Supporting teacher knowledge sharing in China: The effect of principal authentic leadership,teacher psychological empowerment and interactional justice
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2024
Supporting teacher knowledge sharing in China: The effect of principal authentic leadership,teacher psychological empowerment and interactional justice
Teacher knowledge sharing plays a critical role in teacher professional development and education reforms, and principal leadership acts as a facilitator in this process. The current study investigates how and under what conditions principal authentic leadership contributes to teacher knowledge sharing. Data collected from 890 teachers in 29 primary schools in mainland China were analysed using regression analysis and bootstrapping tests. This research tested a moderated mediation model of principal authentic leadership effects on teacher knowledge sharing in which teacher psychological empowerment was included as the mediator and interactional justice as the moderator. The results affirmed the partial mediation model and found significant direct and indirect effects of principal authentic leadership on teacher knowledge sharing. Moreover, interactional justice positively moderated the relationship between authentic leadership and psychological empowerment and further strengthened the whole mediating mechanism. When teachers perceived higher interactional justice, the effects of principal authentic leadership on teacher knowledge sharing were stronger than on counterparts who perceived low interactional justice. Our discussion highlights the benefits of understanding the roles of psychological empowerment and interactional justice involved in the effectiveness of authentic leadership on teacher knowledge sharing and offers recommendations for school leadership practices.
AbbasiSGShabbirMSAbbasM, et al. (2021) HPWS And knowledge sharing behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment and organisational identification in public sector banks. Journal of Public Affairs21(3): e2512.
2.
AgyemangFGDzanduMDBoatengH (2016) Knowledge sharing among teachers: The role of the Big Five Personality traits. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems46(1): 64–84.
3.
AhnJBowers AJWeltonAD (2021) Leadership for learning as an organization-wide practice: Evidence on its multilevel structure and implications for educational leadership practice and research. International Journal of Leadership in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1972162.
4.
AikenLSWestSG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
AlazmiAAAl-MahdyYFH (2020) Principal authentic leadership and teacher engagement in Kuwait’s educational reform context. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220957339.
6.
AmbroseMLSchminkeM (2003) Organisation structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organisational support, and supervisory trustJournal of Applied Psychology88(2): 295–305.
7.
AmbroseMLSchminkeMMayerDM (2013) Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology98(4): 678–689.
8.
AsbariMWijayantiLMHyunCC, et al. (2019) Effect of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing on teacher innovation capability. Dinamika Pendidikan14(2): 227–243.
9.
AvolioBJGardnerWL (2005) Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly16(3): 315–338.
10.
AvolioBJMhatreKH (2011) Advances in theory and research on authentic leadership. In: SpreitzerGMCameronKS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organisational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 773–784.
11.
AvolioBJZhuWKohW, et al. (2004) Transformational leadership and organisational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organisational Behaviour25(8): 951–968.
12.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
13.
BiesRMoagR (1986) Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In: LewickiRJSheppardBHBazermanMH (eds) Research on Negotiations in Organisations. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp.43-55.
14.
BiesRJ (2005) Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In: GreenbergJColquittJA (eds) Handbook of Organisational Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 85–112.
15.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
16.
BowersAJ (2020) Examining a congruency-typology model of leadership for learning using two-level latent class analysis with TALIS 2018. OECD Education Working Papers No. 219, Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
17.
BrislinRW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In: Triandis HCBerry JW (eds) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. vol. 2. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 389–444.
18.
ButlerDLLauscherHNJarvis-SelingerS, et al. (2004) Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education20(5): 435–455.
19.
CharbandYNavimipourNJ (2018) Knowledge sharing mechanisms in the education: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Kybernetes47(7): 1456–1490.
20.
ChenHLFanHLTsaiCC (2014) The role of community trust and altruism in knowledge sharing: An investigation of a virtual community of teacher professionals. Journal of Educational Technology & Society17(3): 168–179.
21.
ChengEC (2021) Knowledge management for improving school strategic planning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(5): 824–840.
22.
ChengECK (2012) Knowledge strategies for enhancing school learning capacity. International Journal of Education Management26(6): 557–592.
23.
CollinsonV (2004) Learning to share, sharing to learn: Fostering organizational learning through teachers’ dissemination of knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration42(3): 312–332.
24.
ColquittJA (2001) On the dimensionality of organisational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 386–400.
25.
ColquittJAConlonDEWessonMJ, et al. (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organisational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 425–445.
26.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
27.
DavenportTHPrusakL (1997) Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford University Press on Demand, UK.
28.
DeciELConnellJPRyanRM (1989) Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology74(4): 580–590.
29.
DeeJRHenkinABDuemerL (2003) Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration41(3): 257–277.
30.
DuignanPA (2014) Authenticity in educational leadership: History, ideal, reality. Journal of Educational Administration52(2): 152–172.
31.
ErdoganBOzyilmazABauerTN, et al. (2018) Accidents happen: Psychological empowerment as a moderator of accident involvement and its outcomes. Personnel Psychology71(1): 67–83.
32.
FarzanehMAziziM (2017) Investigating the mediating role of psychological contract in the relationship between distributing leadership and knowledge sharing. Organisational Behaviour Studies Quarterly5(4): 47–73.
33.
FengFI (2016) School principals’ authentic leadership and teachers’ psychological capital: Teachers’ perspectives. International Education Studies9(10): 245–255.
34.
FossNJMinbaevaDBPedersenT, et al. (2009) Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters. Human Resource Management48(6): 871–893.
35.
FullanM (2002) The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice8(3): 409–419.
36.
HackmanJRHackmanRJOldham GR (1980) Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(1): 5–24.
38.
HallingerPLiuSPiyamanP (2019) Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education49(3): 341–357.
39.
HarmanHH (1967) Modern Factor Analysis.2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
HayesAFPreacherKJ (2013) Conditional process modeling: Using structural equation modeling to examine contingent causal processes. In: HancockGRMuellerRO (eds) Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course. 2nd ed. Greenwich: Information Age, pp. 219–266.
41.
HouHTSungYTChangKE (2009) Exploring the behavioural patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education25(1): 101–108.
42.
IliesRMorgesonFPNahrgangJD (2005) Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly16(3): 373–394.
43.
JooBKJoSJ (2017) The effects of perceived authentic leadership and core self-evaluations on organizational citizenship behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment as a partial mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal38(3): 463–481.
44.
KaslEMarsickVJDechantK (1997) Teams as learners: A research-based model of team learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science33(2): 227–246.
45.
KernisMH (2003) Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry14(1): 1–26.
46.
KhanJJavedBMubarakN, et al. (2020) Psychological empowerment and project success: The role of knowledge sharing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3026093.
47.
KulophasDHallingerP (2021) Leading when the mouth and heart are in unison: A case study of authentic school leadership in Thailand. International Journal of Leadership in Education24(2): 145–156.
48.
KulophasDHallingerPRuengtrakulA, et al. (2018) Exploring the effects of authentic leadership on academic optimism and teacher engagement in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Management32(1): 27–45.
49.
KumiRSabherwalR (2019) Knowledge sharing behaviour in online discussion communities: Examining behaviour motivation from social and individual perspectives. Knowledge and Process Management26(2): 110–122.
50.
LeeANNieY (2017) Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: Evidence from a Singapore sample. Educational Management Administration & Leadership45(2): 260–283.
51.
LeeSKimSLYunS (2018) A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. The Leadership Quarterly29(3): 403–413.
52.
LeithwoodKJantziDSteinbachR (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Time: Changing Education Series. Florence: Taylor and Francis Group.
53.
LiCWWuKKJohnsonDE, et al. (2012) Moral leadership and psychological empowerment in China. Journal of Managerial Psychology27(1): 90–108.
54.
LiW (2021) Teacher knowledge sharing: Bottlenecks, processes and systematic promotion strategies. Research in Educational Development41(12): 28–36.
55.
LiXZhangJZhangS, et al. (2017) A multilevel analysis of the role of interactional justice in promoting knowledge-sharing behaviour: The mediated role of organisational commitment. Industrial Marketing Management62: 226–233.
56.
LockeEAAlaviMWagner JAIII (1997) Participation in decision making: An information exchange perspective. In: FerrisGR (ed) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol. 15Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 293–331.
57.
LuthansFAvolioB (2003) Authentic leadership: A positive development approach. In: CameronKSDuttonJEQuinnRE (eds) Positive Organisational Scholarship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, pp.241–258.
58.
MaoYQ (2003) Knowledge management and innovation of school management. Educational Research281(06): 55–60. (In Chinese).
59.
MayDRGilsonRLHarterL (2004) The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and the engagement of human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology77(1): 11–37.
60.
MishraAKSpreitzerGM (1998) Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: the roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. Academy of Management Review23(3): 567–588.
MOE (Ministry of Education) (2017) Revitalize teacher education to strengthen the construction of the teaching force from the source: “National Working Conference on Revitalizing Teacher Education and Constructing the Teaching force” was held. Available at:http://www.MOE.edu.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/MOE_1485/201708/t20170825_311978.html (accessed 12 December 2021).
63.
NiehoffBPMoormanRH (1993) Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organisational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal36(3): 527–556.
64.
NonakaI (1994) A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation. Organisation Science5(1): 14–37.
65.
NonakaITakeuchiH (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford university press, Oxford, UK.
66.
NonakaIToyamaR (2005) The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: Subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change14(3): 419–436.
67.
Owusu-BempahJAddisonRFairweatherJ (2014) Commonalities and specificities of authentic leadership in Ghana and New Zealand. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(4): 536–556.
68.
PengACSchaubroeckJMLiY (2014) Social exchange implications of own and coworkers’ experiences of supervisory abuse. Academy of Management Journal57(5): 1385–1405.
69.
PolanyiM (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday and Company Inc. Garden city, New York.
RismarkMSølvbergAM (2011) Knowledge sharing in schools: A key to developing professional learning communities. World Journal of Education1(2): 150–160.
72.
RunhaarPSandersK (2016) Promoting teachers’ knowledge sharing. The fostering roles of occupational self-efficacy and human resources management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership44(5): 794–813.
73.
Shapira-LishchinskyOTsemachS (2014) Psychological empowerment as a mediator between teachers’ perceptions of authentic leadership and their withdrawal and citizenship behaviours. Educational Administration Quarterly50(4): 675–712.
74.
ShiY (2016) On trust and social interaction during teachers’ knowledge sharing process. Educational Research37(08): 107–116. (In Chinese).
75.
ShihWLTsaiCY (2016) The effects of knowledge management capabilities on perceived school effectiveness in career and technical education. Journal of Knowledge Management20(6): 1373–1392.
76.
SpreitzerGM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal38(5): 1442–1465.
77.
SrivastavaABartolKMLockeEA (2006) Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal49(6): 1239–1251.
78.
SrivastavaAPDharRL (2019) Authentic leadership and extra role behaviour: A school based integrated model. Current Psychology38(3): 684–697.
79.
TalebizadehSMHosseingholizadehRBellibasMS (2021) Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behaviour. Studies in Educational Evaluation68: 100970.
80.
TanCYDimmockCWalkerA (2021) How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211061445.
81.
TrochimWMDonnellyJP (2005) Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base. Cincinnati: Atomic.
82.
Tschannen-MoranM (2009) Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trustEducational Administration Quarterly45(2): 217–247.
83.
Van KnippenbergDDe CremerDVan KnippenbergB (2007) Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology16(2): 113–140.
84.
WangSNoeRA (2010) Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review20(2): 115–131.
85.
WangWTWangYSChangWT (2019) Investigating the effects of psychological empowerment and interpersonal conflicts on employees’ knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Knowledge Management23(6): 1039–1076.
86.
WhiteheadGEBrownM (2011) Authenticity in Chinese leadership: A quantitative study comparing western notions of authentic constructs with Chinese responses to an authenticity instrument. International Journal of Leadership Studies6(2): 162–188.
87.
YangYHLongJW (2008) The structure and measurement of enterprise staffs’ knowledge-sharing behaviour in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica40(3): 350–357. (In Chinese).
88.
YanginDElmaC (2017) The relationship among interactional justice, manager trust and teachers’ organizational silence behaviour. Universal Journal of Educational Research5(3): 325–333.
89.
ZeinabadiH (2020) Breaking down the walls of weak knowledge-sharing among Iranian teachers: Investigating a less-considered leadership role of principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220968160.
90.
ZeinabadiHAbbasianH (2022) Principal’s leadership and teacher-to-teacher knowledge-sharing in Iranian schools: Developing and validating a multi-dimensional scale. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221095947.
91.
ZhangSBowersAJMaoY (2021) Authentic leadership and teachers’ voice behaviour: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of interpersonal trustEducational Management Administration & Leadership49(5): 768–785.
92.
ZhengJJFuXJ (2018) The relationship between career growth opportunities and knowledge sharing of primary and secondary school teachers. Educational Research39(07): 111–119. (In Chinese).
93.
ZhengJJFuXJ (2019) Effect of organisation identification on knowledge sharing of primary and secondary school teachers: The mediating role of team identification and the moderating role of relationship conflict. Journal of Psychological Science42(2): 430–436. (In Chinese).
94.
ZhengXMLiuX (2016) The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica48(6): 693–709. (In Chinese).
