This study aimed to identify schools’ motivational climate profiles and tested how each profile moderates the linkage of transformational leadership with teacher commitment and alienation. Gathering data from 1193 teachers working in 103 schools in Türkiye, we employed multilevel moderation with a latent class variable to estimate the structural links between our variables. The study offered nuanced evidence to the literature by suggesting that sampled schools were categorised under two profiles as high performance and high mastery school climate in terms of their prevalent motivational climate. Our results also provided evidence of the significant moderator role of the school-level profiles on the effect of transformational leadership. Our study suggests that transformational leaders might be more effective in promoting teachers’ collective sense of commitment and eliminating their sense of alienation in schools where a performance-oriented climate is fostered. Key implications for policy and practice around the contextualised nature of school leadership are discussed in this study.
AmesC (1992) Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology84(3): 261–271.
2.
AsparouhovTMuthénB (2015) Residual associations in latent class and latent transition analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal22(2): 169–177.
3.
BalyerAÖzcanK (2012) Cultural adaptation of headmasters’ transformational leadership scale and a study on teachers’ perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research49(1): 103–128.
BellibaşMŞPolatcanMAkyürekMİ (2022) Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221139932.
6.
BergmanLR (2000) The application of a person-oriented approach: Types and clusters. In: Bergman LS, Cairns RB, Nilsson LG and Nystedt L (eds) Developmental Science and the Holistic Approach. New York: Routledge, 147–164.
7.
BerkovichIEyalO (2017) Emotional reframing as a mediator of the relationships between transformational school leadership and teachers’ motivation and commitment. Journal of Educational Administration55(5): 450–468.
8.
BoyceJBowersAJ (2018) Different levels of leadership for learning: investigating differences between teachers individually and collectively using multilevel factor analysis of the 2011–2012 schools and staffing survey. International Journal of Leadership in Education21(2): 197–225.
9.
BrykASSebringPBAllensworthELuppescuSEastonJQ (2010) Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BuchRNerstadCGSäfvenbomR (2017) The interactive roles of mastery climate and performance climate in predicting intrinsic motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports27(2): 245–253.
11.
BuchananB (1974) Building organizational commitment: the socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly19(4): 533–546.
12.
BushTNgAYM (2019) Distributed leadership and the Malaysia education blueprint: from prescription to partial school-based enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of Educational Administration57(3): 279–295.
13.
ČerneMNerstadCGDysvikASkerlavajM (2014) What goes around comes around: knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal57(1): 172–192.
14.
ChoiPLTangSYF (2009) Teacher commitment trends: cases of Hong Kong teachers from 1997 to 2007. Teaching and Teacher Education25(5): 767–777.
15.
ClarkJP (1959) Measuring alienation within a social system. American Sociological Review24(6): 849–852.
16.
ClarkSLMuthénB (2009) Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Los Angeles, California, USA.
17.
CookJWallT (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology53(1): 39–52.
18.
Darling-HammondL (2000) Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives8(1): 1–44.
19.
DashSSVohraN (2019) The leadership of the school principal: impact on teachers’ job crafting, alienation and commitment. Management Research Review42(3): 352–369.
20.
DuffMBowersAJ (2022) Identifying a typology of New York City schools through teacher perceptions of organizational capacity: a latent class analysis. Leadership and Policy in Schools21(4): 791–815.
21.
EryılmazABurgazB (2011) Levels of organizational alienation of private and public high school teachers. Education and Science36(161): 271–286.
22.
GeijselFSleegersPLeithwoodKJantziD (2003) Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration41(3): 228–256.
23.
GeijselFSleegersPStoelRKrügerML (2009) The effect of teacher psychological, school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal109(4): 406–427.
24.
GrissomJAEgaliteAJLindsayCA (2021) How principals affect students and schools. New York: Wallace Foundation.
25.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRLBlackWC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2): 125–142.
27.
HallquistMNWileyJF (2018) Mplusautomation: an R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in M plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal25(4): 621–638.
28.
HambletonRKPatsulaL (1999) Increasing the validity of adapted tests: myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology1(1): 1–13.
29.
HammadWAbu ShindiYMoradHAl-MahdyYFHAl-HarthiK (2021) Promoting teacher professional learning in Egyptian schools: the contribution of learning-centered leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1969038
30.
HattieJ (2008) Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
HosseingholizadehRAmrahiAEl-FarrH (2023) Instructional leadership, and teacher’s collective efficacy, commitment, and professional learning in primary schools: a mediation model. Professional Development in Education49(3): 518–535.
32.
HowardMCHoffmanME (2018) Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods21(4): 846–876.
33.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
34.
KaoSIiJ (2017) A multilevel study of transformational leadership and motivational climates in university basketball teams. International Journal of Sport Psychology48(1): 50–69.
35.
KapıkıranŞ (2020) The mediator role of academic resilience in the relationship between parental academic success pressure and support and test anxiety in adolescents. Pamukkale University Journal of Education48: 409–430.
36.
KılınçAÇErEBeycioğluK (2021)) Mapping the terrain of training and appointment of educational leaders in the Turkish context: An historical perspective. In: SamierEElkalehESHammadW (eds) Internationalisation of educational administration and leadership curriculum. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 139–157.
37.
KılınçAÇPolatcanMSavaşGErE (2022) How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082803.
38.
KopperudKH, NerstadCGDysvikA (2020) Should I stay or should I go? The role of motivational climate and work–home spillover for turnover intentions. Frontiers in Psychology11(1107): 1–16.
39.
LeithwoodKAJantziD (2006) Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 201–227.
40.
MarcoulidesKMRaykovT (2019) Evaluation of variance inflation factors in regression models using latent variable modeling methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement79(5): 874–882.
41.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: an integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
42.
MathewsBPShepherdJL (2002) Dimensionality of Cook and Wall's (1980) British organizational commitment scale revisited. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology75(3): 369–375.
43.
MészárosI (1970) Marx’s theory of alienation. London: Merlin Press.
44.
MeyerJPMorinAJ (2016) A person-centered approach to commitment research: theory, research, and methodology. Journal of Organizational Behavior37(4): 584–612.
45.
Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018) Turkey’s 2023 Education Vision. http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/ 2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf.
46.
MoolenaarNMDalyAJSleegersPJ (2010) Occupying the principal position: examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 623–670.
47.
MorinajJHascherT (2019) School alienation and student well-being: a cross-lagged longitudinal analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education34(2): 273–294.
48.
MowdayRTPorterLWSteersR (1982) Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
NairNVohraN (2010) An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision48(4): 600–615.
51.
NerstadCGRobertsGCRichardsenAM (2013) Achieving success at work: development and validation of the motivational climate at work questionnaire (MCWQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology43(11): 2231–2250.
52.
NichollsJG (1989) The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
Nylund-GibsonKGarberACSinghJWitkowMRNishinaABellmoreA (2023) The utility of latent class analysis to understand heterogeneity in youth coping strategies: a methodological introduction. Behavioral Disorders48(2): 106–120.
54.
NylundKLAsparouhovTMuthénBO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(4): 535–569.
55.
OmmundsenYRobertsG (1999) Effect of motivational climate profiles on motivational indices in team sport. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports9(6): 389–397.
56.
ParkI (2005) Teacher commitment and its effects on student achievement in American high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation11(5): 461–485.
57.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-YPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
58.
PriceHCarstensR (2020) Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 analysis plan. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 220, OECD Publishing, Paris.
59.
PughKJZhaoY (2003) Stories of teacher alienation: a look at the unintended consequences of efforts to empower teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education19(2): 187–201.
60.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
RaykovTMarcoulidesGAAkaezeHO (2017) Comparing between-and within-group variances in a two-level study: a latent variable modeling approach to evaluating their relationship. Educational and Psychological Measurement77(2): 351–361.
62.
RonfeldtMFarmerSOMcQueenKand Grissom JA (2015) Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal52(3): 475–514.
63.
RossJAGrayP (2006) School leadership and student achievement: the mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education29(3): 798–822.
64.
SarrosJCTanewskiGAWinterRPSantoraJCDenstenIL (2002) Work alienation and organizational leadership. British Journal of Management13(4): 285–304.
65.
SchunkDHDiBenedettoMK (2020) Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology60: 101832.
66.
ShakedHBenolielPHallingerP (2021) How national context indirectly influences instructional leadership implementation: the case of Israel. Educational Administration Quarterly57(3): 437–469.
67.
ShengnanLHallingerP (2021) Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(2): 214–233.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2011) Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education27(6): 1029–1038.
70.
TsangKK (2018) Teacher alienation in Hong Kong. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education39(3): 335–346.
71.
XiuQLiuPYaoHLiuL (2022) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher commitment to change: the mediating roles of professional learning communities and job satisfaction. Asia Pacific Education Review. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09747-8.
72.
YılmazSSarpkayaP (2009) Eğitim örgütlerinde yabancılaşma ve yönetimi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi6(2): 314–333.
73.
ZielinskiAEHoyWK (1983) Isolation and alienation in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly19(2): 27–45.
