This article systematically reviews the literature noting unplanned meetings of the principal or unplanned principal meetings (UPMs) from 1970 to 2022. UPMs are understudied though they are considered essential for communication and/or labeled as distractions. The purpose of this review is to examine notations of UPMs in academic literature to estimate how much principal time they comprise and what purposes they serve. The systematic literature search used keyword search, snowballing, and personal network references to yield 31 academic publications. The interpretive findings of the review suggest that UPMs comprise at least 16% of principal workdays and provide information exchange, crisis management, and emotional support. UPMs fulfilled these purposes through their informality, candidness, immediacy, and confidentiality. UPMs epitomize that small does not mean simple. Even though they usually take under 5 min, they shift the school principal time, attention, and space and carry the potential to shift school and school leadership practice. Significantly, the everyday, little-noted UPMs manifest the work tension and work intensity of principalship and may serve as a novel lens to theorize principal practice.
AllenJALehmann-WillenbrockNRogelbergSG (2015) An introduction to the Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. In: AllenJALehmann-WillenbrockNRogelbergSG (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–11.
2.
Appel-MeulenbroekRde VriesBWeggemanM (2017) Knowledge sharing behavior: The role of spatial design in buildings. Environment and Behavior49(8): 874–903.
3.
Appel-meulenbroekRWeggemanMTorkkeliM (2018) Knowledge sharing behaviour within organisations: A diary-based study of unplanned meetings between researchers. Knowledge Management Research and Practice16(2): 267–279.
4.
ÄrlestigH (2008) Structural prerequisites for principals’ and teachers’ communication about teaching and learning issues. Improving Schools11(3): 189–203.
5.
BennisWGThomasRJ (2020) Crucibles of leadership. Harvard Business Review80: 61–69.
6.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. London: Cambridge.
BrownMOwusuAA (2014) Influence of head teachers ‘management styles on teacher motivation in selected senior high schools in the Sunyani municipality of Ghana. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research4(1): 61–75.
9.
BushT (2022) Challenges facing school principals: Problems and solutions. Educational Management Administration and Leadership50(4): 533–535.
10.
CamburnEMSpillaneJPSebastianJ (2010) Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 707–737.
11.
ChikokoVMthembuP (2021) South African school principal’s use of time. In: LeeMPollockKTulowitzkiP (eds) How School Principals Use Their Time: Implications for School Improvement, Administration and Leadership. New York: Routledge, 187–212.
12.
CliftonJLarssonMSchnurrS (2020) Leadership in interaction. An introduction to the special issue. Leadership16(5): 511–521.
13.
CoburnCE (2006) Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy intimation. American Educational Research Journal43(3): 343–379.
14.
CordeiroPASloanES (1996) Administrative interns as legitimate participants in the community of practice. Journal of School Leadership6(1): 4–29.
CrowsonRLPorter-gehrieC (1980) The discretionary behavior of principals in large-city schools. Educational Administration Quarterly16(1): 45–69.
17.
DaftRLLengelRH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32(5): 554–571.
18.
De NobileJ (2015) The directive communication of Australian primary school principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education18(2): 239–258.
19.
DittrichKGuerardSSeidlD (2011) Meetings in the strategy process: Toward an integrative framework. Academy of Management Proceedings1: 1–6.
20.
DixonNM (1997) The hallways of learning. Organizational Dynamics25(4): 23–34.
21.
DrakeTLRoeWH (2002) The Principalship, 6th editionNew Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
22.
DuffyMFO’RourkeBK (2015) A systemic view on meetings: Windows on organization collective minding. In: AllenJALehmann-WillenbrockNRogelbergSG (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 223–246.
23.
EisenbartBGarbuioMDanieleM, et al. (2016) Does scheduling matter? When unscheduled decision making results in more effective meetings. Journal of Strategy and Management9(1): 15–38.
24.
FornaroCJStruloeffKSterinK, et al. (2021) Uncharted territory: Educational leaders managing out-of-school programs during a global pandemic. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration and Management)49(1): 101–108.
25.
GoldringEBGrissomJNeumerskiCM, et al. (2020) Increasing principals’ time on instructional leadership: Exploring the SAM® process. Journal of Educational Administration58(1): 19–37.
26.
GoldringEBHuffJMayH, et al. (2008) School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice?Journal of Educational Administration46(3): 332–352.
27.
GreenhalghTPeacockR (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal331(7524): 1064–1065.
28.
GrissomJALoebSMitaniH, et al. (2015) Principal time management skills. Explaining patterns in principals’ time use, job stress, and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration53(6): 773–793.
29.
GronnPC (1983) Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration. Administrative Science Quarterly28(1): 22–39.
30.
HallingerPMurphyJF (2013) Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning. NASSP Bulletin97(1): 5–21.
31.
HollingworthLOlsenDAsikin-GarmagerA, et al. (2018) Initiating conversations and opening doors: How principals establish a positive building culture to sustain school improvement efforts. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(6): 1014–1034.
32.
HoppeyDMcLeskeyJ (2013) A case study of principal leadership in an effective inclusive school. Journal of Special Education46(4): 245–256.
33.
HorngELKlasikDLoebS (2010) Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education116(4): 491–523.
34.
HuangTHochbeinCSimonsJ (2020) The relationship among school contexts, principal time use, school climate, and student achievement. Educational Management Administration and Leadership48(2): 305–323.
35.
JacksonJFPetersonKD (2001) Executive behavior : An examination of three decades of administrative work across organizational settings. In: Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration. Cincinnati: OH.
36.
JarvisAMishraPK (2020) Leadership for learning: Lessons from the great lockdown. International Journal of Leadership in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1862920.
37.
JohnsonRBLicataW (1983) Urban school principal grapevine structure. Urban Education17(4): 457–475.
38.
KellySWhiteMIRouncefieldM (2006) Meetings as the practical accomplishment of educational leadership. International Studies in Educational Administration34(2): 46–61.
39.
KmetzJTWillowerDJ (1982) Elementary school principals’ work behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly18(4): 62–78.
40.
KrautREFishRSRootRW, et al. (1990) Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In: OskampSSpacapanS (eds) Human Reactions to Technology: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage, 145–199.
41.
LanaV (2009) A day in the life of a principal. Teaching Community, 25–35.
42.
LarssonPLöwstedtJ (2020) Distributed school leadership: Making sense of the educational infrastructure. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220973668.
43.
LicataWHackWG (1980) School administrator grapevine structure. Educational Administration Quarterly16(3): 82–99.
44.
ManginMM (2007) Facilitating elementary principals’ support for instructional teacher leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly43(3): 319–357.
45.
MartinWJWillowerDJ (1981) The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly17(1): 69–90.
46.
MartinkoMJGardnerWL (1990) Structured observation of managerial work: A replication and synthesis. Journal of Management Studies27(3): 329–357.
47.
MayHHuffJGoldringE (2012) A longitudinal study of principals’ activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(4): 417–439.
48.
MayrowetzDWeinsteinCS (1999) Sources of leadership for inclusive education: Creating schools for all children. Educational Administration Quarterly35(3): 423–449.
49.
MeineckeALHandkeL (2022) The meeting after the meeting: A conceptualization and process model. Organizational Psychology Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221097409.
50.
Midha G (2020) Principal meetings: Pressure mechanisms that shape professional knowledge. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice 20(7): 99–110.
51.
Midha G (2021a) School leadership writ small: Meetings and school principal practice Educational Management Administration & Leadership DOI: 10.1177/17411432211058939.
52.
Midha G (2021b) Inhibited improvisation: School leadership during the COVID-19 crisis. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)) 49(3): 27–60.
53.
Midha G (2022) Meetings: School leadership infrastructure that creates sense. International Journal of Leadership in Education. DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2022.2076287.
54.
MillerL (1994) Japanese and American meetings and what goes on before them: A case study of co-worker misunderstanding. Pragmatics4(2): 221–238.
55.
MintzbergH (1990) The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review 12–20.
56.
MoeNBRollandK (2018) To schedule or not to schedule? An investigation of meetings as an inter-team coordination mechanism in large-scale agile software development. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management6(3): 45–59.
57.
NaparanGBTulodRG (2021) Time management strategies of school administrators towards effective administration: A phenomenological study. New Educational Review63(2000): 59–68.
58.
NurabadiASuciptoSGunawanI (2019) Informal supervision model ‘managing by walking about’ in improving quality of learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research382(ICET 2019): 10–12.
59.
OplatkaI (2017) Principal workload: Components, determinants and coping strategies in an era of standardization and accountability. Journal of Educational Administration55(5): 552–568.
60.
OplatkaIOrHB (2020) The arrival of a new principal and the school staff: The former principal and the first weeks in post. International Journal of Educational Management34(3): 492–504.
61.
PeponisJBafnaSBajajR, et al. (2007) Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behavior39(6): 815–840.
62.
PetersTRobertW (1982) In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper Collins.
PollockKHausemanDC (2019) The use of e-mail and principals’ work: A double-edged sword. Leadership and Policy in Schools18(3): 382–393.
65.
PollockKWangFHausemanD (2015) Complexity and volume: An Inquiry into factors that drive principals' work. Societies5(2): 537–565.
66.
PoppenWA (1968) Communication problems in the schools: Myths and realities. Peabody Journal of Education45(4): 220–224.
67.
RinehartKEAlcornN (2019) Keeping things on track: School principals as managers. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies54(2): 297–313.
68.
RinglingJJSanzoKLScribnerJP (2021) Elementary school principals and informal learning: Leveraging networks. Journal of Workplace Learning33(2): 109–119.
69.
SandlerJThedvallR (eds) (2017) Introduction: Exploring the boring. Meeting Ethnography: Meetings as Key Technologies of Contemporary Governance, Development, and Resistance. New York: Routledge, 1–23.
70.
SchwartzmanHB (1989) The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York: Plenum.
71.
SebastianJCamburnEMSpillaneJP (2018) Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly54(1): 47–84.
72.
SergiovanniTJ (1995) The Principalship: A Reflective Practice Perspective. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
73.
ShererJZSpillaneJ (2011) Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines. Teachers College Record113(3): 611–657.
74.
SmytheESpenceD (2012) Re-viewing literature in hermeneutic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods11(1): 12–25.
75.
SpillaneJPHuntBR (2010) Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies42(3): 293–331.
76.
StrayV (2018) Planned and unplanned meetings in large-scale projects. In: Proceedings of the XP2018 Scientific Workshops, 1–15.
SzetoEChengAYN (2018) Principal–teacher interactions and teacher leadership development: Beginning teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in EducationRoutledge21(3): 363–379.
79.
ThomsonPHallC (2011) Sense-making as a lens on everyday change leadership practice: The case of Holly Tree Primary. International Journal of Leadership in Education14(4): 385–403.
80.
TintoréMCunhaRSCabralI, et al. (2022) A scoping review of problems and challenges faced by school leaders (2003–2019). Educational Management Administration and Leadership50(4): 536–573.
81.
Tschannen-MoranMGareisCR (2015) Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration53(1): 66–92.
82.
TulowitzkiP (2013) Leadership and school improvement in France. Journal of Educational Administration51(6): 812–835.
83.
Van De VenAHDelbecqALKoenigR (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review41(2): 322–338.
84.
Van VoorenC (2018) An examination of K-5 principal time and tasks to improve leadership practice. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development29(1): 45–63.
85.
WangF (2021) Principals’ self and interpersonal leadership amid work intensification. Journal of School Leadership31(5): 396–427.
86.
WangF (2022) Job demands amid work intensity: British Columbia school administrators' perceptions. Educational Management Administration and Leadership50(6): 1013–1031.
87.
WeickKE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.
WildyHClarkeS (2009) Tales from the outback: Leading in isolated circumstances. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration and Management (CCEAM))39(1): 29–42.
