The present study examines how Singapore school leadership is influenced by different cultural values. It employed a systematic review of 72 studies on Singapore school leadership published 2000–2021. Results showed that collectivistic values engendered moral leadership responsibilities while power distance and other Asian values eventuated in the nuanced implementation of distributed leadership. Four values characterizing Singapore society also shaped school leadership. First, meritocratic principles informed how school leaders allocated educational resources and opportunities in schools. Second, future-oriented school leaders focused on preparing students for 21st-century work. Third, the emphasis on achieving systems-level coherence culminated in ecological leadership across the Singapore education system. Fourth, strategically pragmatic Singapore school leaders implemented various leadership models to address complex educational expectations and needs. The confluence of different cultural values resulted in school leaders adopting a meta-strategic leadership perspective in Singapore. The study contributes to scholarship by providing an up-to-date, comprehensive review of Singapore school leadership, encompassing different forms of leadership enacted by all levels of school leaders, that is influenced by different cultural values. It also shows that different values influencing school leadership are not necessarily congruent, thereby pointing the way forward for researchers to examine sources of tension within school leadership.
AlexanderPA (2020) Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality. Systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research90(1): 6–23.
2.
AndersonKT (2015) The discursive construction of lower-tracked students: Ideologies of meritocracy and the politics of education. Education Policy Analysis Archives23(110): 1–30.
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2020) One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive). thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology18: 328–352.
4.
BrooksMCMutoharA (2018) Islamic school leadership: A conceptual framework. Journal of Educational Administration and History50(2): 54–68.
5.
ChenW (2013) School leadership in ICT implementation: Perspectives from Singapore. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher22(3): 301–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0055-8.
6.
ChewJOAAndrewsD (2010) Enabling teachers to become pedagogical leaders: Case studies of two IDEAS schools in Singapore and Australia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice9: 59–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9079-0.
7.
ChuaPTohYTanWK, et al. (2018) Inductive leadership: Activating community-oriented student agency towards school improvement. In: KohTSHungD (eds) Leadership for change: The Singapore schools' experience. Singapore and Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 203–229.
DimmockC (2011) Formulating a research agenda in school leadership and organisational change for school improvement in Singapore. School Leadership and Management31(4): 321–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.606271.
11.
DimmockCGohJWP (2011) Transformative pedagogy, leadership and school organisation for the twenty-first-century knowledge-based economy: The case of Singapore. School Leadership and Management31(3): 215–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2010.546106.
12.
DimmockCTanCY (2013) Educational leadership in Singapore: Tight coupling, sustainability, scalability, and succession. Journal of Educational Administration51(3): 320–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311492.
13.
DimmockCTanCYChiongC (2021) Social, political and cultural foundations of educational leadership in Singapore. In: NormandRMoosLLiuM, et al. (eds) The cultural and social foundations of educational leadership: An international comparison. Cham: Springer, 215–233.
14.
DivaharanSPingLC (2010) Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology26(6): 741–763.
15.
GohJWP (2009) Parallel leadership in an “unparallel” world’-cultural constraints on the transferability of Western educational leadership theories across cultures. International Journal of Leadership in Education12(4): 319–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120902980796.
16.
GohJWPHaironSLimSQW (2019) Understanding distributed leadership practices in the cultural context of Singapore schools. In: HaironSGohJWP (eds) Perspectives on school leadership in Asia Pacific. Singapore: Springer, 11–29.
17.
GopinathanSMardianaAB (2013) Globalization, the state and curriculum reform. In: DengZYGopinathanSLeeCK-E (eds) Globalization and the Singapore Curriculum. Singapore: Springer, pp. 15–32.
18.
GopinathanSWongBTangN (2008) The evolution of school leadership policy and practice in Singapore: Responses to changing socio-economic and political contexts (insurgents, implementers, innovators). Journal of Educational Administration and History40(3): 235–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620802507250.
19.
HaironS (2017) Teacher leadership in Singapore: The next wave of effective leadership. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership2(2): 170–194.
20.
HaironSDimmockC (2012) Singapore schools and professional learning communities:Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review64(4): 405–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.625111.
21.
HaironSGohJWP (2014) Distributed leadership to support PLCs in Asian pragmatic Singapore schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education17(3): 370–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2013.829586.
22.
HaironSGohJWP (2015) Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership: Is the search over?. Educational Management Administration and Leadership43(5): 693–718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745.
23.
HallingerP (2014) Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership: An empirical assessment. Educational Administration Quarterly50(4): 539–576.
24.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 5–24.
HarrisAJonesMSAdamsD, et al. (2014) High-performing education systems in Asia: Leadership art meets implementation science. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher23(4): 861–869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0209-y.
27.
HaydonG (2007) Values for Educational Leadership. London: Sage.
28.
HengMAMarshCJ (2009) Understanding middle leaders: A closer look at middle leadership in primary schools in Singapore. Educational Studies35(5): 525–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690902883863.
29.
HengTTLimL (2021) Diversity, difference, equity: How student differences are socially constructed in Singapore. Cambridge Journal of Education51(6): 693–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1910204.
30.
HoJ-MKohT-S (2018) Historical development of educational leadership in Singapore. In: KohTSHungD (eds) Leadership for change: The Singapore schools’ experience. Singapore and Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 29–83.
31.
HoJHaironSChuaPH (2019) Local evidence synthesis on school leadership. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
32.
HoJKangTShaariI (2021) Leading from the middle: Vice-principals in Singapore as boundary spanners. Journal of Educational Administration59(2): 145–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2020-0123.
HoJChuaPM-H (2019) Successful principalship: beyond leadership practice and teacher agency. International Studies in Educational Administration47(1): 20–37.
35.
HoJShaariIKangT (2021a) The distribution of leadership between vice-principals and principals in Singapore. International Journal of Leadership in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1849811.
36.
HoJShaariIKangT (2021b) Vice-principals as leaders: Role ambiguity and role conflicts faced by vice-principals in Singapore.. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211002527.
37.
HoJMNgD (2012) Factors which impact the distribution of leadership for an ICT reform: Expertise vis-à-vis formal role?School Leadership and Management32(4): 321–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2012.688740.
38.
HoJPYChenD-TVNgD (2016) Distributed leadership through the lens of activity theory. Educational Management Administration and leadership44(5): 814–836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570302.
39.
HoWKGopinathanS (1999) Recent developments in education in Singapore. School Effectiveness and School Improvement10(1): 3–9.
40.
HodgkinsonC (1991) Educational Leadership: The Moral Art. New York: State University of New York Press.
41.
HofstedeG (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill.
42.
HofstedeG (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture2(1). Available at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8/
43.
HuguesC MGillH DBerezinaE (2020) School performance in three South East Asian countries: Lessons in leadership, decision-making and training. European Journal of Training and Development45(2-3): 136–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2020-0014.
44.
JayapragasP (2016) Leaders in Education Program: The Singapore model for developing effective principal-ship capability. Current Issues in Comparative Education19(1): 92–108.
45.
KohHHGurrDDrysdaleL, et al. (2011) How school leaders perceive the leadership role of middle leaders in Singapore primary schools?. Asia Pacific Education Review12: 609–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9161-1.
46.
LambertL (2009) Constructivist leadership. In: DavisB (ed) The Essentials of School Leadership, 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage, pp. 112–132.
47.
LeeANNieY (2016) Teachers’ perceptions of school leader empowering behaviors on psychological empowerment: A moderated path analysis. New Waves Educational Research and Development19(2): 36–58.
48.
LeeANNieY (2017) Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: Evidence from a Singapore sample. Educational Management Administration and Leadership45(2): 260–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215578448.
49.
LeeANNieYBaiB (2020) Perceived principal's learning support and its relationships with psychological needs satisfaction, organisational commitment and change-oriented work behaviour: A Self-Determination Theory’s perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education93: 103076.
50.
LeeS-SHungDTehLW (2016) An ecological view of conceptualising change in the Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice15: 55–70.
51.
LimLTanM (2020) Meritocracy, policy and pedagogy: Culture and the politics of recognition and redistribution in Singapore. Critical Studies in Education61(3): 279–295.
52.
LimLH (2006) Teacher involvement in school change: Perceptions of Singapore principals. New Horizons in Education54: 1–7.
53.
LiowED (2011) The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case study. Critical Sociology38(2): 241–264.
54.
McNaeRBarnardS (2021) Educational leadership for social justice: Bringing connection, collaboration and care from margins to centre. In: NormandRMoosLLiuMTulowitzkiP (eds) The Cultural and Social Foundations of Educational Leadership: An International Comparison. Cham: Springer, pp. 193–212.
NgDFS (2013) Assessing leadership knowledge in a principalship preparation programme. International Journal of Educational Management27(4): 425–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311316340.
59.
NgDFS (2019) Instructional leadership. In: WongBHaironSNgPT (eds) School leadership and educational change in Singapore. Cham: Springer, 7–30.
60.
NgDFSHoJM (2012b) How leadership for an ICT reform is distributed within a school. International Journal of Educational Management26(6): 529–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211251370.
61.
NgDFSNguyenDTWongBKS, et al. (2015) A review of Singapore principals’ leadership qualities, styles, and roles. Journal of Educational Administration53(4): 512–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0085.
62.
NgDFSWongCP (2020) The role of school leadership in Singapore’s future-ready school reform. European Journal of Education55(2): 183–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12392.
63.
NgFSDNguyenTDWongKSB, et al. (2015) Instructional leadership practices in Singapore. School Leadership & Management35(4): 388–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2015.1010501.
64.
NgPT (2013a) An examination of school accountability from the perspective of Singapore school leaders. Educational Research for Policy and Practice12(2): 121–131.
65.
NgPT (2013b) Developing Singapore school leaders to handle complexity in times of uncertainty. Asia Pacific Education Review14: 67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9253-1.
66.
NgPT (2016) What is a ‘good’ principal? Perspectives of aspiring principals in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice15: 99–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9183-2.
67.
NguyenDTNgDYapPS (2017) Instructional leadership structure in Singapore: A co-existence of hierarchy and heterarchy. Journal of Educational Administration55(2): 147–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0060.
68.
NormandRMoosLLiuM, et al. (2021) An international comparison of cultural and social foundations of educational leadership. In: NormandRMoosLLiuMTulowitzkiP (eds) The Cultural and Social Foundations of Educational Leadership: An International Comparison. Cham: Springer, pp. 3–21.
69.
OECD (2020) Leadership for 21st century learning in Singapore’s high-performing schools. In: Leadership for 21st century learning. OECD Publishing, 107–134.
70.
OngCHDimmockC (2013) Principals’ engagement of low ability students in Singapore secondary schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership41(2): 214–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212468345.
71.
RaveendaranSTohYChuaP, et al. (2018) Significance of educational leadership: Case for Singapore schools today. In: KohTSHungDW-L (eds) Leadership for change: The Singapore schools' experience. Singapore and Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 85–101.
72.
RetnaKS (2011) The relevance of ‘personal mastery’ to leadership: The case of school principals in Singapore. School Leadership and Management31(5): 451–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.587403.
73.
RetnaKS (2015) Different approaches to the professional development of principals: A comparative study of New Zealand and Singapore. School Leadership and Management35(5): 524–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2015.1107038.
74.
RetnaLSNgPT (2016) Singapore principals’ understanding and perceptions of the challenges of “Teach Less, Less More” policy. International Journal of Educational Reform25(4): 426–442.
75.
Reyes JrVC (2020) Clipped wings: School leaders’ identities in ICT-enriched education landscapes - A narrative inquiry. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(5): 807–823.
76.
SharpeLGopinathanS (2000) Leadership in high achieving schools in Singapore: The influence of societal culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Education20(2): 87–98.
77.
SohK (2014) Finland and Singapore in PISA 2009: Similarities and differences in achievements and school management. Compare44(3): 455–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.787286.
78.
StewartV (2013) School leadership around the world. Educational LeadershipApril: 48–54.
79.
StottKLowGT (2000) Leadership in Singapore schools: The impact of national culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Education20(2): 99–109.
80.
TanCYDimmockC (2014) Examining how a “top-performing” Asian school system formulates and implements policy: The case of Singapore. Educational Management Administration and Leadership42(5): 743–763.
81.
TanCYDimmockC (2015) Tensions between Meritocracy and Equity in Singapore: Educational issues in preparing a workforce for the knowledge-based economy. Singapore: The Head Foundation.
82.
TanKP (2008) Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review29(1): 7–27.
83.
TengKWA (2018) Perceptions of primary school principals in Singapore about their role as justice agents. PhD Thesis, University of San Francisco, US.
84.
TohY (2016) Leading sustainable pedagogical reform with technology for student-centred learning: A complexity perspective. Journal of Educational Change17: 145–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9273-9.
85.
TohYHungWldChuaPM-H, et al. (2016) Pedagogical reforms within a centralised-decentralised system: A Singapore’s perspective to diffuse 21st century learning innovations. International Journal of Educational Management30(7): 1247–1267.
86.
TohYJamaludinAWldHung, et al. (2014) Ecological leadership: Going beyond system leadership for diffusing school-based innovations in the crucible of change for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher23(4): 835–850.
87.
TorresDG (2018) Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration56(1): 127–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2016-0140.
88.
WangLHGurrDDrysdaleL (2016) Successful school leadership: Case studies of four Singapore primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration54(3): 270–287.
89.
WongCPNgD (2020) The roles of school leaders in developing future-ready learners:The case of Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management35(1): 249–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0283.
90.
WongEMLLiSSCChoiT-H, et al. (2008) Insights into innovative classroom practices with ICT: Identifying the impetus for change. Educational Technology and Society11(1): 248–265.
91.
ZhangYLinT-BFooSF (2012) Servant leadership: A preferred style of school leadership in Singapore. Chinese Management Studies6(2): 369–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17506141211236794.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
