This qualitative research inquiry explores how school leaders shape their identities while navigating incessant and seemingly endless school transformations. The central questions addressed are the following: how do school leaders make sense of their identities in rapid periods of reform? And how do they view themselves in new educational landscapes? An exploratory case study of four target schools that took part in policy reform initiatives directed at the ubiquitous use of Information Communication and Technology was undertaken for this inquiry. Using narrative inquiry as an analytical frame for the focus group discussions interviews and field notes, this inquiry investigates and builds emerging explanations to school leaders’ sense-making in periods of reform.
BarberMWhelanFClarkM (2010) Capturing the Leadership Premium: How the World’s top School Systems are Building Leadership Capacity for the Future. London: Mckinsey & Company.
2.
BernsteinB (1990) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. New York: Routledge.
3.
BlackmoreJ (2006) Social justice and the study and practice of leadership in education: A feminist history. Journal of Educational Administration and History28(2): 185–200.
4.
BolandRJGreenbergRH (1988) Metaphorical structuring of organizational ambiguity. In: PondyLBolandRThomasH (eds) Managing Ambiguity and Change. New York: Wiley, 17–37.
5.
ClandininDJConnellyFM (1995) Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Secret, sacred, and cover stories. In: ClandininDJConnellyFM (eds) Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Landscape. New York: Teachers College Press, 3–15.
6.
ConnellyFMClandininDJ (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Reseacher19(5): 2–14.
7.
ConnellyFMClandininDJ (2000) Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
8.
ConnellyFMClandininDJ (2006) Narrative inquiry. In: GreenJCamilliGElmoreP (eds) Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 477–487.
9.
CraigC (2001) The relationships between and among teachers’ narrative knowledge, communities of knowing, and school reform: A case of ‘the monkey’s paw’. Curriculum Inquiry31(30): 303–331.
10.
DimmockCGohJ (2011) Transforming Singapore schools: The economic imperative, government policy and school principalship. In: TownsendTMacBeathJ (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Singapore: Springer, 225–241.
11.
Easterby-SmithM (1995) The philosophy of research design. In: GlaserBG (ed) Grounded Theory 1984-1994. Mill Valley: Sociology Press, 613–636.
FongSYLimRNgSL, et al. (2007) PSLE Seminar. Singapore: Singapore Examinations and Assessments Board (SEAB).
14.
FrankelRDeversK (2000) Qualitative research: A consumer’s guide. Education for Health13(1): 113–123.
15.
FullerK (2013) Gender, Identity and Educational Leadership. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
16.
GlaserB (1965) The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems12(4): 436–445.
17.
GoetzJPLeCompteMD (1984) Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. London: Academic Press.
18.
GohSPLohNS (2008) Equal chances for all. Straits Times, 10 September, 4.
19.
GopinathanS (2019) Singapore Education System – From Good to Great: Lessons from other Education Systems (Keynote Speech One), Transforming Educational Leadership in 21st Century Context, 26 October, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines.
20.
GregoryKClarkeM (2003) High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore. Theory Into Practice42(10): 66–74.
21.
GurriaA (2010) Presentation of the PISA 2010 Results. Washington: OECD.
22.
HoggM (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review5(3): 184–200.
23.
ICT-WG (2012) Singapore 2012 The Living Digital Hub. Where iT Works. Singapore: Information Communication Technology Working Group (ICT-WG), Ministry of Trade and Industry.
24.
JenkinsH (2010) Multiculturalism, appropriation, and the new media literacies: Remixing Moby Dick. In: Sonvilla-WeissS (ed) Mashup Cultures. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 98–119.
25.
KarpTHelgoT (2009) Leadership as identity construction: The act of leading people in organisations. A perspective from the complexity sciences. Journal of Management Development28(10): 880–896.
26.
KohTSLeeSC (2008a) Digital skills and education: Singapore’s ICT master planning for the school sector. In: LeeSKGohCBFredriksenB, et al. (eds) Towards a Better Future: Education and Training for Economic Development of Singapore Since 1965. Washington, DC and Singapore: World Bank; National Institute of Education, 283–290.
27.
KohTSLeeSC (2008b) Information Communication Technology in Education: Singapore’s ICT Masterplans 1997-2008. Singapore: World Scientific.
28.
LabareeR (2002) The risk of ‘going observationalist’: Negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. Qualitative Research2(97): 97–122.
29.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2008) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management28(1): 27–42.
30.
LimCP (2007) Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development55(1): 83–116.
31.
LooiCKHungD (2004) Singapore’s learning sciences lab: Seeking transformations in ICT-enabled pedagogy. Educational Technology Research and Development52(40): 91–115.
32.
Mertkan-OzunluS (2007) Reflexive accounts about qualitative interviewing within the context of educational policy in North Cyprus. Qualitative Research7(4): 447–459.
PearceCSimsHCoxJ, et al. (2003) Transactors, transformers and beyond: A multi-method development of a theoretical typology of leadership. The Journal of Management Development22(4): 273–307.
37.
PillowW (2003) Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education16(2): 175–196.
38.
QuintD (2004) Fear of Falling: Icarus, phaeton and Lucretius in paradise lost. Renaissance Quarterly57(3): 847–881.
39.
ReayDBallS (2000) Essentials of female management: Women’s ways of working in the education market place. Educational Management & Administration Leadership28(2): 145–159.
40.
ReyesV (2011) Critical Perspectives on Singapore Education Reform: Exploratory Case Study of Information Communication Technology. In: ChoyWTanC (eds) Education Reform in Singapore: Critical Perspectives. Singapore: Prentice-Hall, 107–127.
41.
RichardsonRHans KramerE (2006) Abduction as the type of inference that characterizes the development of a grounded theory. Qualitative Research6(4): 497–513.
42.
RoperJShapiraJ (2000) Ethnography in Nursing Research: Methods in Nursing Research. London: SAGE.
43.
RudA (2004) The interim chair: Special challenges and opportunities. New Directions for Higher Education126(Summer): 45–54.
Smart Nation and Digital Government Office (2019) Smart Nation Progress Viewed 20 November 2019. Available at: https://www.smartnation.sg/ (accessed 17 November 2019).
46.
SmithB (2007) The state of the art in narrative inquiry – some reflections. Narrative Inquiry17(2): 391–398.
47.
TanSCChaiCSLeeCB, et al. (2010) Evaluation of Implementation of the IT Masterplan 3 and its Impact on Singapore Schools: Instrumentation and Baseline Study. Research Brief. Vol. 11-001. Singapore: National Institute of Education, 4.
48.
TanYKChowHKGohC (2008) Examinations in Singapore: Change and Continuity 1891-2007. Singapore: World Scientific.
49.
ThomsonP (2010) Headteacher autonomy: A sketch of a Bourdieuian field analysis of position and practice. Critical Studies in Education51(1): 5–20.
50.
WassermanJAClairJMWilsonK (2009) Problematics of grounded theory: Innovations for developing an increasingly rigorous qualitative method. Qualitative Research9(3): 355–381.
