Exploring how power distance influences principal instructional leadership effects on teacher agency and classroom instruction in Oman: A moderated-mediation analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2024
Exploring how power distance influences principal instructional leadership effects on teacher agency and classroom instruction in Oman: A moderated-mediation analysis
Nations throughout the world have been engaged in efforts to redefine the role of principals to include instructional leadership. This is based upon research that has verified a positive indirect relationship between principal instructional leadership and student learning. This study tested a moderated mediation model of how the power distance orientation of teachers influences the effects of principal instructional leadership on teacher agency and classroom instruction. Data collected from 464 teachers in 65 middle schools in Oman were analysed using structural equation modelling, factor analysis and bootsrapping. The results supported a partial mediation model in which principal instructional leadership was associated with moderate direct and indirect effects through teacher agency on classroom instruction. In addition, lower power distance in principal–teacher professional relationships was associated with stronger effects of instructional leadership on teacher agency. These findings support assertions that instructional leadership is a relational process rather than a top-down bureaucratic form of leadership.
Al-BarwaniT (2011) Leadership for learning in the Middle East: the road travelled thus far. In: TownsendTMacBeathJ (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Berlin: Springer, pp. 103–112.
2.
Al-KiyumiAHammadW (2019) Instructional supervision in the Sultanate of Oman: shifting roles and practices in a stage of educational reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education22(2): 237–249.
3.
Al-Mahdy Y E H EmamM MHallingerP (2018) Assessing the contribution of principal instructional leadership and collective teacher efficacy to teacher commitment in Oman69: 191–201.
4.
Al-NajarN (2016) View of education development in Oman. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review4(1): 10–18.
5.
AlanogluM (2021) The role of instructional leadership in increasing teacher self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Education Review 23(2): 1–12.
6.
Al BalushiSGriffithsD (2013) The school education system in the sultanate of Oman. In: DonnGAl ManthriY (eds) Education in the Broader Middle East: Borrowing a Baroque Arsenal. Oxford: Symposium Books, pp. 107–126.
7.
AlhashemiSE (2017) Management profession and culture in transition: A case of Oman. Tékhne15(2): 108–116.
8.
Al ShabibiASSilvennoinenH (2018) Challenges in education system affecting teacher professional development in Oman. Athens Journal of Education5(3): 261–282.
9.
AlazmiAAHammadW (2021) Modeling the relationship between principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Kuwait: the mediating effects of trust and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi.17411432211038007.
10.
BajunidI (1996) Preliminary explorations of indigenous perspectives of educational management: The evolving Malaysian experience. Journal of Educational Administration34(5): 50–73.
11.
BellibaşMŞGümüşSLiuY (2021) Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement32(3): 387–412.
12.
BellibaşMŞPolatcanMKılınçAÇ (2020) Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: the mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1741143220945706.
13.
BossertSTDwyerDCRowanB, et al. (1982) The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly18(3): 34–64.
14.
BridgesEM (1982) Research on the school administrator: the state of the art, 1967-19801. Educational Administration Quarterly18(3): 12–33.
15.
BrislinRW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology: 389–444.
16.
CollierJE (2020) Applied Structural Equation Modeling Using Amos: Basic to Advanced Techniques. London: Routledge.
17.
Cooper SteinKKintzTMinessA (2016) Reflectiveness adaptivity and support: how teacher agency promotes student engagement. American Journal of Education123(1): 109–136.
18.
CubanL (1988) Managerial Imperative and the Practice of Leadership in Schools. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
19.
DwyerDC (1984) The search for instructional leadership: routines and subtleties in the principal's role. Educational Leadership41(5): 32–37.
20.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998) What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023.
21.
FrostD (2006) The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading & Managing12(2): 19–28.
GeijselFPSleegersPJStoelRD, et al. (2009) The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal109(4): 406–427.
24.
GriffithsDE (1988) Educational Administration: Reform PDQ or RIP. A UCEA Occasional Paper. University Council for Educational Administration.
25.
GümüşSHallinger P CansoyRBellibaşM Ş (2021) Instructional leadership in a centralized and competitive educational system: A qualitative meta-synthesis of research from Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration59(6): 702–720.
26.
GuoWLuJ (2018) Assessing instructional leadership from two mindsets in China: power distance as a moderator. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability30(4): 433–455.
27.
HallingerPHeckR H (1996) Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research. Educational Administration Quarterly32(1): 5–44.
28.
HallingerPHosseingholizadeh R HashemiNKouhsariM (2018) Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(5): 800–819.
29.
HallingerPKovačevićJ (2019) A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature. Review of Educational Research89(3): 335–369.
30.
HallingerPLiuSPiyamanP (2019) Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education49(3): 341–357.
31.
HallingerPWangW C (2015) Assessing the instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Dordrecht Springer.
32.
Hallinger P GümüşSBellibaşM Ş (2020) Are principals instructional leaders yet?' A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership. Scientometrics122(3): 1629–1650.
33.
HattieJ (2012) Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London Routledge.
34.
HayesAF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research50(1): 1–22.
35.
HeckRHallingerP (2014) Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration52(5): 653–681.
36.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJMinkovM (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Vol 2). London: McGraw-Hill.
37.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
38.
JoreskogKGSorbomD (1994) Structural Equation Modeling with the Simplis Command Language. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
39.
KirkmanBLChenGFarhJL, et al. (2009) Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: a cross-level cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 744–764.
40.
KlineRB (2011) Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In: WilliamsMVogtWP (eds) The Sage Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 562–589.
41.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2006) Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 201–227.
42.
LeithwoodKLouisKS (2012) Linking Leadership to Student Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
LeithwoodKMcCulloughC (2017) Strong Districts and their Leadership Project: Final report of research strand. Final report to the Council of Ontario Directors of Education.
44.
LeithwoodKSunJMcCulloughC (2019) How school districts influence student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration57(5): 519–539.
45.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2020) How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “the four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
46.
LiuSHallingerP (2018) Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly54(4): 501–528.
47.
LiuSHallingerP (2021) Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration and Leadership49(2): 214–233.
48.
Liu S HallingerPFengD (2016) Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference59: 79–91.
49.
MayHSupovitzJA (2011) The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly47(2): 332–352.
MurphyJ (1993) Restructuring schooling: the equity infrastructure. School Effectiveness and School Improvement4(2): 111–130.
52.
NguyenDTNgDSan YapP (2017) Instructional leadership structure in Singapore: a co-existence of hierarchy and heterarchy. Journal of Educational Administration55(2): 147–167.
53.
ÖzdemirN (2020) How to improve teachers’ instructional practices: the role of professional learning activities classroom observation and leadership content knowledge in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration58(6): 585–603.
54.
PanHLWNyeuFYChengSH (2017) Leading school for learning: principal practices in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration55(2): 168–185.
55.
PietschMTulowitzkiP (2017) Disentangling school leadership and its ties to instructional practices–an empirical comparison of various leadership styles. School Effectiveness and School Improvement28(4): 629–649.
56.
PyhältöKPietarinenJSoiniT (2015) Teachers’ professional agency and learning–from adaption to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching21(7): 811–830.
57.
QianHWalkerALiX (2017) The West wind vs the East wind: instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration55(2): 186–206.
58.
RossJAGrayP (2006) School leadership and student achievement: the mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L'éducation29(3): 798–822.
59.
SebastianJAllensworthE (2012) The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly48(4): 626–663.
60.
SebastianJAllensworthEWiedermannW, et al. (2019) Principal leadership and school performance: an examination of instructional leadership and organizational management. Leadership and Policy in Schools18(4): 591–613.
61.
ShakedHBenolielPHallingerP (2021) How national context indirectly influences instructional leadership implementation: The case of Israel. Educational Administration Quarterly57(3): 437–469.
62.
ShenXY (2015) Institutional Legitimacy Teacher Agency and the Development of Teacher Teaching Expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Beijing Normal University, Beijing.
63.
SumintonoBHaririHNugrohoPJ, et al. (2019) The role of districts in supporting school leaders’ instructional leadership: a view and experience from a developing country. Journal of Educational Administration57(5): 591–600.
64.
SunJLeithwoodK (2012) Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools11(4): 418–451.
65.
ThoonenEESleegersPJOortFJ, et al. (2011) How to improve teaching practices: the role of teacher motivation organizational factors and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly47(3): 496–536.
66.
TruongTDHallingerP (2017) Exploring cultural context and school leadership: conceptualizing an indigenous model of có uy school leadership in Vietnam. International Journal of Leadership in Education20(5): 539–561.
67.
WalkerADimmockCADimmockC, eds. (2002) School Leadership and Administration: Adopting a Cultural Perspective. London: Psychology Press.
