This study investigated the heterogeneous nature of teachers’ perceptions of distinct leadership practices and explored the predictors of teacher- and school-level leadership typologies on teacher self-efficacy and commitment by using a multilevel latent profile mediation analysis of a dataset of 890 teachers from K-12 schools in Turkey. The results revealed three distinct leadership profiles (limiting, transitioning, and integrating) at the teacher level and two profiles (transitioned and integrated) at the school level, providing evidence that integrating teachers and integrated school profiles were associated with greater teacher self-efficacy and commitment. Additionally, both levels of integrated leadership profiles were indirectly related to teacher commitment through teacher self-efficacy vis-a-vis other profile groups. The study concluded that different leadership styles are related and that the impact of leadership on teachers is maximized when multiple leadership types are integrated.
Al-MahdyYEHEmamMMHallingerP (2018) Assessing the contribution of principal instructional leadership and collective teacher efficacy to teacher commitment in Oman. Teaching and Teacher Education69: 191–201.
2.
AllenNGrigsbyBPetersML (2015) Does leadership matter? Examining the relationship among transformational leadership, school climate, and student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation10(2): 1–22.
3.
AllenNJMeyerJP (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology63: 1–18.
4.
AsparouhovTMuthénBO (2014) Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal21(3): 329–341.
5.
BalyerAÖzcanK (2012) Cultural adaptation of headmasters’ transformational leadership scale and a study on teachers’ perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research49(1): 103–128.
6.
BanduraA (1983) Self-efficacy determinants of anticipated fears and calamities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(2): 464–469.
7.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
8.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: The Free Press.
9.
BassBMAvolioBJ (1990) The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. In: WoodmanRWPasmoreWA (eds) Research in Organizational Change and Development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp.231–272.
10.
BauerDJShanahanMJ (2007) Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In: LittleTBovairdJCardN (eds) Modeling Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.255–283.
11.
BellibaşMŞGümüşSLiuY (2021b) Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement32(3): 387–412.
12.
BellibaşMŞKılınçAÇPolatcanM (2021a) The moderation role of transformational Leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly57(5): 776–814.
13.
BellibaşMŞPolatcanMKılınçAÇ (2022) Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(5): 812–831.
14.
BergmanLRTrostK (2006) The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds?Merrill-Palmer Quarterly52(3): 601–632.
15.
BerkovichI (2016) School leaders and transformational leadership theory: Time to part ways?Journal of Educational Administration55(5): 609–622.
16.
BlaseJBlaseJ (2000) Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration38(2): 130–141.
17.
BolmanLGDealTE (2018) Reframing the Path to School Leadership: A Guide for Teachers and Principals. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
18.
BowersA (2020) Examining a congruency-typology model of leadership for learning using two-level latent class analysis with TALIS 2018, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 219, OECD Publishing, Paris.
19.
BurnsJM (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
BushT (2014) Instructional leadership in centralized contexts: Rhetoric or reality?Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(1): 3–5.
21.
BushTGloverD (2014) School leadership models: What do we know?School Leadership & Management34(5): 553–571.
22.
CansoyRParlarHPolatcanM (2022) Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education25(6): 900–918.
23.
ÇapaYÇakıroğluJSarıkayaH (2005) The development and validation of a Turkish version of the teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Education and Science30(137): 74–81.
24.
ChesnutSRBurleyH (2015) Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review15: 1–16.
25.
CollinsLMLanzaST (2013) Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
26.
CookJWallT (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology53(1): 39–52.
27.
DayCGuQSammonsP (2016) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly52(2): 221–258.
28.
DeVellisRF (2003) Scale Development Theory and Applications (2nd ed).Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication.
29.
DziakJJLanzaSTTanX (2014) Effect size, statistical power, and sample size requirements for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test in latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal21(4): 534–552.
30.
FernandezSChoYJPerryJL (2010) Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. The Leadership Quarterly21(2): 308–323.
31.
FleissJL (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: FleissJL (ed.) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley, pp.1–12.
32.
GeijselFSleegersPLeithwoodK, et al. (2003) Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration41(3): 228–256.
33.
GrissomJAEgaliteAJLindsayCA (2021) How Principals Affect Students and Schools. New York: Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis.
34.
GümüşSBellibaşMSEsenM, et al. (2018) A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 25–48.
35.
HallingerP (2003) Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 329–352.
36.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 5–24.
37.
HallingerPHeckRH (2010) Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?Educational Management Administration & Leadership38(6): 654–678.
38.
HallingerPHosseingholizadehRHashemiN, et al. (2018) Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(5): 800–819.
39.
HallingerPHuberS (2012) School leadership that makes a difference: International perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement23(4): 359–367.
40.
HansonEM (1979) School management and contingency theory: An emerging perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly15(2): 98–116.
41.
HowardMCHoffmanME (2018) Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods21(4): 846–876.
42.
KrügerMLWitziersBSleegersP (2007) The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement18(1): 1–20.
43.
KwanP (2020) Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly56(2): 321–349.
44.
LambertL (2002) A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership59(8): 37–40.
45.
LeithwoodK (1994) Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly30(4): 498–518.
46.
LeithwoodKJantziD (1990) Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement1(4): 249–280.
47.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2000) The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration38(2): 112–129.
48.
LeithwoodKSleegersP (2006) Transformational school leadership: Introduction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 143–144.
49.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2020) How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The Four Paths Model.”Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
50.
LeithwoodKDJantziDSteinbachR (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Buckingham: Open University Press.
51.
LiuSHallingerP (2018) Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly54(4): 501–528.
52.
LiuYBellibaşMŞGümüşS (2021) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 430–453.
53.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
54.
MathewsBPShepherdJL (2002) Dimensionality of Cook and Wall's (1980) British organizational commitment scale revisited. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology75(3): 369–375.
55.
McLarnonMJWO’NeillTA (2018) Extensions of auxiliary variable approaches for the investigation of mediation, moderation, and conditional effects in mixture models. Organizational Research Methods21(4): 955–982.
56.
MeyerJPMorinAJS (2016) A person-centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology. Journal of Organizational Behavior37: 584–612.
57.
MoolenaarNMDalyAJSleegersPJC (2010) Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 623–670.
58.
MorinAJSMcLarnonMJWLitalienD (2020) Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. In: GripYHansenSD (eds) Handbook on the Temporal Dynamics of Organizational Behavior. Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.351–379.
59.
MurphyJNeumerskiCMGoldringE, et al. (2016) Bottling fog? The quest for instructional management. Cambridge Journal of Education46(4): 455–471.
NewmannFMSmithBAllensworthE, et al. (2001) Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis23(4): 297–321.
62.
NylundKAsparouhovTMuthénBO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling14: 535–569.
63.
ParkI (2005) Teacher commitment and its effects on student achievement in American high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation11(5): 461–485.
64.
PorterLWSteersRMMowdayRT, et al. (1974) Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology59(5): 603–609.
65.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
66.
PrintySMMarksHM (2006) Shared leadership for teacher and student learning. Theory into Practice45(2): 125–132.
67.
PrintySMMarksHMBowersAJ (2009) Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership19(5): 504–532.
68.
RyuJWallsJSeashore LouisK (2022) Caring leadership: The role of principals in producing caring school cultures. Leadership and Policy in Schools 21(3): 585–602.
69.
ShengnanLHallingerP (2021) Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(2): 214–233.
70.
SheppardB (1996) Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research42(4): 325–344.
71.
SpillaneJPHallettTDiamondJB (2003) Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education76(1): 1–17.
72.
TanCYGaoLShiM (2022) Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(3): 469–490.
73.
ThomasLTuytensMDevosG, et al. (2020) Transformational school leadership as a key factor for teachers’ job attitudes during their first year in the profession. Educational Management Administration & Leadership48(1): 106–132.
74.
Tschannen-MoranMWoolfolk HoyA (2001) Teacher efficacy capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education17: 783–805.
75.
UrickA (2016) The influence of typologies of school leaders on teacher retention: A multilevel latent class analysis. Journal of Educational Administration54(4): 434–468.
76.
UrickABowersAJ (2014) What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly50(1): 96–134.
77.
van SchaikPVolmanMAdmiraalW, et al. (2020) Fostering collaborative teacher learning: A typology of school leadership. European Journal of Education55(2): 217–232.
78.
VeletićJOlsenRV (2021) Exploring school leadership profiles across the world: A cluster analysis approach to TALIS 2018. International Journal of Leadership in Education: 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1953612.
79.
ZeeMKoomenHMde JongPF (2018) How different levels of conceptualization and measurement affect the relationship between teacher self-efficacy and students’ academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology55: 189–200.
