2013.751313.
93.
SpillaneJP (2006) Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
94.
SpreitzerGMDe JanaszSCQuinnRE (1999) Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior20(4): 511–526. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<511::AID-JOB900>3.0.CO;2-L.
95.
SulemanQSyedMAShehzadSHussainIKhattakAZKhanIUAmjid,MKhanI (2021) Leadership empowering behaviour as a predictor of employees’ psychological well-being: Evidence from a cross-sectional study among secondary school teachers in Kohat Division, Pakistan. Plos One16(7): 1–23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0254576.
96.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics.Boston, MA: Pearson.
97.
TaoJGaoXA (2021) Language Teacher Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98.
TayLYRamachandranKOngWLM TowndrowPA (2021) Empowerment through distributed leadership in reconciliating tensions and dilemmas in teacher professional development. Teacher Development25(5): 647–668. 10.1080/13664530.2021.1939133
99.
TengYPuRHaoY (2024) How can an innovative teaching force be developed? The empowering role of distributed leadership. Thinking Skills and Creativity51: 1–15. 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101464.
100.
ToomAPyhältöKO'Connell RustF (2015) Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching21(6): 615–623. 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044334.
101.
TorresDG (2019) Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education79: 111–123. 10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.001.
UlaşJAksuM (2015) Development of teacher autonomy scale for Turkish teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences186: 344–349. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.023.
104.
Van Der PersMHelms-LorenzM (2019) Regional school context and teacher characteristics explaining differences in effective teaching behaviour of beginning teachers in The Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement30(2): 231–254. 10.1080/09243453.2019.1592203.
105.
VangriekenKGrosemansIDochyFKyndtE (2017) Teacher autonomy and collaboration: A paradox? Conceptualising and measuring teachers’ autonomy and collaborative attitude. Teaching and Teacher Education67: 302–315. 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.021.
106.
WangFLiuHFanM (2024) The relationship between transformational leadership and teacher autonomy: A latent moderation analysis. Acta Psychologica249: 1–10. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104444.
107.
WebberSSO’NeillRMDossingerK (2020) The empowering leadership project. Journal of Management Education44(3): 342–361. doi: 10.1177/1052562919884717.
108.
XiaJWangMZhangS (2023) School culture and teacher job satisfaction in early childhood education in China: The mediating role of teaching autonomy. Asia Pacific Education Review24(1): 101–111. 10.1007/s12564-021-09734-5.
109.
YaoHMaL (2024) Improving teacher career satisfaction through distributed leadership in China: The parallel mediation of teacher empowerment and organizational commitment. International Journal of Educational Development104: 1–10. 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102960.
110.
YouSConleyS (2015) Workplace predictors of secondary school teachers’ intention to leave: An exploration of career stages. Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(4): 561–581. 10.1177/1741143214535741.
111.
ZhangXBartolKM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal53(1): 107–128. 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118.
